Best practices for handling matrix strategy failures in GitHub Actions workflows #176052
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
π Discussion Activity Reminder π This Discussion has been labeled as dormant by an automated system for having no activity in the last 60 days. Please consider one the following actions: 1οΈβ£ Close as Out of Date: If the topic is no longer relevant, close the Discussion as 2οΈβ£ Provide More Information: Share additional details or context β or let the community know if you've found a solution on your own. 3οΈβ£ Mark a Reply as Answer: If your question has been answered by a reply, mark the most helpful reply as the solution. Note: This dormant notification will only apply to Discussions with the Thank you for helping bring this Discussion to a resolution! π¬ |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Why are you starting this discussion?
Question
What GitHub Actions topic or product is this about?
Misc
Discussion Details
I'm working with a GitHub Actions workflow that uses a matrix strategy to test across multiple Node.js versions (14, 16, 18, 20) and operating systems (ubuntu-latest, windows-latest, macos-latest). Currently, if any job in the matrix fails, the entire workflow is marked as failed.
I'm looking for best practices on how to handle partial matrix failures gracefully. Specifically:
I've reviewed the documentation at https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-jobs/using-a-matrix-for-your-jobs but would appreciate insights from others who have implemented robust matrix testing strategies in production environments.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions