I’ve never read this one before. It was published in 1990, when I was going through my phase of being way too cool and grown up for reading children’s books 🙂 . The Trebizon girls, like the Kingscote girls, seem to age in a very strange way – so, having started secondary school in the late 1970s, Rebecca & co are now taking their GCSEs in 1990. Well, it could be 1988 or 1989, but it certainly can’t be any earlier, as the first GCSE exams were only taken in 1988. I prefer to think that it’s 1990, because that’s the year that I took my GCSEs, making this the first school story I’ve ever read that’s exactly contemporary with me!
Like Rebecca, I spent much of 1990 thinking about tennis. However, unlike me, Rebecca was actually playing it, and thinking of turning pro. The main plot of the book, about the choices young athletes face between continuing their education and focusing on their sporting careers – it’d be nice if we could have a university tennis system like they’ve got in America, but we just don’t have enough people – is genuinely interesting, although I’m not sure that Rebecca’s decision works in the context of the times. But there’s also some lazy stereotyping, and a ridiculously silly sub-plot involving very unoriginal boarding school story tropes.
The sub-plot, then. A junior, who is a scholarship girl, is accused of stealing. It then turns out that the thief is not her, but her identical twin sister, who, upset that she didn’t get the scholarship – they tossed a coin for it! – has been sneaking into the school and taking other girls’ things. Oh please! Was that the best that Anne Digby could come up with?!
Rebecca’s storyline is much better. Should she turn pro, or should she stay on at school and do her A-levels, to give her more back-up options, and then make a decision about her tennis career? Things come to a head when she’s offered a contract by a sports agent. Unfortunately, the sports agent is a real stereotype. Of course, all sports agents have Jewish-sounding names, wear loud, vulgar clothes, and are only interested in exploiting naive young athletes for as much money as they can make out of them. Could we just lose the lazy stereotyping, please? Not impressed. But the actual storyline of Rebecca’s dilemma is good, and there’s an amusing moment when she throws a McEnroe-esque tantrum at a match.
In the end, she decides to stay on at school. Hmm. That might be good idea now, but this was the era of female players winning Grand Slam events in their mid-teens. Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario won the 1989 French Open at 17, and Monica Seles the 1990 French Open at 16. 1990 was the year in which Jennifer Capriati turned pro at 13, although she’s probably been regretting it ever since. In 1988, Steffi Graf won the calendar year Golden Slam at 19. So I don’t know that Rebecca staying on at school was a very sensible idea, although keeping your options open *sounds* sensible.
It’s a very short book, and the rest of the “Six” don’t feature much, which is a shame. Nor does the annoying Robbie, which is less of a shame! But it was really nice to find a school story that was set in my era! And I must see if I can get hold of any more of the later Trebizon books cheap.