Friday, February 29, 2008
Friday, Leap Day, 10 miles easy
Thursday, February 28, 2008
Required Reading (not this post, but a reference to required reading)
Lucho posted a little (well, not so much) something on his blog that any endurance athlete needs to read. As I jog a little bit, folks will ask me, usually in June after that little race in town, how they can improve their performance. I should remind them that since this is free advice, they ought to consider the value of the advice they are getting but ... I usually ask them what they are doing for training in terms of volume, speed, long run, etc. But it almost really does not matter because the answer is nearly always the same: run more. And this is true for the 10 mile a week person as well as the 90 mile a week person. It is certainly true for nearly everyone I know. And yes, this mileage increase needs to be done intelligently. You don't go from 0 to 100 miles a week overnight (unless you are Henry Rono). You build the mileage over months, years. It takes that sort of time to build the infrastructure to handle it. Most, myself included, don't have that sort of ability to focus that far out. But we should run more anyway. Just be smart about it. By the way, run more does not mean run slow all the time. I do beleive you need a good dose of turnover as well. When you run long and slow all the time, you will effectively teach your body to run long and slow all the time.Thursday 022808, 10 miles, treadmill, intervals
- 2 mile warm up with "strides" (13 minutes)
- 2 miles (10 minutes)
- 4 minute inactive recovery
- 5 x 1 minute on, 1 minute off at 12mph for the on, 7.5 mph for the off
- 2 minute inactive recovery
- 5 x 1 minute on, 1 minute off at 12mph for the on, 7.5 mph for the off
- 2 minute inactive recovery
- 5 x 1 minute on, 1 minute off at 12mph for the on, 7.5 mph for the off
- 2 minute inactive recovery
- ~ 1 mile cool down with a couple of strides (6:30)
I decided to watch the movie 5000 meters, nothing comes easy. There is this scene in the begining
where they roll a clock to 13:21.5, and discuss how that is the Olympic A standard. I thought this would be a good motivational part to watch while I ran the two mile section. About 3 minutes into my run, I am looking at this running clock on the tube and begin to guess that their seconds are much faster than mine. 13:21.5 had come and gone well befor I got to a mile and a half. All I can say "what is up with that?"I talked to Lucho a bit last night and we are going to look to get together for a run this weekend. is We yapped a bit about his training, Austin, my marathon in August, etc ... Given some of the things we talked about, I am taking a bit of a different approach to what this week is about. Frankly, I don't feel super fresh with this lesser mileage. I don't feel horrible, but it is not like I have a bunch of pop in my legs all of a sudden. Nonetheless, this lower mileage this week fits in well that it serves as a "rest" in the bigger picture of mileage. With 30 so far this week, I am expecting to get 60 or more. That might not seem like a big rest, but with the norm being 80's as of late, that is about a 15 to 20 percent drop.
Wednesday, February 27, 2008
Wednesday 022708, 7 miles, easy
I felt pretty good last night and had thoughts that I'd come back and go "hard-ish" again today. But despite the great weather again today, once I got moving a bit out there, I knew I'd not be able to hold a workout that I'd feel good about. I still feel a bit off - Tracy thinks I am fighting some illness.
some of the findings in the Fitness Rocks 'cast to be particularly interesting. In short, when they told people that they were indeed exercising when they performed routine work activities (routine for them), their measurable health factors improved (BMI, blood pressure, etc). In other words, the verbal on what they were doing either made them change their behavior and become healthier - or their mind somehow changed thier physical health factors. Given that placebos (a substance introduced that will have NO expected physical reaction) have caused people to have rash reactions (demonstrating that when you suggest something - you will get the result), you have to consider the power of your mindset when applied to training and expected race outcomes. Have
you ever met a winner of a truly competitive event who thought "there is no way I can win?" Think (pun intended) about it. I heard another show where Derek Jeter of the Yankees refused to even consider when he was in a slump after he went 0-32 in batting. Now why would he do that?Tuesday, February 26, 2008
Tuesday, 022608, 9 miles, with a tempo
Busy day, night. I got out mid day for a tempo. 2 mile warm up, did 3 laps around Harper Lake off McCaslin (building, each a touch faster than the previous) and then back down through the Davidson Mesa to the office. Whole thing was about 26 minutes with the pace starting a bit above 6 minute pace and then moving down to 5:30s. Looking forward to doing this sort of workout more often now that I can and adding length to it, dropping the pace more. I did not feel well rested, actually kind of flat (still a bit thick) even with the light four yesterday, but we'll see how the rest of the week goes. Warmed down for an other three miles."About 10 hours a week"
"All at once?!"
"No, no, I run every day so some days are 30 minutes, some are a couple of hours."
Here he gives pause and a long look.
"So, what 2 to 5 miles a day ...?"
Monday, February 25, 2008
Monday 022508, 4 miles easy
I felt a bit off throughout the day. I felt ... thick. Tracy said this probably because I am sick. That might be the case, given the crazy flu that has been going around but I don't think so. I just felt heavy and slow today. THICK. Nonetheless, as per plan I went easy, and short - 4 miles. I added on about 30 minutes of stretching, core work, etc. It is hard for me to attack the core given this ab thing, so most of it was working around that. I can't even do a single situp without significant strain. I am supposed to see a doc tomorrow for a physical and I will see what he has to say about it.I am also playing with the GrandCentral Inbox feature where you can leave a messsage (on the right hand pane bar). The way I think this works is you enter the number you are calling from, hit call and then the widget calls you back and you leave a message. I pick up the voicemail on the other end. Geek toy for sure, but then again this whole blog thing is - right?
For anyone who grew up in the 80's, you'll get a kick out of listening to this. Who remembers "Running with the Devil?"
Sunday, February 24, 2008
Sunday 022408, 12 miles, week in review, the upcoming week
It was a good week. I had two runs at 2 hours with both of them including some fair amount of climbing. My mileage was 81 on the week, but the time on that was about 690 minutes (versus about the same amount of mileage last week, with less hills and about an hour less). I had a turn over workout as well.
This next week I am going to try dropping the mileage (50 miles comes to mind) and up the intensity slightly. My take on this that I will do easy days really easy or not run at all, and then get typical mileage on my hard days. I will look to do more core work, athletic work on those easy-off days but really lower the running volume. The objective here is to see if I can get a bit more spring in the legs for the hard days, and experiment a bit with the concept of a taper. I am also going to keep the food log next week as well (I am interested in seeing if a drop in mileage creates an upward shift in weight).
With February ending, I am about done with two training blocks. The first was a block of three months post Pikes where I did not train. I ran, but without structure, consideration to hard or easy, fast or slow, flat or hill. This ended with a vacation trip to Hawaii (and it was a good vacation, evidenced on several fronts including the gaining of nine pounds). This past three months (since that block) has been building back, attempting to get some turnover back, and transitioning "back into a runner." It has been training. I will look to up the focus in the next quarter by extending on what I have done, but upping the focus a bit (as described the other day).
Live it.
Saturday, February 23, 2008
Saturday 022308, 13 miles
I got out on the various off shoots of the Mesa trail with Lucy today. I had little for a course agenda, but I wanted to get two hours. I got that and about 13 miles (with some fair vertical). For most of the run, I figured I'd avoid the ice and let Lucy determine the course. We did not avoid the mud however! We were both so muddy when we got home, my son asked "that's Lucy?!" It took a good amount of bathing to get her clean.Friday, February 22, 2008
Hills versus speed, rambling on training
James (who has the best name for a blog I have seen yet) asked me this question: I'm curious... With ascent being your goal/key race how much speed/track work are you going to do and how do you think it will help? I know the turn over in trail running, especially ascending, is very different than what does down on the track or road.*i am in no way questioning your training... I'm just toying with the idea of adding track workouts to my training this year and all my A races are Xterra with hilly off road runs. Think it would help?
This question / topic has been on my mind a lot. And so James, this post sort of unleashes that question and what I think the answers are. And I confess, I don't quite have this totally figured out. I can talk about how I am approaching this, based on my experience, but I don't think this would work for everybody. But maybe some of it would work for you. Or not. Feedback, criticism ... all welcome.
First though, yes James, I think you ought to do some track work.
Now, that said, I think the true key to success is balance in training hard on flats and hills. Last year, I think I lost sense of that balance. When given the choice of doing a hard hill workout (Green Mountain for example) or a track workout, I'd pick the trail everytime. I can attempt to explain why I did this, but it does not matter - I did it.
Okay - why is that a problem? When I am going up a hill like Green hard, my max pace is probably 8 m/mile. While I get a good workout from a cardiovascular perspective, I think the body adapts to that being the max pace you can reach for. True, you can do it that on a 10 percent grade. But when it comes time to reach for a six minute per mile gear, or faster ... neurologically, you just have not trained your body to be ready for that.
As a result of running a good deal of "slower" miles on hills last year, I feel I have lost a step. I have seen evidence of this. Three months ago when I would do the 200-200-400 workout, I'd struggle to break 75 for a quarter. After giving this workout a run for a couple of months, I have responded by being able to do the last quarter in 70. That is hardly what I'd like it to be, or what I used to be able to do, but it reflects an improvement.
So to those who ask, yeah, but when will you need 70 second quarter speed at Pikes the answer is - I won't. So why do this workout? I lack the true science to explain this but, I feel that in order to be comfortable running fast / hard at the longer distances, albeit at a slower pace, that top end speed needs to be there. I read a study (somewhere!) where your marathon time could often be predicted by your 100m time (assuming you had done the depth of training to manage a marathon). Basically this study said (time in 100m in sec *10 = time in marathon in minutes). While I am not advocating that as a great predictor, I think there is some truth in the underlying concept - to be fast at the long distances, you need to be fast at the short distances. I have lost my short distance speed and am looking to reclaim some of it.
Another reason I am approaching it this way is based on some of the writings of McMillan (based on work with Rosa). I am going to try to get some speed first, and then incorporate the greater endurance later. This turns the model of the base first on its head. Additionally, I think mentally, this gives me a better approach. I can focus on 5Ks and 10Ks in the spring, keeping some of the mental focus off of Pikes until later.
I guess it is important to note here, that I need to do both. But right now, with the hills wrapped up in ice, and slower legs, I am taking advantage of doing some faster work on the track and the mill.
I think the second key point is one needs to consider here is that you need to do what works for you. Scott Elliott gets success at Pikes by running hills nearly to the exclusion of all other work. Simon Guiterrez does most of his work on the flats of Alamosa. Sub 2:20 marathoners have come to Pikes to only get smoked by the hill specialists. Others (like a 2:08 road marathoner from Ecuador who finished second twice at Boston and did Pikes as a bandit) have jumped in and done really well. Some of these folks are killers on the roads. Some never run the roads.
I run with JV alot. I can honestly say that everytime we have run Green, Bear, Sanitas, Flagstaff, or SBC he has owned me. I mean everytime, regardless if it is hard, easy, hot, cold, or even if I have a head start (seriously). But I have, to date, done better at Pikes than him. Does that make me a better runner? No. Pikes has a gentler grade (11 percent on average) than these other hills, and I think I get a slight advantage there on that. The steeper the hill, the better JV does. He is a mountain goat on that 20 percent stuff. We each have our strengths and need to find the balance that works for us. And by works for us, that means the training that makes us successful and that we will enjoy along the way.
So for me, I think the balance, and what will work for me will look like this:
- A long run a week. Alternating the long run on the roads (more miles, faster pace, shorter time interval) with runs on the trails (less miles, more elevation change, longer time out there) ... goal to adapt to the longer run, manage hydration and nutrition. Make as many of these as possible building sessions towards the end. A long trail run could be the out and back on the Mesa, doing Green, Bear and SBC and then back from Chautauqua, or up Sunshine Canyon and back. Flat long runs ... well, there are no lack of options.
- A speed workout. Alternating hills and flat. Hills might be something like Lindens (about a 3:50 to a 4:15 repeat for me, with about 5 minute rest, on a steep road climb west of Boulder, five sets) or the Enchanted Mesa run (10 minutes up the Mesa (a good hill) followed by eight repeats of 200 meters (about) near the Bluebell Shelter. Flat stuff could be 6 x 800 with 1 minute rest or 4 x 1 mile. Any of the good track workouts. In the absence of a track or a good course, the 1 minute on, 1 minute off for up to 40 minutes (20 on, 20 off) is good.
- A tempo workout. Alternating hills and flat. Green makes for a good uphill tempo, as does Flag, or Sanitas. I actually am thinking I like Bear a little less because it is a grade that does not emulate Pikes. I find that the grade of Green to be a bit more in tune with Pikes.
- Altitude. This becomes more important for Pikes given its profile. Being adapted to run at 10, 11, 12, 13k ... well, you need to get out there and do that. This will be more of a summer activity for me, including sleeping at 10K as much as I can.
- Downhill running. For Pikes, I do think I need to add some degree of downhill running to assure form, strength to deal with that pounding ... of course, when you run up, you have to come down. I will add some hard downhill later in the summer.
- Mileage. Generally speaking, anyone doing a marathon needs to do more mileage. Probably more than you are currently doing. But it takes time to effectively build volume to where you can appropriately assimilate it without getting hurt.
- Everything else. And I mean everything. Core work. Stretching. Diet. Hydration. Mental visualization. Balance in life. Being a solid husband, father, friend, co-worker, employee. Showing grace and humility in this whole dang thing because it is a gift to be able to even engage in it.
James -sorry if this went on too long. It did help me a bit to get it out here though. Thanks for asking - and again, I welcome challenges to it, questions, etc.
Friday 022208, 11 miles, track workout 200-200-400
After the run yesterday, I was worked. It was one of those where after the run, my butt is just draggin' ... I was laying in bed in the evening, still feeling that buzz of it all. It is interesting to me that my hard days often leave me feeling invigorated but my easy days leave me feeling like chewed up and spit out. I was jacked enough that I even slept poorly, waking up several times in the night.I am realizing I need to be in the hills a bit more. Last year there was this little voice in my head saying I needed to do more speed, more flat stuff . This year, the voice is saying I need to get those wonderful hills more. Getting on them twice this past week has revealed a chink in the armor I am trying to build. I have a good amount of time to correct that, but dang ... Sanitas and Flagstaff gave me some good kick in the teeth reminding.
It is all about finding that right balance of flat, speed, hill, long, rest, diet ... and LIFE. Yeah, on this blog, I talk a lot about training, my ups and downs with workouts, but I am living a dream. The slice of the dream last night was reading X-Men #7 to my son (he is seven, and this comic is from 1964) and then having my daughter read over my shoulder while I blogged work stuff - and she corrected my grammar and spelling!
Today was yet another perfect weather day. Low 50s, not an ounce of wind. Well, maybe an ounce. I jogged three miles from the office over to Monarch High track later in the afternoon. It gets a little tough to get a track this time of year because you begin to compete for lane space with the high school track team, soccer team, lacrosse group, etc. I do try to stay out of their way, as I am the guest. I did the 200-200-400 workout again. Again, I have not worried on limiting the rest in this workout but this time, I kept it a bit more honest. I was hitting the 200s in 33-34 and the 400s went 73, 72, 72, 71, 70. I felt ... okay. I mean, I did not feel great and powerful - in fact I felt a bit heavy. But in a wierd kind of way, I can feel this shell of crud unpeeling around me. That hardly describes it, but I am getting to a point where I can feel a little turnover in there again. Still a far cry from what it was, but I occasionally get a wiff of it. Or maybe I just need a shower. My abdominal area is still a bit sore, but the strain seems to be very slowly subsiding (sneezing does cause me to wince quite a bit though). Warmed down back to the office for three miles.
Booked my room at Pikes today. Oh yeah, I forgot to mention yesterday that CC has the baddest looking Fu-Man-Chu I have ever seen.
Thursday, February 21, 2008
Thursday, 022108, 11, (5, 6) easy ... Flagstaff
Wednesday, February 20, 2008
Wednesday 02202008, 10 miles, LOSH
Long before I knew its name as the Davidson Mesa, I called the back hill on that big flat area behind my office as LOSH - or the Louisville Open Space Hill. I am including a picture of the mesa today, as the webcam link I put up yesterday ... well for the night owls on the internet, it provides a less than illuminating image.I would put LOSH in my logs to indicate where I had run. This back hill is a short jaunt, but it is fairly steep, rocky and makes my arms hurt when I run it. Along with other parts of my body. Yes, this hill and I have a history. And I think I have yet to win an argument with it. This hill ain't that long. Alone, its steep section is probably 200 yards. A workout for me in the past on this hill has been eight up and down repeats, with the ups being under a minute. So a minute on it is near eight minute pace. That seems slow. I keep telling my lungs and legs that and they don't really seem to care. For a short workout, it is one that usually leaves me grabbing my knees at the end and wobbling in the office for the rest of the day. And it always leaves me with that mixed feeling like I had accomplished something, but that I had so much more to do.
In any case, I took a slightly different approach to this old friend today. Rather than just running the hill outright, I ran a lead up section to it, and then drove into the hill, and then would loop back around the top side of it back to the lead up section. These ended up being just short of being 2 minute repeats with then about a four minute rest jog. The lead ups and hill ended up being about a quarter mile and the jogs were a half mile.
I did not feel real zippy - mostly because I still can't seem to get my stride out as long as I'd like it - because of this abdominal thing. That problem is getting better (which supports my hypothesis that the treadmill is aggrevating it, as I have not been on the treadmill for a few days) but it is still a bit of a problem. Nonetheless, I was getting up the hill in about 65-67. I was satisfied with that given it was a bit iced over in some parts (putting me off the trail into the cacti and yucca), and with the lead in. I did six of these, each one getting quicker. And like an old dependable friend, it left me grabbing my knees on the last one, but still feeling like I had a lot to do. I will look to build this workout to be more laps, quicker overall, and quicker on the ups. 10 miles total, 3 miles warmup, 3 mile warm down, 4 with the six loops. Contributions to the workout today came from Coheed and Cambria (James, I don't really you but I am guessing you'd dig these guys ...) and The Darkness (those guys are nuts).
I am playing with the idea that next week I drop my mileage to 50 miles (from the 70-80ish I have been doing) and focusing the work more on speed. I am interested in performing this experiment for two reasons: 1.) I am curious to see how I respond to a drop in mileage. I'd like to think that a drop would leave me feeling fresher and that I could attack the speed workouts a bit more and b.) I'd like to try this to emulate a bit of a taper. I am trying to figure out how that taper needs to look now, particularly given how Lucho feels his had adverse effects to his effort at Austin. I am thinking that this little experiment will let me play a bit harder in that mileage space, begin to see how my body will respond to lower mileage (albeit, I will be upping the intensity some) and start to sort those things out (178 days to go!).
Oh yeah - I got a question: why is your blog called Hang Nine? Answer: I have nine toes. I lost a toe (and created all sorts of other foot scar tissue issues) when I was a kid (let's say it is a race I lost). My Dad coined the phrase when we found I could not really wear flip flops as they would simply fall off that foot. So think of hang ten (the surf term). I hang nine.
Live it.
Tuesday, February 19, 2008
Tuesday 021908, 10 miles
Monday, February 18, 2008
Monday, 021808, Sanitas, 14 miles
I met up with JV and AV at Sanitas this afternoon. These two are serious mountain goats. Every weekend they are off bagging some 14er. It is easy to overlook this on the planet of Boulder where everyone seems to be sponsored by some shoe company, or are running across the country in a Fred Flinstone vehicle, or are describing a 2:31 marathon as an off day. Climb all the Colorado 14ers? It almost like another Cub Scout badge in this town. But it really is not. Really, it is not. In fact, it quite nuts. Read his blog if you don't beleive me. Maybe I should not have a picture of a mountain goat but instead of mixed martial art fighters to portray how hard this is.
I had put about 2 miles in before hooking up with these two. I had some aspirations to do a tempo up this hill, but the treadmill run last night left me more tapped than I had expected, particularly in, you guessed it, in the abdominal muscle wall area. Latest hypothesis on this is that it is just strained and I am not giving it enough rest for it to effectively heal. I realized that Sanitas is not easy and that running it easy (figure that out) would provide a good workout in any case. And as I expected, it kicked me in the teeth. Sanitas, while short in duration, does have significant grades right from the get go. And ain't even the grades that seem to get me, its the fair step ups. I tried to keep it relaxed but by 10 minutes in, I was, well, something other than relaxed. JV can totally smoke me on this stuff, but he always remains kind, stating how the pace is just fine for him. It was good to run with him, talk training, mountains, and jokes about gas. With about 3 minutes to go I thought there was a shot at breaking 20, but the ascent trip took 20:12.
I know that making deposits in flat and speed first, as I have been, will cause a debt on the hills that I will have to pay. I got notice of that debt today. I said to JV on the way down - "I want to do it all." And I do. I want to do the fast track workouts, the long road runs, the killer hill tempos, the long mountain runs, the hill repeats, the long building flat tempos. Of course, there is this minor issue we have to deal with called recovery. (Total side note, this crud that some Yankee pitcher is hurling about not taking HGH to be a better pitcher but instead to help him recover is that - CRUD. Your ability to recover is your performance). Sanitas put me on notice, I need to inject a run like this at least once a week to keep some hill familiarity in the legs. With the weather breaking, that ought to be a bit easier. The focus will shift a bit to those sort of runs, more structured track work (managing recovery more closely) and moving some of the long runs to the trails (but assuring they are building efforts). Where I am changing from last year at this point is the level of focus I am putting on the hills. It is a minor but significant tweak.
We came back down, caught up with AV and ran with her the rest of the way. It was a good easy run, with the Sanitas portion taking about 40 minutes all told. I parted from JV / AV and I jogged over to Fleet Feet after this, did a quick check on a few things from the wireless, and then got at it again. I got in some minutes before joining the group at the store for the Monday night jog. At this point, I was ready to be done but the group run (which never starts on time, and that bugs the heck out of me), pushed me through another five miles.
All told, it was about two hours, and about 14 miles.
Sunday, February 17, 2008
Sunday, 021708, 13 miles, week in review
13 today on the treadmill. I had early aspirations to get a tempo in today, but I spent a good deal of the day with the family at the pool. Playing in the pool, hot tub, etc took some of the spunk out of my legs and so I landed on just going easy.
Ok week, with a fair long run, and an okay track session. 82 miles on the week, 188 on the month. I found it a bit hard to dig in this week with the abdominal stuff I have been dealing with. Nonetheless, I think I am progressing.
Stir Fry
JZ took lots of pix. It is pretty amazing that digital cameras represent a "toy" of sorts that kids can use. You get a real insight to what their perspective is on life. They are eye level with your dogs, countertips, etc. From JZ's description, he took pictures of lots of dog butts. I will spare you those shots here.
Some olive oil in the wok, garlic, onion, carrots, broch, peppers of different colors and a good amount of cabbage and celery. This approach is not much different than what I do for smoothies ... for smoothies, I look at what fruit we have and throw it in a blender. Suddenly that apple that looks a bit past ripe, works just fine. Same approach for a stir fry - whatever veggies you got - just go. We threw in some steak (KZ explicitly stated that meat in the stir fry was a requirement). I marinated all this with some teriaki, honey, salt, pepper, and a few other spices - but you could use whatever you like to mix it up. Eat your heart out VO2Maxxed.
Saturday, February 16, 2008
Saturday, 021608, 10 (5, 5) easy
Joined Scott E this AM for a real easy jaunt in the foothills west of his house. The trails still have some snow and ice, but traction is not necessary. Scott is just bouncing back so we went real easy for an hour. I got in an other five in the afternoon and played with the jump rope a bit.Friday, February 15, 2008
Training blogs stink
But the entries that capture the human element around that training ... like a race, success, failure, facing your fears, conquering a workout, drilling through the boredom of training 9 months out while it is snowing ... that stuff is awesome. I will try to remember this in my writing.
Except when I am tired and I just want to tell you a bunch of numbers instead. Like my last entry.
Friday 021508, 17 miles
In any case, same sort of approach to my long run as my last one on the mill - build into it. I thought if I could get 17 in two hours, I'd be content with that.
7:23
7:18 (14:42)
7:12 (21:54)
7:11 (29:05)
7:01 (36:05)
6:54 (43:01)
6:48 (49:49)
6:43 (56:33)
6:40 (63:13)
6:35 (69:49)
6:31 (76:20)
6:27 (82:47)
6:27 (89:14)
I was taking water every five minutes to keep well hydrated. I took a gel at the hour, and started drinking some Nuun every five minutes at the 70 minute mark. By the 13th mile (above) I was sweating like it was a July day in Rhode Island. I was not working crazy hard, but I was needing to focus. I figured with the 13 in sub 90, I'd back off for a four mile warm down.
6:52 (95:06)
6:52 (1:42:58)
6:48 (1:49:46)
6:26 (1:56:12)
Yeah - that last mile was just get it done kind of thinking. Again, I need to do this stuff outside, but this morning did not lend to it from a schedule, where I needed to be perspective. My stomach did not hurt much during this run, but I was aware of the tightness down there. Then again, I did start my day with a couple of Advil with the coffee.
Mentally, I think I want to wrap my head around this run getting really fast (for me) as I build through it. That is going to take as much head work as physical work. Thinking about running sub six for 10 seems mentally easy if I am thinking about a race, but hard to do it in a workout. As they say, train hard - race easy.
The Giants Awake
The Way Too Cool 50K entrants list lists a few folks who have done well at Pikes, including Matt and Galen. Like, as in done very well in the fact they have won the Pikes marathon
Matt, of course, is the undisputed king of Pikes. And given he has more than a dozen titles there, and he is now 43, you have to wonder if he will continue to return. There are good arguments on either side: why not continue to dominate, be king of the mountain, until someone knocks him off? When it comes to this run up the hill, no one is close to Matt - he wins by minutes. None of the other big dogs, Guiterrez, Elliot for example - have been close. Well, that is not entirely true. Mackey gave him a bit of a scare on the down portion of the marathon last year, but arguably it was after Matt had sewn the race up.
I am not saying anything about the folks behind Matt - hell, I am one of them. We are busting our tails, but we just don't catch him. True, there are handful of young racers that might become the next generation, but one is yet to emerge from the twenty something crowd of Call, Batliner, Selig, etc. Here, I am wondering what Matt is thinking. Really, with every record on Pikes, what is left for Matt to prove at Pikes? Remember, the guy won the double handily last year - over competition that was motivated by prize money for the first time in years.
Is Matt to a point where he wants to show folks that you can dominate the hill well into your forties; taking satisfaction in the wins he gets there over guys nearly half his age? Or does the entry in things like WTC show he is more willing - ready to move out and on to other events? He has definitely shown dominance in the ultra arena with course records at the Lake City 50 and Leadville. Or does Matt return to Europe where he would race in that next league, well above and beyond what we do here in the US?
It is going to be fun to watch.
Six months out and thinking about a taper
Thursday, February 14, 2008
Thursday, 021408, 11 miles (8, 3)
- I had an easy day yesterday (after three somewhat more challenging days).
- I ate ice cream last night
- I have not run on a treadmill in a couple of days
- Venus is in the constellation of Virgo
- I took some vitamin I (okay, Ibuprofen!) like my medical provider advised me.
But in any case, I felt a bit zippier. Slept great last night too. But my point here is we are not simple experiments where you control one variable and then something else moves. And sometimes, like today, that drives me a bit nuts. Am I just hiding this soreness with Advil? Or am I recovering a bit? And other times, I really don't care ... just run and improve.
It snowed today (after that 65+ yesterday). I got out mid afternoon for an easy 8 (1 hour) and then tacked on an easy 3 a little later. I have avoided the mill for a couple of days but I might be forced back to it tomorrow. It will be interesting to see if this causes a flare up in my stomach area again. Then again, I did not have ice cream tonight.
Wednesday, February 13, 2008
Wednesday 02132008, 10 easy (4, 6)
I contacted my medical provider and I have a general physical in a couple of weeks. I am going to try to get some extensive blood work done then but I am pretty sure it is going to take some sweet talk from me for them to agree to it. I'd like to get the more extensive blood work to see if anything chemically requires some attention there.
I have done a physical every couple of years, and the experience has been pretty much the same: they want to know what the heck I am doing there. I tell them that I am just trying to be preventative, proactive and they just look at me. Do you smoke? No. Do any recreational drugs? No Do you drink? Yes, occasionally. Okay, drink less. Do you exercise? Umm, yeah a little. See ... they don't want to hear that I run seventy miles a week because they see that as a problem. And maybe it is a problem but I am going to be damned if an overweight doctor is going to tell me that. Any health problems? No. Well, that has been the answer until now. Yes, I have a few problems. I have an Achilles that wants to rupture, an abdominal that feels like it is falling out, and I can't touch my toes without bending my knees. Can you help me with that? Nah, I really don't want your help there anyway. But while, I am at it can you make it so that I can breathe more effectively at 14000 feet? Actually, forget it, I don't want your help there anyway. At least not if it means a pill or something.
Anyway, I spoke with a dial-a-nurse about my abdominal issue. After about five minutes she was pretty sure it was not a hernia, suggested I take about 1200-1800 mg a day of vitamin I. I will give it a shot. I'd really rather it be just a damn good muscle strain that I am being a wimp through than a hernia. If it still persists, well, I got that appointment. I think I might avoid the treadmill for a little bit, as that seems to aggravate it (but that does not make a lot of sense).
And despite the fact that everytime I cough, it feels like I am going to fall out of my hips, I was giving serious thought to doing the 50 at Collegiate Peaks this year. What the heck is that all about?
Okay, I don't tell a lot of stories about my family here because I think the internet freaks will hop on them. But considering my hit counter, I don't think I have much to worry about. Plus this one is too good to pass up. My son is sitting in his PJs this AM, eating his cereal. It is getting a bit late in the morning so I say to him, "hey bud, you might want to start getting ready for school and get dressed there." He looks at me and says, "What day is it?" "Wednesday bud." He looks down at his cereal bowl and whispers "... damn it..." I mean, I nearly lost it (in a good way). He loves school and all but we all have bad days. Even in first grade. Yes, for those of you concerned, we had a good talk on how that is not an appropriate response, and how he ought to remind me that those words are not good when I use them.
A few links for the day ...
- For those of you thinking you are doing a lot of mileage, you are not
- Another incredible musician I am guessing you never will hear of.
- This is the truest form of ultra I have seen yet.
- A good interview with Nate Jenkins, who came in seventh at the OT Marathon. Seems like a solid guy. FWIW, I appreciate the entire blue collar versus blue chipper thing we hear about with guys like Sell as opposed to Ritz and Hall. I am not convinced however that Sell trained harder than Hall in year leading up to the race. I am convinced they both trained a lot harder in that period than nearly everyone I know. I am not convinced that just because Sell did not break 10 minutes in the 2 mile in HS, that it was only his hard work and blue collar ethic that got him to be a 2:10 guy. Don't get me wrong, I am a Sell fan, and his story is truly an American story. But let's not dress him up to be Cinderella when compared to Ritz and Hall. I get what he did, but maybe we need to consider he was vastly talented and under trained in HS.
Tuesday, February 12, 2008
Tuesday 02122008, 9 miles with track work
... but I am having a problem now tapping into it. My lower abdominal wall hurt a lot today. I really bugged me in the early part of the warm up, but then it cleared up some. Nonetheless, I found I could not dig the legs as much as I wanted to because I had this core problem. I backed off the workout a touch because of this (both in effort, and in overall duration - 4 sets instead of five). I suspect the treadmill is somehow behind this, because it always seems to hurt more post treadmill running. But that might just be an excuse. I need to get this thing looked at soon. If it is a hernia, it ain't going to just go away.
9 miles on the day, 70 minutes.
Monday, February 11, 2008
Monday 021108, 12 miles (7,5)
February 11, Andrew Crook
2 years ago, this friend and wonderful runner left us. I did not understand this then and I still don't. I don't expect I ever will. His passing simply defies any logical reasoning for me.Andrew was one of the very very few people that I knew that nobody had anything bad to say about. Ever. I mean, even with those we love, we will chuckle and say something about how they are off color, or they are an odd bird, or they are strong willed, or they have this quirk or that quirk. In fact, most of us go through life and have at least a few folks we don't connect with well, and can probably name a few people we don't like. I can't think of anyone ever feeling that way about Andrew.
And he was a ballsy smart competitor on the track. I could write a lot about that, but all I can say is that few of us would train and race as hard and as smart as he did.
I hope he has found some peace. I know there are several of us who do miss him.
Sunday, February 10, 2008
Sunday 021008, Frozen Foot 5K, 14 miles
Last night I was yapping with TG and told him that I'd do this 5K race if I felt good, but not if I felt off, or even on the fence. Well, I must have lied because when I woke up this AM, I did not feel good. I did not feel bad. I just felt flat. But I decided to jump into this anyway, to get a new baseline as to where I am at, and because racing does provide a bit of fuel for rekindling the fire.Saturday, February 9, 2008
Saturday, 020908, 7 easy
Mountain Running Talk at Sherpa's with the BTR
It was a cool, motivating, exciting night. The restaurant has a very mellow atmosphere, good eats, and there was a buzz in the room of the season to come ... the days are getting longer, people are begining to think about what races they want to do, and they can smell the electricty of being out there (while it was snowing outside and the winds were blowing easily at 20mph). Pikes, Mount Washington, Leadville, Hardrock, Mount Evans, Grand Canyon, Boston, Mount Blanc... the lyrics of the night as people spoke to what they want to do next, what they have done and where they want to go. There was one guy there (whose name I forget) who is going to run across the country towing his own trailer!
A few highlights ... Anna, who I had never met, is absolutely adorable. Her spirit and love for running is fully transparent. "I'd probably could do better at the marathon if I focused on that. But I love the mountains too much to give them up." (Her PR in the marathon is 2:32)...Rickey (coming off a 2nd place at the Empire State Building Run), "you have to love what you are doing ... my race with Paul Low last year at Cranmore was one of the few races where I felt like I was in a boxing match the whole time. We just kept slugging at each other, pushing each other." ... Scott Elliot (pictured in his last Ascent win in 2006) on doing Bear 100 times in 100 days, "a lot of people would think it is boring because it is the same thing everyday. But it is not. The conditions are different everyday. I see different wildlife everyday. I am thinking about different things." (Scott and I have talked a lot about his breathing cadence, which is interesting, and not one I am fully subscribed to but his success is very difficult to argue with).