Over the weekend, we went to see Avatar. I had been resisting seeing the movie, since it seemed to be another overblown animation/sci-fi movie, with Sigourney Weaver, no less. A friend of mine raved about the movie, and Sam Worthington is eye candy, so why not. We went to see it.
Yes, it is a visual feast. And yes, it was the typical Hollywood script I had feared for the most part. It has recycled elements from a number of movies including Star Wars, The Matrix, Aliens, Solaris, Pathfinder, Lord of the Rings, Braveheart, Minority Report and a number of others that you’ll think of as you watch the movie. But it did do a nice job with the standard script. And it did send chills up the back of my neck at some points, with that sense of knowing that I was in for a very cool experience. And it was a very cool experience. One of the best aspects was that exotic plant forms played a significant role in creating this world. It did give me the sense of being in another world.
Well, almost.
The premise of the visuals is that the life forms of this world are exaggerated forms of the life forms on Earth. I would think, however, that if this planet were light years away from Earth, that the life forms would be totally different, or at least some life forms would be totally different. All the animal life seemed to be designed as familiar animals (existing or historic such as seen in the fossil record) with extra body parts: extra legs, extra eyes, extra wings. Basic Earth animal forms with extra decoration. The native “intelligent” life, the Navi, were humanoid, even if they were 10 feet tall, blue and with tiger stripes. They also had bodies that we would consider stereotype model ideals. Not that I’m complaining too much, but the men were very slim of hip, very broad of shoulder, beautifully muscled in the way that gymnasts are muscled, and nearly naked but for a loincloth (they even have issues regarding covering that particular part of the body, that we have here on Earth!). The women were shapely in the way that fashion models are shapely, but in an athletic way, and also scantily clothed - this is a tropical climate after all, and funny but the native people dress just like the image of stereotypical peoples endemic to the tropics here on Earth. The Navi look like idealized humans (wouldn’t you love to be Navi?) and achieve physical feats in their daily lives that are idealized human. There are no fat or old Nabi, but perhaps this is because of their dangerous world, where they are all eaten by the vicious beasts before they can get old, or are too busy running to get fat.
I was totally excited to see plant life play such a significant role in the movie. Just as the Nabi are idealized and exaggerated human forms, so is the plant life. There are enormous versions of familiar tropical plants, as well as more colorful versions. I was naming plants when watching: musa, strelitzia, cycas, philodendron, bromeliads, ficus (banyan), soleirolia, selaginella (except some of the movie versions glow when touched or stepped upon). There are also sea creatures appropriated as land plants/creatures, although in amazingly huge sizes. I was thrilled to see amazing detail of the animation that went into these plants. But I was also disappointed that the creators did not diverge more from the plant life that we know here on earth. I was hoping for a re-imagining of plant life as it evolved on a different world, a world with different evolutionary experiences and climates. I was hoping for a more thorough blurring of the boundary between flora and fauna. But no.
There may have been a number of reasons that this was done. This is a STORY after all, and why not? The obvious argument for keeping the world similar to our own, is that in this way, we the audience can feel more of a connection to this created world called Pandora. If Pandora was too far from what we experience, we may not emotionally connect. The apparent perfection of the Nabi is a representation of the perfection that we wish to achieve, and the humans that arrive to destroy the Nabi world are also representations of ourselves. But this doesn’t explain why the plant life was simply taken from the tropical plant life that exists here on Earth. It seems to be simply because the plants were not felt to be significant enough to spend the time and creative effort upon (but they do play a significant role!).
There is a book that I read as a teenager, where the native people, named the Sylvan, are able to control and animate plant life. The plants take an active role in the battles, leaf, root, twig and fruit. Mostly, the trees pulled men off their horses, and dismembered them (YES!). Unfortunately I don’t have the book anymore, and don’t remember the name. I was hoping that something similar would occur in Avatar, so perhaps this is the source of my disappointment. The least they could have done was to lob sticky fruit onto the enemies flight vehicles windows, blinding them since their electronic sensors were already nonfunctional. Or perhaps there could have been toxic fruit or plant parts. If we are using modified things from Earth, why not toxic spores? Or seeds or spores that would get dumped on the warcraft, and grow roots or other plant parts so rapidly that it tears apart the vehicle? Banyan trees whose roots grow into the vehicles and tether or otherwise immobilize them? How about enormous leaves that wrap around men and suffocate them like a butterwort or other carnivorous plants?
Sigh. Will plants always go unappreciated? Speaking of plants in movies, I did love the plants in Minority Report. Now that was done right. This is not to slight to achievements of Avatar. In fact, I may just have to go see it again. This time in 3-D.
By the way, The International Carnivorous Plant Society has a listing of carnivorous plants in movies.
Wednesday, December 30, 2009
snowflakes on eyeballs
Today I discovered that I really don't like the icy sting of snowflakes on my eyeballs. After an hour of this, it seriously detracted from the whole "winter wonderland" experience, and put me in a really bad mood. Next time I'm bringing goggles, no matter how stupid it looks.
Saturday, December 26, 2009
representation
I remember when, on September 23, 1986, the House of Representatives passed a joint resolution naming the rose as the “national floral emblem” of the United States. This choice of the rose as the national flower still strikes me as odd. Although there are native roses in the United States, most of the roses that are grown here have originated from roses that are native to Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. Of course, roses have such complex ancestries, that it is difficult to say specifically the genetic background of a rose, and American roses do have a minor contribution to the genetic pool of the modern rose. The most common class of rose grown in the US is the hybrid tea, whose repeat flowering characteristics were originally derived from an oriental species. It could be argued, however, that as a country we are similar to the hybrid rose in its multinational background. But I am among those who still believe that the national flower should be a species native to where we live. There have been passionate entreaties to use the marigold, a native species, for example. I don't completely discount the rose as the national flower, but I believe that it should be designated a native species rather than the nationally ambiguous “rose.”
So it is peculiar to me as well, those few states who claim non-native species as their state flower. Certainly, we are a nation composed largely of immigrants, so it is telling which states cling to their immigrant plant life, and those who embrace the plant species that existed in this land before the new arrivals. Yes, I know that these states who claim non-native plants as their state flower are now known by their ability to grow such plants, and sometimes even better than in the plants native land. There may also be historical significance of the plant to the people of the state. But it still doesn’t feel quite right to me.
Plants as listed by 50states.com, please correct me if this is incorrect.
States with non-native plants for their state flower.
Alabama: Camellia Camellia (Asia)
Delaware: Peach Blossom Prunus persica (China)
Florida: Orange Blossom Citrus sinensis (Southeast Asia)
Indiana: Peony Paeonia (Although there are native american peonies, they are mostly from the Western US).
New Hampshire: Purple lilac Syringa vulgaris (Southeastern Europe)
Ohio: Scarlet Carnation Dianthus caryophyllus (Mediterranean)
Vermont: Red Clover Trifolium pratense (Europe, Asia, Africa)
States with native plants for their state flower.
Alaska: Forget Me Not Myosotis alpestris (unclear - some sources say this is an asian species, some say it is native to Alaska).
Arizona: Saguaro Cactus Blossom Carnegiea gigantea
Arkansas: Apple Blossom Pyrus coronaria (aka American crabapple)
California: California Poppy Eschscholtzia californica
Colorado: Rocky Mountain Columbine Aquilegia caerulea
Connecticut: Mountain laurel Kalmia latifolia
Georgia: Cherokee Rose Rosa laevigata
Hawaii: Pua Aloalo Hibiscus brackenridgei
Idaho: Syringa - Mock Orange Philadelphus lewisii
Illinois: Purple Violet Viola
Iowa: Wild Prairie Rose Rosa pratincola
Kansas: Sunflower Helianthus annuus
Kentucky: Goldenrod Solidago altissima
Louisiana: Magnolia Magnolia (although I wish they specified a species, such as M. grandiflora)
Maine: White pine cone and tassel Pinus strobus, linnaeus
Maryland: Black-eyed susan Rudbeckia hirta
Massachusetts: Trailing-Arbutus Epigaea regens
Michigan: Apple Blossom Pyrus coronaria
Minnesota: Pink and white lady's-slipper Cypripedium reginae
Mississippi: Magnolia Magnolia grandiflora
Missouri: Hawthorn Crataegus
Montana: Bitterroot Lewisia rediviva
Nebraska: Goldenrod Soldiago gigantea
Nevada: Sagebrush Artemisia tridentata
New Jersey: Violet Viola sororia
New Mexico: Yucca flower Yucca glauca
New York: Rose Rosa (I’m giving some leeway here)
North Carolina: American Dogwood Cornus florida
North Dakota: Wild Prairie Rose Rosa arkansana
Oklahoma: Mistletoe Phoradendron serotinum
Oregon: Oregon Grape Berberis aquifolium
Pennsylvania: Mountain Laurel Kalmia latiflolia
Rhode Island: Violet Viola (although the most commonly planted Viola odorata, and Viola tricolor are European)
South Carolina: Yellow Jessamine Gelsemium sempervirens
South Dakota: Pasque Flower Pulsatilla hirsutissima
Tennessee: Iris Iridaceae (another vague choice, I wish they chose a species native to the state).
Texas: Bluebonnet Lupinus
Utah Sego lily: Calochortus gunnisonii
Virginia: American Dogwood Cornus florida
Washington: Coast Rhododendron Rhododendron macrophyllum
West Virginia: Rhododendron Rhododendron maximum
Wisconsin: Wood Violet Viola papilionacea
Wyoming: Indian Paintbrush Castilleja linariaefolia
Wednesday, December 23, 2009
Monday, December 21, 2009
christmas wish list
It’s no surprise what gifts would thrill me.* They typically have to do with plants, although I would be thrilled if they passed a single-payer health reform bill.
There are intangible things: I’d like my partner to give me a card saying that he decided that he wants us to move to Hawaii. Hmm, wait a minute, both of these so far are completely unrealistic. So before we go on, let’s set some ground rules.
The standard criteria for a gift, is that the gift has to be tangible (a note offering a hundred hours of garden work is acceptable, but also completely unrealistic). It has to be reasonably priced.
So here’s my wish list:
Muck boots, knee high.

1001 gardens you must see before you die. (and I would totally accept the offer to take me to some of them).
garden chipper/shredder

Jonagold semi-dwarf apple tree

worm composter

Gift certificate for seeds.
I’m going to give my hubby a cubic foot of orchid bark for Christmas.**
*You ever notice that people tend to give gifts that tell you who they want you to be, rather than who you really are? Hence the pink tie and the self-inflating camping mattress in my closet.
**Just kidding. If it doesn't start with "Harley" and end with "Davidson", I'm dead meat.
There are intangible things: I’d like my partner to give me a card saying that he decided that he wants us to move to Hawaii. Hmm, wait a minute, both of these so far are completely unrealistic. So before we go on, let’s set some ground rules.
The standard criteria for a gift, is that the gift has to be tangible (a note offering a hundred hours of garden work is acceptable, but also completely unrealistic). It has to be reasonably priced.
So here’s my wish list:
Muck boots, knee high.
1001 gardens you must see before you die. (and I would totally accept the offer to take me to some of them).
garden chipper/shredder
Jonagold semi-dwarf apple tree

worm composter

Gift certificate for seeds.
I’m going to give my hubby a cubic foot of orchid bark for Christmas.**
*You ever notice that people tend to give gifts that tell you who they want you to be, rather than who you really are? Hence the pink tie and the self-inflating camping mattress in my closet.
**Just kidding. If it doesn't start with "Harley" and end with "Davidson", I'm dead meat.
Sunday, December 13, 2009
mini purple

Laeliocattleya Mini Purple 'Tamani' is probably the the most difficult orchid in my collection of which to capture an image. This is the closest that I've come to so far, but it is still a far cry from the real thing. Why is it so difficult? The petals are a velvety reddish magenta, not red, not purple. But it is pretty close to red with a tint of purple. The lip is the closest to the true color. The camera captures the flower as more purplish than my eye sees it, and captures the veining on the petals that aren't very apparent in real life. The petals are darker than the sepals in real life, and the entire flower is composed of shades of the same color, not as the photo shows, with the lip having a redder area, and the petals and sepals more purple. I'll keep trying, but if anyone has any suggestions, please let me know!
Oh and by the way, there is no way to capture the intense day-only fragrance of this orchid.
winter color
Thursday, December 10, 2009
penguins and snowflakes
Tuesday, December 8, 2009
gnarly and muscular
I also like apple trees, which also can get gnarly.
What other trees do you enjoy for the winter silhouette?
Sunday, December 6, 2009
running
It seems that all I've been doing lately is running. From work, to errands, to holiday events, run, run, run...go, go, go. Which is strange, because with the weather so cold (13 degrees last night!), all I want to do is stay in bed. I made it out for a hike today, but not until late. The sun was getting low in the sky, which allowed me to take this photo...of me...running. Those are my gloves in the hand, as I'm always too cold when I start out, but knowing that I'll warm up, a backpack is necessary.
Although you can't tell from the landscape seen here, there are a few things going on in the plant world. I'll post them later. It's been too cold for me to want to go out.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)