Okay with the political height going on, I am going to put in my two sense...actually more like 100 cents (oh wait I guess that would be a dollar). Liz asked a question on facebook about the 47% of people using gov. handouts or something like that. I didn't hear Romney's quote so I wasn't exactly sure of what was said but here is what I think of all the handouts.
When the bailouts started I heard all over the news on all the stations, "America is too big to fail!" They would say that all the time and it made my skin crawl. Nothing is too big to fail. When you make poor choices, the consequences are sometimes failure. Not always but sometimes. Yes, I do think we should have let some businesses tank. It is not the governments job to bailout everyone. Sure it would have been devastating for many people but that is how you learn. I do give the car companies props for paying back the gov. in a timely manner and I think that is great. However, I would not be surprised if the money they paid the gov. back did not go to the debt they pulled from in the first place. It is amazing, when you are financially in the hole, any "extra" money (not really extra because you are in the negative) always has somewhere else more pressing to go. I wish they would would have called Suzie Orman and asked her. I have a sneaky suspicion she would have said, "Denied!" Sure it was great to get a check from our gov. to Will and I when they were trying to help the American people but I was not in favor for that either. Why did they not put that back in where we are under? Now we are in a mess of a financial situation. Yes, if Dave Ramsey were running for president, I would vote him in without any problem. I know there are a ton of other issues but right now, the most pressing is our economy. I don't understand why anyone who feels that way would vote for anyone but the best candidate for fixing our finances. Besides, maybe if all these companies that needed a bail out would have called Bain Capital when their troubles started, they wouldn't have been in that mess in the first place. If you feel other issues are more important, then I can understand why you would chose another candidate.
There was another article posted about Kalamazoo MI. Honestly, I was even more interested in that because my cousins live there and my Uncle is a Professor at their college. I thought it was so amazing that someone donated that money to give everyone a college education. I also think that the government does the exact same thing in certain economic classes. Why is it that the poor class doesn't know that? Or do they and just don't care? I have always had a hard time seeing why the poverty ridden stay that way. They have so much opportunity. Is it because they don't know? Would it be more helpful if the guidance counselors in every school knew all the student's family financial situation and starting from Kindergarten up take them in individually and let them know that they have a great opportunity for college? I really don't understand this and I am not knocking. Financial aid and pail grants paid for my college education. So yes, I definitely fall in the 47%. I actually don't mind this handout at all. I just don't understand how it is so underused by the class it is most trying to help. Also, the lottery in some states pay for college. Georgia's lottery allows everyone with a 3.0 or higher free education through the lottery! I love that some good comes from wasting money. I understand that some people waste these opportunities because they "are not focused" or "just goofed around my freshman year" but I say that is their own fault. If I hadn't had my college paid for, I would have worked my tail end off to get through it. Show some initiative people.
Now comes to K-12 programs. I think that the public education should receive more money and would not mind at all if my taxes went up just for that area. I am however, amazed at how much of the parents responsibility the school takes on. Cole's first day of school, I drop him off and he didn't have a breakfast tray with him. The teacher stops us and asks him if he had eaten or if she needed to run him down to the breakfast booth. (I am glad they are concerned) Seriously, is that what parenting has come to? Not only am I not responsible enough to feed my kid at home but I am not responsible enough to stop in the hall on the way to class to grab him something to eat. How does this happen?! Government has taken on way too much parenting roles. Don't get me wrong, I hate that kids suffer because of parents inadequacies but they are not going to magically become more responsible when there are no consequences and government just steps in and assumes the position. Another example, I sent Cole to school with lunch and a water bottle (he hates warm milk and I didn't know how cold it would stay in a lunch box)his teacher's aid is worried that he won't have anything to drink (maybe water is not sufficient?) and so she gets him milk. This goes on for three days. I would have not had any idea but Cole mentions to me that he likes the milk cartons at school. I ask him why he got some if it was for snack or something and he says, "no, they just give it to me." I tell him that we have to pay for that. He tells me it is just free because they just give it to him. Of course I know better so I talk to the teacher the next day at school. We get paid up and figured out but still I don't understand why she didn't leave a note in his bag or something if she had concerns. I am not upset at all I just think it is sad that there is such a low expectation on parents that is all. They send home a lunch sheet to see if you get reduced or free lunch. They ask you to fill it out because the school gets more money if everyone turns it in. I do. We get reduced lunch (Cole brings his to school). I get a flier from Comcast sent home. I am so irritated that Comcast is soliciting through the school I don't read it and I throw it away. Then I am mentioning it to someone and they tell me that if you get free or reduced lunch that Comcast will give you your internet for $9.99 a month. I don't know if that is government or just Comcast but you can't tell me that if it is government that, that is not overboard. It is so enticing to take handouts! I could very easily take the $9.99 Comcast bill a month and just say, "someone is going to get the handout, it might as well be me" or just stick with my $50.00 a month bill and stay financially independent. It is hard to say no to lower bills. Just for the record though, I did say no to the lower bill and I hope that that $40.00 a month will be put on the national debt (of course it won't). Yes, I do think that government has WAY TOO MANY HANDOUTS!
I have known a few people who get pregnant and/or trying to get pregnant (for someone to love them) and don't even worry that the problem that the father is not involved "the government with take care of us". (Hey I love working with the troubled youth of America). I think that is a problem. Who needs a daddy because government is daddy. This mentality should not be tolerated. Then onto abortion (which government will pay for) hey kids, if you are not going to be abstinent, then use protection, government will pay for that too! This careless behavior is the new trend. Babies are to be celebrated and families are the strength of children not government.
Another problem with the lack of consequences is the level of respect has diminished. I wouldn't want to be a teacher for anything because of it. I am grateful for all those who serve in that capacity and even more grateful for the one's who really care (I think that it is the majority). I think that lack of consequences (good and bad) creates a selfish, entitled, disrespectful people. The idea that we pay taxes because the government knows better than each of us where to put the funds is kind of skewed. It may be true in some senses but if you think of your taxes as your charity work then you are missing out on the pure joy of giving. It takes away the looking for opportunities to serve. It can create, in many, a mentality of "I don't need to help them, the government will take care of it" or "if they weren't so lazy they wouldn't have to rely on the government". I mean I pay my taxes so I am helping out enough, right?! I have heard that more times than I wish (maybe they are just saying it and don't really believe it?! I hope so. It seems to me that the entitled attitude comes in large from the super wealthy and the super poor. It seems like the two extremes are the problem areas. Both are equally as bad in my eyes. Being a victim of circumstance is not an excuse to not be a better person. How can you lift someone else up higher than you are yourself? You can't, but, there are more ways to help than financially. If those who feel like the world owed them something gave a little of their time, they would see the world in a whole new light. The only way to get out of yourself is to give of yourself. If you are stuck in yourself, then you are more disrespectful in general. It puts a wedge on your shoulder that you are either better than others or in lots of cases, worse. People who are self loathers are just as bad as those who think they are "God's gift". Once again, the two extremes are dangerous ground to tread on. Take for example the youtube video that was made degrading Muhammad or Ala or whoever it was that they were degrading. (I didn't see the video, nor do I want to, and I just heard about it through someone else). Being LDS, we are taught to have complete reverence toward deity. It doesn't matter if it is someone you think is deity or not, you should respect others believes. (What do I say about devil worshipers? Hmm, maybe I am just to scared of the consequences if I trashed them.) I for sure to do not condone what happened in the aftermath with the killings of US citizens at all. Don't get me wrong on that. Yet, I can't help but think if we all had a little more respect for each other, the world would be a much more pleasant place. A while ago on the radio, one of the DJ's was saying how you can take the power of words away if you use them enough. You will get use to it (desensitized) and you won't care anymore. They were saying that we should use all the words that are offensive and get rid of the power they have. Terrible advice! I do feel like we do that though. I have always heard that emotional abuse is more detrimental than physical abuse. If that is true, then the D.J.'s theory is completely wrong. We should think about how we are affecting people when we say things. I am not into being completely P.C. but I do believe in using tact.
A people that can't even take care of themselves is a nation in disaster waiting to happen. Someday these careless kids are going to be running for office and running the whole nation. That is kind of scary. At the same time, there are still a lot of amazing parents, families, and people. There are those who are great decision makers and who know how to deal with life's consequences. Hopefully the strong will rise and help influence the weak but there is a difference between helping and enabling. The key is finding the balance. My opinion only, we are way more on the enabling side than the helping side.
You will find men who want to be carried on the shoulders of others, who think that the world owes them a living. They don't seem to see that we must all lift together and pull together.
Henry Ford