B.A.LL.B. Professional Ethics Syllabus 2024
B.A.LL.B. Professional Ethics Syllabus 2024
) SYLLABUS
Semester X
Jan – June 2024
COMPULSORY
HONOURS
JUDICIAL REVIEW 15 – 18
OPTIONALS
LAW OF INSURANCE 34 – 39
INTERPRETATION OF STATUTES 49 – 55
Faculty Name Dr. Dipak Das Year/ Semester 5th Year / X Semester
Dr. Ankit Awasthi
Course Name Professional Ethics No. of Credits 04
Course Code NA Session 1 hour
Duration
No of Contact 60 Lectures Pre-requisite None
Hours
Introduction, The course aims to develop insights into the rules made by the Bar Council
of India with respect to the Professional etiquette of advocates in India. It
Course Objective
gives an outline of the Advocates Act, 1961 with the latest decisions of the
& Pedagogy Supreme Court and various High Courts including the Contempt of Courts
Act, 1971 and the Consumer Protection Act, 2019.
Lecture-based teaching pedagogy will be followed and case laws will also
be discussed in Socratic mode as per the requirement of the syllabus.
Course Objectives:
LEARNING OUTCOMES:
Upon completion of this course, students would be able to:
LO1- Understand the core values that shape the ethical behaviour of an advocate.
LO2 - Advocate’s rights and responsibilities to act in morally desirable ways, towardsmoral
commitment and responsible conduct.
LO3 - Integrating academic learning with experimental learning in a profession.
EVALUATION COMPONENTS
COURSE PLAN
DETAILED SYLLABUS
UNIT CONTENT
This module contains the study of legal profession in India in ancient,
Module 1 medieval and especially the changes which the profession underwent
HISTORY OF during British rule and other related aspects essential to understand the
LEGAL history of legal profession in India.
PROFESSION IN It also includes Legal education especially to track changes in pre and
INDIA post globalization in Indian scenario.
This module includes issues like need and necessity of ethics in the
Module 2 legal profession.
PROFESSIONAL In addition, duties of lawyers towards
ETHICS AND his clients,
DUTIES OF court including Bar and Bench relationship,
LAWYERS public,
his fellow attorneys,
self,
society, etc., will also be undertaken for discussion.
The module will also include role played by a lawyer in the
administration of justice and advocate’s duty towards legal reform and
duty to provide legal aid etc.
This module covers the Advocates Act, 1961 and relevant provisions
Module 3 of the Bar Council of India Rules.
ADVOCATES Special Emphasis to be given on:
ACT, 1961 Salient Features of the Act
Admission and Enrolment of Advocates
Disciplinary Actions
Conduct of Advocates
Rulemaking power of BCI and central government
The core contents of this module are right to practice, right to argue his
Module 4 case, right over his professional fees.
RIGHTS AND Decisions of courts on Advocate’s right to strike will be subject of
LIMITATIONS OF deliberation.
SUCH RIGHTS Conflicts of interests, lawyer’s versus client’s interests and limitations
of the rights of lawyers including restrictions on advertising, bar from
carrying on other professions, etc. will also be taken up for discussion.
This module includes essential skills of a lawyer, case laws and
Module 5 relevant enactments like Consumer Protection Act, 2019; the
LIABILITY FOR Contempt of Court Act, 1971 etc. which imposes liability upon an
DEFICIENCY IN advocate for the wrongs he commits in the course of his professional
SERVICE AND service.
OTHER WRONGS
COMMITTED BY
LAWYERS
The following important topics will be taken up for class discussion
Module 6 during the course:
IMPACT OF Impact of Globalization on legal profession,
GLOBALIZATION Legal outsourcing in India,
ON LEGAL Role of advocate in providing legal aid services,
SERVICES IN Advocate’s role in outside court/informal settlement of
INDIA disputes and,
Age bar and entry into practice.
READINGS:
STATUTES, RULES AND REGULATIONS:
1. Advocates Act, 1961
2. Consumer Protection Act, 2019
3. The Contempt of Court Act, 1971
4. Bar Council of India Rules, 1985
5. The Legal Practitioners (Fees) Act, 1926
CASE LAWS:
S. Ramachandra Rao v. S. Nagabhushana Rao (2022)
Dilip Kundu And Another v. Mira Devi Agarwal and Others (2022)
Thyssen Krupp Industries India Private Limited (S) v. Suresh Maruti Chougule And Others
(2022)
A.K. Balaji v. The Government of India (2018)
Bar Council of India v. A.K. Balaji (2018)
Ex-Capt. Harish Uppal vs Union of India & Anr (2002)
Balraj Singh Malik vs Supreme Court of India (2012)
[Link] vs Union of India & Anr (2012)
State of Punjab And Ors vs Ram Singh Ex. Constable (1992)
Noratanmal Chouraria vs M.R. Murli & Anr (2004)
R.D. Saxena vs Balram Prasad Sharma (2000)
The Communist Party of India (M) vs Bharat Kumar & Ors (1997)
Mahabir Prasan Singh vs M/S Jacks Aviation Private Ltd (1998)
E. M. Sankaran Namboodiripad vs T. Narayanan Nambiar (1970)
In Re: Hon’ble Justice Shri C.S. Karnan (2017)
In Re: Vijay Kurle and others (2020)
M.V. Jayarajan v. High Court of Kerala (2015)
Hari Singh Nagra v. Kapil Sibal and others (2010)
Abhyudaya Mishra v. Kunal Kamra (2020)
Aditya Kashyap v. Rachita Taneja (2020)
Surender Raj Jaiswal And Ors. vs Vijaya Jaiswal (2003)
Jaymal Thakore vs Charity Commissioner (2001)
Harishankar Rastogi vs Girdhari Sharma And Anr (1978)
Bar Council Of India vs High Court Of Kerala (2004)
V.P. Kumaravelu vs The Bar Council Of India, New Delhi (1997)
Pandurang Dattatreya Khandekar vs The Bar Council Of Maharashtra, (1983)
Kerala Vyapari Vyavasayi Ekopana vs State Of Kerala (2013)
George Kurian vs State of Kerala (2004)
In Re: Arundhati Roy vs Unknown (2002)
COURSE OBJECTIVES:
LEARNING OUTCOMES:
LO3 – To examine and evaluate ethical dilemmas and challenges faced by law
enforcement agencies, judicial bodies, and correctional institutions in the criminal
justice system.
L05- To assess the social justice implications and impact of criminal justice
policies and practices on diverse populations, considering issues of fairness,
equity, and human rights.
1 |Page
P a g e | 10
EVALUATION COMPONENTS
COURSE PLAN
[Link]. Topics Lecture Sessions
1 Introduction to Criminal Justice System 1-10
2 Process and Players in the Criminal Justice System 11-20
3 The Law Enforcement Agency: Roles and Objectives 21-30
4 The Role of Judiciary in Criminal Justice system 31-40
5 Use of Technology in Criminal Justice System 41-50
6 Reform Initiatives and Contemporary Issues in the Criminal 51-55
Justice System
7 Revision of the Course 56-60
DETAILED SYLLABUS
UNIT CONTENT
READINGS:
1. Walby, Sylvia, et al. “Law and the Criminal Justice System.” Stopping Rape:
Towards a Comprehensive Policy, 1st ed., Bristol University Press, 2015,
pp. 111–72, [Link]
2. Reddi, P. V. “Role of the Victim in the Criminal Justice Process.” Student Bar
Review, vol. 18, no. 1, Student Advocate Committee, 2006, pp. 1–24,
[Link]
5. Härter, Karl. “Cultural Deviance, Political Crime, Public Media and Security:
Perspectives on the Cultural History of Crime and Criminal Justice in Early
Modern Europe.” Crime, Histoire&Sociétés / Crime, History & Societies, vol.
21, no. 2, LibrairieDroz, 2017, pp. 261–69,
[Link]
7. Benson, Bruce L. “Let’s Focus on Victim Justice, Not Criminal Justice.” The
Independent Review, vol. 19, no. 2, Independent Institute, 2014, pp. 209–
38, [Link]
8. Benson, Bruce L. “Let’s Focus on Victim Justice, Not Criminal Justice.” The
Independent Review, vol. 19, no. 2, Independent Institute, 2014, pp. 209–
38, [Link]
10. Kathuria, Sonam. “The Bargain Has Been Struck: A Case for Plea
Bargaining in India.” Student Bar Review, vol. 19, no. 2, Student Advocate
Committee, 2007, pp. 55–68,[Link]
11. Raman, Kartik Kalyan. “Utilitarianism and the Criminal Law in Colonial
India: A Study of the Practical Limits of Utilitarian Jurisprudence.” Modern
Asian Studies, vol. 28, no. 4, Cambridge University Press, 1994, pp. 739–91,
[Link]
16. The Criminal Justice System in India by [Link] (Konark Publishers Pvt.
P a g e | 14
Ltd)
Text Books:
Introduction, Judicial review is the power of the courts of law to review the
Course Objective actions of the executive or the legislative branches and annul
& Pedagogy those actions where it finds them incompatible with the
constitutional principles. This concept has a long history and in
due course of time has become an essential feature of written
Constitutions of many countries. It aims to balance the entire
system of governance, protect the basic rights of the people, and
establish rule of law in the society. Judicial review is now firmly
established in India and is a basic feature of the Indian
Constitution. Its growth is the inevitable response of the judiciary
to ensure proper exercise of powers by the State and prevent any
violation of basic rights of the people.
LO1- have a deep understanding of the concept of judicial review in all its forms
LO2 –be equipped with the knowledge of how the courts make use of different
writs to exercise their power of review
LO3 - the various grounds on which legislative and executive actions can be
challenged and their respective limitations
LO4- learn the Constitutional and other limitations that restrict the power of
Judicial Review
LO5 – explore new and emerging concepts in the area of Judicial review
EVALUATION COMPONENTS
Evaluation Components Distribution of
Marks
Continuous Internal Assessment (1 & 2) 25
Mid Term examination 25
End Term 50
Total 100
*Note: Pass marks 50% of the final grade.
COURSE PLAN
[Link]. Topics Lecture
Sessions
1 INTRODUCTION 1-10
2 SCOPE OF JUDICIAL REVIEW 11-27
3 MECHANISM OF JUDICIAL REVIEW 28-38
4 GROUNDS OF JUDICIAL REVIEW 39-46
5 LIMITS OF JUDICIAL REVIEW 47-52
6 EXPANDING HORIZONS OF JUDICIAL REVIEW 53-60
P a g e | 17
DETAILED SYLLABUS
UNIT CONTENT
1. Meaning
Module 1 2. Function and Significance
INTRODUCTION 3. Philosophical foundation/Justification
4. Historical Background- UK, USA, India
5. Basic Principles of Judicial Review
6. Judicial Review as a part of the Basic Structure
7. Judicial Review and Appeal-Distinction
1. Meaning
Module 3 2. Habeas Corpus
MECHANISM OF 3. Mandamus
JUDICIAL REVIEW
4. Prohibition
5. Certiorari
6. Quo Warranto
1. Illegality
Module 4 2. Irrationality
GROUNDS OF 3. Procedural Impropriety
JUDICIAL REVIEW
4. Proportionality
1. Constitutional Limitation
Module 5 2. Implied Limitations
LIMITS OF 3. Exclusion of Judicial Review
JUDICIAL REVIEW
4. Judicial Self Restraint
READINGS
Essential:
H.M. Seervai: Constitutional Law of India: A Critical Commentary. [Delhi.
Universal Law Publishing Co. Ltd].
[Link]: Constitution of India. Nagpur, LexisNexis Buttersworth Wadhwa.
Jain, M.P., ‘Indian Constitutional Law’, Wadhwa and company, Nagpur, Fifth
Edition, 2005.
Prasad Anirudh: ‘Judicial Power and Judicial Review’, Eastern Book Company
Jha C.D., Judicial Review of Legislative Acts, LexisNexis Buttersworth Wadhwa
D D Basu, Administrative Law, Kamal Law House, 6th Edition, 2005
M P Jain & S N Jain, Principles of Administrative Law, Wadhwa Publications,
2008
Suggested:
[Link]. An Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution.
(Universal Law Publishing Co)
Granville Austin: The Indian Constitution: Cornerstone of a Nation. [New Delhi,
Oxford University Press].
Harry Woolf, Stanley A. De Smith, [Link],De Smith’s Judicial Review, Sweet &
Maxwell, 2007.
Helen Fenwick, Judicial Review, LexisNexis, 2010
Clive Lewis, Judicial Remedies in Public Law, Sweet and Maxwell, 2009
Bhagawati Prasad Banerjee &Bhasker Prasad Banerjee, Judicial Control of
Administrative Action, Wadhwa& Co., Nagpur, 2001
Reports:
Constituent Assembly Debates
Law Commission Report, dated 26.9.1958
Sardar Swaran Singh Committee Report
Cases (Essential):
Minerva Mills Ltd vs Union of India AIR 1980
[Link] Kumar v. Union of India 1997
Supreme Court Advocates on Record Association vs Union of India 2015
S.R. Bommai v Union of India 1995
Marbury v Madison 1803
McCulloh v Maryland 1819
Thomas Bonham v College of Physicians 1610
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala 1973
Cases (Others):
As may be discussed during the lectures
P a g e | 19
Thus, the main objective of this course, Women and Law is to trace
the development of woman laws through:
LEARNING OUTCOMES: Through the curriculum, the students will be introduced to the
legal status of women in India and their rights in the contemporary scenario which will
enables students to:
LO1- Acquire knowledge on status of women in India through ages and gain
perspective into why were women considered a powerless group;
LO2 – Apply a systematic approach to eliminate on the ideas in the institutions
which marginalize, subordinate and accord secondary citizenship to women
underestimating their contribution;
LO3 – To acquire & apply legal knowledge to the complex Socio-legal problems;
LO4- To develop the understanding of National and International Instruments to
combat the issue of marginalization;
LO5 – to Identify and Understand the problems woman face in terms of
protecting their rights through the criminal Justice administrative system.
LO6- Apply and appraise the legal provisions enacted to ameliorate the
situations with special emphasis on the Indian criminal law and its scope,
applicability and shortcomings in the existing legal regime in this regard and
contribute towards positive development.
EVALUATION COMPONENTS
COURSE PLAN
DETAILED SYLLABUS
UNIT CONTENT
MODULE 1
A. Gender Perspective: Definitions of
Woman and Gender; Gender Roles
JURISPRUDENCE OF
WOMEN AND LAW B. Historical Background and Status of
Women in India
1. Vedic Period
2. Post Vedic period
3. Medieval period
C. Women's Position during the British
Period
1. Social Reforms Movement
2. Nationalist Movement
D. Feminist Jurisprudence
1. Origin
2. Basic issues of Feminist Jurisprudence
3. Schools of Feminist Jurisprudence:
School of Liberal Feminism
School of Radical Feminism
School of Cultural Feminism
School of Post-Modern Feminism
Feminism in India
LGBTQ and women
READINGS:
CASE LAWS:
1. Bobby Art International, Etc. v. Om Pal Singh Hoon & Ors (SC 1996)
2. Joseph Shine [Link], [2018 SCC online SC 1676]
3. Laxmi v Union Of India [2014 SCC 4 427]
4. C.B. Muthamma [Link] of India [1979(4)SCC260
5. Air India and others [Link] Meerza,1982 SCR(1)438
6. Richa Mishra v. State of Chhattisgarh (2016) 4 SCC 179
7. Charu Khurana v. UOI, WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 78 OF 2013 decided
by SC on November10, 2014
8. Vishakha v State of Rajasthan (1997) 6 SCC 241
9. Medha Kotwal v.U.O.I (2013)1SCC 297
10. Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Female Workers (MusterRoll) and
Another, (2000) 3 SCC 224
11. Sabu Mathew George v. Union of India & Ors (2008 SC)
12. Vinod Soni [Link], 2005 Bombay High Court
13. S.R. Batra and Anr [Link] Batra,(SC 2006)
P a g e | 25
14. Hiral P. Harsora And Ors v. Kusum Narottamdas Harsora¸ 2016 SCC
OnLine SC 1118, decided on 06.10.2016
15. All India Democratic Women's Association and Janwadi Samitiv. Union of
India & Ors., 1989 SCR (2)66
16. Centre for enquiry into Health and Allied themes (CEHAT) v Union of
India, Writ Petition (civil) 301 of 2000
BOOKS:
1. Mamta Rao, Law Relating to Women and Children, Eastern Book Company, 4th
Edition, 2019.
2. Lalita Dhar Parihar, Women and Law, Eastern Book Company, 2011
3. SC Tripathi and Vibha Arora, Law relating to Women and Children, Central Law
Publication, 2006
4. Kalpana Kannabiran (ed.), Women and Law : Critical Feminist Perspective, Sage
Publications India Pvt. Ltd., 2014
5. Geetanjali Gangoli, Indian Feminisms: Law , Patriarchies and violence in India,
Ashgate Publishing Company, 2007
6. DK Tiwari & Mahmood Zaidi, Commentaries on Family Courts Act, 1984,
Allahabad Law Agency, 1997
7. BN Chattoraj, Crime against Women: A Search for Peaceful Solution, LNJN-
NICFS,
2007
8. Nomita Agarwal, Women and Law, New Century Publishing House, 2005
9. Manjula Batra, Women and Law & Law Relating to Children in India, Allahabad
Law Agency, 2001
10. Moira Gatens, “A Critique of the Sex/GenderDistinction” in A Phillips ed.
FEMINISM AND SUBJECTIVITY, pp. 139-154
11. Carol Pateman, “Feminist Critique of the Public and Private” in A Phillips ed.
Feminism and Equality, pp. 103-123
12. Usha Ramanathan, “Reasonable Man, Reasonable Woman and Reasonable
Expectations” in Amita Dhanda, Archana Parashar (ed) ENGENDERING LAW,
pp.33-70, Eastern Book Company 1999.
[Link]
13. Ratna Kapur and Brendia Cossman, Subversive Sites: Feminist Engagements
with Law in India 43-75, 1996.
14. Alison Jagar “Introduction: Living with Contradictions: Controversies in Feminist
Social Ethics” Westview Press, 1994
15. Heywood,“Feminism in Political Ideology:An Introduction” pp.252-265 Palgrave
McMillan, 2004.
16. Ved Kumari, “Gender Analyses of Indian Penal Code” in Amita Dhanda, Archana
Parashar (ed) ENGENDERING LAW Essays in Honour of Lotika Sarkar, pp.139-
P a g e | 26
ARTICLES (Online)
1. Saryal, S. (2014). Women’s Rights in India: Problems and Prospects. International
Research Journal of Social Sciences, 3(7), 49-53
[Link]
2. India: The Legal Framework for Women and Work. (2012).
[Link]
3. Chapter III. Indian Laws for the Protection of Women’s Rights against Domestic
Violence.
[Link]
[Link]
4. 2022 and women's rights: Key Supreme court judgments that changed scenario
in India
2022 and Women's Right: Key Supreme Court Judgements that changed scenario
in India ([Link])
5. Trajectories of Women’s Property Rights in India: A Reading of the Hindu Code
Bill
Trajectories of Women’s Property Rights in India: A Reading of the Hindu Code
Bill ([Link])
6. Women and Law, Legal Awareness programme by National Legal Services
Authority in collaboration with National Commission for women.
[Link]
7. Speeches and Writings of M.K Gandhi, “On Womanhood”
[Link]
8. Self-Expression in the Cyber World: Challenges for a Woman by Nasrina Siddiqi,
Sage publications.
[Link]
9. Abused but ‘Not Insulted’: Understanding Intersectionality in Symbolic Violence
in India
[Link]
10. Gender discrimination in devolution of property under Hindu Succession Act,
1956
[Link]
11. Where will all women work
P a g e | 27
[Link]
12. DYNAMICS OF WOMEN’S MOVEMENT IN INDIA: Lecture Series II
[Link]
SERIES%20No.%[Link]
REPORTS (Online)
1. Towards equality report of the Committee on the Status of Women in India,
1975, Department of Social Welfare, Government of India
Towards equality report of the Committee on the Status of Women in India |
INDIAN CULTURE
2. Analysis of Union Government’s Gender Budget Statement, 2021-2022
[Link]
[Link]
3. Marital Cruelty and 498A: A Study on Legal Redressal for Victims in Two States
[Link]
n_Legal_Redressal_for_Victims_in_Two_States.pdf
4. Union Budget 2020-21 and the Gender Budget Statement: A Critical Analysis
from a Gender Perspective
[Link]
5. National Consultation Gender & SDGs:Report
[Link]
s%20Consultation%202-3%20February%202020_0.pdf
6. Status of Gender Equality in India Joint Stakeholders report for the 3rd Universal
Periodic Review on women and LGBTI issues
[Link]
[Link]
P a g e | 28
Faculty Name Prof. (Dr.) V.C. Vivekanandan Year/ 4/VIII and 5/X
Mr. Abhinav K Shukla Semester
Course Name Media and Law No. of 4
Credits
Course Code NA Session 1 Hour
Duration
No of Contact 60 Pre- None
Hours requisite
Introduction, This course discusses the principles of media law as they apply to
Course Objective the work of media and communications professionals in a variety
& Pedagogy of fields. Understanding the current and evolving state of media
law is a challenging task, therefore this course will introduce
students to the study of legal and ethical issues in the media.
Students will develop an understanding and appreciation of
these issues and the ability to analyze the important legal and
ethical issues involved with the mass media industry.
The course specializes in law and is aimed to cover an overview
of the relevant statutory and regulatory provisions, judicial
precedents, and practical aspects of various sectors such as
Electronic and Print Media, Film, Television, Radio, Information
Technology and Broadcasting.
EVALUATION COMPONENTS
Evaluation Components Distribution of
Marks
Continuous Internal Assessment 25
Mid Term examination 25
End Term 50
Total 100
*Note: Pass marks 50% of the final grade.
COURSE-PLAN
DETAILED SYLLABUS
Module I
Evolution of Media
Module III
Press Council of India
Akashvani - All India Radio (AIR)
Regulatory Framework of
Prasar Bharati (Broadcasting Corporation
Media: Regulators and
of India)
Regulations
TRAI
ECI: Model Code of Conduct; Exit Polls and
Opinion Polls
Laws and Ethics related to Advertisement
Legal Dimensions of Media
Censorship of Media
Self Regulation & Other Issues
NOTE: Since many legislative amendments and court decisions could be handed down on
the topics covered herein above after this syllabus has been made applicable, students
are expected to study all such latest amendments and court decisions also, on the topics
mentioned in the aforesaid syllabus. The topics and cases are not exhaustive.
P a g e | 32
READINGS:
CASE LAWS:
1. ABP Pvt Ltd. v. Union of India, (2014) 3 SCC 327 01
2. Bennett Coleman & Co. v. Union of India, AIR 1973 SC 106
3. Bharat Kumar v. State AIR 1997 Ker. 291.
4. Bijoe Emmanuel v. State of Kerela , (1986) 3 SCC 615
5. Hamdard Dawakhana v. Union of India (AIR 1960 SC 554)
6. Indian Express Newspapers v/s Union of India (1985)1SCC 641
7. MSM Sharma v. Krishna Sinha, AIR 1959 SC 395
8. Naveen Jindal v. Zee Media Corporation Ltd, (2014) 2 SCC 1
9. Prabha Dutt v. Union of India, 1982 SCR (1) 1184
10. Prabha Dutt vs Union Of India & Ors (1982 AIR, 6 1982 SCR (1)1184
11. Rajagopal v. State of Tamil Nadu, 1994 SCC (6) 632
12. Romesh Thappar v. State of Madras, 1950 AIR 124, 1950 SCR 594
13. Sakal Papers v/s Union of India A.I.R. 1962 SC 305
14. Secy., Ministry of Broadcasting v. Cricket Association of Bengal, (1995) 2 SCC
161
15. Shreya Singhal v. Union of India, (2015) 5 SCC 1
16. Swatanter Kumar v. The Indian Express Ltd, 207 (2014) DLT 221 57
17. Tata Press Ltd. V. MTNL (1995) 5 SCC 139; AIR 1995 SC 2438
18. Texas v. Johnson 491 U.S. 397 (1989)
OxfordUniversity Press.
Austin, Granville. Working a Democratic Constitution: A History of the
IndianExperience. New Delhi: Oxford University Press
D.D. Basu Law of the Press, Wadhwa Nagpur, 2002
D.D. Basu, The Law of Press of India (1980)
[Link], Commentary on the Constitution of India, Wandhwa Nagpur, Vol.
2, 8thedn., 2007
[Link], Constitutional Law of India Vol.I (1991)
Justice E.S. Venkatramaiah, Freedom of Press : Some Recent Trends (1984)
Lok Sabha Secretariat. Constituent Assembly Debates. 5 Vols. New Delhi: Lok
SabhaSecretariat.
Madhavi Goradia Divan, Facets of Media Law, 2nd Edn., 2018
Rajeev Dhavan “On the Law of the Press in India” 26 J.I.L.I. 288 (1984)
Rajeev Dhavan, “Legitimating Government Rhetoric : Reflections on Some
Aspects of the Second Press Commission” 26 J.I.L.I. 391 (1984)
Ram Jethmalani & D.S. Chopra, Cases and Materials on Media Law, Thomson
Reuters, 1st edn., 2012.
Seervai, H. M. Constitutional Law of India: A Critical Commentary. 3 vols. 4th
ed. NewDelhi: Universal Law Publishers, 2006.
Singh, M. P., and V. N. Shukla. Constitution of India. 11th ed. Lucknow: Eastern
BookCo., 2010.
Soli Sorabjee, Law of Press Censorship in India (1976)
ONLINE ARTICLES/BLOGS/REPORTS:
1. NDTV India ban: A case of regulatory overreach and insidious censorship?
[Link]
overreach-and-insidious-censorship
2. NDTV Ban Order,
[Link]
3. MEDIA AND JUDICIARY: REVITALIZATION OF DEMOCRACY,
[Link]
4. Media Influence on Courts: Evidence from Civil Case Adjudication,
[Link]
5. MEDIA AND LAW: Privileges and Specific Rights
[Link]
m
6. PRESS COUNCIL OF INDIA: NORMS OF JOURNALISTIC CONDUCT,
[Link]
7. ROLE OF MEDIA IN MAKING AND EXECUTION OF PUBLIC POLICY IN INDIA,
The Indian Journal of Political ScienceVol. 74, No. 2 (April - June, 2013),
pp. 309-312 (4 pages); [Link]
P a g e | 34
Faculty @ Dr. Y Papa Rao & Dr. Kiran Year/ Semester VIII and X
Kori Semesters
No of 05 Pre-requisite None
Contact
Hours
(Week)
Total 60
Hours
About the Course:
Course Insurance law in India had its origin from the United Kingdom with the
Objective establishment of a British firm, the Oriental Life Insurance Company in
& 1818 in Calcutta, followed by the Bombay Life Assurance Company in
1823, the Madras Equitable Life Insurance Society in 1829 and the
Pedagogy
Oriental Life Assurance Company in 1874. Later on the Insurance Act,
1938, The Life Insurance Act, 1956, The Marine Insurance Act, 1963,
The General Insurance Business (Nationalization) Act, 1972, Insurance
Regulatory and Development Authority Act, 1999 and the Motor
Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 2019 have been enacted.
The insurance industry of India has 57 insurance companies 24 are in
the life insurance business, while 34 are non-life insurers. Life
Insurance Corporation of India is the only public sector company
among the life insurers. General Insurance Corporation of India is the
only reinsurer in India recognized by the IRDA.
The insurance idea is an old-institution of transactional trade. The age-
old form of insurance was the marine insurance. Consequently, in due
course of time fire and life insurance, made their appearance. Within
P a g e | 35
the last hundred years the insurance principle is being extended wider.
Today one finds insurance cover for health, accidents, motor vehicles,
livestock, crop, burglary, and various other disasters. Insurance is a
device not to avert risks, calamities and disasters; but to mitigate their
rigors and financial losses. The function of insurance is to spread such
loss arising from risks of life over a large number of persons.
The operational framework of insurance idea is provided by the
general principles of contract. The insurance policy, being a contract, is
subject to all the judicial interpretative techniques. Besides, the
insurance idea has a compensatory justice component. This brings it in
the arena of the law of tort as well. It is even suggested that a fully
grown and developed law of insurance may, if not totally displace,
decreases the significance of the law of tort.
Course Objectives:
This course is designed to acquaint the students with the conceptual
and operational parameters of insurance law in the context of the
development of the general principles of law and judicial
interpretation to inform the students about the use of law for the
establishment of “just” order in insurance and to develop the
appreciative and evaluative faculties of the students. The objective of
the course is as follows:
To understand the basic and advance concepts of law of
Insurance.
Pedagogy:
The course components are administered through class room teaching,
showing short documentaries, tutorial classes, open access resources,
workshops/debate/discussions. Every component of the course
module tries to inculcate the basic principles of contract of insurance
and its application in the case laws critically. Students are not only
encouraged to participate in the process of discussion but also
P a g e | 36
Evaluation Components:
Heads of Evaluation components Distribution of marks
End Term Examination 50 marks
Mid Term Examination 25 marks
Continuous Internal Assessment 25 marks
Total 100 marks
COURSE PLAN
Unit Content
Module-1 Definition, nature, and history of insurance
Introduction Contract of insurance- classification of contract of insurance,
nature of various insurance contracts
History and development of insurance in India
The Insurance Act, 1938
Insurance Regulatory Development Authority (IRDA) of
India- role, powers and functions
Module-2 Principle of Uberrima Fidei-non-disclosure-
General Principles misrepresentation in insurance contract
of Law of Insurance Principle of Indemnity
Insurable interest
Risk and principle of causa Proxima
Loss Minimization.
Module-3 Nature and scope of life insurance, definition, kinds of life
Life Insurance insurance, the policy and formation of a life insurance
contract
Event insured against life insurance contract
Circumstances affecting the risk
Amounts recoverable under life policy
Persons entitled to payment
Settlement of claim and payment of money
Module-4 Definition and Scope of Fire Insurance
Fire Insurance Meaning of Fire and Loss by Fire
Special Doctrines: Reinstatement, Subrogation and
Contribution.
Module-5 Nature and scope
Marine Insurance The Marine Insurance Act 1963
Voyage –deviation
Perils of the sea
Partial loss of ship and of freight, salvage, general average,
particular charges
Measure of indemnity, total valuation, liability to third
parties
Module-6 Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 2019
Motor Vehicle Nature and scope
Insurance Third Party Insurance or Compulsory Insurance
Effect of insolvency or death on claims, insolvency and death
of parties, certificate of insurance
Claims tribunal, constitution, functions, application for
P a g e | 38
Prescribed Legislations:
1. The Insurance Act, 1938
2. The Marine Insurance Act, 1963
3. The Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956
4. The General Insurance Business (Nationalization) Act, 1972
5. The Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority Act, 1999
6. Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 2019
7. The Public Liability Insurance Act, 1991
Essential Readings:
1. Bird, John, Modern Insurance Law (10th ed., 2013), Sweet and Maxwell
2. Singh, Avtar, Law of Insurance, EBC
Suggested Readings:
1. Malik, Sumeet, J.V.N. Jaiswal's Law of Insurance- Vols 1&2, Eastern Book Company (2nd
ed., 2020)
2. Gaurav Varshney, Insurance Laws,LexisNexis (1st ed., 2017)
3. M.N. Srinivasan & K. Kannan (Revised by Justice K. Kannan) Principles of Insurance
Law (10th ed., 2017), LexisNexis
4. M.N. Mishra and S.B. Mishra, Law of Insurance (25th ed., 2016)
5. Birds, John, Modern Insurance Law, Sweet & Maxwell; Eighth edition (1 January 2011)
6. M.B. Shah, Landmark Judgments on Insurance under the Consumer Protection Act,
Universal Law Publishing (2004)
7. E.R. Hardy Ivamy, General Principles of Insurance Laws, (6th ed., 1993), Butterworths,
Delhi
8. Vandana Singh, K. B. Agrawal, Insurance Law in India, (2012)
9. Evan James MacGillivray, MacGillivray on Insurance Law: Relating to All Risks Other
Than Marine, Sweet & Maxwell Ltd; 6th Revised edition (1997)
10. K.S.N. Murthy & K.V.S. Sarma, Modern Law of Insurance in India (Sixth Edition- 2019),
LexisNexis, Delhi
Recommended Cases:
1. Pink v. Fleming (1890) 25 QBD 396
2. Mithoolal Nayak v. Life Insurance Corporation of [Link] 1962 SC 814
3. Kasim Ali Bulbul v. New India Assurance Co. AIR 1968 J & K 39
4. Smt. Krishna Wanti Puri v. Life Insurance Corporation of India,AIR 1975 Del. 19
P a g e | 39
5. .Smt. Dipashri v. Life Insurance Corporation of India, AIR 1985 Bom 192
6. Life Insurance Corporation of India v. Asha Goel, AIR 2001 SC 549
7. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. M/s Zuari Industries Ltd.(2009) 9 SCC 70
8. Simmonds v. Cockell (1920) All ER Rep. 162
9. Harris v. Poland ( 1941) All ER 204: 1 K.B.D. 204
10. L.I.C. of India v/s Channasbasamma, AIR 1991 SC 392
11. Vijay Kumar v/s New Zealand Insurance Co. AIR 1954 Bom.
12. Bhagwani Bai v/s L.I.C. of India AIR 1984 M.P.
13. Lakshmi Insurance Co. v/s Bibi Padmavati AIR 1961 Punjab
14. L.I.C. of India v/s Smt. Vijaya Chopra AIR 2008 (NOC) 2334
15. L.I.C. of India v/s Smt. Chandra Kanta AIR 2008 (NOC) 2334
16. L.I.C. of India v/s Mrs. Shashi Sethi AIR 2008 H.P. 67
17. Smt. Sakhitombi v/s Zonal Manager, L.I.C. of India, Calcutta AIR 2009 Gauhati 90
18. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v/s Shri Hasan Sultan Nadaf [(1992) 3 CPJ 64
(National Commission)
19. Castellain v/s Preston [1883 2 Q B 38}
20. Nagappa v. Gurudayal Singh (2003) 2 SCC 274
21. Ibrahim v. Raju (2011) 10 SCC 634
22. Biman Krishna Bose v. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. (2001) 6 SCC 477
23. LIC of India v Asha Goel (2001) 2 SCC 160
24. P.C. Chako v. Chairman, LIC of India (2008) 1 SCC 321
25. Satwant Kaur Sandhu v. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. (2009) 8 SCC 316
26. Reliance Life Insurance Co. Ltd. V. Rekhaben Nareshbhai Rathod (2019) 6 SCC 175
27. Sonell Clocks and Gifts Ltd v. The New India Assurance Co Ltd (2018) 9 SCC 784.
P a g e | 40
India.
CO2: To understand the rationale for the shift from the old
regime to the current regime.
CO3: To understand the legal framework of Individual
Insolvency, CIRP, FTCIRP, and PPCIRP.
CO4: To have a basic appreciation of current challenges & future
opportunities.
The pedagogy for the course will involve a combination of
methods aimed at building the legal knowledge, practical
perspective and skills that are requisite for an exquisite exposure
of insolvency law as lawyers as well as understanding the
perspectives of reading the provisions with interpretation. The
methods used will be based on case law studies in form of a
situation and involve honing practical skills.
LEARNING OUTCOMES: Through the curriculum, the students will get a clear frame of
Law of Insolvency. At the end of the course, students will be able to:
[LO01]: To discuss the fundamentals of Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law.
[LO02]: To enumerate different methods and techniques for resolving Insolvency.
[LO03]: To outline the advantages the new regime has over the previous regime.
[LO04]: To discuss the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process and its future
prospects.
[LO05]: To elaborate on the concept of the Liquidation Process as envisaged under IBC.
[LO06]: To understand and appreciate the regime for personal and partnership
insolvency.
[LO07]: To outline and discuss the infrastructure put in place by the Insolvency and
bankruptcy Code.
[LO08]: To examine and highlight the concept of Cross Border Insolvency and the stand
of the Insolvency Law Committee on it.
EVALUATION COMPONENTS
Evaluation Components Distribution of
Marks
Continuous Internal Assessment 25
Mid Term examination 25
End Term 50
Total 100
*Note: Pass marks 50% of the final grade.
COURSE PLAN
[Link]. Topics Sessions
1 INTRODUCTION 1-11
P a g e | 42
DETAILED SYLLABUS
UNIT CONTENT
a) Basic understanding of “insolvency” and
“bankruptcy.”
b) Key objectives of Insolvency and Bankruptcy
Module 1 Resolution Laws
INTRODUCTION c) Roots, and benchmarks of Insolvency and
Bankruptcy Law
d) Tests for determining insolvency
e) The framework of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Law in
India
a) Applicability and Definitions
b) Persons who may initiate
Module 2 c) The time limit for completion of the process
RESOLUTION OF d) Moratorium
CORPORATE INSOLVENCY e) Insolvency Resolution Process
f) Resolution Plan
g) Fast Track CIRP and Pre-Packaged CIRP
h) Authorities and Enforcement Mechanism
a) Moving from Resolution to Liquidation
b) Initiation of liquidation
Module 3 c) Appointment, powers, and duties of liquidator
LIQUIDATION PROCESS d) Liquidation estate
e) Liquidation Process and Distribution of assets
f) Voluntary Liquidation
g) Vulnerable/Avoidable transactions
h) Dissolution of the corporate debtor
a) Applicability and Terms
b) Individual Insolvency under IBC in comparison with
Module 4 the older regime
INDIVIDUAL INSOLVENCY c) Initiation of Insolvency Resolution
d) Fresh Start Process and Insolvency Resolution
Process
e) Bankruptcy order and its consequences
f) Treatment of Personal Guarantors of Corporate
Debtors
g) Authorities and Enforcement Mechanism
P a g e | 43
READINGS:
STATUTES, RULES, AND REGULATIONS:
1. Companies Act, 2013
2. Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code 2016
3. Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920
4. Presidential Insolvency Act, 1909
5. Various Regulations.
CASE LAWS:
1) Anjali Rathi and Others Vs. Today Homes & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. and Others
(2022) 2 SCC 401
2) Anuj Jain IRP for Jaypee Infratech Limited Vs. Axis Bank Limited etc. (2019) SCC
Online SC 1775
3) ArcelorMittal India Private Limited Vs. Satish Kumar Gupta & Ors. (2019) 2 SCC 1
4) Arun Kumar Jagatramka Vs. Jindal Steel and Power Ltd. & Anr (2021) 7 SCC 474
5) Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Ltd. Vs. Bishal Jaiswal & Anr. (2021) 6 SCC
366
6) Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Ltd. Vs. Tulip Star Hotels Ltd. & Ors.
(2022) SCC Online SC 944
7) B.K. Educational Services Private Limited Vs. Parag Gupta And Associates (2019)
11 SCC 633
8) Babulal Vardharji Gurjar Vs. Veer Gurjar Aluminium Industries Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
(2020) 15 SCC 1
9) Brilliant Alloys Private Limited Vs. Mr. S. Rajagopal & Ors. (2022) 2 SCC 544
10)CoC of Essar Steel India Limited Vs. Satish Kumar Gupta & Ors. (2020) 8 SCC 531
11)Dena Bank (now Bank of Baroda) Vs. C. Shivakumar Reddy and Anr. (2021) 10
SCC 330
12)E S Krishnamurthy & Ors. Vs. M/s Bharath Hi Tech Builders Pvt. Ltd. (2022) 3
SCC 161
13)Ebix Singapore Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CoC of Educomp Solutions Ltd. & Anr. (2021)
[Link] 153 SC
14)Gaurav Hargovindbhai Dave Vs. Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Ltd & Anr
(2019) 10 SCC 572
P a g e | 44
15)Ghanashyam Mishra and Sons Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction
Company Ltd. & Ors. (2021) 9 SCC 657
16)Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited Vs. Mr. Amit Gupta & Ors (2020) SCC Online SC
1167
17)India Resurgence ARC Private Limited Vs. M/S. Amit Metaliks Limited & Anr.
(2021) SCC Online SC 409
18)Innoventive Industries Ltd. Vs. ICICI Bank & Anr. (2018) 1 SCC 407
19)Jaypee Kensington Boulevard Apartments Welfare Association & Ors. Vs. NBCC
(India) Ltd. & Ors. (2021) [Link] 63 SC
20)Jignesh Shah & Anr Vs Union of India & Anr (2019) 10 SCC 750
21)K. Kishan Vs. M/s. Vijay Nirman Company Pvt. Ltd. (2018) 17 SCC 662
22)K. Sashidhar Vs. Indian Overseas Bank & Ors. (2019) 12 SCC 150
23)Kalpraj Dharamshi & Anr Vs. Kotak Investment Advisors Ltd. & Anr. (2021) 10
SCC 401
24)Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. Vs. A. Balakrishnan & Anr. (2022) 9 SCC 186
25)Lalit Kumar Jain Vs. Union of India & Ors. (2021) 9 SCC 321
26)Laxmi Pat Surana Vs. Union Bank Of India & Anr. (2021) 8 SCC 481
27)M/s Embassy Property Developments Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Karnataka & Ors.
(2020) 13 SCC 308
28)M/s. Orator Marketing Pvt. Ltd. Vs. M/s. Samtex Desinz Pvt. Ltd. (2021) SCC
Online SC 513
29)M/s. Reliance Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd. Vs. M/s Hotel Poonja
International Pvt. Ltd. (2021) 7 SCC 352
30)Macquarie Bank Ltd. Vs. Shilpi Cable Technologies Ltd (2018) 2 SCC 674
31)Maharasthra Seamless Limited Vs. Padmanabhan Venkatesh & Ors. (2020) 11
SCC 467
32)Maitreya Doshi Vs. Anand Rathi Global Finance Ltd. and Anr. (2022) SCC Online
SC 1276
33)Mobilox Innovations Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Kirusa Software Pvt. Ltd. (2018) 1 SCC 353
34)Ms. Sagufa Ahmed & Ors. Vs. Upper Assam Plywood Products Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
(2021) 2 SCC 317
35)Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (Mcgm) Vs. Abhilash Lal & Ors. (2020)
13 SCC 234
36)New Okhla Industrial Development Authority Vs. Anand Sonbhadra (2022) SCC
Online SC 631
37)P. Mohanraj & Ors. Vs. M/S. Shah Brothers Ispat Pvt. Ltd. (2021) 6 SCC 258
38)Phoenix Arc Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Spade Financial Services Ltd. & Ors. (2021) 3 SCC 475
39)Pioneer Urban Land and Infrastructure Limited & Anr. Vs. Union of India & Ors.
[2019] 8 SCC 416
40)Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Monnet Ispat and Energy Ltd. (2018) 18 SCC
786
41)Pratap Technocrats (P) Ltd. & Ors. Vs. Monitoring Committee of Reliance Infratel
Ltd. & Anr. (2021) SCC Online SC 661
P a g e | 45
42)Sagar Sharma & Anr Vs. Phoenix Arc Pvt. Ltd. & Anr (2019) 10 SCC 353
43)Sesh Nath Singh & Anr Vs. Baidyabati Sheoraphuli Co-Operative Bank Ltd And
Anr. (2021) 7 SCC 313
44)State Bank of India Vs. V. Ramakrishnan & Anr. (2018) 17 SCC 394
45)State Tax Officer Vs. Rainbow Papers Ltd. (2022) SCC Online SC 1162
46)Sundaresh Bhatt Liquidator of ABG Shipyard Vs. Central Board of Indirect Taxes
and Customs (2022) SCC Online SC 1101
47)Swiss Ribbons Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs. Union of India & Ors. (2019) 4 SCC 17
48)Transmission Corporation of Andhra Pradesh Limited Vs. Equipment Conductors
and Cables Limited (2019) 12 SCC 697
49)Vashdeo R Bhojwani Vs. Abhyudaya Co-Operative Bank Ltd & Anr (2019) 9 SCC
158
50)Vidarbha Industries Power Ltd. Vs. Axis Bank Ltd. (2022) 8 SCC 352
REFERENCES:
Online Blogs/Articles:
A Primer on the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Nishith Desai Associates,
2019,
[Link]
[Link]
BLRC Report - [Link]
Dr. Neeti Shikha, India’s Tryst with Cross-border Insolvency, IBBI Annual journal
2020.
Draft Information Memorandum and Resolution Plan, IBBI -
[Link]
[Link]
Gerard McCormack, “US exceptionalism and UK localism? Cross-border
insolvency law in comparative perspective”, Cambridge University PressVolume
36, Issue 1, March 2016 , pp. 136-162
Jennifer Payne, “The Role of the Court in Debt Restructuring”,
[Link]
court-in-debt-restructuring/
Lucian Arye Bebchuk, “The Uneasy Case for the Priority of Secured Claims in
Bankruptcy”, The Yale Law Journal, 1996, Vol. 105: 857,
[Link]
=ylj
Mark J. Roe & Stephen D. Adam, “Restructuring Failed Financial Firms in
Bankruptcy: Selling Lehman's Derivatives Portfolio”, Yale Journal on Regulation,
Vol. 32, 2015,
[Link]
=yjreg
P a g e | 46
BOOKS
A K Mittal, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: Law and Practice (EBC, 1st ed.).
Ashish Makhija, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code of India, (Lexis Nexis, ed. 2018).
Mulla, Law of Insolvency in India (LexisNexis, 2013)
Sumant Batra, Corporate Insolvency Law and Practice, Eastern Book Company;
1st Edition, 2017 edition
V.S Wahi, Treatise on Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, (Bharat Law House, ed.
2018).
Vinod Kothari and Shikha Bansal, Law Relating to Insolvency and Bankruptcy
Code, 2016, (Taxmann, ed. 2016).
REFERENCES
Bob Wessels and Gert Jan Boon, Cross-Border Insolvency Law, (2nd ed., Wolters
Kluwer Law International, 2015).
Chapter 1, Wood, Philip R., Principles of International Insolvency (The Law and
Practice of International Finance Series, vol. 1), 2nd ed. (South Asian ed. 2009).
Chapters 1 to 4, Finch, Vanessa, Corporate Insolvency Law: Perspectives and
Principles (2nd ed. Cambridge, 2009).
Chapters I and II, Barry E. Adler, Douglas G. Baird and Thomas H. Jackson, Cases,
Problems, and Materials on Bankruptcy, 4th ed. (Foundation Press, N.Y., 2007).
Corporate Laws Manual (2015).
Dinshaw Fardunji Mulla and Aparna Ravi, The Law of Insolvency in India, (6th ed.,
Lexis Nexis, 2017).
Felicity Toube, International Asset Tracing in Insolvency, (1st ed., Oxford
University Press, 2009).
Finch Vanessa and David Milman, Corporate Insolvency Law: Perspectives and
Principles, (3rd ed., Cambridge, 2017).
P a g e | 47
Guide to Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016, (As amended by Insolvency and
Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Ordinance 2017), (Taxmann, ed. 2017).
Ian F. Fletcher, Law of Insolvency, Sweet & Maxwell; 5th edition edition (2017)
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Irit Mevorach, The Future of Cross Border Insolvency, (1st ed., Oxford University
Press, 2018).
Julian R. Franks &Walter N. Torous, Lessons from a Comparison of U.S and U.K
Insolvency Codes8(3)Oxford Review of Economic
Policy<[Link]
Justice P.S. Narayana, Law of Insolvency (Bankruptcy), 8th ed., Asia Law House,
2010).
Lecture 1, Narayan, Ms. Sathya, Mulla on the Law of Insolvency in India, 4th ed.
(Tripathi, 1997).
Mitra, Dr. N.L. (Chairman), Report of the Advisory Group on Bankruptcy Laws-May
2001, along-with Illustrative Code-Corporate Bankruptcy and Winding up Code,
2001; Available at:
[Link]
/01&SECID=4&SUBSECID=27
Rosa M. Lastra, Cross-Border Bank Insolvency, ((1st ed., Oxford University Press,
2011).
Thomson Reuters, Manzar Saeed Commentary on the Insolvency and Bankruptcy
Code 2016, (Hardcover, ed.2017).
Transnational Bankruptcy, Chapter XIII, Barry E. Adler, Douglas G. Baird and
Thomas H. Jackson, Cases, Problems, and Materials on Bankruptcy, 4th ed.
(Foundation Press, N.Y., 2007).
UNCITRAL Model-Law on Cross-Border Insolvency.
Vinod Kothari and Shikha Bansal, Law Relating to Insolvency and Bankruptcy
Code, 2016, (Taxmann, ed. 2016).
Vishwanathan, T.K., Interim Report of the Bankruptcy Law Reform Committee,
(Feb. 2015), available at: [Link]
Ziad Raymond Azar, Bankruptcy Policy: A Review and Critique of Bankruptcy
Statutes and Practices in Fifty Countries Worldwide, Cardozo J. of Int’l. & Comp.
Law, (Vol. 16), 2008, 279.
* IMPORTANT NOTE
1. The reading material is preliminary and suggestive. The faculty shall distribute
pertinent study materials as pre/post lecture content (from time to time). Students
must keep themselves abreast of the distributed materials and clarify their
respective doubts with the faculty.
2. The faculty member-in-charge of the course reserves the right to modify any of the
contents, terms and conditions, provided in this curriculum.
3. A list of project topics would be notified to the class after the commencement of the
session.
P a g e | 49
Introduction, INTRODUCTION:
Course
Objective & Legislation dominates the contemporary legal landscape. Almost all
Pedagogy fields of legal regulation involve legislation in some form. Legislatures
enact laws after much deliberation. No doubt in this process they
have to take into account the present and future needs of the people.
With the emergence of legislation, interpretation of statutes became a
method by which judiciary explores the intention behind the statutes.
Judicial interpretation involves construction of words, phrases and
expressions. In their attempt to make the old and existing statutes
contextually relevant, courts used to develop certain rules, doctrines
and principles of interpretation. Judiciary plays a highly creative role
in this respect. The ability to interpret and understand the operation
of legislation is a skill essential to understanding law and its
operation. In this backdrop, the course is designed to discuss in detail
the nuances of interpretation of statutes.
Course Objectives:
CO 1- To explore tendency of the judiciary in deciding cases.
CO 2 -To understand the system of Interpretation of Statutes which is
the core functions of the Court.
CO 3- To discuss the methods of interpretation according to the
nature and type of law such as remedial, penal laws, tax etc.
P a g e | 50
CO 4 -To know about the various components of a statute and its use
in the interpretation of statutes.
Pedagogy:
Individual Assignments 25
Total 100%
*Note: Pass marks 50% of the final grade.
1 Introduction 8 1-8
Module VII
7. Expiry and Repeal of Statutes
Expiry And
Express or implied Repeal
Repeal Of
Consequences of Repeal
Statutes
Subordinate Legislations under repealed statute
Reading:
Text Books:
Statutes:
1. The General Clauses Act, 1897
BOOKS AND ARTICLES:
Essential Reading:
1. G.P. Singh, Principles of Statutory Interpretation, Lexis Nexis 12th Ed. 2013
2. D.N Mathur, Interpretation of Statute, Central Law Publication 6th Ed. 2021
3. J. Benjamin Cardozo, The Nature of Judicial Process (Chapter I & III), Martino
Publishing 2011
Additional Reading
1. Adrian Vermual, Judging Under Uncertainty, Universal Law Publication Company,
Reprint 2010,
2. Rupert Cross, John Bell, and George Engle, Statutory Interpretation, Oxford
University Press, Third Ed,
3. Peter Maxwell,, Interpretation of Statutes Maxwell & Sons Ltd
P a g e | 53
Articles
1. Joseph Raz, Between Authority and Interpretation (Oxford University Press
2009)
2. Robert H. Bork, The Tempting of America: The Political Seduction of the Law
(New York: The Free Press 1990)
3. Max Radin, Statutory Interpretation, Harvard Law Review, Vol.43, No.6 (April
1930)
4. Paul Brest, The Misconceived Quest for the Original Understanding, Boston
University Law Review, Vol. 60 (1980)
5. Ronald Dworkin, Natural Law Revisited, University of Florida Law Review, Vol.
34 (1982)
6. H.L.A. Hart, Positivism and the Separation and Morals, Harvard Law Review, Vol.
71(1958)
7. Lon L. Fuller, Positivism and the Fidelity to Law – A Reply to Professor Hart,
Harvard Law Review, Vol.71 (1958)
8. Frederick Schauer, Formalism, Yale Law Journal, Vol. 97 (1989)
9. Richard Posner, Legal Formalism, Legal Realism and the Interpretation of
Statutes and the Constitution, Case Western Reserve University Law Review, Vol.
37 (1987)
10. Cass R. Sunstein, On Analogical Reasoning, Harvard Law Review, Vol. 106 (1992)
11. Veena C, Interpretation of Statutes C. Jamnadas & Co. Educational & Law
publisher 4th Ed. 2018
Case Laws:
1. Anurag Mittal V Shaily Mishra Mittal, (2018) 9 SCC 691 :AIR 2018 SC 3983
2. Bhatia International V Bulk Trading S.A 2002 4 SCC 105 : AIR 2002 SC 1432
3. T.N Electricity Board V Status Speg. Mills Ltd (2008) 7 SCC 353 :AIR 2008 SC
2838
4. Municipal Corporation Hyderabad. v. T.N Murthy (1987) 1 SCC 568
5. C.I.T v. Teja Singh AIR 1959 SC 352
6. ITO, Mangalore v. M. Damodhar Bhat, AIR 1969 SC 408
7. Sussex Peerage Case (844) 11 C1 & F 85
8. Wallace v Jaffree 283U.S.25(1931);
9. Padma Sundara Rao v. State of Tamil Nadu, (2002) 3 SCC 533;
10. Tej Kiran Jain v. N. Sanjiva Reddy, (1970) 2 SCC 272,
11. Jugalkishore v. Raw Cotton Co., AIR 1955 SC 376;
12. G. Narayanaswami v. Pannersevan, (1972) 3 SCC 717,
13. Union of India V Elphinstone Spinning and Weaving Com. Ltd 2001 (1) JT SC 536
14. Sunil Batra V Delhi Administration (1978) 4 SCC 409
15. Balram Kumawat v Union of India (2003) 7 SCC 628
16. National Insurance Company Ltd V Anjana shyam (2007) SCC 445
17. Sachidananda Misra V State of Orissa (2004) 8 SCC 599
P a g e | 54
18. C. Ronald V U.T Andaman and Nicobar Islands (2011) 12 SCC 428
19. Shankar Raju V Union of India (2011) 2 SCC 132
20. Union of India V Vasudeva Murthy AIR 2010 SC 2879
21. Hardeep Sing v State of Punjab (2014) 3 SCC 92
22. Craw Ford V Spooner (1846) 6 Moore PC 1
23. Kartar Singh V State of Punjab (1994) 3 SCC 569
24. Heydon's Case (1584) 76 ER 637
25. Bengal Immunity Com. Ltd v State of Bihar AIR 1955 SC 661
26. Sanjay Datt V State through C.B.I Bombay JT 1994 (5) SC 540
27. V.L.S Finance Ltd v Union of India (2013) 6 SCC 278
28. State of U.P V Hari Ram (2013) 4 SCC 280
29. Grid Corporation of Orisa V Eastern Metal & Ferro Alloys (2011) 11 SCC 334
30. Competition Commission of India V Steel Authority of India Ltd 2010 (10) SCC
744
31. C.S.T ,M.P V Radhakrishan (1979) 2 SCC 249
32. Karnataka Bank Ltd V State of Andhra Pradesh (2008) 2 SCC 254
33. State of Maharashtra V Bharat S. Shah (2008) 13 SCC 5
34. Kedarnath V State of West Bengal AIR 1953 SC 404
35. Re Kerala Education Bill , 1957 AIR 1958 SC 956
36. Maharashtra Land Development Corporation V State of Maharashtra 2010 (11)
SCALE 675
37. Keshvanadn Bharati V State of Kerala (1973) 4 SCC 225; AIR 1973 SC 1461
38. Indian City Properties Ltd V Municipal Commissioner of Greater Bombay (2005)
6 SCC 417
39. [Link] V Union of India (2004) 2 SCC 579
40. Union of India V National Federation of the Blind (2013) 10 SCC 772
41. Iqbal Singh Marwah V Mieenakshi Marwah (2005) 4 SCC 370
42. Balraj Kunwar V Jagtpal Singh ILR 26 All 393 PC
43. Brihan Mumbai Electric Supply and Transport Undertaking V Lakshya Media
[Link] (2010) 1 SCC 620
44. Hanlon V Law Secretary 1980 2 All ER 199 (HL)
45. Benagal Nagpur Railway Company v Ruttanji Ramji AIR 1938 PC 37
46. Mudliyar Chatterjee V International Film Com. AIR 1943 PC 34
47. Mohomed Ariffin V Yeah Oai Gark 43 AI 256 Reffered in Jamma Masjid case AIR
1962
48. Shambhu Nath Mehra V State of Ajmer AIR 1956 SC 599
49. Ali M.K V State of Kerla (2003) 11 SCC 632
50. Biman Basu V Kallol Gupta Thakurta AIR 2010 SC 3328
P a g e | 55
LEARNING OUTCOMES:
After the successful completion of Course Curriculum, a student will be able to:
LO1 Explain about the conceptual aspects of socio-economic offences
and different forms of socio-economic offences.
LO2 Distinguish between socio-economic offences and other violations of the
law.
LO3 Critically analyse the various causes of emergence of socio-
economic offences and its all-pervasive dimensions.
LO4 Know and understand the various aspects of socio-economic offences.
P a g e | 58
EVALUATION COMPONENTS
COURSE PLAN
Total 60
DETAILED SYLLABUS
UNIT CONTENT
Module 1 Concept and Evolution of ‘Socio-Economic Offences.’
Introduction to Nature and Extent of Socio-Economic Offences.
theSocio- Mens Rea, Nature of Liability, Burden of Proof and Sentencing
Economic [Link] of White-Collar Crimes
Offences Distinction among Socio-Economic Offences, White Collar
Crimesand Traditional Crimes.
The Socio-Economic Offences in India: The Santhanam
Committee Report, 1964 and the 47th Report of the Law
Commission of India,1972.
P a g e | 59
Definition Clause
Module 2 Hoarding and black
Essential marketingPublic Distribution
Commodities Act, Scheme
1955 Power of the Governments to control production, supply
anddistribution of essential commodities,
Offences and Punishments under the Act.
Cognisance of matter under section 11 EC Act, 1955
Module 3 Definition of ‘food’, ‘Adulterant’, ‘contaminant’, ‘food business’,
The Food Safety ‘misbranded food’
and Standards Act, Authorities under the Act:
2006 Food Safety and Standards Authorities of India & State Food
Safetyand Standards Authorities: Establishment and functions
READINGS:
Suggested Readings:
CASE LAWS:
1. P. Chidambaram v. Directorate of Enforcement (2020) 13 SCC 791.
2. P. Chidambaram v. Directorate of Enforcement (2019) 9 SCC 24.
3. State v. Anil Sharma (2017) 13 SCC 751.
4. Malvinder Mohan singh v. State. 2020 SCC Online Del. 2001.
5. CBI v. Remender Chattopadhyay 2020 14 SCC 396.
6. [Link] Reddy v. Directorate of Enforcement 2022.
7. CBI, Bank Securities And Fraud Cell v. Ramesh Gellie and others CRL no. 167
of 2015.
8. Neeraj Dutta Vs. State (NCT of Delhi), (2019) 14 SCC 311.
9. K. Shanthamma vs. State of Karnataka, (2022) 4 SCC 574.
10. Navaneethakrishnan vs. State by Inspector of Police, AIR 2018 SC 2027.
11. Yashwant Sinha and Ors. v. Central Bureau of Investigation, (2020) 2 SCC 338.
12. Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency Pvt. Ltd. v. Central Bureau of Investigation,
AIR 2018 SC 2039.
13. Union of India v. Ranjit Kumar Saha, (2019) 7 SCC 505.
P a g e | 62
14. Vijay Madanlal Choudhary Vs Union of India, 2022 SCC OnLine SC 929.
15. Bablu @ Jitendra vs. State of U.P [CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 1201 of 2021]
16. Abbas Ali v. State of Punjab, (2013) 2 SCC 195.
17. Abdul Rashid v. State of Haryana, 2014 Cri LJ 1588.
18. Abhay Singh Chautala v. C.B.I, (2011) 7 SCC 141.
19. Ajnappa v. State of Karnataka, (2014) 2 SCC 776.
20. Ashok Kumar Sharma v. State of Rajasthan, (2013) 2 SCC 67.
21. Basant Kumar Sharma v. Government of India, [2013] 120 SCL 122 (Del).
22. Budh Singh v. State of Haryana, (2013) 3SCC 742.
23. CBI v. Birendra Kumar Singh @ Virendra Kumar Singh @ Pandit, 207(2014)
DLT 680.
24. CBI v. Jagjit Singh, (2013) 10 SCC 686.
25. Centre for Public Interest Litigation v. Union of India, AIR 2014 SC 49.
26. Chitan J. Vaswani & Anr v. State of West Bengal & Anr., AIR 1975 SC 2473.
27. Gaurav Jain v. Union of India & Ors, 1997 (8) SCC 114.
28. Gian Chand v. State of Haryana, (2013) 14 SCC 420.
29. Kalicharan Mahapatra v. State of Orissa, AIR 1998 SC 2595.
30. Kanwarjit Singh Kakkar v. State Of Punjab, (2011) 6 S.C.R. 895.
31. Kashmiri Lal v. State of Haryana, (2013) 6 SCC 595.
32. Krishnamurthy @ Tailor Krishnan v. Public Prosecutor, Madras, AIR 1967 SC
567.
33. Kulwant Singh v. State of Punjab, (2013) 4 SCC 177.
34. M. Mohammed v. Union of India, [Link].1491 of 2014.
35. M/S Nestle India Limited v. The Food Safety and Standards Authority of
India, W. P (L) No. 1688 of2015.
36. M/s. G.M.H. Laboratories, HP & Sri Ram Gopal Goyal v. The Asst.
Drug Controller, Bangalore,MANU/KA/0440/2013.
37. Madan Lal Agarwal v. State through Drug Inspector, 2012 Cri L.J. 2584.
38. Mahesh Chand v. State of UP, 2013 (10) ADJ 222.
39. Mak Data (P) Ltd. v. CIT, (2014) 1 SCC 674.
40. Manohar Lal Sharma v. Principal Secy, 2013 (15) SCALE 305.
41. Namdev Genba Parthe through M/s/ Kulswami Medical and General
Stores v. State of Maharashtra.2014 (1) MhLj 266.
42. Narayanan K. v. State of Kerala, ILR (2014) 1 Ker 654.
43. Navdeep Singh v. State of Haryana, (2013)2 SCC 584.
44. Nimmagadda Prasad v. CBI, (2013) 7 SCC 466.
45. Niranjan Hemchandra Sashittal v. State of Maharashtra, (2013) 4 SCC 642.
46. PUCL (PDS Matters) v. Union of India, (2013) 2 SCC 663.
47. Rajesh Shantilal Adani v. Special Director, Enforcement Directorate, Mumbai,
P a g e | 63
1. [Link]
Report-No-47-The-Trial-and-Punishment-of-Social-and-Economic-
Offences
2. [Link]
3. [Link]
n_of_Socio-Economic_Offences_e-Money_Laundering
4. [Link]
[Link]?0=ip_login_no_cache%3De7868165f01fc414f57ca0cb9f7
6fa77
5. [Link]
6. [Link]
sent=1&casa_token=&collection=journals
P a g e | 64