D.Conn.: Despite officers’ not thinking there was apparent authority to consent, the consenter did have that authority

“The Court recognizes that Officer Nunez and a female officer expressed ambivalence as to whether N.H. could consent to a search when she was not the registered owner of the Camry.” Still, she had apparent authority to consent. United States v. Carter, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 142669 (D. Conn. July 25, 2025).

Defendant’s girlfriend had apparent authority to consent to a search for a firearm that he pulled on her during an argument in the apartment they shared. United States v. Smith, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 142481 (S.D.N.Y. July 25, 2025).*

Getting defendant out of the vehicle so the officer could use Google translate to talk to him didn’t violate the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Ceja-Torres, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 18662 (6th Cir. July 25, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Apparent authority, Reasonableness. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.