I Love to Save the Story: How to Preserve Your Church and Congregational Records

I Love to Save the Story: How to Preserve Your Church and Congregational Records, Alabama Department of Archives and History, October 22, 2024

On October 22 I spoke at Alabama Department of Archives and History. The program was a special presentation for Archives Month in conjunction with a couple of speeches i delivered at Faulkner University (also in Montgomery). Here is the ADAH I Love to Save the Story 2024, along with the ADAH Handout_I Love to Save the Story. And the livestream link is below. If you are doing anything along the lines of gathering, preserving or writing congregational history, then I hope something in this presentation might be useful to you.

W. W. Banks wishes H. D. Colerane would document the history of the black churches of Clark County, Kentucky, 1916

Evidently there was at least one “colored Christian” church in Clark County by 1916.  And W. W. Banks, editor of the ‘Colored Column’ of the Winchester Sun wanted H. D. Colerane–“the most competent one in the county to perform such a task”–to chronicle its history.

W. W. Banks, ed. “Colored Column,” Winchester Sun [Winchester, Ky.], January 29, 1916, p. 6

Banks evidently was keenly interested in such matters, and spoke on them (such as this note indicates, see p. 4).  It is possible that Colerane is a variant spelling of Coltrane; the source linked above spells it Coleraine and appearances suggest he was a Baptist minister.

Among black Christian Churches at the time, Sam Buckner would have been among the most informed, at least from long experience, as this note suggests:

“City, County, State” Daily Democrat [Winchester, Ky.], January 23, 1900, p.3

“Severely simple”: the Lord’s Day exercises at the Somerset, Pa., Christian Church, ca. 1887

Few congregations among the Stone-Campbell Movement can claim book-length descriptions of their history, activities, membership, and import.  But the Christian Church of Somerset, Pennsylvania can, and on top of that Peter Vogel published his book in 1887.  I can think of no other comparable congregational history from the 19th century.

It is at points hagiographical by modern standards, but considering the sheer quantity of information it preserves, and much of that from primary written sources and oral history and tradition, I can scarcely fault Vogel for feeling proud of this congregation.  It is certainly a storied history which intersects with many of the people who made the Campbell movement such as it was in its strength in the 1830s-1870s.

What catches my eye is Vogel’s description of the various weekly services and meetings, the full details are in ch. 25, pages 297ff.  Here is his description of the “Lord’s Day Exercises”:

The Lord’s Day Exercises are severely simple. In a church that really numbers over three hundred members, though only two hundred and seventy-five are reckoned as tolerably faithful, the attendance might be better. It is, however, above the usual average of like- sized churches elsewhere. Some of the older members attend only in the forenoon, and the spiritually deficient only at night. Country residents, as a rule, attend but one service, while in many other instances husband and wife, or parents and older children, divide the services between themselves on account of the smaller children. The hot chase during the week after Mammon so tires out some that the Lord must excuse them from attention to Him on His day. Besides, Sunday head-aches, and such like, invade even this home of health. Surely the Lord will be merciful to such, for He was never known to endure weariness or pain!

The first thing in the morning service is either a resurrection or fellowship hymn; then a resurrection chapter is read by one of the elders, taking the four gospels in regular turn, and on a fifth Lord’s day in the month the eleventh chapter of I. Corinthians. Occasionally a crucifixion chapter is taken instead. After [p. 309] this the minister ascends the pulpit, announces and reads either a resurrection or other Lord’s day hymn in praise of Christ. After this is sung by the congregation without organ, a devotional lesson, usually from the Psalms, is read, and the audience stands in prayer which bears in mind the toils and conflicts of the past week, the purpose of the hour, the needs and relations of the church, the absent membership, and the coming week. This is followed by another hymn of either a devotional, penitential, consecrational, or invocatory character. The sermon which follows is addressed to the membership, and ranges somewhere in the broad field of Christian life or duty, or draws inspiration from God’s providence or promises. Sometimes it is so far doctrinal or expository as pressing duty may require. In all cases it has a definite aim suggested by the known needs of the membership, and varies in length from thirty-five to forty-five minutes. The hymn which immediately follows is sung standing, and, if not always suggested by the theme of the sermon, is at least not alien to it; and both sermon and hymn give the key-note to the succeeding prayer. Then the minister and one of the elders attend to the breaking of the loaf and the distribution of the cup. Next the collection is taken up. For this the membership come with prepared envelopes, having name, date and enclosed amount written on them, and containing the proportionate amount of their yearly subscription. A good sister who died five years ago is still regularly remembered by a dollar bill fresh from the press. The loose change in the basket goes into the poor fund. After the collection come the announcements; among these, on the first Lord’s day in each month, the particular books of the [p. 310] Bible which are to be read by those who will, are announced in such order and number as will finish the Bible in the year. A doxology and benediction conclude the services, after which friendly and fraternal greetings are freely exchanged.

Some remain to spend the hour which intervenes between that and the Sunday-school session in friendly conversation, in consultation over the coming lesson, or in the rehearsal of Sunday-school songs. Others return home to relieve those older children or servants who care for the smaller ones during parental absence, that they may go to Sunday-school.

The evening service may or may not have a preliminary song. The pulpit work is, however, always introduced by singing, reading a portion of Scripture, prayer and singing again. These songs are usually of the chorus kind or some other light and popular air, and of varied theme. The Scripture lesson is related to or preparatory for the address or lecture which is to follow. Evening announcements come immediately before the reading of the text. The evening discourse is of varied character, and may be for the instruction of the younger members of the church, for the information or conversion of the world, or the treatment of some popular question. This, too, is immediately followed by a song; and, if the theme of the evening has led to it, an invitation to come to Christ is extended. A short dismissal prayer concludes this service. If, however, an evening collection for missions or other purposes has been announced in the morning, it is taken up immediately before this prayer.

–Peter Vogel, Tale of a Pioneer Church (Cincinnati: Standard Publishing Company, 1887) 308-310.

In my teaching I use this excerpt (among others) to illustrate what congregational worship was like among 19th century Disciples.  Though it is one data point, what I find useful, as a historian, are Vogel’s explanatory comments about the items of worship.  He should know since he served the congregation as minister, twice.  So, not only do we have a recitation of the elements and order of worship from the middle 1880s, we have a participant’s commentary on it.  I thought of this in light of my recent foray into the literature of minister’s manuals concerning the items and order of worship.

Schedule of services for the Church of Christ in St. Petersburg, Florida in March 1926

Every now and then someone asks about the origin of church services on Sunday nights or mid-week services (usually on Wednesday nights).

Perhaps at some point I will write up the few things I have found, but I do not have time to devote to that just now.  It is enough for now to note this ad from Christian Leader, 16 March 1926, at page 13, below which I offer two observations:

Advertisement, Christian Leader, March 16, 1926, p. 13

1. Old church papers such as Christian Leader are rich in advertisements such as this, and as I hope this post demonstrates, they can be a helpful source of information.  For anyone doing local history they supply chronological markers and physical locations, as this one does, for ministers and the congregation.  Thanks to Google Maps we can virtually visit the neighborhood to get a sense of the lay of the land.  It took me about 30 seconds to learn the address for W. A. Cameron on 10th was within earshot of the meeting house location on 9th.  Point being, Cameron lived and ministered in this neighborhood.  From the looks of the front of the nice building (now vacant) on 10th a block away, it appears his work may have had lasting effects.  Anyone interested in local history or anyone interested in gaining a textured view of congregational practice can benefit from this ad.  And that brings me to the second point:

2. This congregation meets twice on Sunday and once mid-week, in this case Wednesday evening.  The Sunday evening worship evidently has additional time devoted to singing, otherwise it appears that the two Sunday worship services are just about identical.  Both services feature preaching and communion, suggesting that a second offering of the Supper for all in attendance might have been the normal practice there, then.

I am also sometimes asked about various practices of the second serving of the Lord’s Supper at evening services.   I do not have the time now to get into that, either.  The short answer is that absent a massive amount of research, I cannot say there is a standard practice among Churches of Christ that held sway across time or geography.  Bottom line is the test of this hypothesis is in ads like this, in addition to articles, anecdotes, descriptions, memories, oral history, and the like.  I offer this ad as one tiny data point that gives texture to our understanding of past practices.

We Do Not Lose Heart: A Homecoming Sermon for Lindsley Avenue Church, October 14, 2007

One of the signal honors of my life was receiving an invitation to preach at the 120th Anniversary Homecoming for Lindsley Avenue Church of Christ in Nashville in October 2007. I blogged about it then, and promised to upload my sermon. I do not remember why I did not upload it, but I did not. I searched, and I found it and I uploaded it to the Spoken Word page.

In 2007 I was freshly out of a deep dive into homiletics. I utilized Paul Scott Wilson’s ‘four-page‘ method to bring a word to the church. I wrestled with what to say. After I settled on a text from 2 Corinthians 4, Wilson’s heuristic gave me a way to approach how to say it. His model helped me frame the sermon. I think the sermon holds up well. I don’t think I could preach it any better today than I did then. I would not change anything except to tighten the language.

The manuscript I scanned and uploaded is the copy I took into the pulpit. It bears a few marks I inserted to help me remember where to place emphasis. I did not read it; but I preached it as written. No recording was made, so you will have to supply emphasis. Looks for the marks and you will be able to get close.

If asked how to preach an anniversary sermon or a homecoming sermon, this is what I could offer. If asked how to incorporate very local congregational history into a sermon, this is how I did it, once. Depending on the task at hand, you could do this very differently. In this case, my charge was to look as much forward as backward. In this case, I was preaching to a church very much at the margins of conventional Nashville Church of Christ culture. In this case, as is true in every case if you look closely and honestly enough, there was a great deal to discourage you. A great deal. But the hope of the gospel surpasses our disappointments. Thus the sermon.

Paul Watson on passing on the tradition

“In this article I wish to raise and at least partially answer the question, how did Israel become and remain ‘the people of God’ from generation to generation? Theologically, of course, the answer is they were called into being and sustained by Yahweh’s grace. But on a more mundane level, how did the community maintain its identity from year to year, generation to generation, epoch to epoch?

“Part, but certainly not all, of the answer to that question lies in the process of traditioning. By ‘traditioning’ I mean the handing on of both substance and the significance of the community’s beliefs and practices from older to younger, from the more experienced to the less experienced. [p. 5]

Watson then cites the language in 1 Corinthians 15.3-5 wherein Paul notes to the Corinthians that what he received, he also passed on to them. He continues,

“Paul is saying, in effect, ‘as I have been ‘traditioned,’ so I ‘traditioned’ you. Notice, too, that ‘tradition’ here is not the antonym for God’s commands. it is not being used in the negative sense of ‘the tradition of men’ (Mark 7:8) but in the positive sense of 2 Thessalonians 2:15. Thus Pual is saying in 1 Corinthians 15 that the tradition catches up and passes on the very heart of the Christian faith, viz., the death, burial and resurration of Jesus. Furthermore, this traditioning process did not originate with the early Christians. its roots go back to the Old testament, to which we now turn.” [p. 6]

Watson then demonstrates, from Deuteronomy 5 and 6 that whereas Yahweh’s initiative precedes his conveyance of obligations upon Israel to observe Torah, their obligation to keep Torah (and the tradition of is observation) derives its significance from that prior act. Why do we keep this law?, the children ask. Because God us brought out of Egypt, the elders respond. Watson notes the communal inclusion of successive generations in the Deuteronomy text, written and preserved for generations after the Exodus event. He notes also that, theologically, the indicative of God’s salvation precedes the imperative of human law-keeping. Watson titles then his next section as ‘The Tradition Interprets the Present.” Successive generations carry forward the story from the past by observing Torah and by reforming each generation with the defining act that constituted them into a people. Who are we? We are those whom God has saved!

He titles the following section “The Tradition Points to the Future” and cites the open-ended nature of the Deuteronomic history (Joshua-2Kings) and Luke-Acts. Both seem to end in a fashion that invites scrutiny of their purpose. Watson suggests both may have been written to those who faced an unknown and uncertain future.

“[Dtr and L-A] are each in a real sense unfinished histories. The former ends with the people of Israel in Exile, with their very existence as a people hanging in the balance. Acts ends with the apostle Paul awaiting trial in Rome, with the outcome of that trial and its implication for Paul and his apostolic career totally unknown. Various historical explanations have been advanced to account for the [p. 10] unfinished nature of these two works. Theologically, however, it seems clear that each has the future in view, as uncertain and precarious as that future might be, and that each is written not to encapsulate the past but to enable the communities of faith to face their respective futures. [p. 9-10]

–Paul L. Watson, “Passing on the Tradition,” Institute for Christian Studies Faculty Bulletin 4 (1983) 5-11.

James Duke reflects on traditio

“We must return to the genuine sense of the term tradition. Tradition is derived from the Latin verb, traditio. As a verb, it is an action term; it is dynamic. Traditio is not something which simply is or is not, it is something that is done or left undone. Traditio means to pass on, to hand over from one to another, to transmit. In the case of Christianity, traditio is to pass on the god news that Jesus is the Christ. Traditio, then, is a constant movement, always in process. How is that message passed on? By constantly telling and showing what it means to say that Jesus is Christ. Human words and human deeds must work out the meaning. The message gives rise to worshipping communities, committed individuals, social and cultural activities of diverse sorts. From the beginning traditio shows itself to be diverse, innovative, open-ended.

“Unless tradito is no more than sloganeering, the confession that Jesus is the Christ must be spelled out by words and deeds. We must express what our confession means. But our expression of the gospel is not the gospel itself; those expressions will necessarily change form age to age and situation to situation. The words and deeds appropriate to the fourth, sixteenth, or eighteenth centuries are by no means adequate to the needs of the present. So we search out what is to be passed on and what is to be discarded. Traditio is the process of sifting and searching. [p. 109]

“The true sense of traditio is endangered from two sides. One the one side it is endangered by traditionalism….Traditionalism occurs when some particular item which expressed the meaning of te gospel is taken to be indispensable to essential for Christinaity itself….

“The genuine sense of traditio, however, is endangered from the other side, that of traditionlessness. Traditionlessness is the substitute of some other message and some other resource for that of the gospel.

–James Duke, “Confessions of an Unrepentant Church Historian,” Lexington Theological Quarterly 12:4 (October 1977), 105-111.

A 1936 aerial photograph of South Nashville and the old City Cemetery showing Lindsley Avenue Church of Christ

This week Metro Archives posted to their Facebook page a fine aerial view of the neighborhood north east of the old City Cemetery. It shows the lay of the land in 1936, which is filled with residences in close proximity to each other, to light industry, with sprinkling of local commercial buildings and churches. This photograph captures a moment in time a generation before the encroaching interstate sliced the neighborhood in two, which itself (among other factors) reflected and intensified suburban flight. The object of the photograph was the cemetery as noted on the item itself. This image is from the Walter Williams collection, a fine trove of local photography. And I appreciate seeing the cemetery, but my eye went first to isolate the Howard School complex at 3rd and Lindsley, then with Lindsley Avenue Church of Christ identified, I moved west a block or so, and north a block or so, to locate the former building of the South College Street Church of Christ. In the second image below I lined the street in front of each in green. This photograph is basically oriented facing north. The Lindsley building is directly east of the green line; and South College is west of its green line.

The photograph documents what this neighborhood looked like for much of the first half of the 20th century. This was primary setting for the ministry of the South College Church, led in earnest for forty years by David Lipscomb, and served by a host of evangelists. This neighborhood is the proving ground for the Lipscomb theory of church growth by planting new congregations. All told some 37 congregations came out of South College either directly, or in time by secondary or tertiary ways. To my knowledge all of them were peaceful swarms.

South Nashville, showing City Cemetery and neighborhood. 1936, from Metro Nashville Archives. https://www.nashvillearchives.org/
South Nashville, showing City Cemetery and neighborhood. 1936, from Metro Nashville Archives. Green highlights show location of Lindsley Avenue Church of Christ and former building of the old South College Street Church of Christ. https://www.nashvillearchives.org/
Detail crop. South Nashville, showing City Cemetery and neighborhood. 1936, from Metro Nashville Archives. Green highlights show location of Lindsley Avenue Church of Christ and former building of the old South College Street Church of Christ. https://www.nashvillearchives.org/