Abstract
MRC Developmental Psychology Unit, Drayton House, Gordon Street, London, W.C.I., England It takes longer to find a normal N embedded in a context of reversed Ns than it takes to find a reversed N embedded in a context of normal Ns. This is true for other letters as well and can be explained by a theory of schema. This theory holds that there is a schema for the normal form of a letter based on past experience, and that this schema is not a static but a flexible construct which is sensitive to the immediate cognitive context. This property of the schema enables recognition even if the letter is presented in a deviating form. A deviation, such as mirror reversal, may at times be as acceptable as the normal form of the letter. This is the case when context stimuli in a scanning task consist of reversed letters. If the target stimulus is the normal form of the letter, it is more difficult to detect since both context and target are accepted as the same letter.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bartlett, F.Remembering. Cambridge: University Press, 1932.
Brunet, J. S. Going beyond the information given. InContemporary approaches to cognition. A symposium held at the University of Colorado. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1957.
Frith, U. Why do children reverse letters? British Journal of Psychology, 1971, 62, 459.
Frith, U. Internal schemata for letters in good and bad readers. British Journal of Psychology, 1974, 65,233–241.
Gibson, E. J.Principles of perceptual learning and development. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1969.
Jennet, S.The making of books. London: Faber, 1964. P. 53.
Kolers, P. A. The recognition of geometrically transformed text. Perception & Psychophysics, 1968, 3, 57–64.
Kolers, P. A., Eden, M., & Boyer, A. Reading as a perceptual skill. M.I.T. Research Laboratory of Electronics Quarterly Progress Report, 1964, 74,214–217.
Neisser, U.Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1967.
Oldfield, R. C. Memory mechanisms and the theory of schemata. British Journal of Psychology, 1954, 45, 14–23.
Rock, I., & Heimer, W. The effect of retinal and phenomenal orientation on the perception of form. American Journal of Psychology, 1957, 70, 493–511.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Frith, U. Acurious effect with reversed letters explained by a theory of schema. Perception & Psychophysics 16, 113–116 (1974). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203262
Received:
Accepted:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203262