Paxton-Hancock slap fight

Oh yeah. Bring it on.

Still a crook any way you look

Attorney General Ken Paxton has called for acting Comptroller Kelly Hancock to be removed from office, in a fiery social media tirade responding to a letter Hancock sent accusing Paxton of falling short in his efforts to stop the spread of Muslim-affiliated groups in Texas.

Paxton called Hancock an “incompetent loser” and “embarrassment” to the position of the state’s chief financial officer in a social media post late Tuesday. He called for Gov. Greg Abbott to remove Hancock from office and replace him with the GOP nominee for comptroller, Don Huffines. Abbott did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Hancock, a former state senator, was appointed by Abbott in June, after Glenn Hegar left to become chancellor of the Texas A&M system.

Paxton’s beef with Hancock goes back years — Hancock was one of two Republican state senators to vote to impeach Paxton on some of the charges levied by the House in 2023.

“He failed to take me down during impeachment, and his career is over,” Paxton posted on social media Wednesday night. “It’s time for him to be fired.”

This recent dustup started after Hancock sent a letter, obtained by Texas Bullpen, to Paxton’s office, criticizing its legal strategy in a case centering on whether Islamic schools can receive funds through the state’s new school voucher program.

[…]

This is the second time in a week that a fellow Republican has questioned Paxton’s legal strategy in high-profile litigation. In a recent legal filing, Abbott noted to the Texas Supreme Court that Paxton had rushed a lawsuit against a Harris County program offering legal aid for undocumented immigrants.

“This emergency — whether artificial or sincere — predictably compressed review before the Fifteenth Court,” Abbott’s lawyers wrote. “Any shortcomings in the lower court’s decision here can easily be attributed to the challenges posed by expedited review.”

See here for a bit of background on the voucher issue. Hancock is basically accusing Paxton of not being Islamaphobic enough, which is more than ugly enough to make me feel sympathy for anyone who isn’t Ken freaking Paxton. I assume the process to remove a Comptroller is the same as the one to remove an AG, which is to say impeachment. Good luck with that one, Kenny. Keep fighting, keep calling each other incompetent losers, keep it up all the way through November.

Posted in Show Business for Ugly People | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Wyatt case goes to grand jury

Okay.

Carla Wyatt

The criminal case against Harris County’s elected treasurer, Carla Wyatt, will go before a grand jury following the repeated postponement of a hearing aimed at deciding whether her burglary of a vehicle charge should proceed, according to court records.

Bringing the case before a grand jury, whose members predominantly decide on felony cases, shifts the decision behind closed doors rather than airing evidence before a judge in open court.

READ MORE: Harris County treasurer Carla Wyatt arrested, charged with misdemeanor for car burglary

Prosecutors filed the misdemeanor charge against 56-year-old Wyatt following her Dec. 27 arrest in the parking lot of the Forget Me Not restaurant after employees reported seeing her rifling through a colleague’s unlocked vehicle, according to prosecutors. A security guard from the Washington Avenue restaurant confronted Wyatt as police were called.

The treasurer remained in the vehicle as police arrived, said her attorney, Christopher Downey, who argued that although Wyatt showed “unusual behavior,” nothing was stolen and she had no plans to steal anything.

During the treasurer’s initial appearance before Judge Shannon Baldwin in County Criminal Court at Law No. 4, the judge declared the allegations ambiguous enough for a probable cause hearing to determine whether the evidence was sufficient for the case to continue.

The hearing was scheduled for late January, but a cold-weather closure postponed the proceedings until Monday. The hearing did not happen then either, meaning probable cause remains unsettled in Wyatt’s case.

A court scheduling form indicates prosecutors plan to take Wyatt’s case to a grand jury.

“We also often choose to present misdemeanor cases to the grand jury, particularly when the defense is challenging probable cause,” said Damali Keith, a Harris County District Attorney’s Office spokesperson.

The office did not immediately provide data on how often low-level cases are presented to a grand jury or say when Wyatt’s case will be presented. Wyatt is scheduled April 7 to return to court.

Coby DuBose, a defense lawyer who mostly handles misdemeanor cases, said the prosecution’s plan to present Wyatt’s case to a grand jury is unusual. Prosecutors are not statutorily required to bring most low-level cases before grand jurors.

“If I can start a case by just filing it — why on Earth would I jump through a hoop to have a grand jury look at it?” DuBose said. “It makes no sense to have a grand jury check your homework.”

[…]

Another lawyer, Murray Newman, also a former Harris County prosecutor, suggested prosecutors may be treating the case differently because it involves a public official. The grand jury process, Newman said, can be used as “a safety valve to get rid of trash cases and be shielded from public view through grand jury secrecy.”

See here, here, and here for some background. I basically agree with Murray Newman here, but I also think it’s because this case isn’t clear-cut. DA Sean Teare has shown that he isn’t afraid to dismiss charges in a political case he doesn’t think merits prosecution. If his office wants to take the unusual but not unheard of step of presenting this misdemeanor case to a grand jury, something that happens about a dozen times a year per the article, I think that’s reasonable. We’ll know soon enough what those folks think and we’ll go from there.

Posted in Crime and Punishment | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

When the sky actually is falling

Because sometimes it kind of does.

Picture a space rock. This one was 3 feet wide, but it weighed about a ton and moved at a speed of about 35,000 miles per hour across the sky, just 50 miles above Houston on Saturday.

The meteor’s trajectory, which NASA gives the tongue-in-cheek title of its “Chicken Little trajectory,” flew above the Tomball and Cypress areas, just about 15 miles west of George Bush Intercontinental Airport.

Barreling through the Earth’s atmosphere, there’s an immense amount of pressure on the rock. Eventually, as with most such space rocks, called meteors, the pressure was too great, and it caused the meteor to break apart, creating an explosion about 30 miles above North Houston. NASA said the explosion had the energy of about 26 tons of TNT, the equivalent of about 100 lightning strikes happening at once.

“It is ironic that NASA spends millions and billions of dollars to collect rocks from space, and one comes to visit all by itself,” said Carolyn Sumners, vice president for astronomy at the Houston Museum of Natural Science.

Many southeast Texans said they heard the explosion when the meteor broke through the sound barrier on Saturday afternoon. Turning their heads to the sky, a few fragments of space rock called meteorites began falling over the course of 8 minutes, if they didn’t burn up on the way to the ground.

“If a meteorite explodes, it will leave what’s called a ‘strewn field,’” Sean Gulick, a research professor at the University of Texas at Austin, said on Texas Standard. “It’s sort of a directional travel — from how it was traveling — it will blow up and leave fragments on the ground.”

[…]

Less than a week prior to Saturday’s meteor explosion in Houston, something similar happened above Cleveland, Ohio — albeit with an even larger meteor.

A 6-foot, 7-ton space rock broke apart on the morning of March 17, causing a similar sonic boom and similar meteorite fragments to hit the Earth. The two phenomena occurring just days apart from one another had many watching the sky, asking how to be prepared.

“In general, the Earth’s atmosphere is struck by objects from space with regularity,” Gulick said. “It just has to be a large enough object that it gets close enough to the ground before burning up that it can make an explosion and actually make pieces arrive on the ground. Most of the time, what you see are basically shooting stars: they’re high up enough, they just burn up, and that’s it.”

Anywhere between once a year and once a decade, an asteroid the size of a car reaches the Earth’s atmosphere. Most often, it burns up and creates a massive fireball before it can reach the surface of the Earth.

As the story notes, a piece of that falling star made an uninvited visit to a local homeowner. Fortunately, as the story also notes, meteorite strikes do tend to be covered by insurance. Both NASA and weather radar stations tracked the flight of this object. I don’t have anything brilliant to say about all this, but as it happens I very briefly saw a shooting star on Friday morning as I was on my morning walk. Not the same as this, and what I saw was both much smaller and didn’t make any noise, but it was cool. I can’t recall ever seeing anything like it before. Anyway, like I said, very cool.

Posted in Elsewhere in Houston, Technology, science, and math | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Texas blog roundup for the week of March 16

The Texas Progressive Alliance likes vegans and beef eaters and bringing you weekly roundups.

Off the Kuff points to CD23 as both an underrated pickup opportunity and a possible barometer of Democrats’ statewide fortunes.

SocraticGadfly talks about the Cesar Chavez bombshell and why it didn’t totally surprise him.

Neil at Houston Democracy Project reported how far-right Republican Councilmember Twila Carter sent the boss of Houston’s police union to stand next to him, because he was taking pictures of public figures in a public place. It was just so stupid.

=========================

And here are some posts of interest from other Texas blogs.

Nick Anderson watches as Donald Trump dismantles the world America built.

The Texas Observer looks at the influencer factor in the Democratic primary.

Your Local Epidemiologist celebrates the legal victory for vaccines.

The Dallas Observer reported on a local public telehealth initiative that went wrong.

Texas Public Opinion Research announced its new project to test policy proposals.

The Barbed Wire tracks a number of Texas LGBTQ+ businesses that have disappeared.

Posted in Blog stuff | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Patrick disses Rehmet

This is obnoxious, but also a little amusing.

Sen. Taylor Rehmet

Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick is sidelining the Texas Democrat who in January won a stunning upset victory in what had been considered a safe Republican state Senate district.

The Republican did not assign the newly minted lawmaker to any of the chamber’s committees this week, effectively cutting him out of the process that helps to shape future legislation.

Rehmet, a Fort Worth machinist, bashed the move as one that hurts voters and used the snub to raise money for his campaign heading toward the Nov. 3 general election.

“After months of (Senate District 9) having no voice in the Texas Senate, Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick has chosen to silence our district even further by refusing to assign me to any committee,” Rehmet, 33, said in a statement. “This decision reflects the kind of petty, partisan politics that too often stands in the way of delivering results for working families.”

Rehmet posted his statement on social media and including a link to website for an organization that raises money for Democrats.

“This isn’t about partisan politics. It’s about representation. It’s about whether working families in Tarrant County have a seat at the table,” says the message of the organization’s website.

Patrick, a Republican who is seeking a fourth term as the Senate’s presiding officer, had put his significant political clout to boost Republican Leigh Wambsganss during the special election for the Senate to replace longtime Republican Kelly Hancock. Wambsganss, who also had the vocal backing of President Donald Trump, is the GOP’s general election nominee for the seat.

The lieutenant governor said in a post-election social media post that Rehmet’s 57% of the vote — in the district that Donald Trump carried by 17 percentage points in 2024 — was a Republican wake-up call. But, he added, that other recent special election winners also were not immediately appointed to committees.

“Sen. Rehmet won a special election to fill out an unexpired interim term in 2026, in which no bills are filed, voted on, or passed. He has to win in November to serve a full term in the legislature,” Patrick said on X. “If he does win in November, he would be assigned committees like anyone else at the beginning of the next legislative session in January 2027. I explained that to him a month ago.”

As the story notes, the Senate does meet in the interim to consider potential future legislation, so not being on a committee does have a negative effect on Sen. Rehmet, who even if he loses in November is still the elected representative for SD09, which therefore loses out on having a voice in that process. He’s been sworn in, he’s a Senator, he should be assigned to some committees.

If this is the Senate’s norm, then I think it’s a bad one. I’m a little skeptical of that, so I thought I’d do some checking. As it happens, the last Senator to be elected in an even-year special election is my own Senator, Sen. Molly Cook. I called her and asked if she had been assigned to any committees after her election in May 2024. She said no, she was not, and though she thought that was wrong and she should have been assigned, she decided not to make a big deal out of it because she was already heavily involved in various campaign efforts for that November. The last such Senators before Sen. Cook were Sens. Sarah Eckhardt in SD14 and Drew Springer in SD30, both elected in 2020. Springer is no longer in the Senate and Sen. Eckhardt’s press releases only go back to 2021, so I can’t say for sure what happened with them.

Again, it may be that Sen. Patrick is telling the truth and that this is The Way It Has Always Been. I still approve of Sen. Rehmet kicking up some dust about it. It’s about representation, and there’s no good reason not to honor that. Whoever is the next Lite Guv, I hope they change this practice.

Posted in Election 2026, That's our Lege | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Fewer people going to Dilley detention center

Take the wins where you can.

Only 100 people are currently detained in the federal government’s controversy-plagued family detention center at Dilley, nonprofit news outlet ProPublica reports. That compares to an average daily population of more than 900 in January.

The Current first reported on a sharp drop in the immigrant prison camp’s population on March 10, when U.S. Rep. Joaquin Castro, D-San Antonio, revealed at a press conference that the number had dwindled to 450 people, including 99 children. When Castro visited the site an hour southwest of San Antonio in January, its population was roughly 1,100.

Not only has the population in Dilley dropped, according to ProPublica, so has the rate at which people are being sent to the lockup.

Between April 2025, when President Donald Trump resumed sending families to the South Texas detention center, and this January, the number of people booked into the site averaged 600 monthly. As of mid-March, the number of monthly book-ins has dropped to just 54.

Castro has said he believes public pushback against the detention of children, combined with inmates’ reports of deplorable conditions inside, played a factor in the government reducing the population at Dilley.

“I believe that the public outcry is making a difference. That people are leaving Dilley. That more people are being released,” Castro said the press conference earlier this month at San Antonio City Hall, where he was joined by a delegation of U.S. House Democrats who accompanied him to Dilley.

[…]

CoreCivic, the private prison company operating the facility, told ProPublica in a statement it doesn’t have “any say whatsoever” in whether detainees are deported or released. However, the company said the health and safety of its detainees remains its “top priority.”

Nonetheless, reports from those detained inside depict unsanitary conditions, including “putrid” drinking water along with mold and bugs in the food. The Current also broke the story nationally of a measles outbreak at the camp on Feb. 1, thanks to a source familiar with conditions inside.

Dilley inmates also have reportedly been rushed to the hospital after staff there have been unable to provide the care they needed. A two-month old infant named Juan Nicolás choked on his own vomit until he became unresponsive and was rushed to the hospital, where he was diagnosed with bronchitis. A teen boy was told to take pain relievers for life-threatening appendicitis until his conditioned worsened and he was hospitalized.

Even though the facility has been reopened for almost a year, staff told Castro’s congressional delegation in early March that the camp is just starting to offer an educational program with a single teacher on staff. Some of the children detained inside had been there for nine months at that point.

“I’ve said very clearly that my goal is to shut down Dilley. I don’t think anybody should be kept in that trailer prison, and most especially children,” Castro said at the press conference.

When the plan is to build a ton of these cursed places all over the country, or at least in the parts of the country that don’t sufficiently resist, it feels weird to celebrate the reduction in population at one of these places. But Dilley is a special kind of hellhole for its appalling treatment of children, so we’ll celebrate its diminishment. The work is far from over – just keeping measles under control is proving to be too big a challenge for the overlords. But kudos to Rep. Castro, who has done a great job getting kids released from Dilley, deserves a lot of credit. (As does Ms Rachel.) He saw a problem and he did something about it. More like this, please. See his recent Q&A in Slate for more.

Posted in La Migra | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Robot cooking

Who’s eating?

When a customer orders kung pow chicken at the new iWok restaurant by the Texas Medical Center, a robotic system sends small white bowls of pre-cut ingredients to sit next to an electric wok. A metal gripper dumps in the trays, and the wok starts to spin, making the meat inside look like nothing more than shirts tumbling about in a washing machine, except that it browns with each rotation.

This process of automated cooking is the main attraction at iWok, a fast-casual Asian fusion restaurant that officially opens Jan. 30. It’s located at 2328 W. Holcombe Blvd. but isn’t planning to stay in just one place for long: CEO Michael Ma intends to open branches of the brand-new concept in Asiatown, Katy and near the Johnson Space Center by the end of March.

This isn’t Houston’s first automated restaurant. Some restaurants now deliver food to diners via robot. Robo Cafe in Katy offers mechanized boba, cotton candy and soft serve machines. The recently opened Snap-a-Box, also in Katy, operates with a very similar system to iWok’s: an automated work that heats and tumbles food by itself to recreate popular Chinese dishes.

iWok represents the latest addition to the trend. Aside from slicing the ingredients, its food is almost entirely robot-made: The automated system can send trays of ingredients from a fridge to the pan, add ingredients, dribble in cornstarch slurry and deposit cooked dishes in the plastic trays they’re served in. Even the restaurant’s boba is prepared by a separate swiveling robotic arm.

The restaurant is keeping its menu short with just 12 dishes so far, mostly Chinese American classics: orange chicken, Mongolian beef, mapo tofu. What sets it apart from most other fast-casual Asian spots, Ma argued, is that the food is made to order by the electric woks, rather than cooked in large batches and left to wait in a buffet.

This isn’t to say that the restaurant is staff-free. Four to five employees will be on hand at any time, Ma estimated, with four partners running the concept behind the scenes: Ma, chief marketing officer George Liu, chief operating officer Stark Liu and culinary director J.D. Yang. Nevertheless, without the need for a chef, Ma thinks his concept will be significantly easier to expand.

“We still need people to prep the food. We still need people to serve the food. We still need people to do customer service. But it solves the most important problem,” he said. “When you don’t have a chef, you can’t run the business.”

I can’t argue with that. Restaurants have long embraced technology as a way to cut costs – which is to say, reduce the number of human workers needed – from kiosks to using AI in drive-thrus, which have had mixed results, and now robot chefs. I assume this will be limited to fast-casual and similar restaurants, where there are no substitution options – even “hold the pickles” might be tricky here – and simple menus. At least for now, anyway. How well it works, well, Houston is a notoriously competitive market for restaurants, so we’ll see. I would definitely be interested in an update on this concept a year from now. None of the named locations are places I tend to frequent, so someone else will have to provide a first-hand report for me. Does this sound like something you’d want to try?

I should note, this was in draft for a little while, but seeing this recent story about a wayward robot delivery vehicle, which reminded me that we have had robot delivery vehicles in Houston for several years now, and I had totally forgotten they existed because I haven’t heard a thing about them since then. I haven’t seen one, that’s for sure. Did you remember that we had robot food delivery vehicles in Houston? Have you ever seen or used one?

Posted in Food, glorious food, Technology, science, and math | Tagged , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Republicans had trouble with precinct voting, too

I know, I know, I’m shocked too.

At least 12,674 Dallas County voters trying to cast ballots in both party primaries showed up at the wrong polling locations March 3 after the county GOP forced the elimination of countywide polling sites on Election Day, county data shows.

Democrats had more than double the number of primary voters in Dallas County as Republicans so, unsurprisingly, a larger number of Democratic voters had to be redirected to the correct site, according to a Votebeat analysis of data provided by Dallas County election officials. But similar percentages of voters from both parties were affected by the change.

Out of the total voter turnout on Election Day, at least 6,641 voters, or 7.7%, seeking to cast ballots in the Democratic primary, and 2,369 voters, or 6.4%, seeking to cast ballots in the Republican primary, went to the wrong voting site. Those voters subsequently received texts from county representatives stationed at polling sites to redirect voters to the correct places, according to the county data, which was obtained by Votebeat via a public records request.

Those numbers don’t reflect the full number of affected voters, either. The county couldn’t determine a party for at least 3,638 additional voters who also received texts because they were redirected to voting locations used by both parties, county officials said. And for 26 other voters in the data, the county had no information. Poll workers also redirected other voters who chose not to receive texts and aren’t reflected in the data, according to Paul Adams, the Dallas County elections administrator.

Allen West, the chairman of the Dallas Republican party, had suggested in a statement on March 4 that the change had affected Democratic voters more than Republican ones.

“Yesterday Republican voters in Dallas County evidenced their ability to adapt and overcome proving that precinct level voting can be accomplished on primary Election Day,” West said in a statement the party posted on social media. “It’s apparent that Democrats struggled with grasping basic civics.”

West, who declined to comment on Votebeat’s findings for this story, has since said Republicans will agree to use countywide voting sites for the upcoming May 26 runoff election, citing the potential for confusion. It’s not clear whether West has signed a contract with the Dallas County Elections Department to make the move official. The department did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Kardal Coleman, the Dallas County Democratic Party Chair said the new findings were not surprising. “In every conversation we said that this type of irresponsible pursuit was going to result in disenfranchisement of all voters, not just Democratic voters, and the data speaks just to that,” Coleman said.

[…]

Republicans in Eastland County, west of Fort Worth, and Williamson County, north of Austin, made similar decisions to switch to precincts, which also led to voter confusion. Republicans in Williamson County have now also said they’ll return to countywide voting for the runoff election. Eastland County Republicans have yet to make a decision, according to county election officials

See here for the previous update. The best part of this story was Allen West, who as they say couldn’t pour water out of a boot if you wrote the instructions on the heel, disparaging Democratic voters’ intelligence. Gratuitous insults aside, of course there was going to be universal confusion. Precinct voting was confusing back in the day when it was the only option on Election Day, especially for non-November elections where precincts needed to be consolidated. The whole point of voting centers – and it was Republican counties like Lubbock that were pioneers with them – is to avoid that kind of needless confusion. But the Republicans like Allen West who are pushing to eliminate them don’t care about any of that, and they don’t care if it makes it harder for their own voters as well. And so here we are.

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Morath names the new Fort Worth ISD Superintendent

I wish him well, but more than that I wish the students, teachers, parents, and other stakeholders of Fort Worth ISD well.

A Floridian who briefly led one of the nation’s largest school districts will captain Fort Worth ISD while it is under state control.

Texas Education Commissioner Mike Morath appointed longtime Florida educator Peter B. Licata as FWISD’s new leader. Licata, who served as Broward County Public Schools superintendent for less than a year, is now charged with driving rapid academic gains for FWISD’s nearly 68,000 students.

He is Fort Worth’s fourth superintendent in just as many years and comes to a district facing similar challenges he faced in Florida.

Alongside the new superintendent, Morath named nine managers who essentially replaced the district’s locally elected trustees. The managers assume governing authority over the district’s nearly $1 billion budget, buildings and what children learn.

Licata served as superintendent of the 236,263-student Broward County Public Schools for 10 months starting in 2023. He resigned and stepped away from day-to-day leadership over health concerns.

Licata spent nearly three decades working in Florida schools, primarily in Palm Beach County, where he rose from classroom teacher and coach to principal and district leader.

After taking the Broward job, he described his approach to equal opportunity as ensuring students receive additional support without lowering academic expectations.

“You can’t raise the floor by lowering the ceiling,” he said in a 2023 interview with South Florida NPR station WLRN.

Broward students saw modest increases in proficiency rates during Licata’s tenure during the 2023-24 school year. His superintendency occurred alongside Florida introducing a new state test that measures progress at the beginning, middle and end of the year.

See here for the previous update. As noted in the story, Morath also appointed a Board of Managers, one of whom is Pete Geren, former Secretary of the Army and Congressman from CD12. I don’t know enough about new Superintendent Licata to have any specific thoughts about him, though I do have some questions about his health given that he resigned as Superintendent of the Broward County school system ten months after being hired for health reasons. The story didn’t go into any details (I presume most if not all of that would be confidential) so who knows. I hope he’s up for the challenge. And I hope that the appointed Board of Managers is actually representative of the community and isn’t a bunch of lapdogs.

The main thing I’m interested in, and have been since the TEA first announced the takeover of FWISD, is whether they see the Mike Miles experience in HISD as a template, a one-off, or something else. I don’t see anything in this story that says “this guy is a Mike Miles clone” or anything like that, but that’s mostly because there’s not much about him in this initial story. We’ll know more as reporters start to nose around and get a chance to visit with him and ask questions about his approach and philosophy. Does the TEA see every takeover as its own unique problem to solve, in which case they wouldn’t necessarily be looking for a Mike Miles, or do they see this as a one-size-fits-all situation and they’re going to hammer that nail without worrying about the correctness of their tools. We don’t have enough information to guess at that yet, but that’s what I’m looking for.

UPDATE: Morath also appointed a new Lake Worth ISD Superintendant, who “said he has no plans to introduce new priorities and will remain focused on the instructional framework already in place”. Which I’m sure is reassuring to Lake Worth ISD, but it makes me wonder if this trip was really necessary. LWISD is much smaller than FWISD, so I don’t expect its experience to shed much light on what the TEA has taken away from the Mike Miles saga. But it’s still worth watching.

Posted in School days | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

A brief check in on District C

As of Tuesday, we are officially halfway through early voting for the Houston City Council District C special election. There have been 2,937 votes cast so far – 778 by mail, 2,159 in person. Except for Sunday and Monday, every day has had between 300 and 376 in person voters. As this period goes through Tuesday the 31st and not a Friday like in March and November, I’m less sure about what the shape of the EV turnout will be. Basically, I have no idea if the last day or two will be noticeably higher than the earlier days. We just don’t usually have early voting like this, mostly because we don’t usually have elections like this. As a totally wild guess, I’d figure final early voting turnout will be around 6K.

In the 2023 election, there were 47,762 total votes cast, for 29.86% turnout. That’s in an election where the (Harris County) citywide turnout was 21.66%, which is another way of saying that District C is a high turnout place. To get to seven percent turnout, which I defined as “high” for this context, a bit more than 11K ballots would have to be cast. Assuming more or less ordinary patterns, that seems within reach. Ask me again when early voting is over.

As a reminder, all of my candidate interviews, with links to the interview transcripts, are here:

Sophia Campos
Audrey Nath
Joe Panzarella
Angelica Luna Kaufman
Nick Hellyar
Laura Gallier
Patrick Oathout

If you live in District C, have you voted yet?

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Second post-primary poll shows Talarico up

Rep. James Talarico

Here’s the basic info, the poll was conducted by Impact Research between March 12-17, which makes it fully after the first poll we saw, both of which have Rep. James Talarico narrowly up on both Sen. John Cornyn and AG Ken Paxton. This one has Talarico up 43-41 on Cornyn and 44-43 on Paxton; the other one had him up two on Paxton and one on Cornyn.

I wouldn’t read too much into any of it right now. Poll results can always be a little wonky when one candidate is determined but the other one is not, as some supporters of one opponent may not be ready to commit to the other one yet. Republicans are still trying to find a line of attack they want to focus on. They’ve been trawling Talarico’s old social media posts and making dumb vegan jokes, which Talarico has treated with the respect they deserve. Something will land eventually, and he’ll need to be on his toes, but as long as Cornyn and Paxton are hacking away at each other it will be harder for anything else to gain purchase. Plus, you know, Iran, inflation, gas prices, economic anxiety. Reality has a way of devaluing trivial personal attacks.

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Lawsuits have been filed against xAI over Grok nonconsensual sexual images

Good.

On Monday, three girls filed a class-action lawsuit against xAI alleging that the company’s Grok AI tool was used to generate child sexual abuse material from their photos.

This new civil case joins at least two others revolving around nonconsensual deepfakes filed against xAI, which was founded by billionaire Elon Musk. Those earlier cases are centered around nonconsensual deepfakes posted on X, the social media platform also owned by Musk, while this new complaint involves a third-party app that relied on Grok AI to make images.

Grok image generation debuted on X in December, and immediately users found ways to generate sexually explicit images despite nudity being banned. Grok generated over 4.4 million images over nine days, per a review by The New York Times, and 1.8 million of those were sexualized depictions of women. Researchers at the nonprofit  Center for Countering Digital Hate estimated Grok made 23,000 sexualized images of children over 11 days.

[…]

All of the cases allege negligence on the part of xAI in releasing Grok. Each case alleges that xAI did not undertake industry-standard testing or implement common guardrails to prevent nonconsensual explicit images or child sexual abuse material from being generated.

xAI debuted the Grok chatbot in 2023, and Musk advertised it as an antidote to other chatbots, which he said were infected with the “woke-mind virus.” From the start, developers said Grok would reply to “spicy” questions that other apps would refuse to answer. This assertion has come back to haunt the company in these lawsuits, as it is being used to demonstrate negligence.

Grok exists as a standalone app and is accessible through the social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter. On December 20, 2025, Musk announced that Grok could be prompted to edit and generate images on X. Deepfake abuse exploded on the platform, with many politicians and civil society watchdogs raising the alarm. After weeks of little action, the social media giant said image generation would be limited to paid X accounts — essentially monetizing nonconsensual deepfakes, critics argued. (Also, it didn’t completely stop free X accounts from making images with Grok.)

On January 14, Musk posted on X that he was “not aware of any naked underage images generated by Grok,” but said “adversarial hacking” could lead to unexpected results that would be immediately fixed. Two of the three lawsuits allege Grok created sexually explicit, if not fully nude, images of kids before this date.

Two of the current cases stem from the rollout of Grok’s image generator on X. Ashley St. Clair, a political influencer and mother of one of Musk’s 14 publicly acknowledged children, sued xAI on January 15 after users prompted Grok to make sexually explicit images of her. St. Clair says some of the images modify a photo of her at 14, creating AI-generated child sexual abuse material.

Jane Doe, the plaintiff in the class-action lawsuit filed January 23, is a woman in South Carolina who says the Grok account posted an AI-generated image of her in a revealing bikini without her consent. She said X refused to take the image down after she originally reported it, and she was only able to get it removed after reporting it many times over three days. She said she had to take unpaid time off work and lives in fear that the image will resurface and cost her professional opportunities.

Unlike the prior two cases, the class-action suit filed Monday focuses on child sexual abuse material allegedly made on an app that licensed the Grok Imagine API. Three students in Tennessee, two minors and one whose deepfakes were sourced from images of her when she was under 18, discovered that someone created AI-generated child sexual abuse material from images they posted on social media. The accused allegedly distributed these images alongside the first names of the victims and the name of their school, heightening the risk of physical harm. The accused was arrested in December, and the complaint says the plaintiffs, known as Jane Does 1, 2 and 3, have suffered severe anxiety, particularly at school.

But Riana Pfefferkorn, a policy fellow at the Stanford Institute for Human-Centered AI and expert on laws concerning AI-generated child sexual abuse material, said this lawsuit seems like “suing xAI on hard mode” because the complaint doesn’t directly tie deepfakes of two of the plaintiffs to Grok.

See here, here, and here for some background. I will note, there’s still time for Ken Paxton to announce a big investigation of Grok and xAI for all of this stuff. Jokes aside, I do hope some Democratic Attorneys General are doing their own investigations, because honestly, why wouldn’t they be? Let’s make these guys sweat already. Mother Jones has more.

Posted in Legal matters, Technology, science, and math | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Hockey returns to Houston area

You’ll have to drive a bit to get to it, though.

Hockey is coming back to Houston.

The North American Hockey League announced the relocation of the North Iowa Bulls to the Houston area for the 2026-2027 season. The team will be renamed the Houston Bulls and play at the new Deep South Ice Rink and Sports Center in Richmond.

The NAHL is a part of the USA Hockey National Junior Development Model. It works closely with NCAA, the NHL, the United States Hockey League and USA Hockey’s National Development Program in order to “best serve as an imperative piece in the development system for collegiate and professional hockey.”

The league is an alternative for players who aren’t a level above in the USHL or the Ontario Hockey League, Quebec Major Junior Hockey League and Western Hockey League, the circuits that comprise the Canadian Hockey League.

“We are excited to bring NAHL hockey to the Houston area and to be part of a rapidly growing hockey market,” Tyler Shaffar, president of the management group that oversees the Houston Bulls, said in a statement. “The Deep South Ice Facility will provide a tremendous home for our players and fans, and we look forward to delivering more than 30 nights of high-level hockey and entertainment each season while contributing to the continued growth of the game in the Houston community.”

The announcement brings organized hockey back to Houston for the first time since the Houston Aeros of the American Hockey League relocated to Iowa in 2013.

[…]

The Deep South Ice & Sports Center is scheduled to open this summer and will be a state-of-the-art, privately-owned facility. The 150,000-square-foot project includes a 1,800-seat arena, 14 suites, two party decks, a second NHL-size practice ice sheet and a volleyball center.

“We’re thrilled to welcome junior hockey to our facility and to the community,” Deep South Ice & Sports Complex general managers TC Lewis & Caren Bell said in a statement. “The Houston Bulls will bring exciting, high-level hockey to our city and create new opportunities for local players and fans to connect with the sport.”

Houston will become the ninth team in the league’s South Division and seventh team from Texas. The others in the division include the Amarillo Wranglers, Corpus Christi IceRays, El Paso Rhinos, Lone Star Brahmas, New Mexico Ice Wolves, Odessa Jackalopes, Oklahoma Warriors, and Shreveport Mudbugs.

Yes, the fact that this team is relocating here from Iowa after the former Houston Aeros abandoned us to move to Iowa is a bit of a full-circle moment. Minor league sports tend to be pretty loose and fun-oriented, so if this sort of thing sounds like it might be your jam, you should check it out. The Lone Star Brahmas, by the way, are in the Dallas suburb of North Richland Hills, in case you want to do a statewide tour. If you’re still holding out for an NHL franchise, keep hope alive.

Posted in Other sports | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Not-quite-final Derek Ryan report

From the inbox:

Turnout

The numbers posted on the Secretary of State show that 2,165,744 people voted in the Republican Primary and 2,311,826 people voted in the Democratic Primary. Yes, more people voted in the Democratic Primary, 146,082 more to be exact. As I have mentioned before, this has happened several times over the past 25 years:

2020: Democrats 2,094,428 / Republicans 2,017,167 (Advantage D +77,261)
2008: Democrats 2,874,986 / Republicans 1,362,322 (Advantage D +1,512,664)
2004: Democrats 839,231 / Republicans 687,615 (Advantage D +151,616)
2002: Democrats 1,00388 / Republicans 622,423 (Advantage D +380,965)

Three of those were presidential years, and in each of those elections, Texas was still in play for the Democratic presidential nomination while the Republican nomination had already been locked up. You have to go back 24 years to find the last time turnout in the Democratic Primary surpassed the totals on the Republican side in a midterm election.

A lot of you were probably still in diapers in 2002. That year, there weren’t any major battles for statewide office on the Republican Primary ballot. The only true undecided race was for Land Commissioner (Jerry Patterson vs. Kenn George). Meanwhile, the Democrats had a contested primary for senate between Ron Kirk, Victor Morales, and Ken Bentsen. To a lesser extent, the Democrats also had a race for Governor between Tony Sanchez and Dan Morales. (No relation between Dan Morales and Victor Morales).

While there have been contested midterm primaries in the Democratic Primary since 2002, none seem to have had the same driving power that we saw this year.

Early vs. Election Day

I am in complete shock by how few people voted on Election Day compared to how many people voted early. I first thought that might be the case when I showed up at my local polling place at 5pm on Election Day (in Travis County), expecting to see long lines, and there was no line. I was in and out within five minutes. The final numbers and data only confirms my personal experience. Outside of a few pockets, election day voters made up a significantly smaller share of the vote than we have seen in past primary elections. For comparison:

Republican Primary
2020: 46% of votes were cast on Election Day / 54% were cast early or by mail
2022: 46% / 54%
2024: 47% / 53%
2026: 36% / 64%

Democratic Primary
2020: 52% of votes were cast on Election Day / 48% were cast early or by mail
2022: 41% / 59%
2024: 41% / 59%
2026: 32% / 68%

The splits we saw in both primaries seem more in line with what we would typically see in a November General Election and not a primary. For comparison, in the 2022 General Election, the split was 68% early/mail and 32% election day.

I’ve had a few people ask why I thought Election Day numbers weren’t higher and my theory is this. For months now, Republicans and Democrats have been inundated with text messages, phone calls, mail, ads on social media, ads on TV/radio, ads on streaming services, you name it. By the time early voting rolled around, each likely voter had probably been contacted several times from various different campaigns. I feel like previous primary voters voters: (a) had already decided if they were going to vote or not and (b) if they had decided to vote, they had likely already made up their mind as to who they would vote for. In other words, there was likely very little information that came out between Friday 7:01pm and Tuesday 7:00pm that was going to convince people to vote (if they hadn’t already decided to vote).

There is some possible evidence of this being the reason. During early voting in the Republican Primary, non-primary voters (those who had either only voted in General Elections or had no history at all) made up 14% of votes cast. However, amongst Election Day voters only, this group accounted for 27% of votes cast. On the Democratic Primary side, the group’s share during early voting was 31% while the group made up 51% of the votes cast on Election Day. The previous primary voters had already made their decisions, leaving those who hadn’t been frequently contacted to account for a larger share of the vote.

[…]

Crossover Voters and New Primary Voters

Just over five percent (5.3%) of the votes cast in the Democratic Primary were from people who had most recently voted in a Republican Primary prior to 2026 and of the votes cast in the Republican Primary, only 2.2% were cast by voters who had most recently voted in a Democratic Primary. Democrats voting in the Republican Primary was about half of what we typically see. Once again, this goes back to the fact that the Democrats had a competitive primary which likely kept Democrats voting in the Democratic Primary as opposed to switching to vote in the Republican Primary.

In addition to primary voters crossing over to vote in the other party’s primary, there is always a group of voters who have no previous primary history who show up to vote. Over one-third (37%) of votes cast in the Democratic Primary came from people who had not voted in either party’s primary between 2018 and 2024. On the Republican side, the share was only 19%.

Primary Data and Predictions for November

I have said multiple times, the total number of people who voted in each party’s primary doesn’t necessarily mean anything in terms of predicting what could happen in November. It’s a nice talking point, but as noted above, Democrats have seen higher primary numbers than Republicans four times since 2000 and in each of those years, Republican statewide candidates still managed to win in November.

The total number of people who voted in the primary elections also is only about half of the equation for November. Combined, both parties accounted for 4.5 million votes cast. We will likely see double that number voting in November.

Having said that, while you can’t look at the top line number and point to possible projections for November, there are some takeaways from this month’s election that do help shed some light on November. One of those being how many people voted in each party’s primary who did NOT vote in the 2022 November General Election (i.e., new midterm voters). There were about 546k in the Democratic Primary and 262k in the Republican Primary who fit this criteria. That’s a difference of 284k votes in favor of the Democrats. In 2022, Governor Greg Abbott defeated Congressman Beto O’Rourke by 883k votes. In 2018, Senator Ted Cruz defeated O’Rourke by only 215k votes. So 284k votes could either determine a winner or it could simply just make for a narrower margin of victory.

This is not quite final because there’s still some data he was unable to get as of this report. He got about 97% of Dem data and about 95% of GOP data; as he notes, it’s a little easier to get Dem data because the large majority of it comes from the 20 most populous counties, while there’s a lot of Republican data in a bunch of small counties that aren’t as quick about providing the voter files. There may be another report when he’s at 100% for each, but it likely won’t be all that different.

You can find a full breakdown of the Dem data here and of the GOP data here. This includes more on primary history as well as the ages of the voters. About 46% of Dem voters were under the age of 50, while only 22% of GOP voters were that young. Make of that what you will. The Chron, which also summarized this report, has more.

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

From the “Don’t run if you don’t intend to try” department

This is all so dumb.

Kelly Hall

Kelly Hall and his co-worker were playing the video game “Call of Duty” in the office of their Austin towing company, waiting for customers, when his friend turned his attention to another television.

The election results were up on the screen, and Hall was winning a race he didn’t even know he was still a part of.

“I laughed,” Hall, 36, said. “I was like, ‘Bro, stop playing.’ And he’s like, ‘No, bro, look.’”

Sure enough, he was ahead of his Democratic opponent, Javi Andrade, by a decisive amount.

Hall barely remembers the number of the solidly red Central Texas district he ran in or the name of his would-be Republican opponent, state Rep. Ellen Troxclair. He paid a total of $750 on the campaign, enough to cover the filing fee, then never touched a single yard sign or dirtied a sneaker blockwalking.

Hall said he thought he had dropped out of the race back in January, when he said Democratic Party precinct chairs urged him to “do the right thing” and allow the party-backed Andrade to run unopposed. He decided to run for Round Rock mayor instead.

But on Tuesday, Hall beat Andrade by almost 3,000 votes after missing a December deadline to drop out in time for his name to be removed from ballots.

The bizarre outcome has thrown what would have been a low-profile race into chaos, with some of the state’s top election lawyers clashing over whose name will be on the ballot in November.

The Texas Democratic Party is moving to replace Hall, who it says is ineligible for the nomination because he is running in the Round Rock mayor’s race. But the Republican-controlled secretary of state’s office says the party cannot pick a substitute, potentially setting the stage for what could be a drawn-out legal battle.

[…]

After filing for the HD 19 nomination, Hall said four precinct chairs reached out to him to implore him to consider stepping down, saying the party already had its preferred candidate. Hall said he felt like he didn’t have a choice but to agree. And he didn’t want to run somewhere he clearly wasn’t wanted anyway.

Hall grew up in Oklahoma, where he worked as a correctional officer, before moving to Texas a decade ago. He visited Austin for South by Southwest to party, parked somewhere he shouldn’t, got his car towed and ended up staying in town to work for the towing company because he couldn’t immediately afford the fees.

Hall, who has also served in the Texas State Guard, said he feels his hard-knock background makes him a more relatable candidate than the typical politician.

“They’re mad because they spent thousands of dollars, and I spent nothing,” Hall said about the Texas Democratic Party.

Andrade, an Army veteran and cybersecurity specialist, received about $1,500 in donations and had about $2,150 on hand as of mid-January, according to campaign finance records. Hall’s campaign records show $0 all the way down.

“I mean, it’s kind of cool because everyone thinks you have to be a millionaire or have all this money to run for office and make a difference. You could be just yourself,” he said. “That right there is going to mess up the Democratic and Republican Party because I just won doing nothing. … I just showed right then and there anything is possible.”

[…]

Craig Morgan, the three-term Round Rock mayor Hall is challenging, has been learning more than he ever bargained for about these types of tedious procedural rules. But Morgan has been mostly focused on another part of the statute: residency requirements.

Hall provided a Cedar Park address when he filed for candidacy in House District 19 but a Round Rock address when he filed for mayor. Both the Texas House and city of Round Rock require candidates to have lived within the district or city for a minimum of one year to be eligible to run.

“On one of them, he lied,” Morgan said of Hall’s forms. “That’s just the reality of it.”

Hall said that he was living between two homes and now primarily lives in Round Rock. He did not own either home. His sister was renting the Cedar Park home, and he lived there while he was helping her with her kids as she moved in. Hall said he had lived in the state House district for over two years when he applied, and he began renting the Round Rock home in January 2025.

Morgan said he explored his legal options to contest Hall’s residency but decided it was not worth the trouble because the court precedents on the issue are “all over the map.” He also did not want to sue his longtime colleagues.

“I’m just not going to sue a city that I’ve given 15 years to,” he said. “They’re just doing their jobs.”

There are at least three villains in this story. First of course is Kelly Hall, for being fickle and feckless. Like, a handful of your opponent’s supporters asked you to drop out, and you got your nose all out of joint? If you can’t laugh that kind of thing off, you’re not cut out for politics. Second is Javi Andrade and his supporters, for not raising any money or apparently running any campaign. There were only 13K votes cast in this race; Kelly Hall had 7,887 of them. Any half-decent blockwalking strategy could have overcome that. Take a good look in the mirror before you complain about the result.

But most of all, Texas’ ridiculous residency laws, which we know from plentiful past experience are basically meaningless, are to blame. The problem with the TDP now claiming that Kelly Hall was actually ineligible to run in the primary is that they accepted his candidate filing, because they would have had no grounds at the time to disqualify him. Your residence is where you say it is, whether or not you have ever lived there, as long as you can say you plan to live there. I’m not even sure that Hall’s “I live here, there, and everywhere” filing strategy is illegal under current law. Maybe the TDP could pursue some kind of fraud claim, but good luck proving intent.

We have a gentleperson’s agreement in this state to mostly look the other way when someone claims a warehouse or a summer house or their mother’s living room sofa as their residence, and most of the time it doesn’t matter; opposing candidates seldom raise it as an issue in races, and when they do the voters often don’t care, or at least don’t prioritize it as an issue. Every once in awhile, it leads to a dumb result, like what happened here, and the courts will shrug their shoulders and say the law as written is sufficiently broad and vague that there’s nothing they can do. That’s what I expect to happen here. It doesn’t matter much – as noted, HD19 is a 70% Trump district, and by the available evidence Javi Andrade was not going to be any better an opponent to the incumbent than Kelly Hall would have been. This will just become another one of those stories about why our residency laws are so stupid. I’ll trot it out as an example the next time this happens, which it surely will in a few more years.

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Spring ISD hoping to avoid HISD’s fate

Good luck, y’all.

Spring ISD has just a few more months to turn around a struggling high school or risk a state takeover of the entire district — but school leaders are optimistic that early test scores show improvements.

After four straight years of failing accountability scores at Dekaney High School, campus and district administrators are trying to turn around the school’s academic performance. If the campus fails again this school year, the Texas Education Agency could take over the entire school district of 32,000 students – just like it took over Houston, Beaumont and Fort Worth ISDs. It would replace the superintendent and elected board with state-appointed leadership.

Cecily Parker, the district’s executive director of school improvement and support, told the board at a March workshop that TEA officials had visited Dekaney — both recently in February and last fall — to observe how the campus was applying its improvement plans.

Parker said at both visits, the TEA officials measured the quality of instructional material and practices in classrooms, and they saw academic growth.

“Dekaney was specifically highlighted for the instructional growth between the fall and the spring visit, reflecting stronger alignment to curriculum expectations and more consistent implementation of campus instructional systems,” Parker said.

To turn around a failing school within one year is an urgent task, but not an impossible one, said Duncan Klussmann, a clinical associate professor at the University of Houston.

Klussmann, a former Spring Branch ISD superintendent, said he saw one school in the San Antonio area that was close to triggering a takeover, but it improved its state rating within a single school year. He also pointed to various HISD schools that have dramatically improved their scores within a year, particularly campuses under state-appointed Superintendent Mike Miles’ New Education System.

However, Klussmann said it’s not easy. It takes a lot of focus and discipline.

He said leaders need to come up with an action plan that targets where the campus and its students are falling behind. Everyone at the campus — including administrators, teachers and students — has to follow those strategies exactly every day for the entire school year to reach their goal.

Principal Connie Smith detailed Dekaney’s updated game plan in January, covering changes in curriculum, instruction and testing. The school revamped how they track academic performance data and started professional learning groups for teachers every school day. They also rolled out more instructional support, weekly student assessments and intervention plans to help students who lag behind.

The bar is high: Dekaney has to go from an F to a C this school year.

“Remember, it’s a fourth-year (failing school) going into the fifth year,” Klussmann said. “They’re not in a situation where they can have really good growth, but barely miss it. They have to get over that line.”

See here for the background. The numbers they have now seem to look good, but as noted there’s no margin for error. Close will not be good enough. I wish you all the best, Spring ISD.

Posted in School days | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Weekend link dump for March 22

“Pull up a chair and endure yet another goddamn article about generative AI.” A long read but worth your time.

“From location tracking and monitoring software to wearable tech like Meta’s AI Glasses and smartwatches, each advancement in tech innovation births another tool for perpetrators to abuse women.”

“Cities and states are filing lawsuits and scrambling for alternative sources of money as the Trump administration seeks to shut off the federal funding spigot for biking and walking trails.”

“Now, the administration of the self-proclaimed “president of peace”—who claims to have ended eight wars, even as he starts new ones—will mint dimes without the olive branch at all. It’s part of the US Mint’s semiquincentennial line, a one-year-only redesign of US coinage commemorating America’s 250th birthday.”

“In the business world, the term [personality hire] might sound like a backhanded compliment — the person hired for their charisma rather than their skills or expertise. But underneath the self-deprecation and TikTok memes, there is a deeper lesson about team building.”

“This year the focus is not so much on Ukrainian weakness but on Ukrainian attempts to fight back and whether they have a chance at success. That is remarkable with the US changing sides and the Russians hammering Ukrainian infrastructure all winter. This change in narrative is because certain key Ukrainian strengths and capabilities are now far more apparent to the media and analytical community than they were a year ago. Much of this strength is in war production and technology, strengths that have become glaringly apparent over the last two and a half weeks. They are so vital that Europe’s defense future now requires Ukraine. Ukraine is now achieving what Europe has struggled with for decades—creating new and innovative start-ups.”

“This is a point that’s hard for a lot of my artist friends to understand: how come so many coders don’t just hate LLMs for stealing their work the way that most writers and photographers and musicians do? The answer boils down to three things”.

“The uprising within DLR Group isn’t the only example of workers pushing back on their employers’ business dealings with ICE—but it may be one of the more successful ones.”

“A new study shows that X’s ‘For you’ algorithm promotes conservative content and demotes traditional media, effectively shifting users’ opinions.”

“The man charged with planting pipe bombs at Democratic and Republican party headquarters on the eve of Jan. 6, 2021, says he’s protected from prosecution by the sweeping clemency President Donald Trump decreed for participants in the attack on the Capitol.”

“I just wish there wasn’t the pressure — culturally, in the publishing world, in our own minds — to wrap our stories up with a neat and satisfying conclusion. I wish I once was lost, I am still wandering was an ok place to be, an ending a reader might accept.”

“When I considered this I decided that it’s actually quite similar to an argument that I’ve made here a number of times. And that is that the old order is categorically shattered. There’s no going back. This is the real takeaway of the Biden presidency. I still think it will likely be judged more generously in the future than it is today. But big picture it was a failure, as would be any effort to simply turn back the tide of Trumpism or reconstitute the political world we knew before Trump. That world, that political order is gone.”

“We do think we’re seeing a shift in the willingness of people in pro-Trump areas in the country to participate in a broader mass movement emerging in opposition to many of his administration’s policies.”

RIP, Kiki Shepard, actor, dancer, and longtime co-host of Showtime at the Apollo.

RIP, Jürgen Habermas, German philosopher and influential thinker on modernity and democracy.

“You didn’t click a phishing link. You didn’t download a binary. You just received a text, and your agent “helpfully” exfiltrated your private keys.”

AI ‘Slop’ Is Flooding Children’s Media. Parents Should Be Very Alarmed.”

“Fam, is it good when a federal judge invents an entirely new rule just for you? Not really!”

Yes, let’s rename Austin’s Cesar Chavez Street for Delores Huerta, if she approves of the idea. And if she approves of the idea, I say rename pretty much any Cesar Chavez thing for Delores Huerta.

“We’re over here just grinding away on banger memes, dude. There’s an entertainment factor to what we do. But ultimately, it boils down to the fact that no one has ever attempted to communicate with the American public this way before.”

“Scientists have discovered a new bee species that depends on a native Texas plant.”

“You have to hold onto power because if you don’t, you lose your immunity. Here I don’t mean legal immunity per se. It’s just that if you’re a made man in the Trump world, there’s no Justice Department. Nothing matters. Do whatever you want. The DOJ won’t touch you. But once you’re cast off the island everything changes. The veil of impunity gets lifted.”

“I mean, if you watch our movies or TV shows, we don’t repeat our plots. I don’t know where that comment came from.”

You can now buy Italy’s World Baseball Classic espresso maker, and some other items from the WBC, at an auction that runs through March 23.

“Anyway, if you’re doing the math, that’s 20% of Duggar boys who have been charged with crimes involving children. If you include the free space, some of you may be very close to winning Duggar Family Child Endangerment Bingo. The next spinoff will be Two Convictions and Counting. None of these family members, by the way, are drag queens.”

RIP, Chuck Norris, best known for being Chuck Norris.

RIP, Robert Mueller, former FBI director and investigator of Donald Trump.

RIP, Nicholas Brendon, actor best known as Xander from Buffy the Vampire Slayer.

RIP, Sam Kieth, comic book artist, writer, and creator whose many works include Sandman, The Maxx, and a personal favorite of mine, Epicurus the Sage.

Posted in Blog stuff | Tagged | Leave a comment

The SD04 special election

Lone Star Left reminds me of an upcoming race I’d overlooked.

Ron Angeletti

I’m usually pretty good at staying on top of these, but for some reason, I had lumped Texas Senate District 04 into the districts with regular elections. When, in fact, SD04 is having a special election. And sneaky Greg Abbott lumped it into the same dates as the city elections (updated the dates below) to improve Republican odds.

The election is between:

Why is SD04 going into a special election on May 2?

This was Senator Brandon Creighton’s seat. And if y’all remember, Creighton was a hillbilly lawyer who championed legislation to remove diversity from higher education. So, he was recently appointed Chancellor of the University of Texas Tech, leaving his Senate seat open.

SD04 isn’t a race that Democrats should treat as impossible, especially not fresh off their SD09 win, but we need to be realistic about how hard this district is. The district’s political gravity lies in Montgomery County, which accounts for the largest share of the seat. The district is made up of all of Chambers County, most of Montgomery County, plus smaller pieces of Harris, Jefferson, and a sliver of Galveston.

In 2024, Trump carried SD04 with 66.6% to Kamala Harris’ 32.4%, and Ted Cruz carried it 63.8% to Colin Allred’s 34.0%. But that was 2024. Politically, it feels like a lifetime ago. For Ron Angeletti to win this special, Democrats would need something in the neighborhood of a 15-point overperformance compared with Allred’s number to get to even, or roughly a 30-point swing from the 2024 Cruz margin.

That’s less than the swing Taylor Rehmet just did in SD09, but it’s still a huge swing.

So what would it take to flip SD04?

I’ll stop there because the answer is somewhere between “an act of God” and “a political earthquake measuring something like 8.7 on the Richter scale”. I’ll get into that in a minute, but first I would like to note that May 2 is the uniform election date and as such the normal date on which this election would fall, by law. Brandon Creighton resigned on October 2. That seat will be vacant for seven months by the time the May election rolls around. Greg Abbott is a shitweasel and the vacancy in SD04 is of little consequence (especially compared to CD18) given that the Lege is not in session, but when else would this election have been? It would have been highly unusual – and again, by law, would have required some kind of emergency justification – to have had it at another time. Sometimes these things are just normal business.

Anyway. I say that this race is an extreme longshot not to be a bummer or to cast any aspersions at all at Ron Angeletti, but simply to note that SD04 is about as impervious a district as there is. Lone Star Left gave the 2024 numbers above, which are daunting enough. Here’s another number to consider: In 2018, Beto O’Rourke lost SD04 by a margin of 65.7 to 33.6, only two points closer than the Trump/Harris margin and slightly worse than the Allred/Cruz margin. In other words, even in the most favorable environment we’ve had in a long time, SD04 was a 65% red district. That’s rough.

“But what about Taylor Rehmet and what he did in SD09?”, I hear you cry. Well, SD09 in 2018 was only 55.6 to 43.6 for Cruz over Beto, which is a lot closer than SD04. Let’s assume that 2026 is at least as positive an environment for Dems as 2018 was. How much better could it get from there? A swing from the 2018 SD09 numbers to the 2026 SD09 runoff numbers (57.0 to 43.0 for Rehmet) would still yield a 52.1 to 47.2 win for Brett Ligon in SD04. I don’t know how much sunnier an assumption you can make.

Now, I do think we should keep an eye on this race, and we should help Ron Angeletti to whatever extent we can. I hope the TDP is helping him, and I hope folks in that district are helping him. If Angeletti can make this a closer race, even just holding Brett Ligon under 60%, that should keep the GOP’s anxiety level ratcheted up. They won’t be able to dismiss SD09 as a one-off fluke as easily if Angeletti beats the spread. Angeletti’s campaign platform has similarities to Rehmet’s but isn’t identical to it, and that’s fine – he’s a different candidate in a different district. Are the voters there open to something other than the same old, same old, which a longtime Montgomery County politician like Brett Ligon represents? Let’s find out.

For what it’s worth, Ligon (who had a primary opponent) had $248,135 on hand as of February 21, the end date for his 8-day report. He raised $303K in the period between his 30-day and his 8-day, so he will be able to top that up as needed. Angeletti had literally five dollars on hand as of his January report; he was not required to file a 30-day or 8-day as an unopposed candidate in his primary. I hope he can raise a few bucks between now and May 2. He would have a better chance at moving the needle if he can do that. And in case you were wondering, about 88K votes were cast in the Republican primary in SD04, while 47K were cast in the Democratic primary. In SD09, it was 67,705 on the Democratic side and 67,562 on the Republican side. These are not the same districts. Let’s keep that in mind.

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Harris County criminal case backlog cleared

Great news.

Sean Teare

After months of declining criminal caseloads in Harris County courts, prosecutors on Tuesday declared victory in clearing out a crippling backlog of felony cases caused by Hurricane Harvey and exacerbated by the pandemic.

“The backlog is not numbers,” District Attorney Sean Teare said at a news conference. “Every single one of these (numbers) is reflecting a group of people: the accused and the victims who have to deal with this in a real, meaningful way.

The backlog improved soon after Teare took office in January 2025, and three new state district courts opened their doors to lighten the load for other courts in 2024. The average number of cases then dropped to levels not seen since Hurricane Harvey wreaked havoc on the criminal justice infrastructure in downtown Houston in 2017.

In the weeks before the storm, which flooded the criminal courthouse, the county’s 22 courts had an average of about 930 pending cases, records show.

The number climbed as courts worked out of other county buildings, and the pandemic later forced in-person proceedings to stall even more. By 2021, the average more than doubled to over 2,200 cases amid a nationwide rise in violent crime, according to a review of state district court statistics.

One court stopped holding trials altogether for more than a year. The jail population also increased, prompting authorities to spend millions to house inmates elsewhere.

[…]

This year, the situation surrounding caseloads is far different — the backlog dropped to an average of 730 cases spread across 29 courts by the end of February.

Commissioner Adrian Garcia credited some members of the judiciary for calming the backlog. He named four judges — [Te’iva] Bell and [Matthew] Peneguy, as well as Brian Warren and Natalia Cornelio — as some of the top performing courts.

Teare also attributed the sustained decline in caseloads to pushing more cases to trial — which allowed other prosecutions to end sooner. A defendant can face multiple charges, but not go to trial on all of them.

Teare’s prosecutors dismissed more than 26,000 felonies during his first 10 months in office — about double what his predecessor, Kim Ogg, did in the same amount of time during her first term in 2017, according to a Chronicle analysis of data from his office.

About half of the felonies dismissed by Teare involved defendants being convicted in other cases — a sign that older cases were coming to a close. This played out when prosecutors dismissed eight charges against Xavier Davis last April after a jury convicted him for a 2021 home invasion triple killing and sentenced him to death. The additional charges stemmed from assaults and jail contraband that prosecutors used to argue for his punishment.

About a quarter of the other dismissals were attributed to a lack of evidence or discretionary reasons, the data shows.

Teare called the first wave of dismissals a “significant reduction.”

“We were disposing of cases with dismissals that should have been dismissed long before that,” Teare said.

This is why we elected Sean Teare. He’s come in and gotten the job done, and there’s been no drama. I don’t know what else you could want.

Posted in Crime and Punishment | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

So how do first responders handle autonomous vehicles?

This story raised more questions than it answered for me.

A viral image from the March 1 shooting in downtown Austin — an autonomous vehicle blocking an ambulance from reaching the scene where a gunman fatally wounded three people and injured 15 others — has put a spotlight on driverless cars as they hit the streets in more major Texas cities.

A video widely circulated on social media shows a Waymo vehicle blocking the street as paramedics try to reach the scene of the shooting at Buford’s, in the city’s nightlife district on West 6th Street, forcing the ambulance driver to seek another route.

“This is why we should not have self-driving cars,” an onlooker says in the video.

The encounter didn’t significantly hinder the city’s ability to respond to the shooting, local emergency officials have said, and an Austin police officer was able to move the vehicle within two minutes of arriving at the scene, the video shows.

[…]

Texas banned cities from regulating autonomous vehicles in 2017, a move policymakers and transportation experts said was necessary to allow the industry to grow. Texas lawmakers last year directed the state’s Department of Motor Vehicles to draw up more regulations to oversee autonomous vehicle companies operating in the state. Those regulations won’t take effect until May.

In the meantime, self-driving cars have hit the road in more parts of the state. The week before the Austin shooting, Waymo, the autonomous vehicle company, deployed its vehicles in San Antonio, Dallas and Houston. Other companies like Tesla, Volkswagen and Zoox are testing self-driving cars in Austin, according to the Texas Department of Transportation.

Austin has been a testing ground for self-driving cars since the middle of the last decade. While city officials are forbidden from regulating autonomous vehicles, they’ve kept an eye on them and tried to work with operators to work out kinks. According to the city’s website, Austin officials have worked to “collaborate with TxDMV and companies as they enter the market to offer staff’s knowledge on the local transportation network to help AVs operate more safely.”

Within a minute and a half of arriving on scene, an Austin police officer commandeered the vehicle and drove it into a nearby parking garage, clearing the roadway.

“We already had a system where a police officer could get in that vehicle and move it. That didn’t exist four years ago,” said Jay Blazek Crossley, executive director of the nonprofit Farm & City, a group that advocates for transportation safety measures.

Austin officials said emergency responders followed established protocol for interacting with autonomous vehicles. Waymo also has its own guide for law enforcement officers in dealing with its cars, and the company says on its website that it “proactively offers training to first responders where we operate.”

“Our first responders are trained on how to manage driverless vehicles that become stopped or unresponsive,” Captain Christa Stedman, a spokesperson for Austin-Travis County Emergency Medical Services, said in an email. “This type of scenario is something we prepare for, and it was resolved quickly without a significant impact to patient care or overall response operations.”

Other cities are figuring out how to handle encounters with autonomous vehicles.

In Dallas, emergency officials are still working out protocols for dealing with autonomous vehicles, city spokespeople said.

In San Antonio, the police and fire departments “have received training and quick-reference guidance for safely managing autonomous vehicles, including steps to take if a vehicle becomes unresponsive, how to contact the vendor for immediate support, and how to redirect vehicles away from active incident scenes,” city spokesperson Brian Chasnoff said.

Waymo met with each department late last year “to familiarize our first responders with its vehicles,” Chasnoff said.

I guess I’d like to know more about what Waymo’s guide says and does, whether any or all of the other robotaxi providers have something similar, what are the minimum standards for such guides, how much of the burden for training first responders falls on the cities and how much assistance they get from the state and the providers, how much variance there can be in cities’ programs, and probably some more questions as well. I mean, I understand that the powers that be wanted a uniform statewide approach to regulating autonomous vehicles, and while I can see the logic in that it’s not clear to me at this point how uniform any of this is. Cities are allowed to regulate their own streets, and yet we all manage to drive in other places without confusion. I’m not sure what’s been gained here, at least for the rest of us.

The story also gets into the issue that Waymos have had with school buses, in Austin and elsewhere.

In all, the Austin school district has issued 25 tickets to Waymo since August, Pickford said. The company had knowledge of its vehicles’ activity, he said, because each ticket issued by the district’s police department was paid on time.

When district officials brought the matter to the company’s attention at a meeting with Waymo representatives in November, company officials initially rejected the district’s assessment that the cars posed a threat to students and refused a request for the company to pause operations during pick-up and drop-off hours, Pickford said.

In the meantime, Waymo cars continued to rack up violations, he said. Human drivers, Pickford said, tend not to reoffend once they’re ticketed.

“The Waymos were not learning, and that was concerning to us,” Pickford said.

Waymo issued a software update in November after meeting with district officials, Pickford said. In December, the company collected data on the district’s school buses with the apparent goal of improving their vehicles’ ability to recognize and respond to school bus signals.

That month, Waymo issued a software recall after its buses also failed to yield to school buses in Atlanta — two months after the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration launched an investigation into the company. The NHTSA and the National Transportation Safety Board have each begun probes into the company for its vehicles’ failures to stop for school buses.

preliminary NTSB report released this week found that one Waymo vehicle illegally passed an Austin ISD school bus in January because one of the company’s remote assistance agents, employees who help the cars’ system navigate unclear driving circumstances, incorrectly told the car it could do so.

Meanwhile, Texas is standing up its own regulatory framework.

At the end of May, Texas will require autonomous vehicle operators to gain authorization from the state Department of Motor Vehicles before their cars can carry passengers on Texas roads.

Companies must certify in writing that their vehicles are “capable of operating in compliance with applicable traffic and motor vehicle laws,” among other requirements, in order to gain that authorization. Operators must also provide a copy of a plan specifying how emergency responders “should interact with the automated motor vehicle” should they encounter one.

Again, it would be nice to know more about this. Mostly, how do those of us who have an interaction with one of these vehicles file a complaint with the state? What happens if there’s evidence that a company isn’t living up to those promises they made? Maybe we’ll find out when those regs are finished, but so far there hasn’t been much for us to go on. And most importantly, if and when someone is injured or their car is damaged in a collision that is determined to be the AV’s fault, how do they get compensated for it? I suppose an insured person could let their carrier deal with it, but what if you’re a pedestrian, or on a bicycle? Or your auto insurance is insufficient, or refuses to deal with it? Filing a lawsuit against Waymo or Tesla or whichever multi-billion dollar corporation seems like a bad way to go about it. Do we have any rules on that yet?

Posted in Planes, Trains, and Automobiles | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

KP George convicted of money laundering

Welp.

Judge KP George

Fort Bend County Judge KP George was convicted Friday of felony money laundering after jurors found he funneled campaign funds into personal accounts and used the money to cover his personal expenses.

The verdict came after several hours of deliberations that began around 2 p.m Thursday.

At trial, prosecutors laid out a series of transactions they said showed George shifting money out of campaign accounts, routing it through personal bank accounts and spending it on a down payment on a house and other expenses.

They pointed to roughly $46,500 in withdrawals, arguing the repeated movement of money was intentional, not a bookkeeping issue.

“This man lied repeatedly,” prosecutor Katie Peterson told jurors. “Crimes have consequences. Lies have consequences.”

George’s defense centered on the claim that the money was his to begin with and that the transactions were transfers between his own accounts.

[…]

George will remain in office until he is formally sentenced, according to the district attorney’s office. If George appeals his conviction, he may stay in office pending the appeal, unless a judge rules that he must be removed. George’s sentencing is unofficially scheduled for June.

See here for the previous update. I can’t wait to see a tweet from Sen. Bettencourt calling on George to resign as County Judge. I’m also greatly amused that the main witness he called on for his defense was Andy freaking Taylor, like good Lord, man.

Anyway. This was all very tawdry, I’m sorry that Fort Bend has to deal with this, and I’m so glad he’s not the Democrats’ problem now. We’ll see what happens next. Houston Public Media has more.

Posted in Crime and Punishment | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

So when might Corpus Christi run out of water?

Could be sooner, could be later. Pick your projection.

Corpus Christi leaders on Tuesday unveiled new projections suggesting that the city could be just two months away from triggering emergency water measures.

At a marathon city council meeting that stretched for 10 hours, Nick Winkelmann, interim chief operating officer of Corpus Christi Water, outlined five potential scenarios — two of which would push the city into a level one water emergency by May. At that point, the city’s water supply would be projected to fall short of demand within 180 days.

When pressed by council member Kaylynn Paxson on which scenario the city is preparing to follow, staffers at the water utility said they expect to narrow the possibilities down to two or three in the coming weeks as more data becomes available.

Meanwhile, Gov. Greg Abbott — who sharply criticized Corpus Christi leaders for their handling of the crisis recently — has ordered agencies to suspend normal procedures in an effort to buy the city more time.

Complicating the outlook are bleak seasonal forecasts. Projections from the National Weather Service show little to no rainfall expected between July and September, limiting inflows to key reservoirs that supply the city, including Choke Canyon, Lake Corpus Christi and Lake Texana.

Despite the mounting concerns, the city has not finalized a curtailment plan that would lay out how much — and how soon — residents and businesses would have to reduce their water use.

“If we get to the point where we have to declare a level one water emergency, we need to be ready for that and we have no precedent to follow and we have no there’s no manual, there’s no video, there’s no, ‘This is how we did it the last time,’ ” City Manager Peter Zanoni told the council, adding that a curtailment plan could take weeks or months to finalize and implement.

[…]

The city recently boosted production from its primary water pipeline that pulls from Lake Texana and the Colorado River, increasing capacity by 24 million gallons per day, even as a deepening drought threatens to cut off that extra water.

Under the drought plan for the Lavaca-Navidad River Authority, which operates the lake, when the lake reaches 50% capacity, the agency must reduce customers’ water supply by 10%. The reservoir is currently at 54% of capacity.

The governor’s office Friday ordered the river authority to change that trigger point to 40% to guarantee more water to the city. The authority is meeting on Wednesday to make that change, according to the governor’s office.

Meanwhile, several major water infrastructure projects remain months or even years away from completion, leaving a critical gap as water demand continues to climb.

To close that gap, the city has turned to drilling wells in two fields in rural Nueces County that are expected to produce up to 26 million gallons daily once fully operational. One field is completed and another has some wells ready to operate soon, but is awaiting a permit from the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.

Corpus Christi officials say the delays could push the city toward a water emergency sooner.

“The only thing holding us up is a piece of paper,” Zanoni, the city manager, said at a Friday press conference.

On Friday, Abbott directed the TCEQ to fast-track temporary permits and loosen certain regulatory requirements to accelerate the city’s drilling projects.

“Corpus Christi is an important economic driver not only for Texas but also the nation,” said Andrew Mahaleris, the governor’s press secretary. “The State of Texas is committing significant investments to ensure Corpus Christi has the water resources it needs to serve citizens. The Governor is further stepping in and has waived regulations to ensure TCEQ can issue temporary permits on an expedited basis — while still preserving public input.”

TCEQ did not immediately comment on whether those permits have been issued.

During Tuesday’s meeting, the council also voted to accelerate the second well drilling project — despite not yet having the permits needed to pump.

The Evangeline groundwater project would include 24 wells and is projected to produce about 24 million gallons of water per day from neighboring San Patricio County. It could be finished by 2028, according to a city memo.

“We’re taking a calculated risk and continuing the design and we’re going to build,” Zanoni told council members. “We’re going to start building the project in about five weeks, without the permits, without the drilling permits.”

Officials say the design for the project is about 60% complete and the wells could deliver roughly 4 million gallons of water per day by November, though that timeline depends heavily on when the city receives permits to start pumping.

See here and here for the background. That Evangeline project may face legal challenges, and of course 2028 may be a bit late for the oncoming disaster. Inside Climate News adds some details.

The city is currently drawing most of its water from Lake Texana, 100 miles to its northeast, where rules by the Lavaca-Navidad River Authority stipulate a 10 percent reduction in Corpus Christi’s draw when the lake falls below 50 percent full, which authorities expect to happen in April.

On Monday Abbott “directed the LNRA to ensure Corpus Christi water is not curtailed in the near term,” Mahaleris said in his statement on Tuesday.

Abbott directed the agency to move its curtailment threshold to the point at which Lake Texana reaches 40 percent “to further protect residents as the city forms long-term solutions,” Mahaleris said. Instead of cutting Corpus Christi’s water 10 percent when Texana hits 50 percent, the Lavaca-Navidad River Authority would cut the city’s water by 20 percent when Texana hits 40 percent, general manager Patrick Brzozowski told Inside Climate News in an interview at the agency office on Monday.

Abbott’s order would in effect delay implementation of water curtailment, but result in twice as much water loss if the reservoir recedes to 40 percent capacity. That would buy Corpus Christi another month to bring new water supplies online before much larger forced cuts of water demand would take effect.

[…]

Most of the region’s water supply goes to industrial users, including chemical plants and refineries that produce jet fuel for Texas airports as well as gasoline for the state. The region’s largest water consumer is a plastics plant operated by ExxonMobil and the Saudi state oil company, which opened in 2022.

Now Corpus Christi is racing to develop the emergency water wellfields before its supplies run short. Those clusters of wells, which the city started in 2025, will pump groundwater into the Nueces River to boost water levels in Lake Corpus Christi.

At current production levels of 4 MGD, those wells won’t prevent the city from entering a water emergency in May, according to city modeling presented Tuesday.

If those wells produce 10 MGD by April, it still might not prevent the city from entering a water emergency in May. If the wells boost production and secure additional permitting by April, it could push the emergency to October.

If, in addition to those conditions, the city receives permits for its Evangeline groundwater import project and it starts producing 4 MGD in November, the city could avoid an emergency altogether.

The city also reported progress on its seawater desalination project and wastewater reuse project. It said containerized brackish water treatment plants could produce 4 MGD in 11 months or 21 MGD in two years. It did not present detailed plans for what to do in the case of an emergency.

The city should be making plans to reduce its current water use, including by industrial water users, according to Todd Votteler, a veteran South Texas water manager and editor in chief of the Texas Water Journal.

“Restricting current use is really the best short-term option,” Votteler, a former executive manager for the Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority, told Inside Climate News. “While the ongoing debate over seawater desalination and other prospective water supplies is important, it is ultimately not relevant to addressing the current water crisis.”

Here’s a more recent update, in which some new water supplies have come online for Corpus Christi and thus reducing the immediate burden. But with all of it there’s a bit of robbing Peter to pay Paul, which I can understand in an emergency, but which runs the risk of expanding the crisis to the places that depend on the sources that Corpus will be borrowing from. And yeah, there’s the matter of the big industrial users.
This story from 2022
was an early warning.

Five years ago, when ExxonMobil came calling, city officials eagerly signed over a large portion of their water supply so the oil giant could build a $10 billion plant to make plastics out of methane gas.

A year later, they did the same for Steel Dynamics to build a rolled-steel factory.

Never mind that Corpus Christi, a mid-sized city on the semi-arid South Texas coast, had just raced through its 50-year water plan 13 years ahead of schedule. Planners believed they had a solution: large-scale seawater desalination.

According to the plan in 2019, the state’s first plant needed to be running by early 2023 to safely meet industrial water demands that were scheduled to come online. But Corpus Christi never got it done.

That hasn’t stopped the city and its port authority from pursuing broader plans to build out a next-generation industrial sector around Corpus Christi Bay and make this region a rival to Houston, home to the nation’s largest petrochemical complex, 200 miles up the Gulf Coast.

As efforts to cut carbon emissions fall desperately behind the timetables established in decades’ of global climate accords, Corpus Christi is planning a massive expansion of its hydrocarbon sector, aimed at delivering oil and gas from Texas’ shale fields to global markets for decades to come.

All that’s missing is the freshwater. Now the commitments city officials made over the past five years are coming due. Exxon’s plastic plant started operations this year and will eventually consume 25 million gallons of water per day, even as the region’s water plan foresees demand exceeding supplies in this decade.

I dunno, maybe forcing those guys to do something would be a good idea? It’s sure not what we’re doing now. I’m sure Greg Abbott can come up with some suggestions, when he’s not busy presiding over Corpus’ City Council meetings.

Posted in The great state of Texas | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Zoox coming to Dallas

From last week. I’m curious to see how it goes.

Amazon’s self-driving unit Zoox plans to start testing its autonomous vehicles in Dallas and Phoenix, the company announced Monday.

To start, Zoox will deploy a “small number” of its retrofitted Toyota Highlander SUVs, with a human safety driver behind the wheel, to map the areas before it introduces its toaster-shaped robotaxis, the company said.

Dallas and Phoenix will allow Zoox to expose its technology to diverse and challenging weather conditions, as well as more sprawling streets, compared with the dense metro areas it’s been testing in so far.

“In Phoenix, we have the opportunity to test our sensor and battery performance against extreme heat and dust on high-speed roads,” Zoox wrote in a blog post. “Dallas provides a valuable testing ground to refine our [artificial intelligence] against diverse weather and complex road networks.”

Zoox said it has served more than 300,000 riders since its launch in Las Vegas and San Francisco.

The expansion gives Zoox’s fleet a presence in 10 U.S. markets. Last November, Zoox began giving free rides in parts of San Francisco, a few months after it opened up its robotaxi service to the public for the first time in Las Vegas.

It’s also testing its autonomous technology in Seattle, Austin, Texas, Miami, Los Angeles, Atlanta and Washington, D.C.

Zoox has been testing in Austin for almost a year. I’m not sure what the schedule is there, but if that’s how slowly they’re moving it could be awhile before they’re doing anything else in Dallas. They are providing service in Las Vegas now, but in a limited area. Has anyone reading this had any experience with them, even just spotting one on the street? I’d be interested to hear. Far as I can tell, they’ve gotten decent reviews so far. They have been seeking broader regulatory approval since last year as well, to deploy their vehicles that don’t have steering wheels or gas/brake pedals. I’m sure that’s holding them back from anything more than testing and limited service. I’ve been seeing those driverless Waymos around my neighborhood lately, so it’s just a matter of time before we start seeing Zooxes as well. TechCrunch, Clean Technica, and D Magazine have more.

Posted in Planes, Trains, and Automobiles | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Interview with Patrick Oathout

Patrick Oathout

And today we finish our journey through the candidate field for the Houston City Council District C special election, which is also now on Day Three of early voting. You still have until March 31 to vote in this race. Our final candidate for your consideration is Patrick Oathout, an Army veteran and safety leader for an AI company. He joined the Army as an Armor officer following the January 6 insurrection and was a tank platoon leader at NATO’s Battle Group on the Russian border in the Ukraine war. He has also interned at Houston City Hall’s Department of Neighborhoods, and was the first openly gay student body vice president at Duke University. Here’s what we talked about:

PREVIOUSLY:

Sophia Campos
Audrey Nath
Joe Panzarella
Angelica Luna Kaufman
Nick Hellyar
Laura Gallier

The transcription for this interview, courtesy of Greg Wythe, is here. Let me know what you think about these, and also please listen to the interviews. We’re done for this cycle, tune in again in a couple of weeks when I hit the Dem primary runoffs. And as always, let me know what you think, of the interviews and the transcripts.

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Ordinance proposed to officially limit HPD’s interactions with ICE

Excellent.

Alejandra Salinas

A trio of Houston City Council members are pushing a plan to change the way Houston police officers work with federal immigration agents, sidestepping Mayor John Whitmire’s authority a week after the mayor announced a more modest tweak to the same police policy.

The announcement comes amid widespread criticism of the city’s cooperation with U.S Immigration and Customs Enforcement and in the wake of a Houston Chronicle report that found in at least two cases Houston Police Department officers directly transported drivers to immigration agents – actions that Whitmire said violated city policy and that legal experts said may have been unconstitutional.

[…]

Newly elected Council Member Alejandra Salinas and colleagues Abbie Kamin and Edward Pollard are pitching the proposal under Proposition A, a 2023 city charter amendment that allows any three council members to add an item to a meeting agenda as long as it’s legal. The charter typically gives only the mayor the power to place items on the agenda. They outlined their proposal at a news conference Thursday morning.

City Attorney Arturo Michel said afterward that city attorneys now have seven days to review the proposal and will contact peer Texas cities to see how they’ve handled recent rule changes. He also questioned whether aspects of the item would pass legal muster.

Salinas’ proposed ordinance introduces three new requirements for the city’s 5,300 officers.

The ordinance would instruct officers that they “may, but are not required to, contact federal immigration authorities” if they receive a hit for an administrative warrant.

The ordinance also states that officers aren’t allowed to detain people beyond the time necessary to complete the traffic stop or investigation, even if that process is completed before the 30-minute window expires.

Michel said Thursday that officers need not detain a person for the full 30-minute period.

More broadly, Michel said, city attorneys’ review of the proposed ordinance will focus on whether its language giving officers discretion on when to call ICE violates state law. He also questioned whether the proposal improperly inserts the council into administrative functions, which are the mayor’s purview.

While Whitmire and Diaz last week doubled down on the need to work with federal officials or risk losing grant funds, legal experts and immigration advocates have cautioned city leaders that the current policy risks violating legal precedent and the U.S. Constitution’s Fourth Amendment.

“The Houston Chronicle recently described egregious examples of HPD officers engaging in conduct that appears to violate the Fourth Amendment after encountering individuals subject to ICE administrative warrants,” officials with the ACLU Texas and Texas Civil Rights Project wrote to Whitmire and members of council Wednesday. “Our review of HPD’s general orders, and the new directives announced on March 11… reveal that the department’s policies go well beyond any state or federal authority to comply with ICE administrative warrants and, in so doing, expose the city to risk of significant legal liability.”

Salinas’ proposed ordinance also would require HPD to compile and provide each council member with a semiannual report on the use of city resources for immigration enforcement, excepting information that might jeopardize a criminal investigation.

Those reports would list each instance in which officers checked someone’s immigration status or contacted federal immigration agents, as well as information about the people stopped, detained or arrested, the alleged offense, the officers involved and the location of the incident.

See here and here for the previous updates. As the story notes, there was an earlier effort to do something similar, put forward by now-former CM Letitia Plummer, but it failed because she was unable to get a third member to sign on before her term ended. I was a little concerned when I saw that CM Kamin was one of the three on this proposal, since her term will be ending within the next two to three months (I have no idea offhand when the District C runoff will be), but it sounds like this will move forward before then, and I also fully expect the next District C Council member to be on board with this anyway.

I’m just really happy to see this, it’s long overdue and it reinforces why CM Salinas won her runoff. Here’s a bit from the press release I got about this:

Bexar County and the cities of Austin and Dallas have already adopted policies stating that civil administrative warrants alone are not a lawful basis for local arrest or prolonged detention, and do not require officers to contact ICE.

“This ordinance helps ensure our police are focused on what they do best – preventing crime and protecting neighborhoods,” said Council Member Salinas. “We are not safer when officers are taken off the streets to wait on the side of the road for ICE, when families are afraid to report crimes, or when trust between the community and law enforcement breaks down. Our peers across Texas, from Bexar County to the cities of Austin and Dallas, have already taken that step. It’s time for Houston to meet this moment.”

“We are not going to turn a blind eye to what is happening. What ICE has done not only sows fear and mistrust, and forced victims into the shadows, it strains local law enforcement resources and time,” said Council Member Kamin. “This ordinance gives HPD the flexibility to determine what they know is best. The term “administrative warrant” is a misnomer. What we are talking about are administrative requests with no nexus to criminal acts, that are created by ICE agents themselves. It is not the same as a standard judicial warrant. If an individual poses a risk to public safety, I trust local law enforcement to act, regardless of someone’s immigration status.”

“As a Council Member representing the most diverse district in our city, I’ve heard directly from families, workers, and small business owners who are living with fear and uncertainty,” said Council Member Pollard. “That’s why I support this proposal. It’s about drawing a clear line that prioritizes public safety, builds trust between our residents and law enforcement, and ensures that we put our resources towards criminals and not displacing families.”

“Fear is showing up in our schools – thousands of students are missing class and parents are afraid to drive their kids to school,” said Jackie Anderson, President of the Houston Federation of Teachers. “If our students don’t feel safe, they can’t focus on learning and nothing else we do matters. This ordinance will help Houston rebuild the trust our schools depend on so families feel safe showing up to the classroom every day.”

A broad coalition of more than two dozen prominent legal, labor, faith, and community organizations representing thousands of Houston families have published a letter supporting the ordinance, calling it legally sound and essential to strengthening community trust and public safety.

A copy of the press Q&A that came with this release is here, and a copy of that letter of support is here. I look forward to this getting its time on the Council agenda. Kudos all around for making this happen.

Posted in Crime and Punishment, La Migra, Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Dallas County will get voting centers for Runoff Day

Hooray for small victories. But don’t expect more than that.

Dallas County Republicans will agree to allow voters to cast ballots at countywide voting sites for the May 26 runoff election after a switch to precinct-based voting sites caused chaos, the county party chair said Tuesday.

Dallas County Republican Chair Allen West supported the use of precinct-based sites earlier this month, but said using precincts again for the runoff would expose the county party to “increased risk and voter confusion” because the county is planning to use countywide sites for upcoming municipal elections and early voting.

“To then shift for the one day runoff election to precincts would bring about large scale disruption,” West said in a statement.

[…]

Republicans still want a separate primary — which means the parties won’t share poll workers and voting equipment — so runoff voters will likely still see separate lines for Republicans and Democrats, according to West’s statement. West said he plans to sign a contract with the county elections department this week to make the change official. He also signaled it isn’t permanent, saying the party successfully executed the primary and can assess lessons learned “and improve upon the process and procedures for March 2028.”

The move by Dallas Republicans and other county parties to eliminate the countywide polling place program for the primary follows a yearslong push by Republicans to ditch it entirely.

Republican critics of countywide voting claim it makes elections less secure because it could allow people “to double or triple vote,” though there’s no evidence that countywide voting is less secure. In addition, Texas election officials have procedures in place to prevent double voting, including the use of technology that helps officials know in real time who has voted and where.

The countywide voting program, which has been in use in Texas for more than 20 years, has allowed counties to save money by using fewer polling locations (and fewer workers and equipment) that are centralized for all voters to use.

See here, here, and here for the background. The Dallas Republicans did manage to hand-count their primary ballots without any screwups that we know about – it surely helps that no races were close enough for any sloppiness to matter – but not everyone was so lucky, and it’s no guarantee of better performance next time. I suggested some mitigations for the anti-voting center push in the previous post, but finding ways to go on offense about this would be well advised. And, you know, winning more elections so that the freaks and zealots will have less power to wreak havoc in the next Legislature and Congress would be a good idea, too. They’re not going to stop trying to move us backwards until it becomes clear even to dummies like Allen West that it’s a losing strategy. It’s on us to make that happen.

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Interview with Laura Gallier

Laura Gallier

We are now one day into early voting for the special election in Houston City Council District C, and we have two candidate interviews to go. Today we have Laura Gallier, who is a longtime CPA and a veteran of attending the public meetings that City Council and Metro and Commissioners Court hold, where she gives her feedback and advocates for things like disaster response, voter registration, GOTV canvassing, and CPA-type work. She has served from on the Finance Committee of the Houston Area Women’s Center and has produced and co-facilitated programs at the Center for the Healing of Racism, among other things. We had a lot to talk about, and you can hear it all right here:

PREVIOUSLY:

Sophia Campos
Audrey Nath
Joe Panzarella
Angelica Luna Kaufman
Nick Hellyar

The transcription for this interview, courtesy of Greg Wythe, is here. Let me know what you think about these, and also please listen to the interviews. One more to go tomorrow.

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Voucher deadline extended after hearing in Islamic schools’ lawsuit

Not a surprise, at least to me.

Texas families now have two more weeks to apply to the state’s new voucher program after a federal judge the deadline extended to March 31, citing concerns that no Islamic schools have been approved for the program while thousands of others have.

The application period was set to close Tuesday before the ruling. But U.S. District Judge Alfred Bennett issued a temporary restraining order that same day, calling the disparity “troubling.”

“If you were to roll dice in a game of chance … you would not come up with those numbers,” Bennett said. “The appearance of this reeks.”

Two groups of Islamic schools and parents have sued acting Comptroller Kelly Hancock, arguing the state effectively blocked Islamic schools from the $1 billion private school voucher program based on religion. The cases were consolidated this week.

[…]

State attorneys argued that accreditation delays — not religion — slowed approvals. In particular, they said schools accredited by Cognia need additional verification, such as in-person site visits. Zachary Rhines, the lead attorney for Hancock, said they have a small administrative staff running the school voucher program, so the process has been slow, regardless of religious affiliation.

When asked by the judge Tuesday, Rhines said that 600 Cognia-accredited schools have been approved so far — none of which are Islamic schools — and around 90 to 100 are still on the waiting list. About 30 of those pending are Islamic schools.

Bennett said while there was no direct evidence of Islamic schools were specifically being blocked, he said it was troubling that the Texas Comptroller’s office cited accreditation by Cognia as an issue for Islamic schools when hundreds of other Cognia-affiliated schools have been approved.

Before the judge’s decision, Rhines said an injunction or pause on the state voucher program would disrupt the tight timeline for the lottery system and funding distribution. He said it also would favor the few families who have not yet applied as they wait for their preferred school to be approved and could prejudice families who have already applied.

In December, Hancock sought legal approval to block Islamic schools from accessing the program due to potential terrorism ties. Hearst Newspapers reported in early February that no Islamic schools had been approved for the program except for three. Those were then removed from the state’s map of approved campuses.

In the hearing Tuesday, attorneys for the plaintiffs argued that some parents were deterred from applying for vouchers, since no Islamic schools were on the state’s approved list. They also said that two Islamic schools — including Excellence Academy, which they represent — have not been able to apply to participate, despite contacting the comptroller’s office.

Bennett ordered the comptroller’s office to send voucher program applications to schools that haven’t received them. The emergency court order will give time for both parties to gather evidence prior to the preliminary injunction hearing set for April.

One of the schools involved in the lawsuit was an Islamic virtual school in Galveston County. It was initially approved for state-funded vouchers. The lawsuit states that after the Chronicle named Bayaan as one of only three Islamic schools admitted to the program, it was immediately removed from the state’s website.

Attorneys for Hancock, however, said that four other non-Islamic schools were initially approved but later dropped.

Rhines repeated arguments from a hearing Friday that Hancock is not blocking Islamic schools from participating but is keeping schools with ties to radical Islamic organizations out of the program. When asked if any school applicants or any Islamic schools were found to have ties to terrorist organizations, Rhines said no.

“The appearance suggests otherwise of a fair and equitable system,” Bennett said.

See here and here for the background. Also not a surprise that the two lawsuits were consolidated. It’s really hard to take any of the state’s claims seriously when they just have no evidence for any of them. I deplore the voucher program, which is the cash grab for private school parents that everyone predicted it would be, but if we have to have it then this exclusion of Islamic schools is clearly discriminatory. A shame the remedy won’t be to scrap the whole thing, but this is where we are. The Trib and the CATO Institute have more.

Posted in Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

What kind of turnout should we expect in District C?

You know there’s a special election going on for Houston City Council District C, right? It’s in the middle of our stretch of many months with voting of some kind going on. What is a reasonable expectation for how many people might show up for this election?

My go-to answer for a question like that is to look at the similar elections from the past and see what they can tell us. Here’s the turnout data for all of the Houston City Council special elections from this century so far:


Date            Race   Turnout
==============================
Nov 2025  At Large #1   17.81%
Dec 2025  AL#1 Runoff    3.61%

Jan 2022   District G    6.10%

May 2018   District K    6.01%

May 2009   District H    4.46%
Jun 2009 DistH Runoff    5.01%

May 2007  At Large #3    4.14%
Jun 2007  AL#3 Runoff    2.74%

Five total elections, three of which included runoffs. These numbers are for Harris County only – the At Large and District K races include a piece of Fort Bend, and for At Large a tiny piece of Montgomery, but I’m keeping this simple.

We can toss the November 2025 At Large #1 race as an outlier – it occurred on a regular Election Day, so even though it was the only city race on the ballot, it benefitted from the normalcy of its date and the other regular elections that were also occurring (and also from the much-ballyhooed CD18 special election). The runoff for that race is more in line with the historic norms.

I don’t want to overcomplicate this. District C generally has high turnout, all of the candidates in this race are actively campaigning, and the race is visible to voters, in that I’ve seen mail, online and social media advertising, and even a couple of yard signs. On the other hand, this election is in April, a month in which no one expects to be voting, and we’re all still talking about the primary. Awareness of and engagement with this race is going to be limited.

Based on what we have seen before, I’d say the expected range of outcome is four to six percent turnout. I’d lean towards the high end of that, so let’s put it at about six percent. If it gets to seven or more, I’d call this high turnout, relatively speaking. If it fails to get to five, I’d call it low turnout. Up to you, District C voters.

(Note: There were 813 total ballots cast on Day One, mostly mail ballots.)

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Texas blog roundup for the week of March 16

The Texas Progressive Alliance might have a pinch of sympathy for the desiccated husk of John Cornyn if the man had any self-respect, but he doesn’t so we don’t and instead have a weekly roundup for you.

Off the Kuff says that if the number of primary votes cast in a Congressional district is indicative of that district’s leanings, the Republicans may be in for a rude surprise in November.

SocraticGadfly offers up a roundup of environmental news, including methane undercounts.

Neil at Houston Democracy Project posted that Houston No Kings organizers made clear they don’t work with HPD & that there are many 3/28 No Kings protests across the Houston-region. We are organizing ourselves for the challenging days ahead.

=============================

And here are some posts of interest from other Texas blogs.

The Texas Observer tells of the Abilene high school librarian who fought back against Moms for Liberty.

The Current previews John Cornyn’s latest attack ad against Ken Paxton.

The Barbed Wire checks in with some Asian-American business owners to see how things are going.

Deceleration would like for Stephen Miller to be the next Trump flunky to go.

Levi Asher interprets some Primary Day data and suggests an action plan for campaigns.

D Magazine checks in on the state of play for sports betting in Texas.

Law Dork documents the latest Justice Department atrocities.

Posted in Blog stuff | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Interview with Nick Hellyar

Nick Hellyar

Today is the first day of early voting for the District C special election! Get out there and vote if you’re a District C resident – yes, I know, you’ve probably done a LOT of voting these past few months, but either you elect these folks or other people do it for you, you know? But first, listen to my interviews with the candidates, for which today is Nick Hellyar. Hellyar is the owner of a real estate company and a longtime political person, who has worked on various campaigns and served in the offices of Council Members James Rodriguez and Twila Carter, as well as then-State Rep. Carol Alvarado. He has run for At Large positions in 2019 and 2023, and you can listen to the interview for that campaign here. My interview with him for this campaign is here:

PREVIOUSLY:

Sophia Campos
Audrey Nath
Joe Panzarella
Angelica Luna Kaufman

The transcription for this interview, courtesy of Greg Wythe, is here. Let me know what you think about these, and also please listen to the interviews. More to come throughout the week.

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The KP George trial is underway

This ought to be something.

Judge KP George

A Fort Bend District Attorney’s Office fraud investigator stood in front of a jury Thursday — wielding a Sharpie and poster board — and said the numbers looked clear to him.

When he first ran for Fort Bend County judge in 2018, KP George solicited money from donors and pledged that the money would be used for his campaign. Instead, the investigator, John Bohannon, said bank records showed money moving out of campaign accounts into George’s personal finances. The funds became cashier’s checks that paid for a new home, property taxes and HOA fees, Bohannon said.

“What he told his donors wasn’t true,” Bohannon said. The longtime law enforcement officer felt it amounted to a crime.

Bohannon’s testimony kicked off a highly anticipated money laundering trial that could send George to prison.

George, the county judge since 2018, is accused of moving tens of thousands of dollars from his campaign accounts and using the money for personal expenses, including to buy a home and pay property taxes.

Prosecutors allege the transactions involved more than $45,000 in campaign money and violated state law governing political funds. George has denied wrongdoing, arguing the transfers were legitimate reimbursements for personal loans he had made to his campaign — something his legal team says is common in political campaigns.

The charges stem from transfers prosecutors say occurred in 2019, after George was first elected to be the county’s top executive. He was indicted on two counts of money laundering, each a third-degree felony punishable by two to 10 years in prison and a fine of up to $10,000 if convicted.

[…]

On cross-examination, Bohannon said that the money laundering investigation started after public integrity investigators had already started looking into allegations that George and his former chief of staff, Taral Patel, had misrepresented their identities online to influence elections.

Patel pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge last year and could be called as a witness in the money laundering case.

George’s attorneys have argued the prosecution is politically motivated.

Attorney Jared Woodfill implied Bohannon conducted a narrow investigation and failed to look into George’s historical campaign records from races prior to 2018, when he ran for Congress, county treasurer and school board.

“You’re missing a whole lot of information,” Woodfill said, including a definitive answer about whether George had loaned himself money.

Bohannon testified that he didn’t look at all of George’s campaign finance reports dating back to 2009, because reports that old weren’t available. He acknowledged he didn’t know if there were loans made in those campaigns.

Woodfill suggested that George might have made inadvertent mistakes.

We’ll see about that. The first day also included testimony from the woman who agreed to be George’s campaign treasurer but testified that she did not fill out any reports for him.

The next day had more expert testimony about the alleged fraud.

Betty Chi, a certified fraud examiner with the Fort Bend County District Attorney’s Office, spent much of the day walking jurors through public records, bank statements and campaign finance reports that she said showed campaign money flowing into George’s personal finances in 2019.

[…]

Chi told jurors she first began looking into George in late September 2024.

She said she started with information anyone could access, including Fort Bend Central Appraisal District records, county clerk records, George’s campaign website and social media.

Through those records, Chi testified, she found that George and his family owned four homes purchased after 2019, including one house that had been fully paid off within about two years.

At the time, George’s salary as county judge was about $150,000 a year, she said. His wife worked as a school teacher. Based on that income and the family’s apparent real estate purchases, Chi said something did not add up.

“The math just didn’t really work out for me,” Chi testified.

She told jurors that the amount of cash the family appeared to have put into real estate was difficult to square with what looked like a typical two-income household with children.

After sharing those concerns with supervisors, Chi said she was eventually authorized to open a formal financial crimes investigation and begin reviewing bank records.

Once investigators obtained those records, she testified, they traced two online transfers totaling about $46,500 from George’s campaign account into his personal savings account in early 2019.

Chi said the money later moved through George’s personal accounts and was eventually tied to a cashier’s check issued to a title company on the same day a deed of trust was signed for one of his home purchases.

She testified that investigators later confirmed through title company records that the money was used toward the home purchase.

Put simply, Chi told jurors, the records showed campaign money leaving a political account, entering George’s personal finances and then being used in connection with a house.

There’s more, so read the rest. I don’t know how long this trial is expected to last, but I’ll check in at least once more before the jury renders a verdict.

Posted in Crime and Punishment | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Endorsement watch: Chron picks Panzarella

They had a lot of viable choices in District C.

Joe Panzarella

Watching Houston activists deal with the Texas Department of Transportation can feel like the story of King Canute trying to turn back the tides. No amount of community organizing can convince the state agency to stop their highway expansion plans entirely. Apparently only the gravitational pull of Austin can control the flow of concrete.

So consider it a sign of striking political sanity — and effectiveness — that Joe Panzarella and others with No Higher No Wider I-10 found a way to redirect community passion about the ill-considered project toward supporting plans to study putting caps over parts of the freeway that cut through Inner Loop Houston.

It’s the sort of smart urbanism that our city desperately needs more of — especially key neighborhoods in District C — but lacks a robust advocate at City Hall. We believe that Panzarella can be that advocate and endorse him in the special election to fill the vacant City Council seat.

[…]

He told the editorial board that he wants to “reduce parking minimums and setback requirements and implement single-stair reform to make it easier and more efficient and cheaper to build in this city.” Single-stair housing policies have been adopted in some cities, updating building codes for residential buildings to have a single staircase, allowing for larger apartment units.

Perhaps even more importantly than his support for these good policies, Panzarella would bring a better way of thinking about municipal policymaking — one that sees how well-intentioned ideas can become tied up in burdensome red tape. Plenty of politicians say they want to cut waste, fraud and abuse, but Panzarella actually knows how to do it.

If elected, he would be the tip of the spear on pursuing the sort of abundant urbanism that Houston invented, almost by accident, when we rejected zoning and shrunk lot sizes. So it is with some frustration that we’ve watched other cities eclipse us in unleashing development and allowing neighborhoods to naturally grow and densify. These are neighborhoods that look like the Heights, Montrose, Midtown and other key parts of District C — neighborhoods that Mayor John Whitmire has essentially insisted must become places commuters quickly drive through rather than welcoming, walkable places Houstonians want to live in.

It’s a challenge Panzarella discussed as he aptly pointed out that District C has a surfeit of incredible amenities, but lacks connections that stitch together neighborhoods and unleash the local quality of life. Westheimer Road has nationally-acclaimed restaurants and bars but a walk down its narrow sidewalks, with little to no buffer from speeding cars, can be lethal.

Traffic-calming measures such as wider sidewalks and pedestrian refuges that reduce crossing distances are good for kids on their way to school and folks supporting local businesses.

“For too long, Houston has developed for recruitment and not for retention, and I look forward to building a District C where everyone is proud to live,” Panzarella said.

Whitmire might not agree with that vision, but Panzarella already has support across the political landscape, including state Sen. Molly Cook, who represents much of District C in Austin. Panzarella also told us he plans to work with Precinct 1 County Commissioner Rodney Ellis, who shares his enthusiasm for multimodal infrastructure like sidewalks and bike lanes. He’ll even find allies in the downtown establishment — Panzarella’s vision of thriving Inner Loop neighborhoods is echoed by the Center for Houston’s Future’s Vision 2050, which calls for housing density and affordability, population growth and more vibrant urban living.

He’ll need those allies when standing up for his constituents to the mayor. We’ve watched as Whitmire has mocked and ignored officials and advocates who try to play nice or work behind the scenes. That just doesn’t work. Assertive coalition building does.

Is it just me or does anyone else think maybe Mayor Whitmire won’t get the Chron’s endorsement in 2027? Just a thought. Anyway, there’s more and it’s a gift link, so go to town. Their runnerup for the endorsement was Nick Hellyar, whom they have endorsed before and said they might have endorsed again “if our current mayor was more respectful of District C residents’ priorities”. Panzarella and Hellyar were rated four stars by their metric, with Patrick Oathout and Audrey Nath getting three and a half, and the rest each three stars.

The interviews I have published as of today:

Sophia Campos
Audrey Nath
Joe Panzarella
Angelica Luna Kaufman
Nick Hellyar

Laura Gallier will be tomorrow and Patrick Oathout on Friday. I don’t envy you District C voters, this is a tough choice, but at least it’s a tough choice between good candidates.

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Interview with Angelica Luna Kaufman

Angelica Luna Kaufman

We keep moving on with the District C special election, where early voting begins tomorrow. Today’s candidate is Angelica Luna Kaufman, where she has served as the Chief of Staff to Harris County Judge Lina Hidalgo. She has had senior roles with the Texas Democratic Party, the Democratic National Committee, and the Harris County Democratic Party, and was the Communications Director for the Sheila Jackson Lee for Mayor Campaign. There’s obviously a lot to talk about there, and you can listen to it all here:

PREVIOUSLY:

Sophia Campos
Audrey Nath
Joe Panzarella

The transcription for this interview, courtesy of Greg Wythe, is here. Let me know what you think about these, and also please listen to the interviews. More to come throughout the week.

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment