WA: SW at 6 am, ziptied, questioned, but told he wasn’t under arrest is still custody

Defendant was in custody for Miranda when a warrant was executed at his house at 6 am and he was taken outside, separated from his family, and ziptied but told he was not under arrest. State v. Magana-Arevalo, 2026 Wash. LEXIS 59 (Jan. 15, 2026).

The warrant was for defendant’s premises, and it mentioned storage sheds and a camper on the property. The camper was subject to search under the warrant. United States v. Barsalou, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7419 (D. Vt. Jan. 12, 2026).*

A threat to tow an illegally parked vehicle is not a seizure. Metrospeedy Operations, LLC v. Nordstrom, 2025 NY Slip Op 34963(U) (N.Y. Co. Dec. 19, 2025).*

“Here, the problem with Mims’s argument is that if the elements of the Facebook warrant to which he objects are stricken, the warrant is still supported by sufficient probable cause and a sufficient nexus. In other words, even if Shanks’s statements were reckless misstatements (which the Court finds they were not), they were not material.” So no Franks violation. United States v. Mims, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7816 (N.D. Okla. Jan. 15, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Curtilage, Custody, Franks doctrine, Seizure. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.