Mail Index

• Thread Index

• [wg-c] Re: [wg-c-1] First question
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: [wg-c-1] First question
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Statement of Interest
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Re: Mechanics (divertimento from First Question]
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Re: Mechanics (divertimento from First Question]
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Re: [wg-c-1] First question
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Committee membership?
  • From: Ivan Pope <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: [wg-c-1] First question
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Re: [wg-c-1] First question
  • From: "Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M." <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: [wg-c-1] First question
  • From: "Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M." <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: [wg-c-1] First question
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: [wg-c-1] First question
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] WG Chairs
  • From: Javier SOLA <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Cross-posting
  • From: Javier SOLA <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: [wg-c-1] First question
  • From: "Siegfried Langenbach" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs
  • From: "Siegfried Langenbach" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs
  • From: Eva Fr�lich <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] WG Chairs
  • From: Ivan Pope <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Discussions of process impacting entire WG
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Agreement on method for consensus determination
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Agreement on method for consensus determination
  • From: Jean-Michel Becar <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Agreement on method for consensus determination
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Agreement on method for consensus determination
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Agreement on method for consensus determination
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c-1] Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs
  • From: Eva Fr�lich <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Agreement on method for consensus determination
  • From: "Siegfried Langenbach" <[email protected]>
• SV: [wg-c] Agreement on method for consensus determination
  • From: "Petter Rindforth" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs
  • From: Javier SOLA <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Disclosure
  • From: Javier <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Agreement on method for consensus determination
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Creating new gTLDs
  • From: Ivan Pope <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Re: [wg-c-1] WORK: Question #1 New GTLDs
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Re: [wg-c-1] WORK: Question #1 New GTLDs
  • From: Ivan Pope <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Merging WG1 and WG3
  • From: Ivan Pope <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Javier, what are you doing?
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• FW: [wg-c] Agreement on method for consensus determination
  • From: [email protected]
• [wg-c] wg-c-3 discussion mandate
  • From: Ivan Pope <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Merging WG1 and WG3
  • From: "Siegfried Langenbach" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: [wg-c-1] WORK: Question #1 New GTLDs
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Merging WG1 and WG3
  • From: Javier <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Merging WG1 and WG3
  • From: Ivan Pope <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Merging WG1 and WG3
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Merging WG1 and WG3
  • From: Javier <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] WG questions
  • From: Ivan Pope <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: [wg-c-1] WORK: Question #1 New GTLDs
  • From: "Siegfried Langenbach" <[email protected]>
• (Fwd) FW: [wg-c] Agreement on method for consensus determinati
  • From: "Siegfried Langenbach" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Merging WG1 and WG3
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] WG questions
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] New TLDs
  • From: Mark Measday <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: [wg-c-1] WORK: Question #1 New GTLDs
  • From: [email protected]
• Re: [wg-c] Re: [wg-c-1] WORK: Question #1 New GTLDs
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: [wg-c-1] WORK: Question #1 New GTLDs
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Re: [wg-c-3] Notes on new gTLD registries
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Re: [IFWP] Javier, what are you doing?
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• Oops -- [wg-c] Re: [wg-c-3] Notes on new gTLD registries
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: [wg-c-3] Notes on new gTLD registries
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Re: [wg-c-1] Compromise
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: [wg-c-3] Notes on new gTLD registries
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: [wg-c-1] Compromise
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Re: Oops --
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] competing models
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Re: [wg-c-1] WORK: Question #1 New GTLDs
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: [wg-c-1] WORK: Question #1 New GTLDs
  • From: "Ken Stubbs" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Re: [wg-c-1] Compromise
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: Oops -- [wg-c] Re: [wg-c-3] Notes on new gTLD registries
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] lists
  • From: Javier SOLA <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Proposing a Co-chair for WGC
  • From: Ivan Pope <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Registry-Registry Operator
  • From: Ivan Pope <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Mailing lists
  • From: Javier <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Mailing lists
  • From: "Ken Stubbs" <[email protected]>
• Re: Oops -- [wg-c] Re: [wg-c-3] Notes on new gTLD registries
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• 2nd try: Re: [wg-c] Mailing lists
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] WG questions
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] WG questions
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] RE: [wg-c-1] Consensus on having new TLDs?
  • From: Ivan Pope <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] WG questions
  • From: Ivan Pope <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] RE: [wg-c-1] Next question: Which gTLDs? How many?
  • From: Ivan Pope <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] RE: [wg-c-1] Consensus on having new TLDs?
  • From: [email protected]
• Re: [wg-c] RE: [wg-c-1] Consensus on having new TLDs?
  • From: "Rita M. Odin" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] RE: [wg-c-1] Consensus on having new TLDs?
  • From: [email protected]
• Re: [wg-c] WG questions
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] RE: [wg-c-1] Next question: Which gTLDs? How many?
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] RE: [wg-c-1] Next question: Which gTLDs? How many?
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] There is no "consensus"
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus"
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] A counterproposal
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus"
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] A counterproposal
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Next question: Which gTLDs? How many?
  • From: Javier SOLA <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] A counterproposal
  • From: Javier SOLA <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus"
  • From: Craig Simon <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] A counterproposal
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus"
  • From: Javier <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Next question: Which gTLDs? How many?
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] A counterproposal
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] A counterproposal
  • From: [email protected]
• [wg-c] definitions
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] A counterproposal
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus"
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] definitions
  • From: Craig Simon <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus"
  • From: Craig Simon <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] definitions
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] definitions
  • From: Craig Simon <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Withdrawl of name from co-chair candidacy
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus"
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Withdrawl of name from co-chair candidacy
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus"
  • From: Javier SOLA <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] A counterproposal
  • From: Javier SOLA <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus"
  • From: Onno Hovers <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] A counterproposal
  • From: "Ken Stubbs" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] A counterproposal
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Lists of new TLDs
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Geographically allocated names
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus"
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Geographically allocated names
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Geographically allocated names
  • From: Onno Hovers <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Re: Lists of new TLDs
  • From: Craig Simon <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus"
  • From: Craig Simon <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus"
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Geographically allocated names
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Geographical management of new gTLDs? (was Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus" )
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus"
  • From: [email protected]
• Re: [wg-c] Geographically allocated names
  • From: "Siegfried Langenbach" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Next question: Which gTLDs? How many?
  • From: Ivan Pope <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] gTLD Trademark Applications
  • From: Ivan Pope <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] RE: [wg-c-1] Next question: Which gTLDs? How many?
  • From: Ivan Pope <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] There is no "consensus"
  • From: [email protected]
• RE: [wg-c] Geographically allocated names
  • From: [email protected]
• (Fwd) FW: [wg-c] Geographically allocated names
  • From: "Siegfried Langenbach" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] I/O Design Initiates Legal Proceedings against CORE
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] I/O Design Initiates Legal Proceedings against CORE
  • From: Ivan Pope <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] I/O Design Initiates Legal Proceedings against CORE
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] I/O Design Initiates Legal Proceedings against CORE
  • From: "'Kent Crispin'" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] There is no "consensus"
  • From: [email protected]
• Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus"
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Geographically allocated names
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus"
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Geographically allocated names
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] I/O Design Initiates Legal Proceedings against CORE
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] I/O Design Initiates Legal Proceedings against CORE
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Geographically allocated names
  • From: "Siegfried Langenbach" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Re: working group c meeting
  • From: "Ken Stubbs" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: working group c meeting
  • From: [email protected] (J. William Semich)
• Re: [wg-c] Re: working group c meeting
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: working group c meeting
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Current list of chair candidates?
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] gTLD Trademark Applications
  • From: Rod Dixon <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Next question: Which gTLDs? How many?
  • From: Rod Dixon <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Geographically allocated names
  • From: Rod Dixon <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] I/O Design Initiates Legal Proceedings against CORE
  • From: Rod Dixon <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] I/O Design Initiates Legal Proceedings against CORE
  • From: Rod Dixon <[email protected]>
• SV: [wg-c] Re: working group c meeting
  • From: "Petter Rindforth" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus"
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] I/O Design Initiates Legal Proceedings against CORE
  • From: Javier SOLA <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus"
  • From: Javier SOLA <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs
  • From: Joop Teernstra <[email protected]>
• FW: [wg-c] Geographically allocated names
  • From: [email protected]
• [wg-c] NOMINATION for WG-C Co-Chair
  • From: [email protected] (J. William Semich)
• Re: [wg-c] Re: working group c meeting
  • From: "Ken Stubbs" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: working group c meeting
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Intellectual Property Rights and gTLDs (was: I/O DesignInitiates Legal Proceedings against CORE)
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus"
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus"
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] I/O Design Initiates Legal Proceedings against CORE
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] I/O Design Initiates Legal Proceedings against CORE
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] I/O Design Initiates Legal Proceedings against CORE
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Geographically allocated names
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus"
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: FW: [wg-c] Geographically allocated names
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs
  • From: "Siegfried Langenbach" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus"
  • From: "Siegfried Langenbach" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus"
  • From: "Siegfried Langenbach" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Chair?
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus"
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Chair?
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs
  • From: "Rita M. Odin" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus"
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus"
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus"
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] I/O Design Initiates Legal Proceedings against CORE
  • From: Javier SOLA <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus"
  • From: Javier SOLA <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] There is no "consensus"
  • From: Ivan Pope <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Importance of the Registry
  • From: Ivan Pope <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] RE: working group c meeting
  • From: Ivan Pope <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] I/O Design Initiates Legal Proceedings against CORE
  • From: Ivan Pope <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] I/O Design Initiates Legal Proceedings against CORE
  • From: [email protected] (Werner Staub)
• Re: [wg-c] RE: working group c meeting
  • From: Javier <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] I/O Design Initiates Legal Proceedings against CORE
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] RE: working group c meeting
  • From: Ivan Pope <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] RE: working group c meeting
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Re: Importance of the Registry
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] There is no "consensus"
  • From: [email protected]
• Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Re: Importance of the Registry
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] I/O Design Initiates Legal Proceedings against CORE
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Competition policy and gTLDs
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] I/O Design Initiates Legal Proceedings against CORE
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] I/O Design Initiates Legal Proceedings against CORE
  • From: "Neuman, Jeffrey" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: Importance of the Registry
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs
  • From: Javier <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: Importance of the Registry
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs Trial Balloon
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] WG Chair Poll
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs -- CALL FOR REMOVAL OF JAVIER SOLA AS CHAIR
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs -- CALL FOR REMOVAL OF JAVIER SOLA AS CHAIR
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Creating new gTLDs
  • From: Dennis Jennings <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Let's work on...
  • From: Javier SOLA <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Let's work on...
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Let's work on...
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Let's work on...
  • From: Javier SOLA <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: Importance of the Registry
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Let's work on...
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Let's work on...
  • From: Javier SOLA <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Voting procedures
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Let's work on...
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Voting CANNOT happen yet!
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: Importance of the Registry
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Voting CANNOT happen yet!
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Voting CANNOT happen yet!
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs
  • From: Joop Teernstra <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Let's work on...
  • From: Rod Dixon <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Let's work on...
  • From: Onno Hovers <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] I/O Design Initiates Legal Proceedings against CORE
  • From: Onno Hovers <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Let's work on...
  • From: Javier SOLA <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Let's work on...
  • From: Ivan Pope <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] CORE
  • From: "Ken Stubbs" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] ICANN hearings and WGC timetable
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] ICANN hearings and WGC timetable
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Comments received
  • From: Javier <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Fwd: Re: Comments received
  • From: Javier <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] co-chair
  • From: Javier SOLA <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Co-Chair
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] co-chair
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] co-chair
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] I/O Design Initiates Legal Proceedings against CORE
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] co-chair
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] co-chair
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] WG-C timetable
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] co-chair
  • From: Rod Dixon <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] co-chair
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] co-chair
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] co-chair
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Election of co-chair
  • From: Javier SOLA <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Election of co-chair
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Election of co-chair
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Election of co-chair
  • From: [email protected] (J. William Semich)
• Re: [wg-c] Election of co-chair
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Election of co-chair
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Election of co-chair
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Election of co-chair
  • From: [email protected] (J. William Semich)
• Re: [wg-c] Election of co-chair
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Election of co-chair
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Election of co-chair
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Election of co-chair
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Election of co-chair
  • From: "Ken Stubbs" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Election of a co-chair
  • From: Javier SOLA <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Election of co-chair
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Election of co-chair
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Election of co-chair
  • From: Joop Teernstra <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Election of a co-chair
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Election of a co-chair
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: Importance of the Registry
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Who should vote for new gTLDs
  • From: Javier SOLA <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Technical problem with Joop posting (was: Re: wg-c Election of co-chair)
  • From: Elisabeth PORTENEUVE <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Who should vote for new gTLDs
  • From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Who should vote for new gTLDs
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: Importance of the Registry
  • From: Rod Dixon <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Who should vote for new gTLDs
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Technical problem with Joop posting (was:WG chair)
  • From: Joop Teernstra <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair
  • From: Javier SOLA <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Election of co-chair
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Who should vote for new gTLDs
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: Importance of the Registry
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: Importance of the Registry
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Election of co-chair
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Election of co-chair
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] constituency representation
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: Importance of the Registry
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair
  • From: [email protected]
• Re: [wg-c] Election of co-chair
  • From: [email protected]
• Re: [wg-c] Who should vote for new gTLDs
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Technical problem with Joop posting (was:WG chair)
  • From: Joop Teernstra <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair
  • From: Joop Teernstra <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Election of co-chair
  • From: Javier SOLA <[email protected]>
• SV: [wg-c] Election of a co-chair
  • From: "Petter Rindforth" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair
  • From: Ivan Pope <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair
  • From: "Siegfried Langenbach" <[email protected]>
• VB: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair
  • From: "Petter Rindforth" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair
  • From: Daiva Tamulioniene <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair
  • From: Elisabeth PORTENEUVE <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] constituency representation
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Election of co-chair
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Who should vote for new gTLDs
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair
  • From: "Neuman, Jeffrey" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Election of co-chair
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Election of co-chair
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Election of co-chair
  • From: Joop Teernstra <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] my testimony for the house judiciary committee hearing
  • From: "Ken Stubbs" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair
  • From: Joop Teernstra <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Election of co-chair
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Who should vote for new gTLDs
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• SV: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair
  • From: "Petter Rindforth" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Who should vote for new gTLDs
  • From: Craig Simon <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Who should vote for new gTLDs
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Who should vote for new gTLDs
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Who should vote for new gTLDs
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair
  • From: "Rita M. Odin" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair
  • From: [email protected] (Werner Staub)
• [wg-c] Question regarding chair vote deadline
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair
  • From: [email protected] (J. William Semich)
• Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Who should vote for new gTLDs
  • From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair
  • From: Kilnam Chon <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Who should vote for new gTLDs
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Who should vote for new gTLDs
  • From: "'Kent Crispin'" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Who should vote for new gTLDs
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Who should vote for new gTLDs
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair
  • From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Who should vote for new gTLDs
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair
  • From: "Keith Gymer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair
  • From: Craig Simon <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Who should vote for new gTLDs
  • From: "Rita M. Odin" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Who should vote for new gTLDs
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Who should vote for new gTLDs
  • From: [email protected]
• IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs (was:Re: [wg-c] Who should vote fornew gTLDs)
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs (was:Re: [wg-c] Who should votefornew gTLDs)
  • From: "Rita M. Odin" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] How to search consensus on new gTLDs
  • From: [email protected] (Werner Staub)
• Re: [wg-c] How to search consensus on new gTLDs
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] How Many gTLDs? (was: Who should vote for new gTLDs)
  • From: Javier SOLA <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Privacy gTLD
  • From: Javier SOLA <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair
  • From: Javier SOLA <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair
  • From: Javier SOLA <[email protected]>
• Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs (was:Re: [wg-c] Who should vote for new gTLDs)
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Privacy gTLD
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair
  • From: Rob Hall <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair
  • From: Amadeu Abril i Abril <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] WHAT DOES THE CHAIR DO?
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs (was:Re: [wg-c] Who should vote for new gTLDs)
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair
  • From: Craig Simon <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Vote ended 40 minutes ago.
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Ignore that...vote ends an 1am EDT
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Ignore that...vote ends an 1am EDT
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Ignore that...vote ends an 1am EDT
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Ignore that...vote ends an 1am EDT
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs (was:Re: [wg-c] Who should vote for new gTLDs)
  • From: "Siegfried Langenbach" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
  • From: "Siegfried Langenbach" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
  • From: "Siegfried Langenbach" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] voting for Eva
  • From: "Siegfried Langenbach" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair
  • From: Richard Lindsay <[email protected]>
• Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs (was:Re: [wg-c] Who should votefor new gTLDs)
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs (was:Re: [wg-c] Who should vote for new gTLDs)
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Election results
  • From: Javier SOLA <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Election results
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Election results
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Election results
  • From: "Siegfried Langenbach" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Election results
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: [email protected] (J. William Semich)
• Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: "Martin B. Schwimmer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: "Rita M. Odin" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: "Rita M. Odin" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: "Rita M. Odin" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: "Rita M. Odin" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: "Rita M. Odin" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: "Rita M. Odin" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: "Martin B. Schwimmer" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Do we need a TM law modification?
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: "Martin B. Schwimmer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Do we need a TM law modification?
  • From: "Martin B. Schwimmer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: "Martin B. Schwimmer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Do we need a TM law modification?
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: [email protected]
• Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: [email protected]
• Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: Joop Teernstra <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: Joop Teernstra <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Do we need a TM law modification?
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Do we need a TM law modification?
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Do we need a TM law modification?
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: Onno Hovers <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Do we need a TM law modification?
  • From: Onno Hovers <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Interests may be broader than some would like to acknowledge
  • From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Do we need a TM law modification?
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Mutually exclusive concepts.
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Interests may be broader than some would like to acknowledge
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Do we need a TM law modification?
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] TM protection and Number of gTLDs must be separate issues
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] TM protection and Number of gTLDs must be separate issues
  • From: [email protected]
• Re: [wg-c] TM protection and Number of gTLDs must be separate issues
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] TM protection and Number of gTLDs must be separate issues
  • From: Onno Hovers <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] TM protection and Number of gTLDs must be separate issues
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Chartered TLDs and gTLDs
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] WG C co-chair
  • From: Eva Fr�lich <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] cTLDs and TM dilution
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Deadlines
  • From: Javier SOLA <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Deadlines
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
  • From: "Ken Stubbs" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Deadlines
  • From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] new to WG
  • From: "Jim Glanz" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Deadlines
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Deadlines
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
  • From: Onno Hovers <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Deadlines
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [ga] Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair
  • From: Randy Bush <[email protected]>
• Re: [ga] Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair
  • From: Randy Bush <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Chartered TLDs and gTLDs
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• SV: [wg-c] Deadlines
  • From: "Petter Rindforth" <[email protected]>
• Re: SV: [wg-c] Deadlines
  • From: Elisabeth PORTENEUVE <[email protected]>
• Re: SV: [wg-c] Deadlines
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• RE: SV: [wg-c] Deadlines
  • From: Ivan Pope <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Deadlines
  • From: "Chicoine, Caroline" <[email protected]>
• Re: Re[2]: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Deadlines
  • From: Raul Echeberria <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Deadlines
  • From: Javier SOLA <[email protected]>
• Re: Re[2]: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
  • From: "Ken Stubbs" <[email protected]>
• SV: SV: [wg-c] Deadlines
  • From: "Petter Rindforth" <[email protected]>
• Re[4]: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re[4]: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re[5]: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• RE: Re[4]: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Deadlines
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• Re: SV: SV: [wg-c] Deadlines
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re[6]: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] weekly reports [was: Deadlines]
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• Re: Re[6]: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: Re[4]: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: Re[4]: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs
  • From: "Neuman, Jeffrey" <[email protected]>
• RE: Re[4]: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs
  • From: Mark Measday <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: Re[4]: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] weekly reports [was: Deadlines]
  • From: Ivan Pope <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs
  • From: Mark Measday <[email protected]>
• RE: Re[4]: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs
  • From: "Rita M. Odin" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs
  • From: Mark Measday <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] weekly reports [was: Deadlines]
  • From: Elisabeth PORTENEUVE <[email protected]>
• RE: Re[4]: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs
  • From: "Rita M. Odin" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: SV: [wg-c] Deadlines
  • From: [email protected] (by way of Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>)
• Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs
  • From: [email protected] (by way of Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>)
• Re: [wg-c] Deadlines
  • From: [email protected] (by way of Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>)
• Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs
  • From: Anthony Lupo <[email protected]>
• Reposted for Rod Dixon: Re: [wg-c] Deadlines
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• Reposted for Rod Dixon: Re: SV: [wg-c] Deadlines
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• Reposted for Rod Dixon: Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs
  • From: "Martin B. Schwimmer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs
  • From: "Rita M. Odin" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Martin B. Schwimmer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs
  • From: Mark Measday <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] More on the property status of TLDs
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: Re[4]: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
  • From: Joop Teernstra <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs
  • From: "Martin B. Schwimmer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] More on the property status of TLDs
  • From: "Rod Dixon" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs
  • From: "Rod Dixon" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Rod Dixon" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re: Re[4]: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: Re[4]: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• RE: Re[4]: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: Jean-Michel Becar <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Setting a bad example
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Setting a bad example
  • From: "Martin B. Schwimmer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Setting a bad example
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Setting a bad example
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs
  • From: Joop Teernstra <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Setting a bad example
  • From: "Rod Dixon" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Deadlines
  • From: Javier SOLA <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
  • From: Javier SOLA <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs
  • From: Mark Measday <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: Joop Teernstra <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs
  • From: "Keith Gymer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs
  • From: Mark Measday <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs
  • From: "Keith Gymer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs
  • From: Elisabeth PORTENEUVE <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Name.Space" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Cartesian rationalism v. Internet evolution
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: Javier SOLA <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] FWD: New Domain Names
  • From: DNSO Webmaster <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Cartesian rationalism v. Internet evolution
  • From: Elisabeth PORTENEUVE <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Cartesian rationalism v. Internet evolution
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Cartesian rationalism v. Internet evolution
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Cartesian rationalism v. Internet evolution
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] "Public" resources
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] "Public" resources
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: Javier SOLA <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Cartesian rationalism v. Internet evolution
  • From: Joop Teernstra <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: Joop Teernstra <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Mutually exclusive concepts.
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Do we need a TM law modification?
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] ICANN as a private entity (was:Eureka?)
  • From: Joop Teernstra <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: Javier SOLA <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: SV: SV: [wg-c] Deadlines
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: Joop Teernstra <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs
  • From: [email protected]
• [wg-c] Faisability question about so called "brand" gTLDs
  • From: Elisabeth PORTENEUVE <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Faisability question about so called "brand" gTLDs
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Faisability question about so called "brand" gTLDs
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Faisability question about so called "brand" gTLDs
  • From: Elisabeth PORTENEUVE <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Faisability question about so called "brand" gTLDs
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Faisability question about so called "brand" gTLDs
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Faisability question about so called "brand" gTLDs
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] "Public" resources
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: Re[2]: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: Re[2]: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re[4]: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: [wg-c] "Public" resources
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: Re[4]: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: Re[2]: [wg-c] "Public" resources
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: Re[2]: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: Re[2]: [wg-c] "Public" resources
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• RE: Re[2]: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: Re[4]: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: Re[2]: [wg-c] "Public" resources
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re: Re[2]: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re[4]: [wg-c] "Public" resources
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re[4]: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: Re[4]: [wg-c] "Public" resources
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re[3]: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• RE: Re[4]: [wg-c] "Public" resources
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: Re[3]: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] "Public" resources
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs
  • From: "Martin B. Schwimmer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Faisability question about so called "brand" gTLDs
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] "Public" resources
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs
  • From: Mark Measday <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Faisability question about so called "brand" gTLDs
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: Re[2]: [wg-c] "Public" resources
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: Re[2]: [wg-c] "Public" resources
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: [email protected]
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Ken Stubbs" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Taxonimies and Chartered TLDs
  • From: "Name.Space" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Ken Stubbs" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Taxonimies and Chartered TLDs
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Ken Stubbs" <[email protected]>
• Re: Re[2]: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Ken Stubbs" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: Re[2]: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Ken Stubbs" <[email protected]>
• Re[4]: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: [email protected]
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: [email protected]
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Ken Stubbs" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: [email protected]
• Re: [wg-c] "Public" resources
  • From: Joop Teernstra <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: [email protected]
• Re: Re[2]: [wg-c] "Public" resources -Reply
  • From: Anthony Lupo <[email protected]>
• Re[4]: [wg-c] "Public" resources -Reply
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: [email protected]
• RE: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Proposal writing
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: [email protected]
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: [email protected]
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Faisability question about so called "brand" gTLDs
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] "Public" resources
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Private TLDs
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] "Public" resources -Reply
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: [email protected]
• Re[2]: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re[3]: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re[3]: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: Joop Teernstra <[email protected]>
• Re[4]: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: Javier <[email protected]>
• Re[3]: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re[3]: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: Re[4]: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re[6]: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re: Re[6]: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Private TLDs
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: [wg-c] Private TLDs
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Private TLDs
  • From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Points to consider regarding new gTLDs
  • From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] exactly what are we trying to accomplish here ?
  • From: "Ken Stubbs" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] exactly what are we trying to accomplish here ?
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Re: exactly what are we trying to accomplish here ?
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] exactly what are we trying to accomplish here ?
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Gotta love it...
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re[6]: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: Joop Teernstra <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] "Public" resources -Reply
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: Re[2]: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: [wg-c] "Public" resources -Reply
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: Re[2]: [wg-c] "Public" resources -Reply
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, re, revisted
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: Jean-Michel Becar <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, re, revisted
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Eureka?
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, re, revisted
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: Jean-Michel Becar <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: [email protected]
• RE: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: "Cohen, Tod" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] maybe we could change our communications a bit... and be more productive at the same time
  • From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, re, revisted
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re[3]: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, re, revisted
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: Rod Dixon <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, re, revisted
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, re, revisted
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: "Siegfried Langenbach" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] straw vote
  • From: Joop Teernstra <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, re, revisted
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: [email protected]
• Re: [wg-c] maybe we could change our communications a bit... and be more pro ductive at the same time
  • From: "Siegfried Langenbach" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] maybe we could change our communications a bit... and be more pro ductive at the same time
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Competition policy and gTLDs
  • From: [email protected]
• Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: "Rita M. Odin" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Competition policy and gTLDs
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: "Cohen, Tod" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: "Paul Stahura" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: "Rita M. Odin" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Competition policy and gTLDs
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: "Martin B. Schwimmer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: Elisabeth PORTENEUVE <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Competition policy and gTLDs
  • From: "Rita M. Odin" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote, getting far afield from the original question.
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: [email protected] (J. William Semich)
• RE: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: [wg-c] Competition policy and gTLDs
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Competition policy and gTLDs
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Why gTLDs.
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Confusing the DNS (was: Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote)
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote, purpose and validity
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: Richard Lindsay <[email protected]>
• RE: Confusing the DNS (was: Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote)
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] The reason for new gTLDs
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• RE: Re[2]: [wg-c] Competition policy and gTLDs
  • From: "Cohen, Tod" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll
  • From: "Ken Stubbs" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Competition policy and gTLDs
  • From: "Rita M. Odin" <[email protected]>
• Re: Re[2]: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: "Rita M. Odin" <[email protected]>
• RE: Re[2]: [wg-c] Competition policy and gTLDs
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: Re[2]: [wg-c] Competition policy and gTLDs
  • From: "Rita M. Odin" <[email protected]>
• Re: Re[2]: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: Re[2]: [wg-c] Competition policy and gTLDs
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Competition policy and gTLDs
  • From: [email protected]
• Re[4]: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: [wg-c] Competition policy and gTLDs
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re[4]: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re[4]: [wg-c] Competition policy and gTLDs
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll
  • From: "Ken Stubbs" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• RE: Confusing the DNS (was: Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote)
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Whois
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: Re[2]: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] maximums
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll
  • From: "Ken Stubbs" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Public Trust
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] straw poll -- reminder
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• RE: Confusing the DNS (was: Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote)
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: Confusing the DNS (was: Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote)
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw poll -- reminder
  • From: Kilnam Chon <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw poll -- reminder
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: Re[2]: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re: Re[2]: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw poll -- reminder
  • From: Mark R Measday <[email protected]>
• Re: Re[2]: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw poll -- reminder
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw poll -- reminder
  • From: [email protected] (Werner Staub)
• Re[2]: [wg-c] straw poll -- reminder
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: "Hal Lubsen" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: Craig Simon <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw poll -- reminder
  • From: Javier <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• [Fwd: [wg-c] straw poll -- reminder]
  • From: Ann-Catherine Andersson <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw poll -- reminder
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw poll -- reminder
  • From: Daiva Tamulioniene <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw poll -- reminder
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw poll -- reminder
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw poll -- reminder
  • From: "Martin B. Schwimmer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw poll -- reminder
  • From: [email protected]
• Brands, TLDs, and Private Ownership (Was:Re: [wg-c] GTLD Strawpoll)
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• Re: RE: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll
  • From: "Rita M. Odin" <[email protected]>
• RE: Brands, TLDs, and Private Ownership (Was:Re: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll)
  • From: Jean-Michel Becar <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] making progress
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• SV: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: "Petter Rindforth" <[email protected]>
• RE: Brands, TLDs, and Private Ownership (Was:Re: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll)
  • From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Public trust?
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] merging naming systems
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] domain leasing
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: Brands, TLDs, and Private Ownership (Was:Re: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll)
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re: Brands, TLDs, and Private Ownership (Was:Re: [wg-c]GTLDStraw poll)
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• RE: Brands, TLDs, and Private Ownership (Was:Re: [wg-c] GTLD Stra w poll)
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Straw Vote
  • From: [email protected]
• RE: Brands, TLDs, and Private Ownership (Was:Re: [wg-c] GTLD Stra w poll)
  • From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] straw poll -- reminder
  • From: [email protected]
• RE: Brands, TLDs, and Private Ownership (Was:Re: [wg-c] GTLD Stra w poll)
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Re: Where has NSI claimed that it "owns .COM" ?
  • From: "Martin B. Schwimmer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: Where has NSI claimed that it "owns .COM" ?
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] straw poll -- reminder
  • From: "Chicoine, Caroline" <[email protected]>
• Re: Brands, TLDs, and Private Ownership (Was:Re: [wg-c] GTLDStraw poll)
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: [wg-c] straw poll -- reminder
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: Brands, TLDs, and Private Ownership (Was:Re: [wg-c] GTLDStraw poll)
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: Brands, TLDs, and Private Ownership (Was:Re: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll)
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] domain leasing
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: Brands, TLDs, and Private Ownership (Was:Re: [wg-c] GTLDStraw poll)
  • From: "Martin B. Schwimmer" <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: Brands, TLDs, and Private Ownership (Was:Re: [wg-c] GTLD Stra w poll)
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] NSI's creativity
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: Brands, TLDs, and Private Ownership (Was:Re: [wg-c]
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] straw vote
  • From: Raul Echeberria <[email protected]>
• Re: [Fwd: [wg-c] straw poll -- reminder]
  • From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
• Re: Brands, TLDs, and Private Ownership (Was:Re: [wg-c]
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• RE: Re[2]: [wg-c] straw poll -- reminder
  • From: "Chicoine, Caroline" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] NSI's creativity
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: Brands, TLDs, and Private Ownership (Was:Re: [wg-c]
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re[4]: [wg-c] straw poll -- reminder
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: Brands, TLDs, and Private Ownership (Was:Re: [wg-c]
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [Fwd: [wg-c] straw poll -- reminder]
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: Brands, TLDs, and Private Ownership (Was:Re: [wg-c]
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw poll -- reminder
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: Brands, TLDs, and Private Ownership (Was:Re: [wg-c]
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [Fwd: [wg-c] straw poll -- reminder]
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re: Re[4]: [wg-c] straw poll -- reminder
  • From: "Rita M. Odin" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] NSI's creativity
  • From: "Rita M. Odin" <[email protected]>
• RE: Re[4]: [wg-c] straw poll -- reminder
  • From: "Chicoine, Caroline" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: Where has NSI claimed that it "owns .COM" ?
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: Brands, TLDs, and Private Ownership (Was:Re: [wg-c]
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: Re[4]: [wg-c] straw poll -- reminder
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: [wg-c] straw poll -- reminder
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re[6]: [wg-c] straw poll -- reminder
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: Re[4]: [wg-c] straw poll -- reminder
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: Re[4]: [wg-c] straw poll -- reminder
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] NSI's creativity
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: Re[4]: [wg-c] straw poll -- reminder
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Do Famous mark holders really have a problem protecting their mark?
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: Brands, TLDs, and Private Ownership (Was:Re: [wg-c] GTLD Stra w poll)
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] A branded TLD would be .nsi
  • From: "Martin B. Schwimmer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] A branded TLD would be .nsi
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [Fwd: [wg-c] straw poll -- reminder]
  • From: Paul Garrin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] domain leasing
  • From: Joop Teernstra <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] domain leasing
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] domain leasing
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• RE: [Fwd: [wg-c] straw poll -- reminder]
  • From: Jean-Michel Becar <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• Antitrust (Was:Re: Re[4]: [wg-c] straw poll -- reminder)
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] domain leasing
  • From: Joop Teernstra <[email protected]>
• Re: Antitrust (Was:Re: Re[4]: [wg-c] straw poll -- reminder)
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: [email protected] (Werner Staub)
• Re: [wg-c] domain leasing
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: Antitrust (Was:Re: Re[4]: [wg-c] straw poll -- reminder)
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] I've been Micro-shafted!
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: [email protected] (Werner Staub)
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: "Siegfried Langenbach" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: "Keith Gymer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw poll -- reminder
  • From: "Keith Gymer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on
  • From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on
  • From: Paul Garrin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw poll -- reminder
  • From: Elisabeth PORTENEUVE <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw poll -- reminder
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw poll -- reminder
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] A different perspective
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] A branded TLD would be .nsi
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Public trust?
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw poll -- reminder
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] A branded TLD would be .nsi
  • From: "Martin B. Schwimmer" <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: [wg-c] straw poll -- reminder
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: Rod Dixon <[email protected]>
• Re: Re[2]: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re[4]: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] straw votes
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• Re: Re[4]: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re[6]: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• RE: Re[4]: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• ccTLDs (was Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions)
  • From: Elisabeth PORTENEUVE <[email protected]>
• Re: ccTLDs (was Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions)
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] straw poll
  • From: Daiva Tamulioniene <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Separating the Sheep from the Goats
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Separating the Sheep from the Goats
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] missing point
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Separating the Sheep from the Goats
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on
  • From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] missing point
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Separating the Sheep from the Goats
  • From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw poll -- reminder
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re[7]: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: [wg-c] Separating the Sheep from the Goats
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on
  • From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Separating the Sheep from the Goats
  • From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Separating the Sheep from the Goats
  • From: [email protected] (J. William Semich)
• [wg-c] how many = what number?
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] A branded TLD would be .nsi
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Separating the Sheep from the Goats
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] A branded TLD would be .nsi
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Separating the Sheep from the Goats
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Separating the Sheep from the Goats
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Separating the Sheep from the Goats
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Separating the Sheep from the Goats
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: [wg-c] Separating the Sheep from the Goats
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Separating the Sheep from the Goats
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Separating the Sheep from the Goats
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] how many = what number?
  • From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: [wg-c] Separating the Sheep from the Goats
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Separating the Sheep from the Goats
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Separating the Sheep from the Goats
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] A branded TLD would be .nsi
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] A branded TLD would be .nsi
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] how many = what number?
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Trying to close on Question 1
  • From: Javier SOLA <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] how many = what number?
  • From: [email protected]
• Re: [wg-c] Trying to close on Question 1
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• FW: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] how many = what number?
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Trying to close on Question 1
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Trying to close on Question 1
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on
  • From: [email protected] (J. William Semich)
• RE: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] is this really the work we have before us?
  • From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] is this really the work we have before us?
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Trying to close on Question 1
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] is this really the work we have before us?
  • From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] The nature of a registry
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] capital idea
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Trying to close on Question 1
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] consensus
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] marketing
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] demonization
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] capital idea
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] marketing
  • From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] capital idea
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] demonization
  • From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] marketing
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] capital idea
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] capital idea
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Re: consensus
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] demonization
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: [wg-c] Trying to close on Question 1
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] is this really the work we have before us?
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: [wg-c] is this really the work we have before us?
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Trying to close on Question 1
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Recap from past threads...
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] capital idea
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Recap from past threads...
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] is this really the work we have before us?
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Trying to close on Question 1
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Trying to close on Question 1
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] capital idea
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Reversible experiments
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] A branded TLD would be .nsi
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] straw vote -- new reminder
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] capital idea
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- new reminder
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] is this really the work we have before us?
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: Re[2]: [wg-c] is this really the work we have before us?
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Trying to close on Question 1
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] capital idea
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Trying to close on Question 1
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: Re[2]: [wg-c] is this really the work we have before us?
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] is this really the work we have before us?
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Recap from past threads...
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: Re[2]: [wg-c] is this really the work we have before us?
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: Re[2]: [wg-c] is this really the work we have before us?
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] is this really the work we have before us?
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] is this really the work we have before us?
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] capital idea
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re[4]: [wg-c] is this really the work we have before us?
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] is this really the work we have before us?
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Recap from past threads...
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• RE: Re[2]: [wg-c] is this really the work we have before us?
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: [wg-c] Recap from past threads...
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: [wg-c] is this really the work we have before us?
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re[4]: [wg-c] is this really the work we have before us?
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Recap from past threads...
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] is this really the work we have before us?
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] capital idea
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• RE: Re[2]: [wg-c] Recap from past threads...
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re[4]: [wg-c] Recap from past threads...
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• RE: Re[4]: [wg-c] Recap from past threads...
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] capital idea
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: [wg-c] capital idea
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Trying to close on Question 1
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Recap from past threads...
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] is this really the work we have before us?
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] new deadline for straw poll
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Trying to close on Question 1
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- new reminder
  • From: Craig Simon <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Separating the Sheep from the Goats
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Trying to close on Question 1
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: Mikki Barry <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] is this really the work we have before us?
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: Mikki Barry <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] is this really the work we have before us?
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] is this really the work we have before us?
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: Mikki Barry <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Re-bidding
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re-bidding
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Re-bidding
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] This workgroup list and disruptions, and a motion
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Fwd: DNSO new gTLD working group
  • From: Javier SOLA <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: Craig Simon <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] This workgroup list and disruptions, and a motion
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] This workgroup list and disruptions, and a motion
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] This workgroup list and disruptions, and a motion
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] This workgroup list and disruptions, and a motion
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] This workgroup list and disruptions, and a motion
  • From: "Rita M. Odin" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: [wg-c] This workgroup list and disruptions, and a motion
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] This workgroup list and disruptions, and a motion
  • From: [email protected]
• Re: [wg-c] This workgroup list and disruptions, and a motion
  • From: [email protected]
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] This workgroup list and disruptions, and a motion
  • From: "Keith Gymer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] This workgroup list and disruptions, and a motion
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Avery-Dennison decision and new gTLDs
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Avery-Dennison decision and new gTLDs
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Avery-Dennison decision and new gTLDs
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Avery-Dennison decision and new gTLDs
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Taking away a registry
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Proposal of statement to be forwarded to ICANN
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Proposal of statement to be forwarded to ICANN
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] This workgroup list and disruptions, and a motion
  • From: "Siegfried Langenbach" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: [wg-c] This workgroup list and disruptions, and a motion
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: Craig Simon <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Posts by person
  • From: Craig Simon <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Posts by person
  • From: Craig Simon <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Posts by person
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Posts by person
  • From: Craig Simon <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Posts by person
  • From: "Petter Rindforth" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] IETF
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Avery-Dennison decision and new gTLDs
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Posts by person
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Avery-Dennison decision and new gTLDs
  • From: [email protected]
• Re: [wg-c] Avery-Dennison decision and new gTLDs
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Posts by person
  • From: Craig Simon <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] straw vote -- reminder
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: [email protected]
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Switching costs: a proposal
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Back to the charter
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Switching costs: a proposal
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• SV: [wg-c] Posts by person
  • From: "Petter Rindforth" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Switching costs: a proposal
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Output of the WG
  • From: Javier <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Switching costs: a proposal
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Switching costs: a proposal
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Switching costs: a proposal
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Question
  • From: "Michael O'Flaherty" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Switching costs: a proposal
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] new gTLD's
  • From: "dominik tirl" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] new gTLD's
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: Mikki Barry <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] new gTLD's
  • From: Mikki Barry <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: Mikki Barry <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] new gTLD's
  • From: "Ken Stubbs" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] new gTLD's
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: Re[2]: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: [wg-c] Switching costs: a proposal
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: Re[2]: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re[4]: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Output of the WG
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Too many "Straw Men", overblown analogies, illogical conclusions, axes being sharpened.
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Too many "Straw Men", overblown analogies, illogical conclusions, axes being sharpened.
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Too many "Straw Men", overblown analogies, illogical conclusions, axes being sharpened.
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• No Subject
  • From: Mikki Barry <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Too many "Straw Men", overblown analogies, illogical conclusions, axes being sharpened.
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Re:
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re:
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Re:
  • From: Mikki Barry <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Too many "Straw Men", overblown analogies, illogical conclusions, axes being sharpened.
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re:
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re:
  • From: Mikki Barry <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re:
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Re:
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Another worthless and overblown analogy.
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: (completely off-topic)
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] http://www.cavebear.com/cavebear/growl/issue_2.htm#multiple_roots
  • From: Karl Auerbach <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] http://www.cavebear.com/cavebear/growl/issue_2.htm#multiple_roots
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c]http://www.cavebear.com/cavebear/growl/issue_2.htm#multiple_roots
  • From: Paul Garrin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & callfor votes on remaining questions
  • From: Craig Simon <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & callfor votes on remaining questions
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] http://www.cavebear.com/cavebear/growl/issue_2.htm#multiple_roots
  • From: Karl Auerbach <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Re:
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] http://www.cavebear.com/cavebear/growl/issue_2.htm#multiple_roots
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Re: multiple_roots
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Re:
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] http://www.cavebear.com/cavebear/growl/issue_2.htm#multiple_roots
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: multiple_roots
  • From: Karl Auerbach <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote
  • From: "Keith Gymer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Why not seek peace? Why the ruckus?
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Re: Why not seek peace? Why the ruckus?
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: multiple_roots
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Switching costs: a proposal
  • From: [email protected]
• Re: [wg-c] Output of the WG
  • From: "Siegfried Langenbach" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: multiple_roots
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Output of the WG
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Why not seek peace? Why the ruckus?
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] WG C Straw Pole vote
  • From: "Chicoine, Caroline" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: multiple_roots
  • From: Karl Auerbach <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] WG C Straw Pole vote
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] WG C Straw Pole vote
  • From: "Chicoine, Caroline" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] WG C Straw Pole vote
  • From: Raul Echeberria <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] WG C Straw Pole vote
  • From: "Cohen, Tod" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] WG C Straw Pole vote
  • From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: multiple_roots
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] WG C Straw Pole vote
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] straw poll -- final reminder
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] straw poll -- final reminder
  • From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] WG C Straw Pole vote
  • From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: [wg-c] straw poll -- final reminder
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] compromise proposal
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] WG C Straw Pole vote
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw poll -- final reminder
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] WG C Straw Pole vote
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw poll -- final reminder
  • From: Elisabeth PORTENEUVE <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] WG C Straw Pole vote
  • From: "Keith Gymer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] WG C Straw Pole vote
  • From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] straw poll -- final reminder
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] WG C Straw Pole vote
  • From: [email protected] (J. William Semich)
• RE: [wg-c] WG C Straw Pole vote
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: multiple_roots
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] straw poll -- final reminder
  • From: Mikki Barry <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal
  • From: Mikki Barry <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Re: Fwd: RE: [wg-d] Let's discuss the funding of ICANN - It's part of the business plan ...
  • From: "Peter R. Rony" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Straw vote
  • From: "Petter Rindforth" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] compromise proposal
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw poll -- final reminder
  • From: "Rita M. Odin" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw poll -- final reminder
  • From: "Rita M. Odin" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw poll -- final reminder
  • From: "Martin B. Schwimmer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] wg-c straw vote
  • From: "Chicoine, Caroline" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] wg-c straw vote
  • From: Anthony Lupo <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal
  • From: [email protected]
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] compromise proposal
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Toasted: compromise proposal
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] compromise proposal
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] compromise proposal
  • From: Jean-Michel Becar <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] compromise proposal
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] compromise proposal
  • From: Jean-Michel Becar <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] straw poll -- final reminder
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] compromise proposal
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Toasted: compromise proposal
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal
  • From: Mark R Measday <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] compromise proposal
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] compromise proposal
  • From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] straw poll results
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Compromise proposal
  • From: "Petter Rindforth" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal
  • From: Mark R Measday <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Compromise proposal
  • From: "Chicoine, Caroline" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] a further note on the straw poll results
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Compromise proposal
  • From: "Rita M. Odin" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Compromise proposal
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Compromise proposal
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Compromise proposal
  • From: Mikki Barry <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Compromise proposal
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Compromise proposal
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] compromise proposal
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Compromise proposal
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Compromise proposal
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Compromise proposal
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Compromise proposal
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Compromise proposal
  • From: Paul Garrin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Compromise proposal
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Compromise proposal
  • From: Paul Garrin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Compromise proposal
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Compromise proposal
  • From: "Chicoine, Caroline" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Compromise proposal
  • From: Mikki Barry <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Compromise proposal
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Compromise proposal
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Compromise proposal
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Compromise proposal
  • From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Compromise proposal
  • From: Mikki Barry <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Reaching decisions.
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] All quite on the Western Front.
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Not quite quiet on the Western Front.
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Not quite quiet on the Western Front.
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal
  • From: "Siegfried Langenbach" <[email protected]>
• Wrong Question (Was Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal)
  • From: [email protected] (J. William Semich)
• Re: Wrong Question (Was Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal)
  • From: Annie Renard <[email protected]>
• RE: Wrong Question (Was Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal)
  • From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <[email protected]>
• SV: Wrong Question (Was Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal)
  • From: "Petter Rindforth" <[email protected]>
• Re: SV: Wrong Question (Was Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal)
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: Wrong Question (Was Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal)
  • From: "Keith Gymer" <[email protected]>
• RE: SV: Wrong Question (Was Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal)
  • From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <[email protected]>
• SV: SV: Wrong Question (Was Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal)
  • From: "Petter Rindforth" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Compromise proposal
  • From: "Martin B. Schwimmer" <[email protected]>
• RE: Wrong Question (Was Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal)
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Well, maybe this won't work
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• Reaching Decisions and "Re: [wg-c] Well, maybe this won't work"
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• RE: Reaching Decisions and "Re: [wg-c] Well, maybe this won't work"
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: Reaching Decisions and "Re: [wg-c] Well, maybe this won't work"
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Well, maybe this won't work
  • From: Karl Auerbach <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Well, maybe this won't work
  • From: Craig Simon <[email protected]>
• RE: Reaching Decisions and "Re: [wg-c] Well, maybe this won't work"
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Well, maybe this won't work
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Well, maybe this won't work
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• RE: Reaching Decisions and "Re: [wg-c] Well, maybe this won't work"
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Well, maybe this won't work
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Votebot sample ballot.
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Well, maybe this won't work
  • From: Karl Auerbach <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Well, maybe this won't work, "Zero Option" in VoteBot
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] hidden agenda
  • From: "Siegfried Langenbach" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] hidden agenda, hidden rocks in the harbour.
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Well, maybe this won't work
  • From: Jean-Michel Becar <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: [wg-c] Well, maybe this won't work
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] hidden agenda
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Well, maybe this won't work
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Process?
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] An amazing lack of activity.
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Process?
  • From: Jean-Michel Becar <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] An amazing lack of activity.
  • From: "Greg M." <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] An amazing lack of activity.
  • From: "Jim Glanz" <[email protected]>
• FW: [wg-c] Compromise proposal
  • From: "Chicoine, Caroline" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] An amazing lack of activity.
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] An amazing lack of activity.
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] An amazing lack of activity.
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Re: An amazing lack of activity.
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] bounced messaage, reposted for Dan Busarow
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: An amazing lack of activity.
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Votebot sample ballot.
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] RE: Domain Name ruling favours small business.
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Votebot sample ballot.
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Votebot sample ballot.
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Votebot sample ballot.
  • From: "Jim Glanz" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] An amazing lack of activity.
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Votebot sample ballot.
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Votebot sample ballot.
  • From: Joop Teernstra <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Votebot sample ballot.
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Votebot sample ballot.
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Votebot sample ballot.
  • From: Joop Teernstra <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Votebot sample ballot.
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Votebot sample ballot.
  • From: "Jim Glanz" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Votebot sample ballot.
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Votebot sample ballot.
  • From: "Paul Stahura" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Compromise proposal
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: Wrong Question (Was Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal)
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: SV: Wrong Question (Was Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal)
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Well, maybe this won't work
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: SV: Wrong Question (Was Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal)
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Well, maybe this won't work
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Well, maybe this won't work
  • From: Mikki Barry <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Well, maybe this won't work
  • From: Joop Teernstra <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Well, maybe this won't work
  • From: "Jim Glanz" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] response to Milton -- sorry if I'm imposing on you to "listen".
  • From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <[email protected]>
• Re: Wrong Question (Was Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal)
  • From: [email protected] (J. William Semich)
• RE: [wg-c] response to Milton -- sorry if I'm imposing on you to
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: Wrong Question (Was Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal)
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Developing negotiating points
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: SV: Wrong Question (Was Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal)
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Well, maybe this won't work
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Well, maybe this won't work
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re: SV: Wrong Question (Was Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal)
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Well, maybe this won't work
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Well, maybe this won't work
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Well, maybe this won't work
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Well, maybe this won't work
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Re: [IFWP] PICS and domain names
  • From: [email protected] (Esther Dyson)
• No Subject
  • From: Javier <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Re: response to Milton -- sorry if I'm imposing on you to "listen".
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Re:
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] RE:
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Developing negotiating points
  • From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] response to Milton -- sorry if I'm imposing on you to
  • From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] response to Milton -- sorry if I'm imposing on you to
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Consensus on *one* thing;-)
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Re:
  • From: Paul Garrin <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Developing negotiating points
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re:
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Developing negotiating points
  • From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Developing negotiating points
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
  • From: "Petter Rindforth" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
  • From: Mikki Barry <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
  • From: Javier <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] General Opinion
  • From: [email protected]
• Re: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
  • From: Paul Garrin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
  • From: "Jim Glanz" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
  • From: Jean-Michel Becar <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Well, maybe this won't work
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: SV: Wrong Question (Was Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal)
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Well, maybe this won't work
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Relativity.
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
  • From: [email protected]
• RE: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
  • From: Ann-Catherine Andersson <[email protected]>
• Re: SV: Wrong Question (Was Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal)
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
  • From: [email protected] (Werner Staub)
• Re: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
  • From: [email protected] (Werner Staub)
• Re: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Bullies: Re: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] useless speculation and predictions
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] With apologies, Bill Semich's Position on New gTLDs
  • From: [email protected] (J. William Semich)
• RE: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] cherry picking
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] With apologies, Bill Semich's Position on New gTLDs
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] With apologies, Bill Semich's Position on New gTLDs
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] With apologies, Bill Semich's Position on New gTLDs
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re[2]: [wg-c] With apologies, Bill Semich's Position on New gTLDs
  • From: Chris Burton <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Re: cherry picking
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• RE: Re[2]: [wg-c] With apologies, Bill Semich's Position on New gTLDs
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: Re[2]: [wg-c] With apologies, Bill Semich's Position on New gTLDs
  • From: "Jim Glanz" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
  • From: "Jim Glanz" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: cherry picking
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: cherry picking
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: cherry picking
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] IMPORTANT MESSAGE RE: WG-C
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Call for Nominations for the election of ICANN Board members
  • From: DNSO Listadmin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Re: cherry picking
  • From: "Paul Stahura" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Procedures for nomination for the election of ICANN Board Members
  • From: DNSO Listadmin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT MESSAGE RE: WG-C
  • From: Randy Bush <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT MESSAGE RE: WG-C
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT MESSAGE RE: WG-C
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT MESSAGE RE: WG-C
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• The Emperor's New Consensus (was:Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT MESSAGERE: WG-C )
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT MESSAGE RE: WG-C
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] IMPORTANT MESSAGE RE: WG-C
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT MESSAGE RE: WG-C
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT MESSAGE RE: WG-C
  • From: Randy Bush <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Omthaloskepsis devined at last;-)
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: The Emperor's New Consensus (was:Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT MESSAGE RE: WG-C )
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Re: Status of our TLD request?
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• Re: The Emperor's New Consensus (was:Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT MESSAGERE: WG-C )
  • From: Randy Bush <[email protected]>
• RE: The Emperor's New Consensus (was:Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT MESSAGERE: WG-C )
  • From: "Chicoine, Caroline" <[email protected]>
• RE: The Emperor's New Consensus (was:Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANTMESSAGERE: WG-C )
  • From: Anthony Lupo <[email protected]>
• Re: The Emperor's New Consensus (was:Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT MESSAGE RE: WG-C )
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] We have no Emperor: Re: The Emperor's New Consensus (was:Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT MESSAGE RE: WG-C )
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] We have no Emperor: Re: The Emperor's New Consensus (was:Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT MESSAGE RE: WG-C )
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] We have no Emperor: Re: The Emperor's New Consensus (was:Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT MESSAGE RE: WG-C )
  • From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] We have no Emperor: Re: The Emperor's New Consensus (w as:Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT MESSAGE RE: WG-C )
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] We have no Emperor: Re: The Emperor's New Consensus (w as:Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT MESSAGE RE: WG-C )
  • From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] We have no Emperor: Re: The Emperor's New Consensus (
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: The Emperor's New Consensus (was:Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT MESSAGE RE: WG-C )
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] We have no Emperor: Re: The Emperor's New Consensus (was:Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT MESSAGE RE: WG-C )
  • From: "Siegfried Langenbach" <[email protected]>
• Ma Bell is alive and well and living in Marilyn: RE: [wg-c] We have no Emperor: Re: The Emperor's New Consensus (w as:Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT MESSAGE RE: WG-C )
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] We have no Emperor: Re: The Emperor's New Consensus (w as:Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT MESSAGE RE: WG-C )
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] We have no Emperor: Re: The Emperor's NewConsensus(w as:Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT MESSAGE RE: WG-C )
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] We have no Emperor: Re: The Emperor's New Consensus (w as:Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT MESSAGE RE: WG-C )
  • From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <[email protected]>
• Re: The Emperor's New Consensus (was:Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT MESSAGE RE: WG-C )
  • From: "Paul Stahura" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Re: From Working Group C: Bill Semich's Position on New gTLDs
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] We have no Emperor: Re: The Emperor's New Consensus (w as:Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT MESSAGE RE: WG-C )
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Voting customs: RE: [wg-c] We have no Emperor: Re: The Emperor's New Consensus(w as:Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT MESSAGE RE: WG-C )
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: The Emperor's New Consensus (was:Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT MESSAGE RE: WG-C )
  • From: [email protected] (Werner Staub)
• Re: Voting customs: RE: [wg-c] We have no Emperor: Re: The Emperor's New Consensus(w as:Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT MESSAGE RE: WG-C )
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: The Emperor's New Consensus (was:Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT MESSAGE RE: WG-C )
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Restatement of the compromise consensus
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] We have no Emperor: Re: The Emperor's NewConsensus(w as:Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT MESSAGE RE: WG-C )
  • From: "Chicoine, Caroline" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Restatement of the compromise consensus
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] We have no Emperor: Re: The Emperor's NewConsensus(w a s:Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT MESSAGE RE: WG-C )
  • From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Re: From Working Group C: Bill Semich's Position on New gTLDs
  • From: Eric Brunner <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] We have no Emperor: Re: The Emperor's NewConsensus(w a s:Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT MESSAGE RE: WG-C )
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Chartered TLDs (Re: From Working Group C: Bill Semich's Position on New gTLDs)
  • From: Eric Brunner <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] We have no Emperor: Re: The Emperor's New Consensus(w as:Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT MESSAGE RE: WG-C )
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Restatement of the compromise consensus
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Restatement of the compromise consensus
  • From: Mikki Barry <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Restatement of the compromise consensus
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Restatement of the compromise consensus
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Restatement of the compromise consensus
  • From: Eric Brunner <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] IMPORTANT MESSAGE RE: WG-C
  • From: Jean-Michel Becar <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] IMPORTANT MESSAGE RE: WG-C
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Restatement of the compromise consensus
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Restatement of the compromise consensus
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Restatement of the compromise consensus
  • From: Joop Teernstra <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] IMPORTANT MESSAGE RE: WG-C
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Restatement of the compromise consensus
  • From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Restatement of the compromise consensus
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] NSI/ICANN agreement?
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] NSI/ICANN agreement?
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Comments?
  • From: Craig Simon <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Comments?
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] This Is Moot
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Comments?
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Motion to Postpone
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Motion to Postpone
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Motion to Postpone
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Motion to Postpone
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Motion to Postpone
  • From: [email protected]
• Re: [wg-c] Comments?
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Motion to Postpone
  • From: Randy Bush <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Comments?
  • From: Craig Simon <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Motion to Postpone
  • From: "Ken Stubbs" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Motion to Postpone
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Motion to Postpone
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Motion to Postpone
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Motion to Postpone
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Motion to Postpone
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Motion to Postpone
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Motion to Postpone
  • From: "Chicoine, Caroline" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Motion to Postpone
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Motion to Postpone
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Motion to Postpone
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Motion to Postpone
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Motion to Postpone
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Motion to Postpone
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Don do this!
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Motion to Postpone
  • From: Craig Simon <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Motion to Postpone
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Re: Motion to Postpone
  • From: Eric Brunner <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Motion to Postpone
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Motion to Postpone
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Motion to Postpone
  • From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Motion to Postpone
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Motion to Postpone
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Motion to Postpone
  • From: "Siegfried Langenbach" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Comments?
  • From: "Keith Gymer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Motion to Postpone
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Motion to Postpone
  • From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Comments?
  • From: Craig Simon <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Comments?
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Comments?
  • From: Randy Bush <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Comments?
  • From: Craig Simon <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Comments?
  • From: Randy Bush <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Re: Comments
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Motion to Postpone
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] New deadlines?
  • From: "Petter Rindforth" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Comments?
  • From: "Keith Gymer" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Pathetic
  • From: Chris Burton <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] New deadlines?
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Motion to Postpone
  • From: "Chicoine, Caroline" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] New deadlines?
  • From: Javier <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Pathetic
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] New deadlines?
  • From: "Chicoine, Caroline" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] New deadlines?
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] New deadlines?
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] New gTLDs via US Government legislation???
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] New gTLDs via US Government legislation???
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] New gTLDs via US Government legislation???
  • From: Randy Bush <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] New gTLDs via US Government legislation???
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] New gTLDs via US Government legislation???
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] New gTLDs via US Government legislation???
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] New gTLDs via US Government legislation??? (Hi,this is an automated message. I am on vacation and will be outof the office until Tuesday Octo)
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] New deadlines?
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] New gTLDs via US Government legislation??? (Hi,this is an automated message. I am on vacation and will be outof the office until Tuesday Octo)
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] New gTLDs via US Government legislation??? (Hi,this is an automated message. I am on vacation and will be outof the
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] New gTLDs via US Government legislation??? (Hi,this is an automated message. I am on vacation and will be outof the office until Tuesday Octo)
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] New gTLDs via US Government legislation??? (Hi,this is an automated message. I am on vacation and will be outof the office until Tuesday Octo)
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] New gTLDs via US Government legislation???
  • From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] New gTLDs via US Government legislation???
  • From: Randy Bush <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] New gTLDs via US Government legislation???
  • From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] New gTLDs via US Government legislation???
  • From: Eric Brunner <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Branded TLDs
  • From: "Martin B. Schwimmer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Branded TLDs
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Branded TLDs
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Branded TLDs
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Branded TLDs
  • From: "Martin B. Schwimmer" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] The warp-core is down cap'n an' all we have is impulse power...
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Position paper
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] WGC Position Paper
  • From: "Chicoine, Caroline" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Position paper
  • From: Eric Brunner <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Short Position Paper
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Short Position Paper
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Short Position Paper
  • From: Eric Brunner <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Short Position Paper
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] position paper
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Short Position Paper
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Short Position Paper
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Short Position Paper
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Short Position Paper
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Short Position Paper
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Short Position Paper
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Short Position Paper
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] position paper
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] position paper
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Short Position Paper
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Short Position Paper
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Short Position Paper
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Short Position Paper
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Short Position Paper
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• WG-C RULES was Re: [wg-c] Short Position Paper
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Short Position Paper
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re: WG-C RULES was Re: [wg-c] Short Position Paper
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re: WG-C RULES was Re: [wg-c] Short Position Paper
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: WG-C RULES was Re: [wg-c] Short Position Paper
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] position paper
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Short Position Paper
  • From: "Rick H. Wesson" <[email protected]>
• RE: WG-C RULES was Re: [wg-c] Short Position Paper
  • From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <[email protected]>
• RE: WG-C RULES was Re: [wg-c] Short Position Paper
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• RE: WG-C RULES was Re: [wg-c] Short Position Paper
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] 2 Post Rule
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] 2 Post Rule
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• RE: WG-C RULES was Re: [wg-c] Short Position Paper
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• RE: WG-C RULES was Re: [wg-c] Short Position Paper
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• RE: WG-C RULES was Re: [wg-c] Short Position Paper
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] DNSO WG-C summary statistics
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] DNSO WG-C summary statistics
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Pleading on the "two-post" rule
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Pleading on the "two-post" rule
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Pleading on the "two-post" rule
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] position papers
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] A Position Paper on some new gTLDs
  • From: Eric Brunner <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] A Position Paper on some new gTLDs
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] modified proposal
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] modified proposal
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] modified proposal
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] A Position Paper on some new gTLDs
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] 2 Post Rule
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] position papers
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] modified proposal
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] modified proposal
  • From: [email protected]
• [wg-c] Comments on the Brunner proposal
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Fill in the blanks
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] position papers
  • From: Joop Teernstra <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] position papers
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] position papers
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] position papers
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Milton Mueller's Approach
  • From: "Timothy M. Denton" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] position papers
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] position papers
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] A Position Paper on some new gTLDs
  • From: Eric Brunner <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Re: Comments on the Brunner proposal
  • From: Eric Brunner <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] A Position Paper on some new gTLDs
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Comments on the Brunner proposal
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Position paper
  • From: Rod Dixon <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] position paper
  • From: Rod Dixon <[email protected]>
• RE: WG-C RULES was Re: [wg-c] Short Position Paper
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: WG-C RULES was Re: [wg-c] Short Position Paper
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• RE: WG-C RULES was Re: [wg-c] Short Position Paper
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: WG-C RULES was Re: [wg-c] Short Position Paper
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: WG-C RULES was Re: [wg-c] Short Position Paper
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Summary of Ambler-Brunner correspondence on A Position Paper on some new gTLDs
  • From: Eric Brunner <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Summary of Ambler-Brunner correspondence on A Position Paper on some new gTLDs
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Comments on the Brunner proposal
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Short Position Paper
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Short Position Paper
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Re: Summary of Ambler-Brunner correspondence on A Position Paper on some new gTLDs
  • From: Eric Brunner <[email protected]>
• No Subject
  • From: Javier <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] YAPP (yet another position paper)
  • From: "Paul Stahura" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] YAPP (yet another position paper)
  • From: "Paul Stahura" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Support of position
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Position paper
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] position papers
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] position papers
  • From: [email protected] (J. William Semich)
• Re: [wg-c] position papers
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] position papers
  • From: "Cohen, Tod" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] position papers
  • From: "Martin B. Schwimmer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] position papers
  • From: "Keith Gymer" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Position paper: Commentary on three points.
  • From: Joseph Friedman <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Position paper: Commentary on three points.
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Position paper: Commentary on three points.
  • From: Joseph Friedman <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Position paper: Commentary on three points.
  • From: Eric Brunner <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] support for Eric's proposal
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Position paper: Commentary on three points. (I & III)
  • From: Eric Brunner <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Position paper
  • From: Paul Garrin <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] position papers
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Final position paper
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Response to Mueller in Working Group C
  • From: Eric Brunner <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] my position paper v. 1.1
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Position paper: Commentary on three points.
  • From: Joseph Friedman <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Position paper: Commentary on three points. (I & III)
  • From: Joseph Friedman <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Final final report
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] my position paper v. 1.1
  • From: [email protected]
• Re: [wg-c] my position paper v. 1.1
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] my position paper v. 1.1
  • From: "Siegfried Langenbach" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] my position paper v. 1.1
  • From: Jean-Michel Becar <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Support of Jonathan Weinberg's position paper version 1.2
  • From: Joseph Friedman <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] my position paper v. 1.1
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] my position paper v. 1.2
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] A Position Paper on some new gTLDs (v.01)
  • From: Eric Brunner <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] yet another version of my position paper
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Final version of proposal
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] position paper with additional signature
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Eric Brunner's position paper: member co-signers list
  • From: Eric Brunner <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] another supporter added
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] yet another version of my position paper
  • From: [email protected]
• Re: [wg-c] Final version of proposal
  • From: [email protected]
• Re: [wg-c] WGC Position Paper
  • From: "Rita M. Odin" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] MHSC Position Paper
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Final version of proposal
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] my position paper v. 1.1
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] my position paper v. 1.1
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] WGC Position Paper
  • From: Annie Renard <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Re: MHSC Position Paper (unavailable), and your comments
  • From: Eric Brunner <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] WGC Position Paper
  • From: "Paul Stahura" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] WGC Position Paper
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Re: MHSC Position Paper (unavailable), and your comments
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] my position paper v. 1.1
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] WGC Position Paper
  • From: "Paul Stahura" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] .com vs. ccTLDs in Europe
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] .com vs. ccTLDs in Europe -- followup
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] .com vs. ccTLDs in Europe
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] .com vs. ccTLDs in Europe
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] .com vs. ccTLDs in Europe
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] .com vs. ccTLDs in Europe
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] .com vs. ccTLDs in Europe
  • From: "Martin B. Schwimmer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] .com vs. ccTLDs in Europe
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] .com vs. ccTLDs in Europe
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] .com vs. ccTLDs in Europe
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] .com vs. ccTLDs in Europe
  • From: "Martin B. Schwimmer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] .com vs. ccTLDs in Europe
  • From: Joseph Friedman <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] .com vs. ccTLDs in Europe
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] .com vs. ccTLDs in Europe
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Re: MHSC Position Paper (unavailable), and your comments
  • From: Eric Brunner <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Re: MHSC Position Paper (unavailable), and your comments
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] .com vs. ccTLDs in Europe -- followup
  • From: Karl Auerbach <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] MHSC Position Paper (always available)
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] another supporter
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] .com vs. ccTLDs in Europe
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] .com vs. ccTLDs in Europe
  • From: Annie Renard <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] .com vs. ccTLDs in Europe
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] another supporter
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] .com vs. ccTLDs in Europe
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] .com vs. ccTLDs in Europe
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Nothing I Can Support
  • From: [email protected] (J. William Semich)
• RE: [wg-c] Nothing I Can Support
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] .com vs. ccTLDs in Europe
  • From: "Martin B. Schwimmer" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Re: MHSC Position Paper (unavailable), and your comments
  • From: Eric Brunner <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Introduction and unofficial proposal
  • From: [email protected]
• Re: [wg-c] Introduction and unofficial proposal
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Introduction and unofficial proposal (humor)
  • From: Eric Brunner <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Introduction and unofficial proposal
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] LA Meeting
  • From: Jean-Michel Becar <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Fwd: Call Congress - Stop H.R. 3028, The "Cyberpiracy" Act
  • From: Mikki Barry <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] LA Meeting
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Re: LA Meeting
  • From: Eric Brunner <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Importance of gTLDs
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] .com vs. ccTLDs in Europe
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Re: Fwd: Call Congress - Stop H.R. 3028 ...
  • From: Eric Brunner <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Fwd: Call Congress - Stop H.R. 3028, The "Cyberpiracy" Act
  • From: "Cohen, Tod" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Fwd: Call Congress - Stop H.R. 3028, The "Cyberpiracy" Act
  • From: Mikki Barry <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] LA Meeting
  • From: [email protected]
• RE: [wg-c] Fwd: Call Congress - Stop H.R. 3028, The "Cyberpiracy" Act
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] LA Meeting
  • From: [email protected]
• [wg-c] Meeting of WG-C
  • From: "Timothy Denton" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Re: MHSC Position Paper (unavailable), and your comments
  • From: Eric Brunner <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] LA Meeting
  • From: [email protected]
• [wg-c] Interim report
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] ICANN UDRP Now Available
  • From: [email protected] (J. William Semich)
• Re: [wg-c] ICANN UDRP Now Available
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] LA Meeting
  • From: Jean-Michel Becar <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] LA Meeting
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] LA Meeting
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] LA Meeting
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] LA Meeting
  • From: Eric Brunner <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] LA Meeting
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] LA Meeting
  • From: Jean-Michel Becar <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] LA Meeting
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Steps towards a working compromise (Position Papers A,C,D,E)
  • From: Eric Brunner <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] WG-C meeting tomorrow (Wed.)
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] WG-C meeting tomorrow (Wed.)
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] WG-C meeting tomorrow (Wed.)
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] WG-C meeting tomorrow (Wed.)
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] WG-C meeting tomorrow (Wed.)
  • From: Eric Brunner <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] WG-C meeting tomorrow (Wed.)
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Excerpt from [ga] IANA-ccTLD managers meeting, Monday Nov. 1
  • From: Eric Brunner <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: Eric Brunner <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: Eric Brunner <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: "Timothy Denton" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: Eric Brunner <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] (un) free market issues
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: Eric Brunner <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] NSI as a minority owned business.
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] NSI as a minority owned business.
  • From: Eric Brunner <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Notification to DOC/NTIA
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] NSI as a minority owned business.
  • From: Eric Brunner <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] NSI as a minority owned business.
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] NSI as a minority owned business.
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] another dispatch from LA; this mailing list
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] another dispatch from LA; this mailing list
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: "Ken Stubbs" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: Craig Simon <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: "Keith Gymer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] On IBM's "proliferation of signposts" concern
  • From: [email protected] (Werner Staub)
• Re: Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: Eric Brunner <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Things wg-c can do next
  • From: Eric Brunner <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] bounced message, reposted for Milton Mueller
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] bounced message, reposted for Milton Mueller
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] bounced message, reposted for Milton Mueller
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] FYI South-North Development Monitor (SUNS) #4545
  • From: Eric Brunner <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] bounced message, reposted for Milton Mueller
  • From: "Ken Stubbs" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] FYI South-North Development Monitor (SUNS) #4545
  • From: "Keith Gymer" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Way too late!
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Way too late!
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] FYI EPA Indian Statistics.
  • From: Eric Brunner <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] The limits of theoretical debate: time for experiments
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] The limits of theoretical debate: time for experiments
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] The limits of theoretical debate: time for experiments
  • From: [email protected]
• Re: [wg-c] The limits of theoretical debate: time for experiments
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] The limits of theoretical debate: time for experiment
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] The limits of theoretical debate: time for experiments
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] FYI South-North Development Monitor (SUNS) #4545
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] bounced message, reposted for ... and The limits of ...
  • From: Eric Brunner <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] bounced message, reposted for ... and The limits of ...
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] registry contracts
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] bounced message, reposted for ... and The limits of ...
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] registry contracts
  • From: Eric Brunner <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] registry contracts
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] registry contracts
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] The limits of theoretical debate: time for experiment
  • From: "Timothy Denton" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] registry contracts
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] registry contracts
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] bounced message, reposted for ... and The limits of ...
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] registry contracts
  • From: [email protected]
• Re: [wg-c] bounced message, reposted for ... and The limits of .
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] registry contracts
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] bounced message, reposted for ... and The limits of .
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Way too late!
  • From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] registry contracts
  • From: "Chicoine, Caroline" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] registry contracts
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] registry contracts
  • From: Mikki Barry <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] registry contracts
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] chair
  • From: "Rick H. Wesson" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] registry contracts
  • From: Eric Brunner <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] registry contracts
  • From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] registry contracts
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] registry contracts
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] registry contracts
  • From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] registry contracts
  • From: Mikki Barry <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] registry contracts
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] bounced message, reposted for ... and The limits of ...
  • From: Eric Brunner <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] chair
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] We need a root registry context
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] We need a root registry context
  • From: Eric Brunner <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] registry contracts
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] registry contracts
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] The legal status of registries
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] RE: [ga] Re: Stop the addition of new TLD's - Understand the REA
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Object lesson in why we need new TLDs
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] registry contracts
  • From: [email protected] (J. William Semich)
• Re: [wg-c] registry contracts & legal status of ...
  • From: Eric Brunner <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] registry contracts
  • From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] registry contracts
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] The legal status of registries
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] The legal status of registries
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] registry contracts
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] The legal status of registries
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] The legal status of registries
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] registry contracts
  • From: Eric Brunner <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] The legal status of registries
  • From: John Charles Broomfield <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] The legal status of registries
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Discharging employees no longer needed after loss of contract. (Formerthread "registry contracts".)
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] non/for profit
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Discharging employees no longer needed after lossof contract. (Formerthread "registry contracts".)
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] non/for profit
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] registry contracts
  • From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] registry contracts
  • From: Mikki Barry <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] non/for profit
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] non/for profit
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Discharging employees no longer needed after loss of contract. (Former thread "registry contracts".)
  • From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] registry contracts
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] registry contracts
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] registry contracts
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] registry contracts
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] registry contracts
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] non/for profit
  • From: Eric Brunner <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] non/for profit
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] non/for profit
  • From: Eric Brunner <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Non Destructive Testing (SNT)
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Non Destructive Testing (SNT)
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Call for comments on the Interim Report from the WG-C, new gTLDs.
  • From: DNSO Listadmin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] registry contracts
  • From: Eric Brunner <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] registry contracts
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Factual evidence of price competition
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Factual evidence of price competition
  • From: [email protected] (Werner Staub)
• Re: [wg-c] Factual evidence of price competition
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Factual evidence of price competition
  • From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] non/for profit
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] non/for profit
  • From: Eric Brunner <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] non/for profit
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] New gTLD's
  • From: "Penman, Ian" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] non/for-profit
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] non/for-profit
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] non/for-profit
  • From: "Keith Gymer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] non/for-profit
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Non/for profit
  • From: Harold Feld <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] non/for-profit
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] non/for-profit
  • From: Harold Feld <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] non/for-profit
  • From: Eric Brunner <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] non/for-profit
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] non/for-profit
  • From: Mikki Barry <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] non/for-profit
  • From: [email protected]
• Re: [wg-c] non/for-profit
  • From: Eric Brunner <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Possible solution to lock in?
  • From: Harold Feld <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] non/for-profit
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Non/For-Profit & Working Group B
  • From: "Michael D. Palage" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] non/for-profit
  • From: "Timothy Denton" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] non/for-profit
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Possible solution to lock in?
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Non/for profit
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] non/for-profit
  • From: [email protected]
• RE: [wg-c] Possible solution to lock in?
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Possible solution to lock in? For Profit registries.
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Possible solution to lock in?
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] New gTLD's
  • From: Eric Brunner <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Possible solution to lock in? For Profit registries.
  • From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Possible solution to lock in?
  • From: "'Kent Crispin'" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Possible solution to lock in? For Profit registries.
  • From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Possible solution to lock in? For Profit registries.
  • From: [email protected] (J. William Semich)
• RE: [wg-c] non/for-profit
  • From: "Rod Dixon" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] registry contracts
  • From: Eric Brunner <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Possible solution to lock in?
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Possible solution to lock in? For Profit registries.
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Possible solution to lock in? For Profit registries.
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] non/for-profit
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] registry contracts
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] Possible solution to lock in? For Profit registries.
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] New gTLD's
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] registry contracts
  • From: Eric Brunner <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] registry contracts
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] registry contracts
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] registry contracts
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] registry contracts
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] URGENT: Moratorium on all additions to confusing GTLDs and ccTLDs Required.
  • From: "matt hooker" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Bounced message, forwarded for Mark Measday
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] registry contracts
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] URGENT: Moratorium on all additions to confusing GTLDs and ccTLDs Required.
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] registry contracts
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] registry contracts
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] RE: [ga] URGENT: Moratorium on all additions to confusing GTLDs
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [ga] RE: [wg-c] URGENT: Moratorium on all additions to confusing GTLDs and ccTLDs Required.
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-b] RE: [wg-c] URGENT: Moratorium on all additions to confusing GTLDs and ccTLDs Required.
  • From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] bounced message, reposted for Ross Rader
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-b] RE: [wg-c] URGENT: Moratorium on all additions to con
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] New gTLDs and ISPs (was: URGENT . . . )
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-b] RE: [wg-c] URGENT: Moratorium on all additions to con
  • From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-b] RE: [wg-c] URGENT: Moratorium on all additions to con
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-b] RE: [wg-c] URGENT: Moratorium on all additions to con
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] non/for-profit
  • From: "Keith Gymer" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] registry contracts
  • From: Eric Brunner <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] non/for-profit
  • From: Eric Brunner <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] New gTLDs and ISPs (was: URGENT . . . )
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] registry contracts
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-b] RE: [wg-c] URGENT: Moratorium on all additions to con
  • From: Mikki Barry <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Possible solution to lock in?
  • From: Harold Feld <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] non/for-profit
  • From: Harold Feld <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] non-member submission, reposted for Roberto Gaetano
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] registry contracts
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Public utility model
  • From: Harold Feld <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-b] RE: [wg-c] URGENT: Moratorium on all additions to confusing GTLDs and ccTLDs Required.
  • From: Harold Feld <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-b] RE: [wg-c] URGENT: Moratorium on all additions to con
  • From: Harold Feld <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] URGENT: Moratorium on all additions to confusing GTLDs and ccTLDsRequired.
  • From: "matt hooker" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] non-member submission, reposted for Roberto Gaetano
  • From: Harold Feld <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] New gTLDs and ISPs (was: URGENT . . . )
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] registry contracts
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] lock-in
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] lock-in
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] New gTLDs and ISPs (was: URGENT . . . )
  • From: "Sportack, Mark A, CSCIO" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] New gTLDs and ISPs (was: URGENT . . . )
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] New gTLDs and ISPs (was: URGENT . . . )
  • From: [email protected] (J. William Semich)
• RE: [wg-c] New gTLDs and ISPs (was: URGENT . . . )
  • From: "Sportack, Mark A, CSCIO" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] New gTLDs and ISPs (was: URGENT . . . )
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] New gTLDs and ISPs (was: URGENT . . . )
  • From: Harold Feld <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Holidays
  • From: Harold Feld <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] New gTLDs and ISPs (was: URGENT . . . )
  • From: Milton Mueller <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] URGENT: Moratorium on all additions to con
  • From: [email protected]
• Re: [wg-c] New gTLDs and ISPs (was: URGENT . . . )
  • From: Craig Simon <[email protected]>
• RE: [ga] RE: [wg-c] URGENT: Moratorium on all additions to con
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] bounced message, reposted for Ross Rader
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] three non-member submissions, reposted
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] New gTLDs and ISPs (was: URGENT . . . )
  • From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <[email protected]>
• RE: [ga] Re: [wg-c] URGENT: Moratorium on all additions to confus ing GTLDs and ccTLDs Required.
  • From: [email protected]
• RE: [wg-b] RE: [wg-c] URGENT: Moratorium on all additions to confusing GTLDs and ccTLDs Required.
  • From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-b] RE: [wg-c] URGENT: Moratorium on all additions to con
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] We don't need a moratorium
  • From: Jeff Shrewsbury Info Avenue <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] Unique DNS Root or "usability", question for Tony
  • From: Eric Brunner <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] A recommendation for Working Group C to meet ICANN's policy on public participation
  • From: bob broxton <[email protected]>
• RE: [ga] RE: [wg-c] URGENT: Moratorium on all additions to con
  • From: [email protected]
• [wg-c] Closing date for comments on the WG-C report is extended
  • From: DNSO Listadmin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Unique DNS Root or "usability", question for Tony
  • From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Unique DNS Root or "usability", question for Tony
  • From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
• Re: [wg-c] Unique DNS Root or "usability", question for Tony
  • From: "Mark C. Langston" <[email protected]>
• [wg-c] bounced message, reposted for Matthew Hooker
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
• RE: [wg-c] New gTLDs and ISPs (was: URGENT . . . )
  • From: "Sportack, Mark A, CSCIO" <[email protected]>