Showing posts with label Japan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Japan. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 12, 2013

Sometimes You Can't Go Home Again

Trey Smith


When Mount St. Helens blew her top in 1980, the nearby landscape looked like it had been leveled by an atomic bomb. Some people thought that any form of life would not return before several generations had passed. And yet, within 5 years or so, life did return. It seems that nature has a way of repairing herself.

Climactic events can be fierce and lead to overwhelming destruction. Most communities that find themselves in the path of a major hurricane, tornado or flood take years to rebuild, but they DO rebuild. There is one event -- a human-caused one -- in which this is not always the case: a nuclear accident. When a nuclear plant melts down, it can render the surrounding area uninhabitable for, maybe, forever.

This is what the citizens of the towns surrounding Fukushima have just learned. Up until now, the government has issued assurances that people would be allowed to return home at some point. But in the last few days government officials have admitted the obvious: the communities near the Fukushima plant have been rendered uninhabitable for the foreseeable future. Residents who had pinned their hopes on going home are now coming to the realization that "home" will have to be somewhere else!

You see, this is THE issue with nuclear energy. As long as things are humming along, nuclear energy seems like a good thing. But when a problem arises and things aren't humming along, it's not a good thing at all. This so-called wonderful energy source has the capacity to end human civilization all by itself. So, while many will argue that it has many upsides, this one downside cancels out all the supposed benefits.

It is bad enough that residents near Chernobyl or Fukushima have been permanently displaced, but what happens when a nuclear catastrophe renders the planet unlivable? If the entire population of earth is displaced, we have nowhere else to go!

Thursday, October 17, 2013

Counting on You, Not Me

Trey Smith

Dressed in a hazardous materials suit, full-face mask and hard hat, Japan's prime minister, Shinzo Abe, left his audience in no doubt: "The future of Japan," he said, "rests on your shoulders. I am counting on you."

Abe's exhortation, delivered during a recent visit to the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant, was only heard by a small group of men inside the plant's emergency control room. But it was directed at almost 6,000 more: the technicians and engineers, truck drivers and builders who, almost three years after the plant suffered a triple meltdown, remain on the frontline of the world's most dangerous industrial cleanup.

Yet as the scale of the challenge has become clearer with every new accident and radiation leak, the men working inside the plant are suffering from plummeting morale, health problems and anxiety about the future, according to insiders interviewed by the Guardian.
~ from Plummeting Morale at Fukushima Daiichi as Nuclear Cleanup Takes Its Toll by Justin McCurry ~
What Abe said to the men risking life and limb to cleanup this horrific nuclear disaster is not that alike what many leaders say to their brave men and women sent off to war. Just like in a war, many of the circumstances at the Fukushima Daiichi plant were set in motion by politicians and corporate bigwigs. In other words, the calamity was intensified by those driven by greed and power, but the work required to clean up the mess is borne by the powerless.

It has been this way all throughout human history. Even back in the days of Laozi and Zhuangzi, the rulers drew up the plans for conquest, but it was mainly poor conscripts who did the fighting...and dying.

It has often been noted that if the rich and powerful had to fight their own battles, they would be few and far between. If George W. Bush and Dick Cheney personally had led the troops into Iraq or Afghanistan, do you think these "wars" would have lasted so long or even taken place at all? If Barack Obama had to put his boot on the ground, do you think we would have bombed Libya?

~

If truth be known, Shinzo Abe is incorrect. The future of Japan (or the world) does NOT rest on the shoulders of the workers cleaning up Fukushima. No, it rests on the shoulders of leaders like Shinzo Abe. If they continue to put their lust for ever more power and profit before anything else, it merely sets the stage for future disasters. It is leaders like Abe and corporate CEOs who hold the cards!

Friday, September 27, 2013

What Were They Thinking?

Trey Smith

On September 7, 2013 Japan’s Prime Minister Shinzo Abe said to the 125th session of the International Olympic Committee, the following:

Some may have concerns about Fukushima. Let me assure you, the situation is under control. It has never done and will never do any damage to Tokyo.

This will surely be remembered as one of the great lies of modern times. In Japan some people call it the “Abesolute Lie”. Believing it, the IOC decided to bring the 2020 Olympics to Tokyo.

Japanese government spokespersons defend Abe’s statement by saying that radiation levels in the Pacific Ocean have not yet exceeded safety standards.

This recalls the old story of the man who jumped off a ten-story building and, as he passed each story, could be heard saying, “So far, so good”.

We are talking, remember, about the Pacific Ocean – the greatest body of water on earth, and for all we know, in the universe. Tokyo Electric Power Company – TEPCO – has been pouring water through its melted-down reactor at Fukushima and into the ocean for two and a half years, and so far the Pacific Ocean has been able to dilute that down to below the safety standard. So far so good. But there is no prospect in sight of turning off the water.
~ from Some Facts You Should Know About Fukushima by Takashi Hirose ~
When I heard that the IOC awarded the 2020 Olympics to Japan, my first thought was: What were they thinking? Japan is home to the worst nuclear accident in history and the IOC wants to invite the world to go there? That seems to me like a recipe for disaster.

Imagine the IOC voting to hold the summer Olympics in New Orleans just after the Hurricane Katrina or the Gulf oil debacle. That would have been a crazy decision too.

Hey, as long as the IOC is making irrational choices, why not pick Damascus or Baghdad for the 2024 Olympics. I'm sure people would be safe there!

Wednesday, July 4, 2012

A Glowing Democracy

Trey Smith


While I spend a good deal of space on this blog critiquing the shortcomings of my own country, I should point out that the United States is not the only nation in which money rules over the voices of the people. It happens frequently in Europe as well as Australia. I would be remiss in not pointing out that the Japanese people suffer from this plight as well.
The Japanese government has defied the will of its people. In the face of stiff opposition, it has resumed its reliance on nuclear power, ending a two-month period when the country had rid itself of that source.

The Japanese public hasn’t been too happy.

“News reports said that about 1,000 protesters marched on Sunday in central Tokyo, two days after tens of thousands of chanting anti-nuclear demonstrators filled streets in front of the prime minister’s residence,” states The New York Times.

And these demonstrators do not reflect just a minority opinion.

“Seventy-one percent of respondents to a Mainichi newspaper poll published on June 4 objected to a speedy restart” of Japan’s reactors, says a Bloomberg News piece. “In a separate poll released June 5 by the Pew Research Center, 70 percent of Japanese said the country should reduce its reliance on atomic energy and 52 percent feared they or their families may have been exposed to radiation.”

But the government of Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda chose to rush in regardless. That even experts are cautioning otherwise seems to have had little effect.
~ from Japanese Government Refuses to Listen to Its People by Amitabh Pal ~
Wherever you go in this modern world -- it was just as true in antiquity -- money and its resultant power talks! It talks just as loudly in democratic nations as it does in communist and fascist ones. It is unsurprising that this would be so in the latter two because they don't pretend to give a shit what the people need or say. It is far more troubling in a so-called democracy for this very reason: what the majority thinks is SUPPOSED to matter.

But time and again we see that it doesn't! If you have overwhelming majorities on one side and great wealth on the other, we all know who tends to win the day. It doesn't matter if wealth desires to pursue a strategy, policy or program that is potentially injurious to the majority or the planet. When they put their feet squarely down on this side or that, government tends to follow like a puppy on a leash.

Chew on that thought as you watch the fireworks display.

Saturday, March 3, 2012

The Eerie Glow of Money

Trey Smith


What is a government to do when pollution or toxins threaten to harm the almighty god of economics? Well, a government COULD decide to put the health and safety of its citizens first and simply accept that an economic hit must be taken. Sadly, this option is rarely invoked as can be seen in the Japanese government's reaction to the calamity at the Fukushima nuclear plant.
In the immediate aftermath of the nuclear crisis, Tokyo announced it was raising the permitted level of radiation in food by a factor of five, meaning produce that would previously have been thrown out was suddenly alright.
Think about this for half of a second. On the day before the disaster unfolded, x was considered too much. Now, through the magic of economics, xxxxx is the new threshold.

It is more than obvious that these changes have nothing to do with science -- it's all about economics. The lower standard means that fewer crops are sold and less money is made. So, to combat this potential problem, the easy solution is to raise the standard!

You want to now WHY people around the globe have little faith in their government leadership? This situation offers a stark answer!

Friday, September 9, 2011

Shades of BP

Radioactive material released into the sea in the Fukushima nuclear power plant crisis is more than triple the amount estimated by plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Co, Japanese researchers say.

Japan's biggest utility estimated around 4,720 trillion becquerels of cesium-137 and iodine-131 was released into the Pacific Ocean between March 21 and April 30, but researchers at the Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA) put the amount 15,000 trillion becquerels, or terabecquerels.
~ from Sea Radiation from Fukushima Seen Triple Tepco Estimate by Yuko Takeo ~
Reminiscent of BP's dubious reporting during the Gulf oil spill, another major corporation has been caught underreporting the damage their actions have wrought. This brings to mind yet again why government relies on the guilty to be up front and honest!

In the case of both BP and TEPCO, it is logical that they would try to minimize their culpability. The more damage they admit to, the more it has the potential negatively to impact the bottom line. Why provide the very noose from which you will be hanged?

It's not just corporations that attempt to minimize culpability, it's really a human trait. If you catch little Billy raiding the cookie jar and you announce to him that he will have to forgo watching television on a ratio of one day per cookie devoured, do you think he will confess to eating all 10 of them? He may fess up to eating 4 and then blame the other missing six on sister Sally, brother Tommy or Brutus, the dog!

When calamities of this nature occur, the public needs independent scientific peer-reviewed teams to perform the testing. Relying on the offender to provide accurate information is a guarantee that we won't receive it in a timely manner, if at all!!

Saturday, April 23, 2011

Shock Doctors Salivate Over Japan

Sometimes, when reading a news report, a sentence or two that has little to do with the main thesis of the article is what jumps out at you. This happened to me just now as I was reading "No End in Sight for Nuclear Catastrophe in Japan" at Common Dreams. The majority of the text dealt with the ongoing nuclear emergency, but what caught my attention was this.
[Secretary of State] Clinton pledged steadfast support for Japan in the face of "a multidimensional crisis of unprecedented scope".

Japan and the US announced the creation of a public-private partnership to spearhead reconstruction. "We wish to enhance co-operation between Japan and American businesses," Clinton said...
Isn't this how the shock doctors of Corporate America always seem to view crises? As Naomi Klein so eloquently pointed out in The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism, a disaster always has the potential to be a huge windfall for some corporations. What Clinton was saying, in essence, is that US corporations will now be at the head of the line to be awarded huge reconstruction contracts paid for, of course, by Japanese taxpayers.

In the coming weeks and months -- even as the headlines fade and the mainstream media moves on to other B-I-G stories -- I will endeavor to keep a close watch on the situation in Japan and report on it here. We are being granted the opportunity to watch disaster capitalism unfold right before our eyes. It will be interesting to see just how well Klein has described what is sure to unfold in Japan.

Wednesday, April 20, 2011

We Screw Up -- But You Pay!

If I lived in Japan, I think I would be fit to be tied. Not only would I have to be dealing with the damage caused by the earthquake, tsunami and nuclear crisis, but now I would have just learned that the government thinks I need to pay for TEPCO's misdeeds!
Japanese consumers would be on the hook for nuclear damage payments and earthquake reconstruction costs under two tax plans the government is considering, officials said Tuesday.

The Kyodo News agency said one plan would raise electricity customers' charges to help cover claims against Tokyo Electric Power Co. from people who suffer losses from the crisis at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant. The increase would come in the form of a higher electricity source-development tax, which is collected from customers as part of their electricity bills.

TEPCO must pay people forced to evacuate from the region surrounding the nuclear plant, but officials said the power company may not be able to pay all the claims.

"While TEPCO will be primarily responsible for damages payments, the government may have to support the firm," Economy, Trade and Industry Minister Banri Kaieda told a press conference Tuesday. "We are considering taxation, the electricity charge and other measures to enable the government to shoulder some of the burden."

A second plan would raise to 8 percent Japan's current 5-percent consumption tax for about three years, Kyodo said. The extra $273 billion ($22.5 trillion yen) would pay for reconstruction of the country's northeastern region, said senior lawmakers in the Democratic Pary of Japan...
Isn't this how it always seems to go? A corporation puts its profits ahead of the public's health and safety and the government allows it to happen, but, when something goes wrong, the citizens are forced to bail out the corporation!

The same thing is happening in the Gulf of Mexico. Yes, BP indeed is shouldering SOME of the costs, but we all know that you and I will end up footing most of the bill.

It doesn't seem to matter where a person lives. It doesn't seem to matter what type of political system is utilized. When you and I screw up, the justice system expects us to pay for our own misdeeds, but when the rich and powerful mess up -- particularly when there have been many warnings that their actions might lead to catastrophe -- they, by and large, are allowed off the hook.

It sucks.

Monday, April 18, 2011

How Much If a Life Worth?

In its purest sense, no dollar amount can be put on this miracle we call life. Life itself is precious and money is vulgar and ephemeral. Life comes from the mysterious beyond and money is a human-created mechanism of exchange. Still, within the confines of human social relationships, we must ask: How much is a life worth?

There is no one answer. It all depends upon a person's station in life.

If an individual is a member of the ruling elite, then that life is worth a helluva lot! Money will be thrown at you for assorted reasons. Your tax responsibilities will be reduced and, in many cases, you will be completely excused from shouldering ANY responsibility to your community by not being required to pay any tax at all!

If you run into trouble -- even if your own reckless behavior caused the problem -- your fellow citizens will bail you out. We will hand you buckets of cash hand over fist in the hopes that a few pennies trickle back to the rest of us.

If an individual is not part of the ruling elite, then that life isn't worth all that much. You will be required to pay for most of the services, wars, pollution and lifestyles of everybody else. If you try to scrimp -- even a little -- on what we say you owe, the justice system will come after you and make you pay dearly for trying to skirt your responsibility to society.

If you are unfortunate enough to live near the Gulf coast in the US or Eastern Japan, then the powers that be will demonstrate for you how little your meager life is worth. In Japan, TEPCO is paying families uprooted by the nuclear disaster $12,000. The average payout for victims of the BP oil spill is $16,000.

On the surface, that may sound like a significant chunk of change. People with no jobs or facing home foreclosure might say that $12K or $16K would alleviate a great amount of worry for them. But how can such meager amounts of money replace the lives torn asunder?

In Japan, some people were evacuated with little more than the clothes on their backs. They have lost their homes, belongings, modes of transportation, and everything in between. They've lost their jobs and their children have lost their schools. $12K is a pittance in comparison!

Along the Gulf Coast, the economy is in shambles. The fish and the shrimp haven't come back. Tourism is way down. Oil sheens continue to roll in with the tide. With the fishing and tourism industries stuck in idle, few jobs are to be had.

To make matters worse, according to the federal government, "the 2009 poverty threshold for a family of three was 18,310 dollars." So, handing out an average of $16K doesn't even get a typical family above the poverty line!

The message is clear. Most lives on this planet aren't worth a lot and their value is sinking like a rock.

Tuesday, April 12, 2011

Really Bad...But Not So

The ongoing nuclear crisis in Japan again is illustrating in real time that, when it comes to mega disasters, the government is not to be trusted. It doesn't seem to matter what type of government we're talking about. Democracies or dictatorships. Capitalist or communist. The track records of far too many governments is to keep their own citizens in the dark for as long as possible at great risk of life and limb.

You have probably heard that Japan recently upped the assessment of their crisis to level 7, on par with the Chernobyl accident. That's the highest level on the scale! Yet, while they now admit that the situation is much more grave than they originally let on, they continue to try to soft sell it as well.
The new ranking signifies a "major accident" that includes widespread effects on the environment and health, according to the Vienna-based IAEA. But Japanese officials played down any health effects and stressed that the harm caused by Chernobyl still far outweighs that caused by the Fukushima plant...
Talk about mixed messages! On the one hand, the government is telling its citizens the situation is dire. On the other hand, they downplay the health risks involved. These two aspects would seem mutually exclusive!

To make matters worse, 5 more communities -- some as much as 40 miles away -- have been added to the evacuation zone. People in these 5 communities are being told to uproot their lives. Why would they need to do so IF the potential health effects weren't serious?

I can certainly understand a government not desiring to foment panic as panic tends to lead to chaos. However, the avoidance of panic doesn't seem to be the prime motivator in far too many cases. No, the government wants to shield itself and the corporations involved from scrutiny and criticism.

In such cases, it seems that the corporate citizen is more highly valued than the rest of us!

Monday, April 11, 2011

How Now Glowing Cow

Though the nuclear accident in Japan happened in what seems like a world away, radiation is showing up in more and more places in the US. No need to worry, we're told, the vast majority of it is within "acceptable levels."
Radiation from Japan has been detected in drinking water in 13 more American cities, and cesium-137 has been found in American milk — in Montpelier, Vermont — for the first time since the Japan nuclear disaster began, according to data released by the Environmental Protection Agency late Friday.

Milk samples from Phoenix and Los Angeles contained iodine-131 at levels roughly equal to the maximum contaminant level permitted by EPA, the data shows. The Phoenix sample contained 3.2 picoCuries per liter of iodine-131. The Los Angeles sample contained 2.9. The EPA maximum contaminant level is 3.0, but this is a conservative standard designed to minimize exposure over a lifetime, so EPA does not consider these levels to pose a health threat.

The cesium-137 found in milk in Vermont is the first cesium detected in milk since the Fukushima-Daichi nuclear accident occurred last month. The sample contained 1.9 picoCuries per liter of cesium-137, which falls under the same 3.0 standard...
You see, this is one of the critical problems with nuclear energy. When something goes wrong, it impacts people the world over. You could live in a nation that categorically rejects nuclear energy -- though the US certainly does NOT fall in this category -- and you would be victimized just as much as those who embrace nuclear power!

I will note that the levels of radiation showing up in the US should spur us to exhibit greater compassion for what the Japanese populace is experiencing. Here we are thousands of miles away and we are detecting obvious levels of radiation. Just imagine what those within 100 miles must be dealing with! If you are one of the many who are a bit concerned, imagine the anxiety and uncertainty that many of our Japanese counterparts are confronting day-in and day-out.

As this nuclear tragedy continues to unfold, things are bound to grow worse before, or if, they get better.

Sunday, April 10, 2011

A Bigger Japanese Tsunami May Be Coming

Beyond the human and environmental toll of the earthquake, tsunami and nuclear holocaust that Japan continues to deal with, one thing I have been thinking about for the past month is the worldwide economic toll. Before the earthquake, Japan had the second largest economy in the world and it has fallen to the #3 spot and may well fall much farther.

There is a really good article, "Trials of Globalization: And We All Melt Down" at This Can't Be Happening that speaks to the concerns I've had.
It’s certainly not my expertise. What I do know is that, on top of the terrible calamities brought on by the tsunami and the scary portents of the radiation spewing into the air, the ocean, and into the ground surrounding Fukushima and beyond, we are facing an economic juggernaut that is likely to shatter the world’s fragile recovery. You don’t take out the world’s third biggest economy – until recently, the second -- with no impact, despite the recent assurance by that reliable sage Timothy Geithner that the crisis in Japan would not hinder the U.S. recovery. (Meanwhile, Tim’s banking buddies are busy reviewing their clients’ exposure.)
As the author (Betsy Ross, a pen name) aptly points out, Japan provides a lot of parts for computers and such things, but productivity and distribution are way down for several reasons.
Needless to say, these are far from typical times, and this is no typical disaster. Faced with the loss of a critical supply partner, many companies around the world are confronting a quite different reality. Japan is suffering huge shortages as production capacity shrivels and logistical issues mount--particularly in the are of transportation. The Financial Times reports that Japanese manufacturing activity plummeted to a two-year low in March, according to the Markit/JMMA purchasing managers’ index, which hit its worst low since its inception in 2001.

We’re not just talking about the now infamous Japan-made five components that go into the iPad 2 or the wafer material needed to manufacture semiconductor chips or the metallic paint needed to produce shiny red and black cars. I can attest that companies of all sizes find themselves in the same pickle, with normally efficient Japanese production and transportation chains hobbled by power interruptions, radiation fears, earthquake damage, and severe after-shocks. These days, many global shipping lines won’t even dock at Japan’s busiest ports, Tokyo and Yokohama, for fear of radioactive contamination. And that’s not just being paranoid. If their hulls pick up any radioactivity, they could be barred later from other ports, for example in the US.
Even worse, the Japanese government must now figure out a way to pay to fix all the destruction wrought by the tsunami and nuclear meltdown. We're not talking about chump change either. Where might some of that money come from?
It’s possible the government will have to start cashing out their U.S. T-bills, which is a whole other story, since Japan and China have financed our government’s profligate ways for the past decade or so. One thing for sure is that foreign governments are not likely to rush into Japan with huge coffers of cash any time soon. The U.S. and European taxpayers are in no mood to spring for someone else’s Marshall Plan. And given their wretched history, China would be an unlikely savior for Japan, although strange things do happen...
Yes, there have been a few meager signs that the US economy may be coming out of its doldrums, but it is hard to imagine in this age of globalization that our economy will come away from this situation unscathed.

Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Why Am I Not Reassured?

Gosh, the reports coming out of Japan seem to be getting worse and worse. Here's what they announced today.
Tokyo Electric Power Co. on Monday took the unprecedented measure of dumping 10,000 tons of low-level radioactive water in the Pacific Ocean from a facility at its crippled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power complex to make room for the storage of more highly contaminated water, which is hampering restoration work at the plant.

With the total amount of water to reach 11,500 tons, including contaminated groundwater from near the No. 5 and No. 6 reactors, the government said the disposal was unavoidable in order to secure safety. The level of radioactive substances in the water is up to 500 times the legal limit permitted for release in the environment.

The government's nuclear agency said the disposal will pose ''no major health risk'' and experts say that the radioactive materials are likely to be diluted in the sea, but it remains uncertain how the marine environment will be affected when taking into account the impact of highly radioactive water already leaking into the sea from the plant located on the coast of Fukushima Prefecture.
~ from Kyodo News ~
Is it any wonder that people are frightened? TEPCO and the Japanese government keep reporting that this or that is up to 500, 1,000, 10,000 or 100,000 times the permissible limits, but, hey don't worry.

This is the exact same scenario Americans were treated to by our own government and BP during last year's mammoth oil spill. We were told that the oil wasn't as bad as it appeared and that the dispersant used would pose no serious health risks to area residents. Despite these reassurances, people up and down the Gulf coast got sick and, one year later, many of them remain sick.

What is the point in having legally permissible limits of toxic substances if, when those limits are exceeded by large margins, we're told it's no big deal? Are the limits themselves meaningless?