Thursday, 31 May 2007

THE WEAKEST LINK

I'm furious. Absolutely. Bloody.Furious. UNISON Labour Link has just announced it will be backing the Dear Leader and Alan Johnson for the Deputy Leadership.
Cast an eye at the photo on the left. You will see UNISON General Secretary Dave Prentis and some equally furious NHS workers protesting at last year's Labour Party Conference. I was there. NHS workers were angry at the privatisation of NHS Logistics. They were angry at privatisation and PFI. They have campaigned tirelessly against marketisation and pay cuts. How does the UNISON leadership reward them? Yes. By supporting the very team which SUPPORTS privatisation, outsourcing and profiteering. Brown is already Leader. He doesn't need any endorsements. Johnson, apart from Blears, is the most right-wing candidate for the Deputy Leadership and a fan of marketisation.
I hope Dave Prentis is pleased with himself. I hope next time he gets his microphone switched off by the Labour leadership during a speech which they don't like that he doesn't expect sympathy. Because thousands of UNISON members are going to be absolutely gutted that, yet again, their leadership has let them down.
The ONLY candidate who followed UNISON policy on pay and privatisation was John McDonnell and the union leadership didn't lift a finger to get their members' interests on the agenda and John on the ballot. I hope questions are asked and hell raised at the TUC conference in September.
As John McDonnell said :" In 1997 we campaigned with the slogan "24 hours to save the NHS". Public sector workers marched in their thousands to kick out the Tories and elect a Labour government. Today they are marching again in towns and cities across the country, not for Labour, but to oppose job cuts and the closure of accident and emergency units.
Labour party members are proud that we have ploughed resources into the NHS, but they are angry when they see public money being laundered through the NHS into the profits of private companies and former government policy advisers populating the boards of companies gaining from privatised contracts.
We were told in 1997 that it was what worked that mattered. But it has increasingly become what makes profit that matters. Why should we have to put up with primary care trust budget deficits, job cuts and closures, when we spend £6bn on the war in Iraq and plan to spend £76bn on replacing Trident? "
I would like the so-called "awkward squad" to answer those questions. But let's face it. They have rolled over and died. Every single one of them. Simpson, Woodley and Prentis are a disgrace and a sad disappointment to the Labour left.

SMALL (BUT IMPORTANT) VICTORIES

Just to prove I'm not a sad git who spends all my life whingeing about Gordon Brown, there is political life beyond the environs of New Labour. As an unashamedly Labour Left councillor, I'm glad to report victory in saving a valuable green space for the children living in my ward.
Hebden Bridge is a property hotspot and all available land in the town is being snapped up - not for social housing but expensive executive homes. Residents in my backyard were determined to fight off developers who wanted to build on a meadow bordering on Victorian terraces lacking gardens or play space of any sort. The development would also have been a traffic and safety hazard. Planners in Halifax nevertheless recommended the green light but we argued our case at Tory-run Calderdale Council - and won. A small victory but one which means a lot to the people at the sharp end.Well done, everyone concerned.

CLUNKING FIST STRIKES BACK


Today's Times makes grim reading for the left and centre-left. Though less than impressed with the Deputy Leadership hopefuls, I must concede that the four centre-ground candidates have at least tacked to the left. Some (Cruddas, Hain, Harman) more than others ( Benn)
But even these modest steps in the right direction are too much for our unelected Dear Leader.
According to The Times, "At a union hustings last weekend, three of the contenders irritated Mr Brown by speaking against the closure of Remploy factories, which provide employment for disabled people. One senior minister said yesterday that the deputy contenders were running out of control and that it was time for “Gordon to rein them in”.
Sounds familiar ? You bet it does. And how utterly, miserably predictable. I daresay Brown would have preferred no contest at all for Deputy Leader. However. not being able to prevent this one with his bullying, he's now having a hissy fit because candidates dare to show a bit of independent thought.
Brown says: “There will be no retreat to the soft options, the narrow politics or the failed policies of the past. No retreat from the essential reforms of our public services. That is not the way forward for New Labour. That is not the government I will lead.”
In other words, to coin a phrase I heard somewhere else , he has "no reverse gear."

Wednesday, 30 May 2007

VIVA FIDEL !


PS: If you want to cheer yourselves up there is an article by Fidel Castro in today's Comment is Free.!

DEPUTY DAWGS FAIL TO IMPRESS

Distinctly underwhelmed. And pretty much depressed by the lacklustre Muppet Show which was last night's Deputy Leadership hustings on Newsnight. The best 90-second soundbite came from Hilary Benn, who even managed to mention "socialism"and "redistribution of wealth." From then on in, things were deeply unimpressive. Six candidates -and not really a cigarette paper between them in terms of policy or principles. So it was down to personality. Blears and Johnson fared the worst - Hazel irritating as usual and Johnson's resemblance to Reg Varney becomes more marked each time I see him. Pity he's not driving a bus instead of aiming to be Deputy Leader. Hain didn't impress either and spoke so fast you couldn't really take in what he was saying. Yes I would say this wouldn't I but Jon Cruddas did not really come across as much different to the others. No to Trident, yes to nuclear power stations. And the disingenuous "sorry about the war" line. On that showing, he's just not going to do it.

Surprisingly, it was Harriet Harman who came across the best. She said quite vehemently she would not have supported the war in Iraq had she known there were no WMD -and lambasted the spin doctors for yet again leaking policy on the hoof over Home Office powers to stop and search. So she might yet get my vote - were it not for the fact she is utterly in hock to Gordon. Still, they all are....Benn was nice but a bit dull and worthy . At least he's not an uber-Blairite nightmare like Haze and Reg ( sorry, Alan Johnson) .But all in all, it's a pretty sorry spectacle. In hindsight, maybe the Left should have run a candidate.
And, compared with the one and only televised leadership hustings with Brown, Meacher and McDonnell this was an extremely dull affair. So as far as my vote goes it's now between Benn, Hain and Harman. But whoever wins this miserable apology for a contest, the real fight now is for the heart and soul of the Labour Party. For that, it's back to grassroots activity.

Tuesday, 29 May 2007

CAMPBELL IN THE SOUP


Seems like Alistair Campbell has upset the Blairs because of the "fantastically indiscreet" nature of his memoirs - due out in July. Or has he ? So far, the only leaked item has been the fact that Blair apparently swears like a trooper and that he called the avuncular Roy Hattersley a c***. The GB/TB rows have been toned down and Mandelson, it's said, doesn't come out of it very well (hardly a surprise). So I detect the familiar sound of spin.....
To his credit, Campbell apparently turned down £400,000 in newspaper serialisation rights so he must be expecting to trouser a few bob from the general public. However, I wouldn't be at all surprised to see his revelations on the remainder shelf in a few weeks' time. Blair quits on June 24 and after that he will be yesterday's man. As Campbell is the day before yesterday's man, will anyone really be that interested in what he has to say? I saw him on his one-man tour and he was less than impressive.....

Monday, 28 May 2007

CRUDDAS - THE BACKLASH CONTINUES

I am not going to repeat my views on Jon Cruddas and his role in denying Labour members a vote on the leadership. But it's interesting to note that other former supporters with far more influence than me are now going to use their votes elsewhere. One such is Newport MP Paul Flynn, who actually signed his nomination papers. Flynn now says he will vote for Peter Hain, which takes the total of Welsh MPs supporting Hain to 16. Flynn says Cruddas "is not performing at the hustings" but I would also speculate he was less than impressed that Cruddas did not nominate his favoured leadership candidate, which was John McDonnell. As Flynn points out, Hain is a "consummate politician.” who has done a great job in Northern Ireland.And , given his most recent statements re draconian Home Office measures, I may well end up voting for him myself. Now, to those of you on the left still with illusions in Cruddas, let me offer you this gem.
Cruddas tells the Western Mail: “I was in the Labour Party in the 1980s, and one half of the constituency party wanted to nationalise the corner shop while the other wanted to invite the Russians in. I don’t want to go back to that."
Well I was in the Labour Party in the 1980's both in London and Manchester and those are not my memories. Let me remind him. The People's March For Jobs, The Miner's Strike, the women of Greenham Common, the fight against the Poll Tax, the GLC ' s stand against Thatcher, mass CND demonstrations. Difficult times, difficult issues and they should not be dismissed with crass remarks.

REID'S "BIG BROTHER" LEGACY


What a nice farewell present from John Reid. Far from going gently into that good night, the Big Bruiser has one last anti-libertarian trick up his sleeve. The Home Office is planning to give police draconian powers to stop and question anyone they choose, anywhere they choose, about their identity and movements. The kind of powers you would have in wartime.
Under the new plans, anyone refusing to give their personal ID could be charged up to £5000. This further step towards a police state is of course backed by uber-Blairite Hazel Blears who describes it as "sensible." But civil liberties groups have joined forces to condemn it. Peter Hain is to be congratulated for making a stand ( albeit also electioneering) and describing this as "the domestic equivalent of Guantanamo Bay." Indeed , it's a bit of a shame he didn't re-discover his radicalism a bit earlier.
The good news is that Brown's allies are briefing that they need to consult with police as to whether this is "necessary." But we on the Left must keep up the pressure Don't expect this "Big Brother" attitude to suddenly stop when Brown gets into Number 10.

Sunday, 27 May 2007

LOWERING THE LEADERSHIP BAR


This is how you do it:
June 8 is the deadline for CLPs to submit. If your branch or GC isn't meeting before then, circulate to anyone else you know who can help get this through. . Calder Calley CLP has already done so and we'll be arguing our case at Manchester 2008 - it takes a yesar to get on the agenda. You will need a Constitutional Amendment Form . Labour Party national Contact Renee Finan 0207 783 1374
Proposed rule change:
4B Procedural rules for elections for national officers of the Party.
Paragraph 4B.2b(1)
In the case of a vacancy for leader or deputy leader, each nomination must be supported by 12.5 per cent of the Commons members of the PLP. Nominations not attaining this threshold shall be null and void."

Amendment

Delete 12.5 and insert 7.5

Points to stress: This isn't about individuals, it's about democracy.
Party members have just been denied a vote and a candidate reflecting a significant strand of opinion within the Party. They have been disenfranchised.

The original 1981 threshold was 5 percent which was raised in 1988 by neil Kinnock ( to stop the Left, basically) . Ensuring a a contest engages the wider public and gives Party more credibility .....Gordonbrown's coronation will not help his case come the next Election.

Saturday, 26 May 2007

OPEN THE BOOKS!


If you are of the left and of a certain age, the above logo will inspire instant nostalgia. Frankly, these days, it's unlikely to inspire much else as the said Tendency and newspaper disappeared from the mainstream labour movement nearly 20 years ago.
These days, it's morphed into the Socialist Party, a tiny sect still run by Peter Taaffe, an ex-Jesuit still seriously into democratic centralist discipline. So much so that the Militant blog has now been closed to outside influences. It seems that comrades who want to join in the "comradely" discussion have to be fully paid-up members - or not contribute at all. Given the pitiful numbers now in Militant, which at its height in the mid-1980s had three Labour MPs, dozens of councillors and thousands of supporters, one would have thought they would be keen to recruit new blood and spread the word. Obviously not. Quite a change from my day,
when every Labour Party Young Socialist was a potential recruit ( whether they wanted to be or not !)

Friday, 25 May 2007

THE QUESTION OF CRUDDAS


Jon Cruddas had my vote until Wednesday May 16 at around 8.30pm. That was when John McDonnell had to concede it was "mathematically impossible" to get the 45 nominations required to get on the leadership ballot. One of the major reasons why that just didn't happen was down to the ambivalent and, frankly, shameful attitude of the soft-left MPs in the Compass Group. These are the people who have shared platforms on anti-Trident demonstrations, walked into division lobbies against top-up fees, supported measures like the Trade Union Freeedom Bill and defended council housing. Yet when push came to shove off they marched again - into the lemming-like rush to sign Gordon Brown's nomination papers. In Cruddas's case, this particular signature might well be his political death warrant.It's not about recriminations or being vindictive. I just have no time for hypocrites.
Read this week's Tribune. Cruddas says the Deputy Leadership election is " an unrivalled opportunity to refresh and renew our Party structures and our policy direction." Yes, the reason it is "unrivalled" is that the PLP, Cruddas included, has just performed the most undemocratic act in the Labour Party's history - and denied the membership a vote on the leadership.
And here he is again:""We have to examine why it is that half our members have left in the past 10 years and what we can do to build the party again as an active, community-based and campaigning organisation." Yes, Jon, a leadership contest would have been a start, wouldn't it? Just take a gander at the John4Leader website and read the posts from distraught members thinking of tearing up their cards.
Let me be clear. I'm not writing this in anger, late at night, or under the influence of alcohol!
In the past seven days I have thought about this long and hard. But I'm still not falling into line with the Morning Star, which today said we should put aside "hurt feelings and ruffled feathers" and vote for Jon Cruddas.
This is not a trivial spat, nor the Schadenfreude of factional in-fighting . The fact is that Jon Cruddas based almost his entire campaign around grassroots involvement and Party democracy. He has helped deny us both. I think that is dishonourable. And the non-event of the Deputy Leadership just doesn't make up for that. Sorry.

BOB CROW, THE RMT AND QUESTION TIME


Question Time is one of the last great programmes on the TV. If the panel is bad then it's not so great, but last night's was a treat.Where else would you get Michael Heseltine, Alan Johnson, and Bob crow arguing the toss in the same room? Wonderful stuff. RMT boss Bob Crow is 100 per cent old school.No bullshit, no spin, he just tells it like it is.Bob spoke upon behalf of many of the policies associated with the John McDonnell campaign. In favour of more council housing, anti-Trident, anti-privatisation. He got a good reception. Alan Johnson , it must be said, is less appalling than fellow candidates Blears and Harman. But he comes across as a slippery character who has sold his old trade union principles down the river for high office. And Bob Crow did not fight shy of reminding him about earlier battles in which they shared trade union solidarity. Sadly for us in the Labour Party, Bob's union, the RMT, is still disaffiliated. Long odds I know but I hope at some stage soon that changes. Brown's uncontested leadership is hardly helpful but it also illustrates why we desperstely need lefts back in the Party.

We also need to get the left's message across as much as we can in the media - so nip down the Question Time website and make a few suggestions.........

Wednesday, 23 May 2007

DIARY DATE WITH GORDON

Checked my bank balance and concluded that £50.00 was a bit much to spend bowing down before the Dour Leader.No doubt the clapping seals and nodding dogs will be out in force but socialists less pleased at this Stalinist coup might care to put this date in their diaries......June 24 is the day when King Gordon is crowned in Manchester.The Stop The War Coalition is organising a demonstration on the theme of Change the policy - not just the leader. Check out their website for details. PS:My guess is they will be giving tickets away.
PPS: Having been one of the first to register for the leadership hustings in Sheffield TWO WEEKS AGO ( when it looked as though there would be a proper contest) , still haven't heard a sausage .Wonder why. Let's just say when Blair came to Huddersfield two years ago during the General Election campaign, certain comrades were excluded from the invite list.

SIMPSON SPELLS IT OUT







I am reproducing this article from Alan Simpson's website - a fair and reflective piece on the long-term implications of Gordon Brown's coronation: It will be in the next issue of LabourLeft Briefing www.labourleftbriefing.org.uk/. Labour Left briefing will be at the Compass Conference Saturday June 9. "Another World Is Possible." Lunchtime seminar with Tony Benn, John McDonnell MP, Christine Shawcroft (Labour NEC)
THE NEXT KING FROM SCOTLAND:
Gordon Brown's accession to the Labour leadership is a coup not a coronation. Few may have doubted he would win a leadership contest within the Party, but that is quite different from a succession without an election.
Despite claims that he would welcome a contest, the Brown camp has moved heaven and earth to avoid having one.Their plan was to deliver a steamroller effect amongst Labour MPs that simply flattened the prospects of any challenge.
We should not kid ourselves about the Parliamentary weaknessses of the Left in organising a leadership challenge.It was always going to be difficult to reach beyond Campaign Group MPs and get a consensus of supoort that would at least allow the Party to discuss issues rather than personalities.There are, though, a good number of MPs who are aware that there are democratic issues at stake which are more important than career prospects under a new regime.
Many MPs had initially said they would support a left candidate at the nominations stage, simply to guarantee that the Party as a whole could decide on its next leader. many recognised the underlying problems of a democratic process that ended up leaving MPs as both the selectorate and the electorate of a new leader. Leaders emerging in this way, in other parts of the world, are invariably seen as the political voice of the faux democracy.
Once nominations officially opened, all the mood music about the desire for a contest changed. MPs openly talked about not wanting to upset Gordon. All the candidates in the deputy leadership race were at pains to say they didn't want any of their own support to be attached to a possible challenge to Gordon, and the body language of the one encounter that took place between Gordon Brown, John McDonnell and Michael Meacher made it clear this was an experience Brown did not want to repeat That was when the Brown machine started to hoover up nominations to stop the prospect of a challenge in its tracks.
This will turn out to be a short-lived and misjudged "victory" for the Machine. The press will soon pick up on the undemocratic comparisons with the Tory Party and the Lib Dems. In this Parliament,the Tories have had a full and open leadership contest, in which all of their members were able to elect their new leader. The Lib Dems did the same. If they have any sense, they will do so a second time;to give themselves a more popular leader that the electorate might warm to. Sadly forMing Campbell his time came and went before he had even taken his coat off.
If the Lib dems do have a second leadership contest, perhaps they might offset one of these elections against Labour's failure to have any. None of the issues John McDonnell and Michael Meacher wanted to raise will go away. Climate change will hit us like a ton of bricks. None of our current policies - on energy supply, water management and food security - amount to a row of beans. Our involvement in Iraq is not much better.
The"peace" in Basra is a farce. Troops cannot go out on their own. It is not safe to send Prince Harry out there. And our involvement in the US "push" is just pushing up our own casualty lists and the certainty of being driven out of an Iraq we will have given to Al Qaida.
At home, it is almost as bad. PFI schemes leave the public with monstrous bills to pay back. Public sector cuts damage the coherence of integrated services just when we need this the most. And Gordon's economic stability is a three-card trick that rests on the transfer of public (Govt) debt into private (credit) debt.It is an unstable bubble that is bound to burst.
None of these issues were able to be debated by Party members in the context of a labour leadership election. None of these issues will go away.The machine management of a non-election contest will be a Pyrrhic victory for Gordon Brown. He will be a Prime Minister without a honeymoon.For sure, he will have the 100 days of glittering announcements, most of which will be cosmetic. But no-one will doubt that Gordon's fingerprints are all over the mess he brings with him from the last 10 years. It is the beginning of the next contest, not the end of this one.
Alan Simpson MP
Nottingham South.

Monday, 21 May 2007

NOTHING PERSONAL, JUST BUSINESS 2......

From yesterday's Mail On Sunday:
Education Secretary Alan Johnson is heading for a showdown with Gordon Brown over his refusal to guarantee that the winner of Labour's deputy leadership contest will be Deputy Prime Minister. Labour sources say Mr Brown is considering giving the DPM role to Jack Straw as a reward for running his leadership campaign - with the new deputy Labour leader relegated to Party issues."
Mr Johnson is reported to have said"Over my f***** dead body." Frankly, I wouldn't goad the Dear Leader too much if I were he.......

Another Walter Wolfgang Scenario

Last night on TV, the unedifying spectacle of a woman protestor being bundled out of Brown's ridiculous "hustings" by a couple of heavies after daring to heckle the Dear Leader over Iraq. Looked just like the Walter Wolfgang incident. They have learned nothing..... and will pay the price. BTW there will also be a demonstration at Brown's "coronation" in Manchester in June. I believe it's being organised by Stop The War Coalition.

STAND DOWN MARGARET


Glad to see widespread condemnation from MPs for Industry Minister Margaret Hodge, who has sparked outrage after pandering to prejudice and saying that immigrants should have less right to social housing than established British families.
The Labour MP for Barking, who ironically is an immigrant herself, said that indigenous families' "legitimate sense of entitlement" should override the needs of recent arrivals. She added that a "transparent" points system giving more weight to length of residence, citizenship and national insurance contributions could be a better way of allocating housing.
This is precisely the sort of garbage which fuels the BNP. Hazel Blears leapt to her defence but I am glad to hear that she got a rather less warm reception from John McDonnell MP on GMTV. In today's Guardian, he says: "This is a deeply reactionary and dangerous statement to make. The issue, however, is not the allocation of housing, but the chancellor's failure to allow affordable house building over the last 10 years - resulting in the present housing crisis."

Sunday, 20 May 2007

NOTHING PERSONAL, JUST BUSINESS ..


From today's Times: One supporter of the Chancellor said that Ms Blears must be "crushed" and made to come last of the six deputy leadership candidates to send a firm signal that "Blairism is dead". MPs supporting the five other candidates have begun co-operating to stop her gaining support in a bid to destroy her deputy leadership bid. " Makes me almost feel sorry for Hazel . Almost.....

THE ARROGANCE OF THE BROWNITES


If you want to know what the Brownites think of us on the Left, read Andrew Rawnsley in today's Observer. It's not a pleasant experience but pretty essential if we are ever going to fight back. The mindset is astonishing in its arrogance and disdain Brown, he says, now has the support of "all wings" of the Party, ignoring the obvious fact that there is a distinction between 315 Mps and 180,000 ( and falling) Party members - and of course the two million trade unionists who pay the political levy.
The two left challengers are dismissed as Campaign Group "jokers." First rule of journalism, He should get his facts right. Michael Meacher is not a Campaign Group member and, whatever the wisdom or otherwise of his campaign, I never doubted his serious intent. And, yes, John McDonnell must have had a right old laugh campaigning for nine months to packed meetings and then getting stitched-up by Brown's Stalinist henchmen. I found it pretty hilarious as did the thousands who were expecting to be able to vote for him.
So detached from reality is this fawning media sycophant that he clearly sees nothing wrong in the fact Brown has acceded to the throne without a contest, either.
"Though Gordon Brown has had to pretend that he would have welcomed a challenge, he has got the uncontested crowning that he always wanted"
Well, how bloody fantastic for Gordon. Sod the rest of us. In the past 48 hours, Brown has already leaked plans for a whole new tranche of nuclear power stations.Harman ( thought to be Brown's favoured candidate forthe deputy leadership) is defending private health and education. So it already looks as though Brown is going to make Blair seem like Nye Bevan.
I hope the PLP are throughly pleased with themselves .

Saturday, 19 May 2007

WHY I'M VOTING FOR HILARY BENN

Hilary Benn and me go back a long way (well. sort of). Back in 1983 I campaigned for Hilary when he stood as MP for Ealing North.Yes, we lost.
Then two weeks ago I did a phone interview with Hilary for a publication I work for. I was impressed with his honesty and integrity and clear respect for those who are to the left of him. Yes I know he has to be nice to his dad but, on issues like Iraq and Trident, he agreed to disagree while sharing the same aims as me. ie peace, social justice and democratic socialism. That used to be the way in the Labour Party. It was a broad church. The way to champion one's beliefs was via honest debate. This week, the broad church tradition was renounced by the PLP. The deputy leadership candidate allegedly with "left" views, Jon Cruddas, failed to back the leadership candidate who shared his views on Trident and party democracy.So he lost my vote and, I suspect, the votes of thousands of others. The other candidates veer from unspeakable (Blears) to wishy-washy (Harman) . Alan Johnson is all things to all men and Hain will get my second preference if Benn doesn't make it. I cannot pretend I vote with the same enthusiasm as I did when Tony Benn stood as deputy in 1981.But it's better than the alternatives.

THE FIGHTBACK BEGINS

Last night , Calder Valley CLP passed unanimously a resolution calling for the leadership election threshold to be lowered from 12.5 per cent to 7.5 per cent. This measure would have ensured that John McDonnell was on the ballot. We told our MP Chris McCafferty we felt betrayed and disgusted by the behaviour of the PLP and MPs like herself who chose to ignore the wishes of thousands of ordinary Party members and trade unionists for a contest. She actually hadthe gall to suggest John McDonnell was not a "credible" left candidate. So I am cutting and pasting the following report from the PCS trade union website about its annual conference. It speaks for itself.......


The day ended with a powerful speech by John McDonnell MP, chair of the PCS parliamentary group. Speaking the day after learning he had not secured enough nominations to challenge Gordon Brown for the Labour leadership, he received a spontaneous standing ovation before he even began.
John thanked delegates for the welcome and noted wryly: “It’s been rough old week in Westminster.”
He added: “I’m disappointed, but not for myself. I’m disappointed for all Labour party members across the country. They are not going to get a voice or a say in the future direction of a Labour government.”
John thanked PCS for its solidarity, saying: “I’m really grateful for you standing shoulder to shoulder with me.”
He went on to outline the threat Gordon Brown poses to members’ terms and conditions, and public services in general, with increased privatisation and real terms pay cuts.
Other unions should come on board and show solidarity with PCS, he said, and the TUC should also show a ‘more robust interpretation of solidarity’. “We want them to lead, we want them to co-ordinate, to be at the forefront alongside us and brining others along.”
He hailed the Make Your Vote Count campaign as ‘tremendously effective’. “It put us right in the faces of those politicians making the decisions”, he said. “There could be a general election in the next two years and votes of PCS members and their families are enough to change an election.”
Closing, he promised to continue to wholeheartedly support PCS both in parliament and workplaces. “In PCS I see a membership determined. I see anger building and we can turn that into solidarity and action. Whether it’s in parliament or on the picket lines I’ll be there with you.”

Friday, 18 May 2007

THIS LEADERSHIP IS A TRAVESTY

Just looked in the dictionary to check I've got it right. Yep."Ridiculous distortion or misrepresentation." Thought I would give it 24 hours to calm down.But as of now Friday May 18 I still think democracy in the Labour Party finally died this week. The ultimate control freakery after years of Party hacks taking the piss and taking over conference, turning it into a Nuremberg rally, blocking resolutions, "encouraging" delegates to vote a certain way.
Thousands were heartened by the fact that someone had the guts to stand up to New Labour in the hope that things would change, if not now, then the future. I argued myself silly getting people to re-join on that promising basis.
Now we have a Leader who I have no doubt is backed overwhelmingly by the PLP. But not, as we knew, by a significant number of Party members, trade unionists and affiliated organisations. That division, however small, was unacceptable to the Brown machine.But let's not blame them entirely. Let's also blame the cowardly, spineless MPs who put their perosnal interests before the people who put then there in the first place, the "left" MPs who failed to deliver, the trade unions who preferred to put their money on someone who wouldn't frighten the horses rather than help advance socialism.Yes, I know it's "blame culture" ,notconstructive, not positive, not helpful.But after years defending the indefensible, accepting the unacceptable, being desperate for Blair to go, what do we get? Something a hell of a lot worse. A Leader imposed on us from above, whom many had already decided they did not want to vote for, and who will almost definitely lead us to defeat at the next election. And you know something? I'm not sure I care

Thursday, 17 May 2007

COMPARE AND CONTRAST




Two interesting pictures.And strangely relevant.....don't you think? Now we have a Chinese -style Dear Leader,it's goodbye for now to Labour Party democracy.

Wednesday, 16 May 2007

DON'T MOURN, ORGANISE !


Today has been a sad one for all of us who worked so hard to get a socialist candidate on the ballot. My heart goes out to all the campaign team, the Party members, trade unionists, and young people involved in the John4Leader initiative. We have been denied a vote and denied a say in the future direction of our Party.It's absolutely tragic.
The level of support John got in the PLP did NOT reflect his support on the ground. Brown clearly knew he would be a serious contender once he got on the ballot and did his utmost to stop it. But I'll tell you something. Brown bangs on about "Britishness" well there is one thing the British don't like and that's a bully. He is one. What sort of control freak needed 308 nominations? We now have a Party leader and PM who no-one - apart from the PLP - has voted for. It will work against him in the end. Ironically, I got a letter today from Brown saying he would be listening and learning from Party members. Really? When he wouldn't let us have a vote.....So the only vote we have now is for Deputy Leader.Until today, it was going to be Jon Cruddas. But his "left" campaign was clearly nothing of the sort. Little point opposing Trident if you vote for the candidate who supports it.One thing is clear.
We have to pick ourselves up and carry on campaigning on the issues. We have to re-claim this Party from the spineless, right-wing apparatchiks who have taken over. And continue to believe that "another world is possible" But as of this moment, I wouldn't blame anyone for feeling pretty damn bleak.......

WELCOME TO ALBANIA



I hope Owen, who works for John, doesn't mind me sharing his thoughts on the story so far..........welcome to Albania


Even when Brown had won over two-thirds of the PLP, he was still ringing round MPs and doing all that he can (with his power of patronage, blackmail etc) to ensure that they nominated him.After Sunday's debate, Brownites decided that they did not want a contest with John. John impressed even the most hardened Brownites. Even the Blairite deselected MP Jane Griffiths - who on Saturday described John as a "trot gobshite" on her blog - wrote, after attending the hustings, that John was the best performer.Brown knew that John had every chance of winning a significant section of both the party and union votes and he decided to do all he could to prevent that from happening.Whatever the parliamentary gatekeepers decide, there is a) grassroots support for John and b) overwhelming grassroots support for a contest.If the MPs block a contest, then you have no way of disproving either a) or b).

24 HOURS TO SAVETHE LABOUR PARTY

There are the MPs to lobby
Anne Begg/ Joe Benton/ Colin Burgon/ Stephen Byers/ Charles Clarke/ David Clelland/ Ann Clwyd/ Vernon Coaker/ Michael Connarty/ Jim Cousins/ Jon Cruddas/ Andrew Dismore/ Jim Dowd/ Gwyneth Dunwoody/ Frank Field/ Bruce George/ Nia Griffith/ Mike Hall/ David Hamilton/ Dai Havard/ Sharon Hodgson/ Kate Hoey/ Brian Jenkins/ Piara Khabra/ Peter Kilfoyle/ Fiona Mactaggart/ Chris McCafferty/ Siobhain McDonagh/ Rosemary McKenna/ Alan Meale/ Alan Milburn/ Austin Mitchell/ Chris Mullin/ Jim Murphy/ Stephen Pound/ Terry Rooney/ Graham Stringer/ Jon Trickett/ Paul Truswell/ Rudi Vis/ Michael Wills/ David Winnick/ Anthony Wright/ Tony Wright/

Tuesday, 15 May 2007

WE NEED 18 MORE MPs.......


First update of leadership nominations: John has 27 nominations. He needs 18 more. Please get lobbying. Fast. I sent an e-mail earlier to Jon Cruddas who has reached the magic 44.Perhaps others might do similar......

BLUE SKY THINKING REQUIRED........


Left-wing doom merchants and right-wing mischief-makers seem to be uniting to demoralise the John McDonnell campaign. Dave Osler reports the Standard's story that Meacher's supporters are not crossing over. Frankly why give it oxygen?
Alan Simpson MP, Parliamentary Manager for the Michael Meacher Campaign says today:"The story in the Standard today is complete nonsense. Michael, myself and the whole of the Meacher team are absolutely committed to supporting John McDonnell. We are in the process of contacting all of Michael's supporters and we have no doubt that the vast majority will be prepared to switch their support to John."
"The issue could not be clearer - if MPs want their party members to be able to have a vote there is one route open and that is to nominate John McDonnell"
"Any suggestion that there is any alternative route is just mischief-making."
Thanks, Alan. And nice to see us all once more singing from the same hymnsheet.Would the Private Frasers please shut it for the next 48 hours. Thanks......

Monday, 14 May 2007

YES!!!!!!!!


Yeay and thrice yeay!!!!!! John McDonnell now goes forward as the only left candidate and has three days to muster the magic 45. This is an absolute bloody triumph, frankly.My hunch things were going well vis avis the media interviews and last night's Fabian debate was happily proved right.Well done to all in the campaign, all who lobbied, now let's get John on the ballot and start REALLY re-claiming the Party.
I must say that Michael Meacher was really magnanimous and gracious in defeat.Let's hope the MPs who were supporting him now rally round. And that we get a good joint left campaign going.

DECISION DAY-PART 2


So, here we go again. Another nail-biting day to see whether or not Gordon Gets crowned - or contested.The last 48 hours have been good ones for the John McDonnell campaign. More endorsements from UNISON in Scotland, Labour CND and Labour Against The War. Lots of TV coverage too. Objectively, the money has to be on John as the left challenger. But MPs are notoriously flakey.So, for purely superstitious reasons, I will make no predictions.
One thing we can say is that there is a profound sense of relief all round that Blair is history.We on the Left face more tough times - but at least we're getting a hearing.
Brown deserves credit for encouraging last night's debate. Both Michael Meacher and JohnMcDonnell also deserve credit for having the guts to stand against Brown - and argue their case before an audience which would have been largely New Labour. In front of the assembled media throng. What a travesty it will be if it all ends today.

Sunday, 13 May 2007

EVER HEARD OF DEMOCRACY?

I've heard it all now. Outgoing Deputy Leader John Prescott is throwing his three penn'orth in - urging Michael Meacher and John McDonnell not to challenge Brown, just for the sake of denying the chancellor a simple coronation.
“Who would want to vote for someone who is going to lose in the final analysis anyway? It’s cuckoo daft!” says Prescott. What! By the same token, one would perhaps abolish elections in seats where the result is a foregone conclusion. Some people vote Labour all theur lives and never get a Labour MP. And here the result is NOT a foregone conclusion. Yes it would be if it was just the PLP. But it's not. And, has Prescott never heard of democracy. Maybe it's been so long absent from the Labour Party he's forgotten the basic principles on which the Party was founded. Blair, he may have forgotten, was virtually certain to win in 1994.We still had an election. I hope there's a good result tomorrow.If this becomes a joint left campaign, then maybe we can get behind whoever goes forward.Maybe......

Saturday, 12 May 2007

A SNOG TOO FAR .............


This photo opp was not a good idea......we had enough of this touchy-feely nonsense with Tony and Cherie. Excuse me while I go and hide behind the sofa in embarrassment......it really doesn't do you any favours Gordon. Quit the snogging and start coming up with some decent policy ideas. PS:Note the blue tie......

WILL LABOUR LISTEN TO THE GRASSROOTS?


Today's Guardian has a letter in support of John McDonnell signed by over 300 activists. The other good news is that UNISON in Scotland is backing John. But will the PLP listen? Watching Brown's campaign launch yesterday was a bit of a surreal experience. So is his website. The speech Brown made was pretty dull stuff. Its tenor was the Brownspeak of recent years about "listening to the people" and looking after "hard working families." Nothing wrong with any of that . An improvement on Blair's acting.
But where's the substance? And, frankly, what's the point of a leadership campaign if there is only one candidate? MPs line up like sheep and tell us there is no alternative.It feels like living in Albania.The Labour Party is crying out for a contest and a debate and most MPs are just covering their ears. I hope some of them will listen this weekend.

Friday, 11 May 2007

SOBER LIGHT OF DAY

No, I'm not a Putin fan. Let's just say that following Blair's speech - and the not very good news about the leadership ballot - my partner and I went out and got very very drunk. We found some other lefties in our local Trades Club and swapped e-mails and phone numbers. All Labour Party members. All supporters of John McDonnell.
I am going to hang fire until Monday when we will know what the situation really is. Blair has just endorsed Brown so he's finally fulfilled his part of the "Deal." Shame the rest of the Party don't get a say.

PUTIN SHOWS WAY FORWARD AFTER BLAIR GOODBYE

I What year is this? .........2007 May 9 Parade to mark victory over the Nazis, or is it a veiled threat to US hegemony? All power to the Soviets!! Solidarity with Putin!!

Thursday, 10 May 2007

LABOUR'S NOT "NEW" LOGO


Is this a hopeful sign??????Not a trace of the "New" anywhere.....

HIGH ANXIETY -PART 2


I have been glued to the TV most of the day expecting the announcement about which candidate - Meacher or McDonnell - will go forward to the ballot. My hunch that things would not go to plan was proved right at 3.35 when the BBC suddenly announced that the press conference planned at 4pm was to be delayed till Monday. I see no point in endless speculating.However, if things nominationswise were truly as Meacher himself had said then McDonnell would have stood down. As it is, we face another 72 hours of tortuous waiting. That's politics. Judging by the interview John has just done for the BBC, what I would say is that it's very far from game over......

BLAIR'S LAST SPEECH (AGAIN)


You have to hand it to Tony Blair. He has milked his departure so much that we could have been forgiven for thinking he was never, really, going to go. But now he have it.June 27.The day when many will rejoice. Not the good burghers of Sedgefield.
The party faithful were visibly in tears and Tony, as usual, gave it his all. Having been a reluctant observer of many of Blair's speeches, this wasn't one of his best. Same old message about doing things "his way" doing "what he thought was right" ie Iraq and faux humility. It didn't win me over (no surprise, there) but I daresay Tone's loyal followers will be crying into their beer as I blog. Am pretty tempted to have beer myself as in several hours time we will find out whether the John McDonnell campaign really has been outfoxed by the Meacher. I can't believe that will happen, but given his track-record I do fear it.If he does go forward, it's utter humiliation time. Not what we wanted at all......

Wednesday, 9 May 2007

NO CONTEST ?


If this is the best Michael Meacher can do 24 hours before his date of destiny with John McDonnell, surely there is nothing to fear... You really couldn't make it up!
Still, who needs support from key figures in the labour and trade union movement when.....


Celebrated fashion icon Dame Vivienne Westwood has today announced her support for Labour leadership candidate Michael Meacher.The clothes designer feels that the Labour Party needs to be invigorated by a leader with principles and that is why she is supporting Meacher.Westwood said: “I want honest politicians who care about making the world a better place and not just about staying in power for what? – Well, Power! I believe Michael could take the Labour Party in a new and fresh direction – that is desperately needed.”

BLAIR'S LAST 24 HOURS AS LABOUR LEADER

At 12 noon tomorrow Tony Blair is to announce his resignation as Labour leader. So why aren't I whooping with joy? Many of his acolytes will soon go with him and Labour has the chance to renew and change. But I have to say my gut instinct is that it won't under a Brown Premiership. Nor will it, obviously, unless there is a contest. Which is by no means certain.
Tomorrow, we will also find out who goes forward from the left to try and get the 44names for the ballot. I really can't believe it will be Michael Meacher. But, given the snakepit of Westminster, who knows......so for now the fizzy stuff remains unopened.

Tuesday, 8 May 2007

BROAD CHURCH IN BURNLEY


Yesterday I was at the Burnley May Day celebrations and saw Blairite Kitty Ussher speak on a platform with John McDonnell and Gordon Prentice.
What a breath of fresh air to see three MPs with very different views being conciliatory and working together to speak up for Labour. Even Ussher was using phrases like "state intervention" - not the Blairite rhetoric I have always seen her spout before .She also reported that when she told her colleagues locally Blair was going that she got round of applause - that got a big cheer! So it seems even the loyalists are accepting things must change. Even if it's only the nature of the language they use.
The downside? Ussher also claimed Trident and trade union rights were not issues striking a chord with ordinary constituents. She was lucky not to get heckled but that frankly achieves nothing.....
Gordon Prentice, not renowned for pulling his punches, called for a proper debate on such issues once Blair resigns on Thursday.I lobbied him some weeks ago so I'm hoping he will support John McDonnell's candidature.
Blair resigns on Thursday - it's also the crunch day which will see whether or not
Brown has a coronation. The two left camps are meeting up and sharing intelligence on nominations. If Meacher goes forward, it will be an utter disaster.He just won't get the backing from the CLPs and union activists and will be utterly humiliated..The pundits are predicting he won't. I hope they are right as I don't want to have to vote for him. Even worse, it will be a wasted opportunity to bring left views to the fore.

Sunday, 6 May 2007

SO FAREWELL THEN, JOHN REID........


Just back from abandoned jaunt to Forest Of Bowland ( weather desperate) to news John Reid won't be standing as Leader and is quitting Cabinet life for backbenches. New Labour seems to be imploding before our very eyes. That is quite a bombshell, though. I still expected Reid maybe to stand (Clarke clearly realised he had no chance following last Sunday's YouGov poll) as he's an authoritative figure who does have a following on the hard right of the Party. These events are certainly not what anyone predicted.Does this make a challenge from the left more likely? My guess is even more pressure will now be piled on MPs to allow the "coronation" which what's left of New Labour want. So not necessarily. Are they basically just hoping to hand Brown a poisoned chalice -and re-group in a couple of years' time. Given the news in Scotland, a Brown Premiership would need all the help it can muster from the rest of the Party. Interesting times......

Saturday, 5 May 2007

SO FAREWELL THEN, TOMMY SHERIDAN



"It's very disappointing," he told reporters. "There's no sour grapes: we fought a hard campaign, we had eight months in existence and we've certainly scored the largest Socialist vote in Glasgow."Despite those allegations, must be noted that in his heyday Tommy Sheridan was a fine class warrior.Sad, but predictable, end to his career. And a prime illustration why , however tortuous it is, socialists should now come back to Labour, and try and re-claim it.


Back on Council......Just

No blogging yesterday as up all night (literally) in Manchester then on to Halifax for count. Back on council but only just, disappointing but could have been worse. Good news is Labour now has seven councillors instead of 5 on Hebden Royd. Which means almost 50 per cent of the local council and a significant breakthrough. In Calder, our candidate failed to beat the budgie-breeder by only 76 votes. In Luddendenfoot, the BNP were beaten back into 4th place and we came third.
Nationally, not the rut everyone expecting but hardly good news . Scottish Socialist Party utterly wiped out in Scotland. So much for the great breakthrough which caused many comrades to leave Labour. So where now?
Charles Clarke appears to have ruled out standing for Leader so only a few days to go before a decision .Contest or no contest? Still in the balance I assume. Surely Brown must see it must be in his interests ? Well, possibly not. Mind still befuddled from exhaustion.
Quick hello (if he reads this ) to fellow Labour blogger Chris Paul. Nice to meet you at town hall......

Thursday, 3 May 2007

WHY THE SOCIALIST PARTY HAS GOT IT WRONG


Really WASN'T going to post today, but about to leave the house for final leaflet round/canvas when got Google alert from our comrades in the Socialist Party. Yes, they are already rubbing their ideologically pure little hands with glee at the possible prospect of no contest for the Labour leadership. They go on to quote the YouGov poll which gave the two left candidates a combined rating of 15 percent as "evidence." that there is no point staying in the Party.
I've already said that a candidate with naff all publicity in the mainstream media, no rich friends to pay for slick PR campaigns, etc etc , is doing pretty well at this stage in the game to beat two ex-Ministers in the leadership stakes. A full-on campaign would give us a very respectable share of the vote, and a real chance fordebate, if not the final prize itself. But no, that's not the scenario the SP like is it? They prefer to paint the Labour Party as an unprincipled "rump," a "dispirited band." Not worth it etc etc . Well, I've got news for them .Whether we get on the ballot or not, the Labour left's campaign for socialist values, led by the grassroots and spearheaded by John McDonnell , will continue in the months and years ahead. As this Morning Star interview makes clear..........

JOHN McDONNELL
by RICHARD BAGLEY
After nine months on the road, JOHN McDONNELL's Labour leadership campaign is nearing the finishing line. It seems he's relishing the challenges to come.
IT'S been a long time coming, but it looks like Tony Blair is finally going to step down from the Labour leadership after 13 years at the top.
His tenure has been tortuous for leftwingers, marked by subservience to big business and an obsession with the private sector. If his anointed successor Gordon Brown has his way, that looks likely to continue full steam ahead.
But one man hoping to throw a spanner in the works is left Labour leadership contender John McDonnell, who has waged a nine-month campaign aimed at uniting the grass roots of the labour and trade union movement around a truly progressive programme.
In the face of a virtual media blackout and overwhelming odds, his campaign has won the backing of a diverse range of groups and individuals disgusted at the direction in which the country and the Labour Party have been taken.
The latest step is the publication of a compact book, Another World is Possible. Contained within its pages is a comprehensive assessment of the state of the world and Britain in the 21st century - and some proposals as to how these problems can been tackled.
Meeting McDonnell in Parliament, it seems as if, rather than taking their toll on the Labour MP for Hayes and Harlington, the nine months on the road have left him in high spirits.
"It's been tremendous," he beams. "I've met people who have no other ambition than to actually do good, they have no other objectives other than to promote the objectives on which they agree, no other reason for getting involved than that they believe themselves to be socialists and trade unionists and part of a movement that wants to change the world. It reaffirms your faith in humanity."
The man labelled "Honest John" by the Guardian in a recent profile talks animatedly about the contents of Another World is Possible and his leadership campaign, speaking with an excited air but seemingly without the kind of inflated ego so common in the political world.
"The one thing the whole campaign has been about is that it is not about individuals, it's a collective effort," he replies when asked about the new publication.
"What we wanted to do was to get a document that was accessible, readable and gave us a shared understanding of how the world is.
"The whole purpose of this is not looking backwards. We've got to look back in terms of how we got here, but we can't look back for old solutions.
"What we've got to do is found our new solutions as 21st century socialists on the principles that we've developed but then to look to the future."
The stark picture painted in Another World could be deemed depressing - not least, McDonnell concedes, by his wife - but the MP rejects the word.
"It's in your face, accurate, it's daunting. I don't think it's depressing.
"We've painted a picture of how globalisation works - this is what it means to you in terms of inequality, in terms of insecurity and fear, in terms of the impact on the environment, the planet plundered for profit and, in addition to that, what it means in terms of international wars and instability.
"So, that is a bleak description of the world as it now is, but, actually, it's honest, it's the world that people recognise out there. The underlying features of our society today are insecurity and fear."
The stakes are certainly high, a fact underlined when Brown proclaimed last year that Britain must become an "evangelist" for globalisation.
"It was an extraordinary expression to use," says McDonnell, "but that's what new Labour have done. They've unleashed the market on every area of our lives. We've got to understand that.
"They've introduced the market as their guiding force. What is our guiding force? It's democracy. So, how do we ensure that, where they've introduced the market, we democratise those areas.
"The underlying concept is what we've got to do is get back to the roots of socialism, which is about using democracy to create equality. That's what socialism is about."
And McDonnell is convinced that there is widespread support in Britain for socialist ideas.
"Whether it's campaigns on the environment, trade unions, students or whatever, all people want change because they're not satisfied with what's out there at the moment.
"You've now got groups in all parts of civil society campaigning at the local, regional and national level and we've got international movements that we've never had before."
That's as may be, but the fact remains that the electoral system means that candidates must win over their parliamentary colleagues first.
On the left, both Michael Meacher and McDonnell have announced their intention to stand.
They need to secure 45 nominations from Labour MPs in order to launch a campaign proper once Blair announces his decision.
'We've got to get back to the roots of socialism, which is about using democracy to create equality.'
The last few days have seen an unhelpful exchange between the Meacher and McDonnell campaigns following a Guardian article reporting that Brown was worried about the latter's challenge.
While the MP for Hayes and Harlington is not keen to get too bogged down by the issue, he does concede that the friction has been a "diversion."
"Michael Meacher's campaign has not been helpful," he says, "but it's about policies, not personalities. What we're saying to Michael is: 'Look, we'll sit down, set out the nominations that we've got and, if you set out yours, whoever's got the most can go forward'.
"The problem we've got in terms of timescale is that we expect Blair to go on May 8 or 9. There will only be five days - probably three parliamentary sittings - to get the nominations in. And, if an MP has nominated a candidate, unless that candidate withdraws, the MP can't switch their ballot."
While there is still uncertainty over the number of nominations that Meacher has secured - although the former environment minister has said that he has a fair few - McDonnell is confident that he has won over a number of MPs to the cause, a list that goes beyond the traditional left-wing Campaign Group.
"At the moment, we've think we've got 25. Our campaign manager MP Michael Wood's estimation is that that will go up to 30 shortly.
"We're allowing people to make up their own minds, not putting pressure on them, convincing of the arguments. Then there's the last 10-15. We think we can get there, but it's going to be tough."
Whatever the result among MPs, though, McDonnell believes that the grass-roots campaign waged by him and his fellow travellers has done a great deal to boost morale on the left.
In fact, he recalls, it was the clamour for a left contender at meetings across the country last year that led to his decision to run for the leadership. Initially, McDonnell had argued against the idea.
"My argument then was that, when the left enters any activity from hereon in, it's got to be serious and it's got to be successful. The way we measure that success is, does it advance the movement or does it set it back?" he explains.
"I didn't think we had sufficient support either in the constituency Labour parties or the trade unions either to win the Labour leadership but also to win the battle of ideas and to move the movement forward."
But a series of meetings changed his mind. He says: "What completely convinced me was not just the enthusiasm but the willingness of people to say: 'Well, we can put the structure in place ... we've still got a tremendous base among the rank and file of the Labour Party on the left who are socialists and, at the same time, we've got a huge base in the trade union movement'."
While unions such as the Fire Brigades Union, transport union RMT and public-sector union PCS have backed his campaign, even ordering some of the 10,000 copies of Another World is Possible to distribute among their members, Britain's biggest unions have not put their weight behind McDonnell.
"The 'big four,' plus CWU, meet on a regular basis and, tactically, they've decided that they would not nominate anyone until the election is called. The objective behind that appears to be that they want to negotiate with Gordon Brown," asserts McDonnell.
"It's interesting that, since they agreed that strategy, three months later, he announces a wage cut for public-sector workers and we've gone through in the last six months the biggest wave of privatisations that this country has been through - beyond anything that Thatcher dreamed of and into areas that Thatcher was fearful of touching - privatising whole sections of the Ministry of Defence, a £15 billion contract for MoD training, the coastguard service, the liberalising of the Post Office.
"Individual members are now asking: 'Why isn't our union backing someone who's backing us?'" he says.
While it has been suggested that there's no point in backing McDonnell's campaign because he has little chance of even getting past the first hurdle, the MP points out that the same argument has been used before.
"That was the explicit argument used in the debates around whether anyone should vote for Derek Simpson or Tony Woodley," he points out.
"Exactly the same arguments were used. They did win, because people had the confidence and courage to vote and organise on the basis of principle."
'People feel completely powerless, so they create their own world through drugs or try to satisfy themselves through consumerism.'
Nevertheless, McDonnell remains confident that, if he can secure sufficient nominations, a majority of rank-and-file trade union members will use their vote to back his campaign.
The MP chuckles when asked whether the McDonnell campaign is just about winning the leadership.
"If it was just about achieving position," he laughs, "I'd have picked up every right-wing policy that new Labour is pursuing and portrayed myself as a new Labour politician. I'd most likely be in the Cabinet by now and be what the Guardian would call 'a serious candidate.'
"It isn't about that at all. What this is about is saying: 'Here's a set of ideas. Do we share these ideas? Can we move forward? Can we build a movement around them?
"That doesn't undermine the seriousness of wanting to become the leader of the Labour Party, because if we could achieve that objective, it would give us such strength in developing the arguments and giving us another platform from which we can advocate our policies."
He raises again the Guardian piece that has caused all the trouble with Meacher over the past few days.
"Why is Gordon Brown desperate not to have me stand?
"I don't necessarily think he's worried about losing. What he and his colleagues are worried about in new Labour is that, if I stand, it will demonstrate that there is overwhelming support for our ideas and that might well be translated into a significant vote - and I'm confident about that, both in trade unions and among local Labour Party members.
"What we'll have done is we'll have recreated the broad church of the Labour Party.
"Once we've done that, there is no leader who wants to win the next election that can ignore that that force has re-emerged. Whether it be in changing policy or the composition of government, any leader who wants to win the next election will have to take that into account."
To many, it may seem like a challenge too far, but McDonnell is having none of it.
"The worst thing about society at the moment is that people feel completely alienated and powerless," he says.
"It results in people creating their own world through drugs or trying to satisfy themselves through consumerism or being left completely isolated.
"What we're saying is: 'Well, actually, you can become part of a movement that can tackle those issues and your contribution is as valuable as anyone's."
"Whether we win the leadership election campaign or not, whether we're on the ballot paper or not, what we've built is a movement for the next stage of our campaign."

Wednesday, 2 May 2007

NO, I'M NOT A BLAIR BABE!


A man called Joseph posts on our local website. He won't be voting Labour as he wants to give Blair "a kicking." Blair is "my man", he says, because I'm in the Labour Party. I am known locally for campaigning on national issues So he won't be voting Labour. Even though he acknowledges I am anti-war and anti-Blair .The logic of which mostly escapes me.But I have to note where he is coming from.
Four years ago, three years ago, two years ago, one year ago. Blair was the major problem. Unfortunately, despite his announcement on the news last night that a departure date is due next week, it seems he still is for many people. Despite the fact he won't even be in the GOVERNMENT in a few weeks ( and expect a by-election soon in Sedgefield).People have simply had enough - and they want to protest. It's illogical, unfair, unjust. And very tough on all the thousands of candidates up and down the country. Well, I've done my best to answer this guy's points. Am just off out to deliver last leaflets.
Tomorrow night, will be working in my home town of Manchester where, actually, the "Blair kicking" era is now largely over. I expect a friend of mine (Kath Fry, good left-winger) to re-gain her council seat in Whalley Range. How did they do it? Largely by re-branding themselves "Manchester Labour" and distancing from national policy. To be fair, Manchester has also benefitted hugely from central government funding. The city council has a great track-record , which helps......I won't know the actual results round here till Friday, which is when West Yorkshire in its bizarre wisdom holds the count. Lots of BNP candidates. Hope the news isn't too bad. At the last count (picture above with local MP Chris McCafferty) our local The Fox And Goose had record takings. Let's hope against hope that this year it's for the right reasons.

Tuesday, 1 May 2007

PAXO MAKES MINCEMEAT OUT OF HAZEL


Poor old Hazel Blears. Boxed into a corner big-style by Jeremy Paxman tonight on Newsnight.What a car crash it was. Now I have "form" with Hazel. I actually voted for her as the Salford PPC when she stood as "soft left" candidate on the retirement of Stan Orme MP. That left-wing stuff didn't last long onceshe becamean MP. Mind you, I also had "form" with Stan Orme. I lambasted him at the Grand Hotel in Brighton at Party Conference in 1981 when he didn't vote for Tony Benn but that's an entirely different story.
I think Hazel means well, she cares about her local community, and she is from a solid Labour background. But she does not have an independent thought in her head.To see her parrotting "the line" on Newsnight illustrates exactly why people are so sick and tired of New Labour. No straight answers, refusing to tackle issues head-on, or even admit there might, er, be a problem with policies or personalities. Paxman rang rings round her.The words "rabbit" and "headlights" spring to mind. Deputy Leader? I don't think so.
Still, better news pollwise from Scotland. I sincerely hope people like Elaine Smith do OK. Now there's a woman who really does speak her mind.She would be more than a match for Jezzer.

TEN YEARS ON.........

Ignorance is bliss.Thus it was 10 years ago that I sat happily over a Turkish meze dinner with a friend following Tony Blair's arrival in Number 10."We were elected as New Labour, and we will govern as New Labour," he had just told a grateful nation. The thing was that most of didn't quite know what that meant. Well, we certainly do now.
I'd just like to say that sometimes we/I need reminding that this Govt HAS done good things. Earlier today, I was talking to a Minister who shall remain nameless -let's just say his dad is voting for a very maverick leadership ticket. Anyway, he was waxing lyrical about how under Labour we had done much to assuage global poverty, helped write off billions in Third World debt, and the "fantastic" job which Blair and Brown had done at the G8 summit and so on. Now I accept that's probably true .I also accept the Northern Ireland peace process, minimum wage, SureStart, and the money invested in health and education. But I honestly think most of the electorate have forgotten.
I think they are tired of being patronised and preached at, tired of seeing British soldiers being brought back in coffins, tired of sleaze , and what they perceive as the sheer hypocrisy at the top.
Now maybe that's unfair. After all, even the most rebellious of Labour rebels vote WITH the Govt about 75 percent of the time. I concede Gordon Brown MUST have good intentions.It''s just what he is saying that is the problem. More of the same. More New Labour. More fights against the "war on terror." It is all deeply disheartening. On Thursday, judging from the levels of public vitriol being hurled at Blair ( Socialist Worker has already switched its tack to Unite Against Brown) I think it will be far worse than anyone is expecting.The irony is that he is now doing what many of us in the Party asked him to a couple of years ago. He's going. But it's too little, too late. People still want to give him a "kicking." And Brown is now just as much associated with what has become a tainted brand.
According to my interviewee, we need "more straightforward politics." That's absolutely right. No spin, no sleaze, honest opinions, and honest difference of opinions. Unless Labour's "broad church" is allowed to congregate once again , and Brown starts listening instead of pontificating, he really is courting disaster. And, if he somehow manages to scupper a leadership contest, he is courting the biggest disaster of all. A Tory Government.

MAY DAY, MAY DAY......


From today's Sun .Gordon speaks courtesy of his big chum RupertMurdoch. A nation shakes its head in disbelief.......and many Labour Party members feel very queasy indeed. It could be from Private Eye, but frankly it's beyond satire. Well done Number 11 spin doctors. Thousands more votes go down the pan.......
"When I think of the hours we spent sharing a Commons office in the 1980s, debating how the Labour Party might become New Labour and how we could fight for the great causes of our age, he has been right to say that what binds Britain and America together is the shared beliefs in liberty, democracy and the dignity of every single individual that both our countries value.
I am honoured to call Tony my oldest friend in politics, of course with the inevitable ups and downs along the way, but still the longest partnership between Prime Minister and Chancellor for 200 years.
Honoured to have worked with him to create a Britain that is stronger, fairer and more prosperous than that bright morning back in 1997 when Tony first walked up Downing Street — a Britain which can hold its head up high in the world."
NB: April 29 Sunday Times front page: "Super-rich Treble Wealth In Last 10 Years"