Stargate (1994)

“Stargate” should be much, much better than it actually is. Its interstellar-travel narrative is rife with exploratory potential, loaded as it is with imagination and grandiose implications for the human race, not to mention the kind of first-rate special effects only top-bidder money could buy at the time and an operatic, majestic score that underscores the narrative’s reach. But somehow, it just never really comes alive, beginning with the sharp contract in the casting of its leads: Kurt Russell is a marvel of charisma, confidence and machismo as Colonel O’Neill but he’s ill-paired with the lifeless, charmless James Spader, who is the cinematic equivalent of a limp noodle here. (It’s hard not to wonder how an appealing, nerdy-brainy actor like, say, Matthew Broderick would have brought the role to life, but as it is, it’s like watching fireworks get rained out right before launch). There’s also the strange case of Jaye Davidson, whose Ra is by the most fascinating thing about the movie but is introduced more than an hour in, and by that point we’re too bored for his enigmatic, visually striking appearance to register. There are some really cool moments and captivating elements here and there, but it’s like director Roland Emmerich seems more interested in showing off his wonderfully ornate sets and his access to the best special effects money can buy than populating his movie with enough likable, interesting characters to get the audience invested in more than his storyline’s flash-and-bang aspects, and sidelines his most interesting performer in the process.

Rating: ★★★ (out of 5)

Avengers: Age of Ultron (2015)

Despite the superstar returning cast and a battery of the finest special effects money can buy, this sequel to 2012’s smash hit is less than the sum of its parts. This time around, the battle scenes are more akin to Michael Bay’s “Transformers” series than director-screenwriter Joss Whedon’s usual oeuvre: The camera work is frenetic and distracting, never settling on one thing for too long to the point where it’s often difficult to ascertain exactly what’s going on and who’s fighting who. Additionally, at this point, it’s rather dull to watch the Avengers fighting with CGI-propelled robots who exhibit no personality or possess any distinctive visual marks, meaning that the underwhelming climax feels unnecessarily protracted. There’s also the issue of Ultron himself, voiced as he is by James Spader like he’s in a sitcom, carrying no menace or sense of foreboding as he unleashes a poorly explained and executed plot to take over the world and resulting in one of Marvel’s most forgettable villains. Luckily, new series additions Elizabeth Olsen and Aaron Taylor-Johnson bring a spark of renewed inspiration to the proceedings, with Olsen in particular acclimatizing herself well to the CGI spectacle and bringing stinging humanity to the proceedings. With such a charismatic cast and well-established dynamics among the group, there are many scenes that are compelling along the way, but the plot that holds the movie together holds it back from Marvel greatness, settling for a mostly-ho hum, occasionally thrilling spectacle of sound and fury mostly signifying nothing as viewers patiently wait for the oft-promised showdown with Thanos in the next installment.

Rating: ★★★ (out of 5)

Wolf (1994)

There’s an undeniable pedigree to “Wolf,” which manages to be both a strength and a weakness. On the one hand, director Mike Nichols first foray into horror is predictably a classy, well-structured affair, with clear characterizations and terrific work by an ensemble cast. In addition, leads Jack Nicholson and Michelle Pfeiffer make a surprisingly effective pair and work well together despite the improbable age difference between the two, while the supporting cast is strong all the way through. However, the structured, careful approach to filmmaking with defines many of the movies directed by Nichols works against him here, as his approach to the suspense is too mannered for the movie to really come alive.

Rating: ★★★ (out of 5)

The Watcher (2000)

This has to be one of the worst big-studio movies released during the 2000s. Despite the participation of Keanu Reeves, James Spader and Marisa Tomei, there’s just no reason to watch this whatsoever: The screenplay is wincingly terrible, the acting is barely emotionally ambulant, and the music choices are distracting and obstructive. But really, it’s the direction that dooms the movie from the get-go. Director Joe Charbanic seems to have no grasp of directorial conventions and employs a series of lame choices (like washed-out photography and sub-television narrative flourishes) that only draw attention to the story’s lack of cohesion or suspense. Rumor has it that Reeves was conned into making this movie and that his participation attracted top talent, which would explain how such great potential is wasted so thoroughly on a rank amateur like Charbanic.

Rating: ★ (out of 5)