There are a whole load of books around at the moment which retell ancient Greek myths/legends/epics from the viewpoint of one or more of the women involved. This one, as the title suggests, is about Helen of Troy and her sister Clytemnestra, and it’s very readable: I enjoyed it.
The language is quite simplistic, to the extent that it sometimes feels more like a book for older children than a book for adults. Also, the author’s decided to use spellings which she feels more accurately reflect Greek – I take her point, but everyone’s used to the names Clytemnestra, Aeneas, Menelaus, etc, and it’s a bit confusing to see them spelt differently. And it’s quite a short book: it leaves long gaps in the story and then starts again with “X years later ….”.
OK, moaning over! As I said, I enjoyed it.
There are umpteen different versions of many parts of the sisters’ story. In this book, Clytemnestra, Castor and Pollux are all the children of Tyndareus and Leda, but Helen’s the daughter of Zeus. Other than that, the gods don’t really feature – the bit with Paris judging the goddesses’ beauty isn’t mentioned at all. Both sisters are young and unmarried when Agamemnon’s first mentioned. And Helen chooses to go off with Paris. There are a couple of sub-plots which I assume are the author’s own invention – one involves Agamemnon forcing the sister of Calchas to become his concubine, and the other involves Helen not wanting to have any more children after a difficult birth with Hermione. Both sisters come across as being very human, and we don’t really blame Helen for leaving a marriage that hasn’t really worked out, or even blame Clytemnestra for killing a cruel husband who sacrificed their daughter and forced young women into concubinage.
The Trojan women do blame Helen, but we sympathise with them too. The person who comes across as being the big baddie is Agamemnon – the author really doesn’t like him. He’s shown as being actually rather pleased that Helen’s run off with Paris, because it gives him an excuse to start a war and try to extend his control over both the other Greek kingdoms and the city and hinterland of Troy. Paris is portrayed as being a fop and a coward, and Helen ends up wondering what she ever saw in him. The bit about Helen pleading with Oenone to help heal Paris’s wounds is omitted, and Deiphobus is shown as trying to rape Helen but being stopped by Menelaus.
All in all, it’s a very enjoyable book, despite the rather simplistic language. Worth a go. I’m reading another of the current plethora of books about Ancient Greece at the moment, and it’s not a patch on this one! Oh, and does anyone fancy writing an alternative version of Book IV of the Aeneid which shows Dido realising that Aeneas is actually a total wuss and not worthy of her love, and gets on with ruling Carthage instead of killing herself? Just a thought!