Skip to main content
Cornell University
Learn about arXiv becoming an independent nonprofit.
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > math > arXiv:1906.08383

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Mathematics > Optimization and Control

arXiv:1906.08383 (math)
[Submitted on 19 Jun 2019 (v1), last revised 28 Jun 2020 (this version, v3)]

Title:Global Convergence of Policy Gradient Methods to (Almost) Locally Optimal Policies

Authors:Kaiqing Zhang, Alec Koppel, Hao Zhu, Tamer Başar
View a PDF of the paper titled Global Convergence of Policy Gradient Methods to (Almost) Locally Optimal Policies, by Kaiqing Zhang and 3 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Policy gradient (PG) methods are a widely used reinforcement learning methodology in many applications such as video games, autonomous driving, and robotics. In spite of its empirical success, a rigorous understanding of the global convergence of PG methods is lacking in the literature. In this work, we close the gap by viewing PG methods from a nonconvex optimization perspective. In particular, we propose a new variant of PG methods for infinite-horizon problems that uses a random rollout horizon for the Monte-Carlo estimation of the policy gradient. This method then yields an unbiased estimate of the policy gradient with bounded variance, which enables the tools from nonconvex optimization to be applied to establish global convergence. Employing this perspective, we first recover the convergence results with rates to the stationary-point policies in the literature. More interestingly, motivated by advances in nonconvex optimization, we modify the proposed PG method by introducing periodically enlarged stepsizes. The modified algorithm is shown to escape saddle points under mild assumptions on the reward and the policy parameterization. Under a further strict saddle points assumption, this result establishes convergence to essentially locally-optimal policies of the underlying problem, and thus bridges the gap in existing literature on the convergence of PG methods. Results from experiments on the inverted pendulum are then provided to corroborate our theory, namely, by slightly reshaping the reward function to satisfy our assumption, unfavorable saddle points can be avoided and better limit points can be attained. Intriguingly, this empirical finding justifies the benefit of reward-reshaping from a nonconvex optimization perspective.
Comments: Initially submitted in Jan. 2019. Accepted to SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization (SICON)
Subjects: Optimization and Control (math.OC); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Systems and Control (eess.SY); Statistics Theory (math.ST)
Cite as: arXiv:1906.08383 [math.OC]
  (or arXiv:1906.08383v3 [math.OC] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1906.08383
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Kaiqing Zhang [view email]
[v1] Wed, 19 Jun 2019 22:33:25 UTC (1,103 KB)
[v2] Tue, 17 Sep 2019 12:39:19 UTC (1,105 KB)
[v3] Sun, 28 Jun 2020 21:54:41 UTC (2,446 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Global Convergence of Policy Gradient Methods to (Almost) Locally Optimal Policies, by Kaiqing Zhang and 3 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
view license
Current browse context:
math.OC
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2019-06
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.LG
cs.SY
eess
eess.SY
math
math.ST
stat
stat.TH

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status