Skip to main content
Cornell University
Learn about arXiv becoming an independent nonprofit.
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:1607.06141

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Cryptography and Security

arXiv:1607.06141 (cs)
[Submitted on 20 Jul 2016]

Title:Strong Hardness of Privacy from Weak Traitor Tracing

Authors:Lucas Kowalczyk, Tal Malkin, Jonathan Ullman, Mark Zhandry
View a PDF of the paper titled Strong Hardness of Privacy from Weak Traitor Tracing, by Lucas Kowalczyk and 3 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Despite much study, the computational complexity of differential privacy remains poorly understood. In this paper we consider the computational complexity of accurately answering a family $Q$ of statistical queries over a data universe $X$ under differential privacy. A statistical query on a dataset $D \in X^n$ asks "what fraction of the elements of $D$ satisfy a given predicate $p$ on $X$?" Dwork et al. (STOC'09) and Boneh and Zhandry (CRYPTO'14) showed that if both $Q$ and $X$ are of polynomial size, then there is an efficient differentially private algorithm that accurately answers all the queries, and if both $Q$ and $X$ are exponential size, then under a plausible assumption, no efficient algorithm exists.
We show that, under the same assumption, if either the number of queries or the data universe is of exponential size, and the other has size at least $\tilde{O}(n^7)$, then there is no differentially private algorithm that answers all the queries. In both cases, the result is nearly quantitatively tight, since there is an efficient differentially private algorithm that answers $\tilde{\Omega}(n^2)$ queries on an exponential size data universe, and one that answers exponentially many queries on a data universe of size $\tilde{\Omega}(n^2)$.
Our proofs build on the connection between hardness results in differential privacy and traitor-tracing schemes (Dwork et al., STOC'09; Ullman, STOC'13). We prove our hardness result for a polynomial size query set (resp., data universe) by showing that they follow from the existence of a special type of traitor-tracing scheme with very short ciphertexts (resp., secret keys), but very weak security guarantees, and then constructing such a scheme.
Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS)
Cite as: arXiv:1607.06141 [cs.CR]
  (or arXiv:1607.06141v1 [cs.CR] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1607.06141
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Jonathan Ullman [view email]
[v1] Wed, 20 Jul 2016 22:31:10 UTC (39 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Strong Hardness of Privacy from Weak Traitor Tracing, by Lucas Kowalczyk and 3 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CR
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2016-07
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.DS

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Lucas Kowalczyk
Tal Malkin
Jonathan Ullman
Jonathan R. Ullman
Mark Zhandry
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status