I have finally managed to get to here with no idea what the blog will look like but I am far behind so let me RANT first . 5 days till Christmas doesn't matter when you aren't in the mood for Christmas, just getting it here and gone is good.
court did not happen trial postponed my attorney was unavailable. WTF??? expensive attorneys are not always the answer.
crazy fukr is still crazyin his trial brief he says he is 62. he is 63. I will copy from here and maybe it will help me to understand.
" Mr. Larmore is a 62 year old Veteran of the Vietnam War and suffers from chronic post-traumatic stress disorder, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, marijuana use(Washington State certified for medical use), bilateral inguinal hernia, restless leg syndrome, chronic low back pain, reflux disease, hearing loss and chronic right ankle pain. While serving in one of his three tours, he was injured and many of his fellow soldiers were killed. During this event, he was traveling in the back of the vehicle when he got "a funny feeling" and moved to the front. Several moments later the vehicle was hit and he was wounded. Most of the men who were sitting in the back, the area he left, were either severely injured or killed.
The Parties separated in December 2010 and have lived separately since then(I went to take care of my Mother then we separated when I kicked him out of Pine St. March 1st, 2011)
LAW:
RCW 26.09.090 sets out the statutory framework for determination of an award of spousal maintenance. It is to be read in conjunction with RCW26.09.080,- the disposition of property and debt. Generally any factors but fault can be considered by the court as to the award. maintenance is not meant to be a "perpetual lien" on the earnings or income of the other spouse. hogberg vs hogberg, 64WNblablabla (1964) "It is not the policy of the law to place a permanent responsibility upon a divorced spouse to support a former wife; she is under an obligation to prepare herself so that she might be self supporting." (here I must say if this WAS the POLICY would it stop people like Mr Larmore from marrying fleecing and being free to divorce and do it again? he knew what he was doing so well, he took every THING. and still is claiming I have his stuff...but I digress)
Cleaver vs Cleaver (1977)..... Maintenance is meant to be a "flexible tool" to attain a just result.
in re the marriage of Washburn, 101Wn 2d 168,677 P.2d152 (1984).
Among the relevant factors are:
1. Financial feasibility. Mr. Larmore has a 70% disability Veterans award and Social Security benefits that total about 3600a month. ( yeah as of dec 2010 that was close to his income.) while Mrs. Larmore has Social Security benefits of 1234 a month. Mr Larmore is attempting to become gainfully employed. which will reduce the benefit amount he receives.(Mrs Larmore became 100% disabled during the relationship)
2. Duration of marriage this is a short term marriage of five years. (cant tell his own age and cant tell he just went past our 7th anniversary)
3.Age. Mr Larmore is 62 years old, DOB 12-07-49 and Mrs. Larmore is 49 years old, DOB 08-04-63.
4. Emotional condition; both parties have psychological and physical limitations.(yes we do, but I did not use his limitations to take from him, as he used my brain injury to get money out of my retirement account.)
5.Standard of living; While together, the parties had a modest lifestyle. (really? my 269,000. and his 289,000. from 2005 thru 2010, that is how much money {most of it tax free dollars} we PISSED through. and what do I have to show for it ?? bankruptcy in 2010; foreclosure in 2011; car repo-ed in 2011; I live with my son. I have scrap stuff and he still wants half.)
RCW26.09.090 governs the disposition of property. Mr Larmore has previously submitted a property list to the court and requests the return of his property.
( he had 3 months alone in our home while I was taking care of my Mother after her surgery, he had already sent the house into foreclosure, he started moving his stuff to the shop before we got official word of the foreclosure, he knew what was happening, and when I found out about Angela Harper-Snyder, I told him to move out by March 1st, I wanted whatever time was left to me in my home without him there. he had all that time to get his stuff out or to hire someone to do it for him, he had no bills, other than shop rent. EVERY THING that he left at Pine st is GONE. I walked away from it. I paid someone to take my scrap stuff and my personal furniture(that I had before Mr Larmore came around), to my bedroom and scrap room IN my SONS home.
both of us had lists with the court. I only had one, repeated it twice, and still haven't got the items on it. I was boxing up his private stuff in March, April, and May of 2011 and my son was taking it to him by the carload until Johnnie called my son a thief and a liar in court. )
Discussion:
Both parties have significant mental and physical limitations. They have been separated since 2010, their marital residence has been foreclosed and they have been involved in a very contentious case in which there is little to fight about. Mr Larmore should be allowed to get his property back. In July of 2011, this court ordered Mr Larmore to pay $500. a month as spousal support to Mrs Larmore but he has failed to do so. He alleges that Mrs. Larmore is an avid scrapbooker and is able to drive substantial distances to attend functions. After various discussions about the need to finalize this dissolution, he now recognizes the need to follow the courts decisions and is willing to commit himself to do so. he offers to pay Mrs. Larmore $500 a month as spousal support for a total of three years.
all submitted on 12-12-12.
so what is all of this BS can anyone tell me ? and can any one tell me how the heck to come out ahead?
