Abstract
The limited availability of installation space downstream of valve-induced flow disturbances represents a critical metrological challenge, as ultrasonic flowmeters (UFM) exhibit high sensitivity to such disturbances. International standards currently overlook the impact of field installation on the accuracy of UFM. This paper presents and compares the influences of flow disturbances induced by a butterfly valve and a knife-gate valve on the performance of a clamp-on transit-time UFM. Measurements were performed at non-standard sections downstream of each valve by varying the angular position (α) of ultrasonic transducers in 30° increments around the pipe center. The tests were conducted for two distinct closings of the valve, corresponding to Reynolds numbers (Re) of 77,600 and 360,000. The main concern of this study is to evaluate and ensure that the measurements obtained in such non-standard sections are reliable and acceptable. This study further improves the accuracy of the UFM measurement based on a compensation criterion without maintaining the standard length of a pipeline. CFD models were created to provide insight the differences in installation effects. The CFD predictions show good agreement with the experimental results, with mean absolute percentage errors of 2.2% for the butterfly valve and 5.43% for the knife-gate valve. The results showed that, at the same Re, the transit-time signal stability and measurement accuracy differ noticeably between the two valve types. The findings showed that the spatial distribution of flow velocity strongly influences the performance of the UFM. The study revealed that at 9DN downstream of the disturbance element for higher Re, the correction factor (Cfac) does not exceed 1.02, where the measurement error (δ) and its repeatability uncertainty are within the permissible limits without the need to determine an optimal α. This study also provided certain values of α where the correction factor becomes minimal at distances below 9DN.
During the embargo period (the 12 month period from the publication of the Version of Record of this article), the Accepted Manuscript is fully protected by copyright and cannot be reused or reposted elsewhere.
As the Version of Record of this article is going to be / has been published on a subscription basis, this Accepted Manuscript will be available for reuse under a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 licence after the 12 month embargo period.
After the embargo period, everyone is permitted to use copy and redistribute this article for non-commercial purposes only, provided that they adhere to all the terms of the licence https://creativecommons.org/licences/by-nc-nd/4.0
Although reasonable endeavours have been taken to obtain all necessary permissions from third parties to include their copyrighted content within this article, their full citation and copyright line may not be present in this Accepted Manuscript version. Before using any content from this article, please refer to the Version of Record on IOPscience once published for full citation and copyright details, as permissions may be required. All third party content is fully copyright protected, unless specifically stated otherwise in the figure caption in the Version of Record.
