Skip to content

Conversation

@jucktnich
Copy link

@jucktnich jucktnich commented Sep 2, 2023

@jucktnich jucktnich changed the title MSC ????: MUID verification MSC4050: MUID verification Sep 2, 2023
@jucktnich jucktnich marked this pull request as ready for review September 2, 2023 14:38
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
# MSC4050: Matrix user id verification for third parties

If you want to sign up for a service that requires a guaranteed contact method, the current standard process is to send a verification code or link to the user. A similar method is used for so-called magic links. But this method is heavily flawed since it requires you to change the app, and for verification codes to copy the code. Finally, you need to delete the message. This proposal should simplify this process with minimal effort for the websites and services, from now on called third parties, using this method.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please limit lines to ~100 characters.

@turt2live
Copy link
Member

@jucktnich please sign off on your changes to have this MSC be eligible for FCP later on in the process.

@turt2live turt2live added proposal A matrix spec change proposal kind:feature MSC for not-core and not-maintenance stuff needs-implementation This MSC does not have a qualifying implementation for the SCT to review. The MSC cannot enter FCP. labels Sep 2, 2023
- shorter lines
- corrected spelling
- changed muid to mxid
@jucktnich jucktnich changed the title MSC4050: MUID verification MSC4050: MXID verification Sep 2, 2023
@InezMc
Copy link

InezMc commented Sep 4, 2023

Private sign off has been recieved.


## Proposal
### Requesting verification
The back-end of the requesring server sends a matrix event to the user. The content object has the following keys:
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The backend cannot send events directly to the user, it must be done in a room. You should probably specify how the room is created and managed.

Also, you should specify what event type is used here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

kind:feature MSC for not-core and not-maintenance stuff needs-implementation This MSC does not have a qualifying implementation for the SCT to review. The MSC cannot enter FCP. proposal A matrix spec change proposal

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants