Category Archives: Probable cause

W.D.N.Y.: Def had standing in his work premises under Mancusi v. Deforte

Defendant had standing in his work premises under Mancusi v. Deforte. On the merits his Franks challenge fails: “Even assuming arguendo that any of the above challenged statements could be considered false or misleading, Defendants have put forth no credible … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Def had standing in his work premises under Mancusi v. Deforte

N.D.Ohio: Violating retail store’s “no firearms” prohibition was RS for stop

Defendant’s violating a “no firearms” prohibition at a retail establishment was reasonable suspicion for his stop for trespassing. United States v. Sinkfield, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54823 (N.D. Ohio Mar. 17, 2026). To succeed on an ineffective assistance of counsel … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Violating retail store’s “no firearms” prohibition was RS for stop

OR: Stop for illegible temporary paper plate was objectively reasonable [and pretextual]

Defendant’s temporary paper plate was wrinkled and illegible, and that led to the stop. The car was also known to frequent drug houses. Stop still valid. State v. Martin, 347 Or. App. 680 (Mar. 11, 2026).* The individual facts didn’t … Continue reading

Posted in Pretext, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OR: Stop for illegible temporary paper plate was objectively reasonable [and pretextual]

Army: PC shown for picture files in other apps on cell phone

There was probable cause to search the picture files in defendant’s cell phone beyond the app defendant used. It was reasonable to conclude pictures could be moved between places on the phone. United States v. Ingram, 2026 CCA LEXIS 119 … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Collective knowledge, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on Army: PC shown for picture files in other apps on cell phone

D.Ariz.: PC for forfeiture is similar to PC for a warrant

Probable cause for forfeiture is similar to probable cause for a warrant. United States v. Tetherus, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49868 (D. Ariz. Mar. 11, 2026)*:

Posted in Forfeiture, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: PC for forfeiture is similar to PC for a warrant

D.Neb.: Just because the state seizes a cell phone doesn’t mean they know the Brady implications of the contents

Just because the state seizes a cell phone doesn’t mean they know the Brady implications of the contents. Moss v. Jeffreys, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45716 (D. Neb. Mar. 4, 2026) (§ 60.58 n.2) 2255 petitioner’s claim that defense counsel … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Cell phones, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Just because the state seizes a cell phone doesn’t mean they know the Brady implications of the contents

CA8: Crowd dispersal was not a seizure

Police actions in dispersing a crowd were not a seizure, even using less than lethal force. Perkins v. City of Des Moines, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 6528 (8th Cir. Mar. 5, 2026).* CBP officer’s conviction for excessive force on a … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Probable cause, Seizure | Comments Off on CA8: Crowd dispersal was not a seizure

W.D.Ark.: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to sentencing

The exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to sentencing. Owen v. United States, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42184 (W.D. Ark. Jan. 20, 2026) (recognizing rule). The officer here blocked defendant’s parked car while he was in it, so that was a stop. … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Probable cause, Seizure | Comments Off on W.D.Ark.: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to sentencing

CA10: RS didn’t dissipate during wait for drug dog

Reasonable suspicion here once developed didn’t dissipate before the 20-30 minute wait for the drug dog. United States v. Labs, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 5789 (10th Cir. Feb. 27, 2026). By statute, “[t]he evidence admissible for meeting the State’s burden … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Forfeiture, Inventory, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA10: RS didn’t dissipate during wait for drug dog

TN: Three controlled buys in three days is PC

Three controlled buys three days in a row was probable cause for a warrant for defendant’s house. State v. White, 2026 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 95 (Feb. 27, 2026).* “Here, a review of the affidavit demonstrates that it does contain … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on TN: Three controlled buys in three days is PC

DC: “police had probable cause to believe that Mr. Turner’s bullet-riddled car might contain bullet fragments from the shooting”

“There can be little question that the police had probable cause to believe that Mr. Turner’s car contained evidence of a crime. Four cars parked along the street, including Mr. Turner’s Lexus, were struck by bullets in a drive-by shooting. … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause | Comments Off on DC: “police had probable cause to believe that Mr. Turner’s bullet-riddled car might contain bullet fragments from the shooting”

OH9: Smell of burnt MJ justified search even though officers found none

The smell of burnt marijuana justified the search of defendant’s car even though none was found. State v. Dejournett, 2026-Ohio-640 (9th Dist. Feb. 25, 2026).* An empty beer can in the beverage holder doesn’t justify a search of the car. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH9: Smell of burnt MJ justified search even though officers found none

W.D.Okla.: Def bears no burden on applying crime-fraud exception to his cell phone search

The government seized this Oklahoman’s cell phone and searched it with a warrant. Oklahoma is largely marijuana legal. Pleading the crime-fraud exception, the government bears the burden of segregating the valid conversations from the federal conspiracy allegations. Defendant bears no … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Cell phones, Plain view, feel, smell, Privileges, Probable cause, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on W.D.Okla.: Def bears no burden on applying crime-fraud exception to his cell phone search

E.D.Pa.: Warrant not required to be shown at time of arrest

The Fourth Amendment does not require a warrant be provided at the time of arrest, and an arrest can occur with probable cause and without a warrant in felony cases. Mister v. Marino, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33508 (E.D. Pa. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Waiver | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Warrant not required to be shown at time of arrest

E.D.N.Y.: It’s not actually required a cell phone be involved in a crime; it’s whether it is likely it was

It’s not constitutionally required to show that a cell phone was actually used in a crime for probable cause to search it. It’s enough that it likely could have. “A law enforcement-affiant’s personal expertise combined with attestation to a defendant’s … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Exclusionary rule, Nexus, Probable cause, Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: It’s not actually required a cell phone be involved in a crime; it’s whether it is likely it was

OH8: Apt building maintenance workers consented to administrative elevator inspections

Cleveland’s city elevator inspector got permission from the maintenance persons at three apartment buildings in Cleveland to conduct regular inspections. This was all by consent. The court thus does not have to decide whether the inspections were also valid as … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Consent, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause, Protective sweep | Comments Off on OH8: Apt building maintenance workers consented to administrative elevator inspections

CA8: Stop unreasonably extended for drug dog; denial of suppression reversed

Window tint violation should have taken 5-6 minutes, but it dragged out for 20 minutes while the drug dog was coming. The stop was overlong under Rodriguez and the motion to suppress should have been granted. United States v. Johnson, … Continue reading

Posted in Automatic license plate readers, Dog sniff, Emergency / exigency, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA8: Stop unreasonably extended for drug dog; denial of suppression reversed

N.D.Iowa: Motion for return of property after final administrative seizure denied

Defendant’s motion for return of seized cash comes after administrative forfeiture became final. Denied. United States v. Mims, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27957 (N.D. Iowa Feb. 11, 2026).* Defendant didn’t seek resolution of his motion to suppress, so the trial … Continue reading

Posted in Forfeiture, Probable cause, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Waiver | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: Motion for return of property after final administrative seizure denied

NC: Temporary immobility of a car doesn’t prevent the automobile exception from applying

Temporary immobility of a car doesn’t prevent the automobile exception from applying. (This is after a remand for a probable cause finding. The court also discusses the good faith exception and the court must guard against the exception swallowing the … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Automobile exception, Dog sniff, Probable cause | Comments Off on NC: Temporary immobility of a car doesn’t prevent the automobile exception from applying

E.D.N.C.: Random stop at military base gate validly led to DUI

Military officers working the gate at Fort Bragg had reasonable suspicion defendant was driving under the influence when he was stopped for random inspection before entry into the base. It ripened to probable cause. United States v. Lock, 2026 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Military searches, Probable cause, Waiver | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: Random stop at military base gate validly led to DUI