Friday, March 23, 2007
Knut
Awwww ...

"First Polar Bear Born in Berlin Zoo in 30 Years"
Knut makes his debut ...
"Knut Woos the Crowds at First Public Appearance"

"First Polar Bear Born in Berlin Zoo in 30 Years"
Knut makes his debut ...
"Knut Woos the Crowds at First Public Appearance"
Tuesday, March 20, 2007
Pet owners beware: Pet food recall
An ingredient used in a lot of common pet food brands may be causing many pets to get very sick, even die.
Menu Foods is recalling certain gravy-style pet food in cans and pouches it made from Dec. 3 to March 6. This includes common brands, such as Iams, Eukanuba, and Science Diet, that use products from Menu Foods.
"Pet Food Co. Knew Of Problem Last Month"
"Bay Area Pet Owners Frustrated Over Recall"
Recall lists and information
Menu Foods is recalling certain gravy-style pet food in cans and pouches it made from Dec. 3 to March 6. This includes common brands, such as Iams, Eukanuba, and Science Diet, that use products from Menu Foods.
"Pet Food Co. Knew Of Problem Last Month"
"Bay Area Pet Owners Frustrated Over Recall"
Recall lists and information
Thursday, March 15, 2007
'Slanted eyes'
Listening to NPR this evening on my way home, I heard the end of the "All Things Considered" program on Canada's CBC radio. It caught my attention because I heard "slant eyes."
Basically, André Boisclair, who is the leader of the Parti Québécois in Quebec, used the French phrase "les yeux bridés" to refer to the Asian students he saw at Harvard University. I guess the phrase translates to "slanted eyes" or "slanting eyes" in English.
He was later questioned by reporters about the use of the phrase and refused to apologize even after being told what it meant in English and how offensive it is to Asians.
What?! Does "Asian" not translate in French? I guess he said people in Quebec would understand him. Yes, I'm sure people would know what he meant, but that doesn't excuse such ignorance and idiocy.
Here's a link to the radio show:
CBC Radio Show Program Logs, March 15, 2007 (I couldn't get it to work, though.)
Listen to Part 2 of the program, should be toward the end of the segment. It includes Boisclair responding to reporters' questions. A synopsis is also below:
I just found an article about Boisclair and his response to some homophobic comments. Article states that he is openly gay ...
"Boisclair responds to homophobic slurs"
So he said, "Homophobia exists, but I feel these words are very insulting for the people of Saguenay–Lac-St-Jean."
Then I see on the side this related news story: "Boisclair defends derogatory comments"
The article includes the statement in which he used "les yeux bridés" ...
"'The reality is these countries are not just working to create jobs in sweatshops," he said. 'When I was in Boston, where I spent a year, I was surprised to see that on campus, about one-third of the students doing their bachelor degrees had les yeux bridés (slanting eyes).'
"Boisclair stood his ground Thursday, and said he will not withdraw the comment, which he said is an acceptable expression in French.
'If the translation in English has a different meaning than the one in French, then I didn't use the word in English, I used it in French, and no way will I excuse myself.'"
So I guess it was too difficult for him to say "about one-third of the students doing their bachelor degrees were Asian."
Basically, André Boisclair, who is the leader of the Parti Québécois in Quebec, used the French phrase "les yeux bridés" to refer to the Asian students he saw at Harvard University. I guess the phrase translates to "slanted eyes" or "slanting eyes" in English.
He was later questioned by reporters about the use of the phrase and refused to apologize even after being told what it meant in English and how offensive it is to Asians.
What?! Does "Asian" not translate in French? I guess he said people in Quebec would understand him. Yes, I'm sure people would know what he meant, but that doesn't excuse such ignorance and idiocy.
Here's a link to the radio show:
CBC Radio Show Program Logs, March 15, 2007 (I couldn't get it to work, though.)
Listen to Part 2 of the program, should be toward the end of the segment. It includes Boisclair responding to reporters' questions. A synopsis is also below:
Les yeux bridés -- "slanted eyes".
That's the expression André Boisclair used yesterday to describe Asian students. The Parti Quebecois leader was campaigning in Trois Rivières when he made the comment.
Boisclair was referring to the number of Asian students he saw while studying at Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts. He told the Quebec students he was surprised that about one-third of the Harvard students had what he called "slanting eyes."
Today, when questioned by reporters, Boisclair refused to apologise for the comment, which he says is common in French.
I just found an article about Boisclair and his response to some homophobic comments. Article states that he is openly gay ...
"Boisclair responds to homophobic slurs"
So he said, "Homophobia exists, but I feel these words are very insulting for the people of Saguenay–Lac-St-Jean."
Then I see on the side this related news story: "Boisclair defends derogatory comments"
The article includes the statement in which he used "les yeux bridés" ...
"'The reality is these countries are not just working to create jobs in sweatshops," he said. 'When I was in Boston, where I spent a year, I was surprised to see that on campus, about one-third of the students doing their bachelor degrees had les yeux bridés (slanting eyes).'
"Boisclair stood his ground Thursday, and said he will not withdraw the comment, which he said is an acceptable expression in French.
'If the translation in English has a different meaning than the one in French, then I didn't use the word in English, I used it in French, and no way will I excuse myself.'"
So I guess it was too difficult for him to say "about one-third of the students doing their bachelor degrees were Asian."
Thursday, March 08, 2007
Japan to start new investigation into WWII sexual slavery
"Japan to Probe WWII Military Brothels"
"Under intense pressure from Asia and the United States, Prime Minister Shinzo Abe said Thursday that ruling party lawmakers will conduct a fresh investigation into the Japanese military's forced sexual slavery of women during World War II.
"Abe triggered outrage in China, North and South Korea and the Philippines last week by saying there was no proof the women were coerced. He said Monday that Japan will not apologize again for the Japanese military's 'comfort stations.'"
"Historians say that about 200,000 women — mostly from Korea and China — served in Japanese military brothels throughout Asia in the 1930s and 1940s. Accounts of abuse by the military have been backed up by witnesses, and even former Japanese soldiers.
"Abe's statement contradicted evidence in Japanese documents, unearthed in 1992, that historians said showed that military authorities had a direct role in working with contractors to forcibly procure women for the brothels."
Updated (3/8/06):
Found this article from March 1 (bolding mine) ...
"Japan's Abe: No proof of WWII sex slaves"
Updated 4/11/07:
Found this interesting article ...
"Historian documents Japan's role in sex slavery"
"Under intense pressure from Asia and the United States, Prime Minister Shinzo Abe said Thursday that ruling party lawmakers will conduct a fresh investigation into the Japanese military's forced sexual slavery of women during World War II.
"Abe triggered outrage in China, North and South Korea and the Philippines last week by saying there was no proof the women were coerced. He said Monday that Japan will not apologize again for the Japanese military's 'comfort stations.'"
"Historians say that about 200,000 women — mostly from Korea and China — served in Japanese military brothels throughout Asia in the 1930s and 1940s. Accounts of abuse by the military have been backed up by witnesses, and even former Japanese soldiers.
"Abe's statement contradicted evidence in Japanese documents, unearthed in 1992, that historians said showed that military authorities had a direct role in working with contractors to forcibly procure women for the brothels."
Updated (3/8/06):
Found this article from March 1 (bolding mine) ...
"Japan's Abe: No proof of WWII sex slaves"
Before Abe spoke Thursday, a group of ruling Liberal Democratic Party lawmakers discussed their plans to push for an official revision of Kono's 1993 apology.
Nariaki Nakayama, chairman of the group of about 120 lawmakers, sought to play down the government's involvement in the brothels by saying it was similar to a school that hires a company to run its cafeteria.
"Some say it is useful to compare the brothels to college cafeterias run by private companies, who recruit their own staff, procure foodstuffs, and set prices," he said.
"Where there's demand, businesses crop up ... but to say women were forced by the Japanese military into service is off the mark," he said. "This issue must be reconsidered, based on truth ... for the sake of Japanese honor."
Updated 4/11/07:
Found this interesting article ...
"Historian documents Japan's role in sex slavery"
Monday, March 05, 2007
Grammar Girl to the rescue!
Heard a brief segment on NPR this morning about podcasts by Grammar Girl. Just checked out her blog, which has some posts and podcasts about some common grammar questions and mistakes. She includes some good examples, too. Guess she's been getting a lot of press these days.
Friday, March 02, 2007
U.S. Rep. Honda calls for formal Japanese apology for comfort women
Last night on NPR, I caught the last part of a segment from the "As It Happens" CBC radio show. U.S. Representative Mike Honda was being interviewed about the resolution he introduced in Congress that calls on the "government of Japan to formally and unambiguously apologize for and acknowledge the tragedy that comfort women endured at the hands of its Imperial Army during World War II."
I did a search online and found he introduced the resolution on January 31. Here's a press release with the full text of Rep. Honda's statement.
"These women ... endured gang rape, forced abortions, humiliation, and sexual violence resulting in mutilation, death, or eventual suicide—and to this date, they have still not received justice from this tragedy."
Honda addresses the issue that Japan has already apologized to these women:
"Some question whether this resolution is necessary and warn that it could affect our nation's strong friendship and alliance with Japan. Some even argue that Japan has already apologized, and this resolution fails to recognize that. It is true that Japan's previous Prime Ministers have issued statements related to comfort women. However, it is clear that these statements are not viewed by the government of Japan with unequivocal respect, and the comfort women themselves do not consider them formal apologies. Japan has equivocated in its stance on this issue, which is made clear in their recent attempts to alter previous public statements and their school textbooks.
"For example, in 1993, Japan's then Chief Cabinet Secretary Yohei Kono issued an encouraging statement regarding Japan's comfort women, which expressed the Government's sincere apologies and remorse for their ordeal. Today, some members of Japan's Liberal Democratic Party strive to review and even possibly rescind Secretary Kono's statement.
"Further, the Japanese government continues to seek to downplay the comfort women system in its textbooks. We must ask ourselves, if Japan has truly come to terms with its past in acknowledging what its Imperial Army forced upon these women, why are they suppressing the knowledge of this through education? Education on this tragedy is important to ensure that future violence against women, especially in conflicts, should not be tolerated or repeated. Textbook suppression, coupled with efforts to revise Secretary Kono's 1993 statement, is disheartening and indicates that Japan wavers in its apology to these women."
Honda stated that only a few hundred of the comfort women are still alive. In his statement he said:
"Madam Speaker, to put it frankly, the few surviving comfort women in the world who live with this burden are dying. We must help them achieve some peace of mind by moving this resolution forward. For the women who survived this brutality, this resolution demonstrates that our nation supports them and hears their voices calling for justice."
At the end of the radio show, what really upset me was the final comment by the radio announcer that Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe has stated that there is no evidence that these women were coerced into sexual slavery.
I find it interesting how the different news organizations handle this subject, leaving out certain information or focusing on certain aspects.
Just check out the following headlines and articles (Reuters especially):
"WWII Sex Slaves Testify Against Japan" (AP on sfgate.com)
"Jan Ruff O'Herne, 'Comfort Woman' Survivor, to Testify Before Congress February 15" (PR Newswire)
"As the first Caucasian 'Comfort Women' survivor to speak out, O'Herne's presence will contribute to maintaining the focus as a women's human rights issue, rather than an Asian regional politics issue."
"At U.S. hearing, WW2 sex slaves spurn Japan apologies" (Reuters)
"WWII sex slaves in Japan seek U.S. help" (AP on msnbc.com)
"Rep. Honda asking Japan for apology to sex slaves" (San Jose Mercury News)
"Japan's WWII sex slaves testify" (cnn.com)
Updated (3/5/07):
"Japan Resists Call to Apologize for War Practice"
I did a search online and found he introduced the resolution on January 31. Here's a press release with the full text of Rep. Honda's statement.
"These women ... endured gang rape, forced abortions, humiliation, and sexual violence resulting in mutilation, death, or eventual suicide—and to this date, they have still not received justice from this tragedy."
Honda addresses the issue that Japan has already apologized to these women:
"Some question whether this resolution is necessary and warn that it could affect our nation's strong friendship and alliance with Japan. Some even argue that Japan has already apologized, and this resolution fails to recognize that. It is true that Japan's previous Prime Ministers have issued statements related to comfort women. However, it is clear that these statements are not viewed by the government of Japan with unequivocal respect, and the comfort women themselves do not consider them formal apologies. Japan has equivocated in its stance on this issue, which is made clear in their recent attempts to alter previous public statements and their school textbooks.
"For example, in 1993, Japan's then Chief Cabinet Secretary Yohei Kono issued an encouraging statement regarding Japan's comfort women, which expressed the Government's sincere apologies and remorse for their ordeal. Today, some members of Japan's Liberal Democratic Party strive to review and even possibly rescind Secretary Kono's statement.
"Further, the Japanese government continues to seek to downplay the comfort women system in its textbooks. We must ask ourselves, if Japan has truly come to terms with its past in acknowledging what its Imperial Army forced upon these women, why are they suppressing the knowledge of this through education? Education on this tragedy is important to ensure that future violence against women, especially in conflicts, should not be tolerated or repeated. Textbook suppression, coupled with efforts to revise Secretary Kono's 1993 statement, is disheartening and indicates that Japan wavers in its apology to these women."
Honda stated that only a few hundred of the comfort women are still alive. In his statement he said:
"Madam Speaker, to put it frankly, the few surviving comfort women in the world who live with this burden are dying. We must help them achieve some peace of mind by moving this resolution forward. For the women who survived this brutality, this resolution demonstrates that our nation supports them and hears their voices calling for justice."
At the end of the radio show, what really upset me was the final comment by the radio announcer that Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe has stated that there is no evidence that these women were coerced into sexual slavery.
I find it interesting how the different news organizations handle this subject, leaving out certain information or focusing on certain aspects.
Just check out the following headlines and articles (Reuters especially):
"WWII Sex Slaves Testify Against Japan" (AP on sfgate.com)
"Jan Ruff O'Herne, 'Comfort Woman' Survivor, to Testify Before Congress February 15" (PR Newswire)
"As the first Caucasian 'Comfort Women' survivor to speak out, O'Herne's presence will contribute to maintaining the focus as a women's human rights issue, rather than an Asian regional politics issue."
"At U.S. hearing, WW2 sex slaves spurn Japan apologies" (Reuters)
"WWII sex slaves in Japan seek U.S. help" (AP on msnbc.com)
"Rep. Honda asking Japan for apology to sex slaves" (San Jose Mercury News)
"Japan's WWII sex slaves testify" (cnn.com)
Updated (3/5/07):
"Japan Resists Call to Apologize for War Practice"
A lovely trio
The Ahn Trio will be performing Saturday at the College of St. Catherine in St. Paul for its Women of Substance series. The StarTribune has a nice write-up on the South Korean sisters ...
"Rock Ahn, sisters"
"Rock Ahn, sisters"
Thursday, March 01, 2007
SFIAAFF 2007
Tickets are now available for walk-up purchase for the 2007 San Francisco International Asian American Film Festival. Get 'em while they're still availabe!
I've got mine already. You got yours?
Check out the Web site for a descriptions of this year's films. Some interesting ones to note:
"And Thereafter II" (South Korea/U.S.)
Award-winning filmmaker Hosup Lee continues his exploration into the protracted aftermath of the Korean War with "And Thereafter II," the second in his trilogy of documentaries on Korean military brides.
"Koryo Saram—The Unreliable People" (U.S.)
In 1937, Josef Stalin began a campaign of massive ethnic cleansing, forcibly deporting everyone of Korean origin in Far East Russia to the unsettled steppe country of Central Asia, 3700 miles away. Y. David Chung and Matt Dibble's groundbreaking documentary charts the extraordinary untold history of the Koryo Saram (the Soviet Korean phrase for Korean person), dubbed "The Unreliable People" by Stalin. Through never-before-seen historical footage and emotional personal accounts from the original Koryo Saram, a lost history is pieced together, one that survived Stalin's mandate to eradicate the Korean language and tradition. Whether in Kazakh, Korean or Russian, the film asks questions that all immigrants can relate to: how to hold onto one's traditions, and how to save one's culture from being overwhelmed.
"Made In Korea: A One Way Ticket Seoul-Amsterdam?"
(The Netherlands)
Documentary filmmaker In-Soo Radstake is just like any average Dutchman. He feels close to his parents, likes meat and potatoes and cheers on his favorite sports team. A Korean adoptee, he doesn't feel conflicted about his identity or have any deep stirrings to find his Korean roots. But when he embarks on an innocent journey to find the eight other Korean adoptees who flew on the same plane as him from Korea to Holland over twenty years ago, a domino effect of events will alter his life. He first meets Ungila, and is taken by her knowledge of Korean culture and her personal story of being reunited with her birthmother. She quickly becomes In-Soo's girlfriend, and is instrumental in opening up a world of wounded, pent-up emotions. With her love and support, In-Soo travels back to Korea for the first time and visits his old orphanage. Soon a long-repressed need to find his birthmother bubbles to the surface, and In-Soo is on a desperate quest to reconcile a part of himself that he didn't even know existed.
"Tie a Yellow Ribbon" (U.S.)
New York filmmaker Joy Dietrich, who showcased her short film SURPLUS at SFIAAFF ‘01, returns with a feature-length film on the lives of three Asian American women desperately needing to feel some kind of connection. Jenny Mason, a jagged Korean adoptee, is unable to let go of her family's past, and refuses to let anyone in emotionally. An aspiring photographer, her work’s visceral beauty seems frozen in time, much like her own inner turmoil. Her life intersects with two other Asian American women, Bea and Sandy. Bea, a delicate beauty, is afraid to be alone and doesn't know how to handle the silent expectations placed on her. Sandy, dubbed a "mouse," is a skittish, shy girl who can't seem to find her own voice enough to be respected and noticed. As Bea and Sandy struggle to find love, acceptance and connection, they help Jenny see how she must stop running and face her own damaged past. "Tie a Yellow Ribbon" is a rare view into the very real, emotionally complex interior of a Korean adoptee who needs to reconcile her feelings on race, identity and family, complexes that have nothing to do with a birth-mother search. One of the first feature films to address the abnormally high rates of suicide and depression among Asian American women, this groundbreaking work entices and challenges us to look at the hard, imperfect struggles that Asian American women face on a daily basis.
And some other films from South Korea and Korean filmmakers: "The Day a Pig Fell Into the Well," "In Between Days," "The Power of Kangwon Province," "Turning Gate," "Virgin Stripped Bare by Her Bachelors," "Woman Is the Future of Man," and "Woman on the Beach."
And some others I thought sounded interesting: "American Pastime," "New Year Baby," "The Wash," and "Year of the Fish."
Last year I bought the Festival 6 Pack (six films for the price of five), but this year I limited myself to only three films (buying tickets so hubby can go, too, gets very expensive). Sigh. At least a few that I wanted to see are available on NetFlix.
See you at the theater!
I've got mine already. You got yours?
Check out the Web site for a descriptions of this year's films. Some interesting ones to note:
"And Thereafter II" (South Korea/U.S.)
Award-winning filmmaker Hosup Lee continues his exploration into the protracted aftermath of the Korean War with "And Thereafter II," the second in his trilogy of documentaries on Korean military brides.
"Koryo Saram—The Unreliable People" (U.S.)
In 1937, Josef Stalin began a campaign of massive ethnic cleansing, forcibly deporting everyone of Korean origin in Far East Russia to the unsettled steppe country of Central Asia, 3700 miles away. Y. David Chung and Matt Dibble's groundbreaking documentary charts the extraordinary untold history of the Koryo Saram (the Soviet Korean phrase for Korean person), dubbed "The Unreliable People" by Stalin. Through never-before-seen historical footage and emotional personal accounts from the original Koryo Saram, a lost history is pieced together, one that survived Stalin's mandate to eradicate the Korean language and tradition. Whether in Kazakh, Korean or Russian, the film asks questions that all immigrants can relate to: how to hold onto one's traditions, and how to save one's culture from being overwhelmed.
"Made In Korea: A One Way Ticket Seoul-Amsterdam?"
(The Netherlands)
Documentary filmmaker In-Soo Radstake is just like any average Dutchman. He feels close to his parents, likes meat and potatoes and cheers on his favorite sports team. A Korean adoptee, he doesn't feel conflicted about his identity or have any deep stirrings to find his Korean roots. But when he embarks on an innocent journey to find the eight other Korean adoptees who flew on the same plane as him from Korea to Holland over twenty years ago, a domino effect of events will alter his life. He first meets Ungila, and is taken by her knowledge of Korean culture and her personal story of being reunited with her birthmother. She quickly becomes In-Soo's girlfriend, and is instrumental in opening up a world of wounded, pent-up emotions. With her love and support, In-Soo travels back to Korea for the first time and visits his old orphanage. Soon a long-repressed need to find his birthmother bubbles to the surface, and In-Soo is on a desperate quest to reconcile a part of himself that he didn't even know existed.
"Tie a Yellow Ribbon" (U.S.)
New York filmmaker Joy Dietrich, who showcased her short film SURPLUS at SFIAAFF ‘01, returns with a feature-length film on the lives of three Asian American women desperately needing to feel some kind of connection. Jenny Mason, a jagged Korean adoptee, is unable to let go of her family's past, and refuses to let anyone in emotionally. An aspiring photographer, her work’s visceral beauty seems frozen in time, much like her own inner turmoil. Her life intersects with two other Asian American women, Bea and Sandy. Bea, a delicate beauty, is afraid to be alone and doesn't know how to handle the silent expectations placed on her. Sandy, dubbed a "mouse," is a skittish, shy girl who can't seem to find her own voice enough to be respected and noticed. As Bea and Sandy struggle to find love, acceptance and connection, they help Jenny see how she must stop running and face her own damaged past. "Tie a Yellow Ribbon" is a rare view into the very real, emotionally complex interior of a Korean adoptee who needs to reconcile her feelings on race, identity and family, complexes that have nothing to do with a birth-mother search. One of the first feature films to address the abnormally high rates of suicide and depression among Asian American women, this groundbreaking work entices and challenges us to look at the hard, imperfect struggles that Asian American women face on a daily basis.
And some other films from South Korea and Korean filmmakers: "The Day a Pig Fell Into the Well," "In Between Days," "The Power of Kangwon Province," "Turning Gate," "Virgin Stripped Bare by Her Bachelors," "Woman Is the Future of Man," and "Woman on the Beach."
And some others I thought sounded interesting: "American Pastime," "New Year Baby," "The Wash," and "Year of the Fish."
Last year I bought the Festival 6 Pack (six films for the price of five), but this year I limited myself to only three films (buying tickets so hubby can go, too, gets very expensive). Sigh. At least a few that I wanted to see are available on NetFlix.
See you at the theater!
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
