As I was reading about Dorothy Day for this week’s class, one passage from our textbook in particular caught my attention for its connection to some of the feminist themes we’ve been discussing. It comes from Day’s book Meditations, published in 1970:
“I know that what I write will be tinged with all the daily doings, with myself, my child, my work, my study, as well as with God. God enters into them all and is inseparable from them. I think of the Lord as I wake and as I think of Teresa’s daily doings.
Perhaps it is because I have a wandering mind. But I do not care. It is a woman’s mind, and if my daily written meditations are about the people about me, of what is going on, then it must be so. It is a part of every meditation to apply the virtue, the mystery, to the daily life we lead.
Because I am a woman involved in practical cares, I cannot give the first half of the day to these things. I must meditate when I can, early in the morning and on the fly during the day. This is not in the privacy of a study — but here, there, and everywhere — at the kitchen table, on the train, on the ferry, on my way to and from appointments, and even while making supper or putting Teresa to bed.”
Here’s what made my ears perk up. What does it mean to have “a woman’s mind”? What does Day mean when she writes, “Because I am a woman involved in practical cares, I cannot give the first half of the day to these things”?
I want to engage in a bit of speculative interpretation of this passage. I’m no Dorothy Day expert — in fact, this class is the first time I’ve really learned about her instead of just hearing her mentioned as a famous Catholic. I’m no gender studies or theological scholar, either. But I think it could be interesting to try to draw some conclusions about Day’s message. Continue reading →