Over more than 40 years of practice, I’ve worked in jurisdictions in which I was not admitted to practice and served as local counsel to lawyers not admitted in jurisdictions where I was. It’s hardly uncommon, but it is fraught with the potential for very serious problems. As Eugene Volokh notes, those problems smacked an Oregon local counsel upside the head for a sanction of $14,205.66 when pro hac vice counsel submitted papers containing hallucinated AI citations.
Ms. Couvrette … [had] asked Mr. Murphy to serve as local counsel for Mr. Brigandi’s pro hac vice admission. Mr. Murphy signed Mr. Birgandi’s pro hac vice application and personally attested that he read and understood the requirements of serving as local counsel under LR 83-3….
Mr. Brigandi’s son was dating Ms. Couvrette’s daughter, and Mr. Brigandi had agreed to represent Plaintiffs for free. According to Mr. Murphy, Mr. Brigandi was primarily responsible for the litigation strategy and for all dispositive motions practice. Mr. Murphy explained, “[m]y role mostly involved strategizing with Mr. Brigandi and Ms. Couvrette on how to fashion a settlement in connection to the commercial property…. I believed that my expertise in landlord tenant law would be helpful.” … Continue reading

