Skip to main content
Cornell University
Learn about arXiv becoming an independent nonprofit.
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:1810.00798

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Software Engineering

arXiv:1810.00798 (cs)
[Submitted on 1 Oct 2018]

Title:Doric: Foundations for Statistical Fault Localisation

Authors:David Landsberg, Earl Barr
View a PDF of the paper titled Doric: Foundations for Statistical Fault Localisation, by David Landsberg and 1 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:To fix a software bug, you must first find it. As software grows in size and complexity, finding bugs is becoming harder. To solve this problem, measures have been developed to rank lines of code according to their "suspiciousness" wrt being faulty. Engineers can then inspect the code in descending order of suspiciousness until a fault is found. Despite advances, ideal measures --- ones which are at once lightweight, effective, and intuitive --- have not yet been found. We present Doric, a new formal foundation for statistical fault localisation based on classical probability theory. To demonstrate Doric's versatility, we derive cl, a lightweight measure of the likelihood some code caused an error. cl returns probabilities, when spectrum-based heuristics (sbhs) usually return difficult to interpret scores. cl handles fundamental fault scenarios that spectrum-based measures cannot and can also meaningfully identify causes with certainty. We demonstrate its effectiveness in, what is to our knowledge, the largest scale experiment in the fault localisation literature. For Defects4J benchmarks, cl permits a developer to find a fault after inspecting 6 lines of code 41.18% of the time. Furthermore, cl is more accurate at locating faults than all known 127 sbh. In particular, on Steimann's benchmarks one would expect to find a fault by investigating 5.02 methods, as opposed to 9.02 with the best performing sbh.
Subjects: Software Engineering (cs.SE)
Cite as: arXiv:1810.00798 [cs.SE]
  (or arXiv:1810.00798v1 [cs.SE] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1810.00798
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: David Landsberg [view email]
[v1] Mon, 1 Oct 2018 16:28:43 UTC (989 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Doric: Foundations for Statistical Fault Localisation, by David Landsberg and 1 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
view license
Current browse context:
cs.SE
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2018-10
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
David Landsberg
Earl T. Barr
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status