Skip to main content
Log in

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. BanfieldAnn (1982),Unspeakable Sentences: Narration and Representation in the Language of Fiction, Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  2. BrunerJerome S. (1986),Actual Minds, Possible Worlds, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. GraesserArthur C., SingerMurray, & TrabassoTom (1994), ‘Constructing Inferences during Narrative Text Comprehension’,Psychological Review 101, pp. 371–395.

    Google Scholar 

  4. KreuzRoger J. & MacNealyMary Sue (eds.) (1996),Three Obstacles in Empirical Research on Aesthetic and Literary Comprehension, Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  5. SchankRoger C. (1990),Tell Me a Story: A New Look at Real and Artificial Memory, New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  6. SchankRoger C. & RiesbeckChristopher K. (1981),Inside Computer Understanding: Five Programs Plus Miniatures Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. HirschE. D.Jr.; KettJoseph; & TrefilJames eds., (1987),Cultural Literacy: What Every American Needs to Know, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  2. HoltJohn (1964),How Children Fail, New York: Dell.

    Google Scholar 

  3. HoltJohn (1972),Freedom and Beyond, New York: Dell.

    Google Scholar 

  4. PapertSeymour (1980),Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas, New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  5. SuppesPatrick (1980), ‘Computer-Based Mathematical Instruction,’ in R. P.Taylor, ed.,The Computer in the School: Tutor, Tool, Tutee, New York: Teachers College Press, pp. 215–230.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zoll, Daniel (1995), ‘S.F.'s Cable Censor’,San Francisco Bay Guardian, Vol. 30, No. 8, November 22, p. 17.

References

  1. BlockNed (1981), ‘Psychologism and Behaviorism,’The Philosophical Review 90, pp. 5–43.

    Google Scholar 

  2. CherianSunil, and TroxellWade (1995), ‘Intelligent Behavior in Machines Emerging from a Collection of Interactive Control Structures’,Computational Intelligence 11, pp. 565–592.

    Google Scholar 

  3. MaesPattie, ed. (1991),Designing Autonomous Agents: Theory and Practice from Biology to Engineering and back, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. BonJourLaurence (1985),The Structure of Empirical Knowledge, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. KitcherPhilip (1989), ‘Explanatory Unification and the Causal Structure of the World’, in PhilipKitcher and Wesley C.Salmon, eds.,Scientific Explanation, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. LehrerKeith (1974),Knowledge, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. KripkeSaul A. (1982),Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language: An Elementary Exposition, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  2. MalcolmNorman (1962), ‘Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations’, in Vere C.Chappell, ed.,The Philosophy of Mind, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall: 74–101.

    Google Scholar 

  3. NagelThomas (1986),The View from Nowhere, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. RyleGilbert (1949),The Concept of Mind, London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  5. StrawsonPeter F. (1959),Individuals: An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics, London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. DretskeFred (1981),Knowledge and the Flow of Information, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. DretskeFred (1988),Explaining Behavior, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. FodorJerry (1984), ‘Semantics, Wisconsin Style’,Synthese 59, pp. 231–250.

    Google Scholar 

  4. SearleJohn (1980), ‘Minds, Brains, and Programs’,Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, pp. 417–424.

    Google Scholar 

  5. HorganTerry (1991), ‘Actions, Reasons, and the Explanatory Role of Content’, in B.McLaughlin, ed.,Dretske and His Critics, Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, pp. 73–101.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. BurgeTyler (1988), ‘Individualism and Self-Knowledge’,Journal of Philosophy 85: 649–663.

    Google Scholar 

  2. FodorJerry A. (1987),Psychosemantics, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. GarfinkelAlan (1981),Forms of Explanation, New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. McKinseyMichael (1991), ‘Anti-Individualism and Privileged Access’,Analysis 51: 9–16.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. DonnellanKeith (1972), ‘Proper Names and Identifying Descriptions’, in DonaldDavidson and GilbertHarman, eds.,Semantics of Natural Language, 2nd edition, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel, pp. 356–379.

    Google Scholar 

  2. HoweIrving (1957),Politics and the Novel, New York: Meridian Books.

    Google Scholar 

  3. JamesHenry (1886),The Princess Casamassima, London: Penguin Books, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  4. KripkeSaul (1980),Naming and Necessity, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  5. PutnamHilary (1983), ‘Taking Rules Seriously: A Response to Martha Nussbaum’,New Literary History 15, pp. 193–200.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Graesser, A.C., Bowers, C.A., Trabasso, T. et al. Book reviews. Mind Mach 6, 395–442 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00729803

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00729803