Category Archives: Informant hearsay

NC: Informant doesn’t need “track record” to be creditable

The informant doesn’t need a “track record” to be credited as a source of information. State v. Vandergrift, 2026 N.C. App. LEXIS 202 (Mar. 18, 2026). Police responded to a stolen ATM report and found defendant near an ATM in … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NC: Informant doesn’t need “track record” to be creditable

CA5: No REP against license plate readers

License plate readers violate no reasonable expectation of privacy. Also, the stop was supported by reasonable suspicion. United States v. Porter, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 7888 (5th Cir. Mar. 17, 2026). The informant’s information was sufficient to show probable cause … Continue reading

Posted in Automatic license plate readers, Good faith exception, Informant hearsay, Search incident, Seizure | Comments Off on CA5: No REP against license plate readers

CA11: 4A doesn’t require “in the presence of the officer” for misdemeanor arrest

While Georgia law requires a misdemeanor offense be in the presence of the officer, the Fourth Amendment does not. The arrest was constitutionally valid. Middlebrooks v. Kasmar, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 5855 (11th Cir. Feb. 27, 2026). There was information … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Arrest or entry on arrest, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on CA11: 4A doesn’t require “in the presence of the officer” for misdemeanor arrest

DC: “police had probable cause to believe that Mr. Turner’s bullet-riddled car might contain bullet fragments from the shooting”

“There can be little question that the police had probable cause to believe that Mr. Turner’s car contained evidence of a crime. Four cars parked along the street, including Mr. Turner’s Lexus, were struck by bullets in a drive-by shooting. … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause | Comments Off on DC: “police had probable cause to believe that Mr. Turner’s bullet-riddled car might contain bullet fragments from the shooting”

KY: Arrest warrant isn’t constitutionally required for a felony arrest

An arrest warrant isn’t constitutionally required for a felony arrest. Hernandez v. Commonwealth, 2026 Ky. LEXIS 7 (Feb. 19, 2026). There was no rationale entitlement to discovery of the name of the informant in this case, so defense counsel wasn’t … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Arrest or entry on arrest, Informant hearsay, Seizure | Comments Off on KY: Arrest warrant isn’t constitutionally required for a felony arrest

CA8: No QI for nearly point black shooting protestor in eye with less than lethal device

Shooting a protestor in the eye at point blank range with a “less than lethal” device that the officers are trained on and warned can actually be lethal was excessive force. No qualified immunity. Marks v. Bauer, 2026 U.S. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Informant hearsay, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA8: No QI for nearly point black shooting protestor in eye with less than lethal device

AL: Trial court erred in finding cell phone SW didn’t provide for seizure and then search

The search warrant for defendant’s cell phone authorized both seizure and search of the phone, and the trial court was clearly erroneous in concluding that it did not permit a search, too. (The officer admitted working off a template cell … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Informant hearsay, Warrant execution | Comments Off on AL: Trial court erred in finding cell phone SW didn’t provide for seizure and then search

OH2: Dog handler’s testimony of dog certification was sufficient to show reliability

The dog handler’s testimony that the dog was certified before this sniff was sufficient to show the dog was reliable. State v. Murphy, 2026-Ohio-143 (2d Dist. Jan. 13, 2026). Search warrants can be based on hearsay. Mendenhall v. City & … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Informant hearsay, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH2: Dog handler’s testimony of dog certification was sufficient to show reliability

E.D.N.C.: No REP in tent in homeless encampment that was trespassing on private property

Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in his tent in a homeless encampment on someone else’s private property. That’s “wrongful presence.” He also disclaimed the tent, but standing is enough to deny relief. United States v. Tillman, 2026 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Trespass | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: No REP in tent in homeless encampment that was trespassing on private property

D.D.C.: Arrest on a warrant where defendant fled justified search incident

Defendant had a warrant for his arrest. He was seen by police, and he fled. When he was tackled to the ground and handcuffed, the officers rolled him over finding a gun in his waistband. It was a valid search … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Informant hearsay, Search incident | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Arrest on a warrant where defendant fled justified search incident

W.D.La.: Can’t be ineffective for not arguing state constitution in federal criminal case

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not arguing the state constitution in a federal criminal case. United States v. Powell, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 256220 (W.D. La. Dec. 10, 2025). “Here, the affidavit detailed the information on which the officer relied, … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on W.D.La.: Can’t be ineffective for not arguing state constitution in federal criminal case

VA: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in revos

The exclusionary rule, along with a host of other things, doesn’t apply in revocation proceedings. Commonwealth v. Jackson, 2025 Va. LEXIS 57 (Nov. 20, 2025) (citing treatise § 9.16). The collective knowledge doctrine applies to traffic stops. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Exclusionary rule, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on VA: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in revos

NC: Admin. tax warrant search of house violated 4A

Search under a general administrative tax warrant under state law violates the Fourth Amendment. This involved a search of a house where the taxes were not paid on illegal drugs. Also, it was issued by the Secretary of Revenue and … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Consent, Informant hearsay, Neutral and detached magistrate, Probable cause, Warrant papers | Comments Off on NC: Admin. tax warrant search of house violated 4A

NY: The smell of a decomposing body in a Brooklyn apartment was plain smell for finding source

Defendant had no standing to contest the opening of an apartment refrigerator finding a decapitated body. This was plain smell. The officers could smell the decomposing body, and that was enough to open the refrigerator door. People v. McGee, 2025 … Continue reading

Posted in Foreign searches, Informant hearsay, Standing, Waiver | Comments Off on NY: The smell of a decomposing body in a Brooklyn apartment was plain smell for finding source

CA6: Applying PC deference, there was PC for this warrant based on informant hearsay

“Applying this deference here, we conclude that the state judge properly found probable cause based on the informant’s claims that Howard stored illegal drugs at his apartment. The officer’s affidavit adequately established the informant’s reliability and basis of knowledge. First, … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA6: Applying PC deference, there was PC for this warrant based on informant hearsay

C.D.Cal.: Private case subpoenas not 4A issue

A private party issuing subpoenas in a civil case is not subject to the Fourth Amendment. Rodney v. TransUnion LLC., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 211570 (C.D. Cal. Sep. 2, 2025). This Walmart store’s asset protection person was considered a reliable … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: Private case subpoenas not 4A issue

W.D.Wash.: Putting meth in a public trash can was abandonment, not just hiding it

Putting meth in a public trash can was treated as abandonment, not hiding it for later. United States v. Denham, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 201311 (W.D. Wash. Oct. 10, 2025). Use of a cell phone to deposit stolen checks supported … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Search incident | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: Putting meth in a public trash can was abandonment, not just hiding it

W.D.Wis.: Lack of info on CI’s credibility wasn’t material; PC shown otherwise

The affidavit for warrant omitted pertinent details about the CI’s credibility and apparent baggage, but it doesn’t matter: “And yet, the pertinent facts provided by Hample were corroborated by other information, including text messages, phone records, location tracking, and surveillance. … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Wis.: Lack of info on CI’s credibility wasn’t material; PC shown otherwise

S.D.N.Y.: Legal mail can be copied for inmate to guard against disguised legal mail

Prisons can copy legal mail in presence of the inmate to guard against contraband coming in disguised as legal mail. Prisoners’ Legal Servs. of N.Y. v. United States Dep’t of Homeland Sec., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 195443 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 5, … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Consent, Informant hearsay, Mail and packages, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Legal mail can be copied for inmate to guard against disguised legal mail

D.Kan.: Affidavit emailed with SW to judge was considered “attached”

In overcoming a warrant particularity challenge cured by the affidavit, the government satisfied its burden that the affidavits in support of the warrant were emailed to the issuing judge as two pdf files in the same email. They weren’t, of … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Nexus, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant papers | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Affidavit emailed with SW to judge was considered “attached”