MN: Physician-patient privilege doesn’t exempt medical records from SW

Nonprivileged information in a patient’s medical records does not automatically become privileged when it is transmitted to or acquired by a healthcare provider. The physician-patient privilege statute does not prohibit a district court from issuing an order granting the State’s request for a warrant authorizing a particularized search of a criminal suspect’s medical records where the suspect was injured at the scene of a traffic accident. State v. Smeby, 2026 Minn. LEXIS 101 (Mar. 18, 2026).

The seizure of plaintiff’s bus was without a warrant, but that’s not a Fourth Amendment violation. Ravenscroft v. Cellar, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56133 (D. Neb. Mar. 18, 2026).*

“Figueroa’s response to those questions, in light of other attendant factors, gave Albrecht reasonable suspicion to believe that she was engaged in unlawful drug trafficking. In particular, he knew the Buick had a travel history that, based on his training and experience, was suspicious and consistent with drug trafficking. … Then, when Albrecht asked Figueroa about her travel history, she lied about it. And so did Lopez, who gave a completely different story. That also gives rise to reasonable suspicion. … In addition, Albrecht knew that Figueroa had previously been arrested for possession of a controlled substance. This, too, can contribute to an officer’s reasonable suspicion of drug trafficking.” United States v. Figueroa, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56392 (D. Kan. Mar. 17, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Privileges, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.