Category Archives: Prison and jail searches

N.D.Tex.: Room searches in center for sexually violent predators same as a prison cell search

Plaintiff is sexually violent predator confined in the Texas Civil Commitment Center. Room searches there are governed by the same rationale as prison cell searches. Welsh v. Pearson, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50445 (N.D. Tex. Mar. 11, 2026). Even if … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Prison and jail searches, Strip search | Comments Off on N.D.Tex.: Room searches in center for sexually violent predators same as a prison cell search

W.D.Tenn.: No standing in GPS locator of car rented by another; also private search

Defendant had no standing to challenge the state’s use of a rental car’s GPS where another person rented the car. It was also private action. United States v. Busby, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27276 (W.D. Tenn. Feb. 10, 2026). This … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus, Prison and jail searches, Private search, Standing | Comments Off on W.D.Tenn.: No standing in GPS locator of car rented by another; also private search

OH2: No REP in juvenile detention phone calls

Even in juvenile detention, there’s no reasonable expectation of privacy in jail calls. In re C.C., 2026-Ohio-374, 2026 Ohio App. LEXIS 437 (2d Dist. Feb. 6, 2026). “Tyson, while failing to cite any binding authority in support of his position, … Continue reading

Posted in Independent source, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on OH2: No REP in juvenile detention phone calls

CA6: No standing in a group chat SW of another person’s account

Defendant had no standing to challenge a group chat obtained by search warrant from a social media provider of another person’s account. (Defendants discussed a kidnapping over group chat.) United States v. Blake, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 3686 (6th Cir. … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Social media warrants, Standing | Comments Off on CA6: No standing in a group chat SW of another person’s account

ID: Potential for destruction of evidence on cell phone was justification for its seizure

Defendant was reported for video voyeurism of his stepdaughter in the bathroom, and police got his phone, telling him they were seizing it. Then they got a warrant. The potential for destruction of evidence was sufficient justification for a warrantless … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Prison and jail searches, Strip search | Comments Off on ID: Potential for destruction of evidence on cell phone was justification for its seizure

CA10: Consent search of house for medical furlough from hospital after being brought there by police wasn’t coerced

Defendant was detained for DUI, but he had medical issues and police wanted to release him to home under a “medical furlough.” He consented to an inspection of his house and weapons were found. He was never in custody, and … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Prison and jail searches, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA10: Consent search of house for medical furlough from hospital after being brought there by police wasn’t coerced

CA4: Def’s pants transported from hospital to jail were searched, and inevitable discovery applies

Defendant’s pants were transported from the hospital to the jail, and inevitable discovery covers their search. United States v. Gibbins, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 1432 (4th Cir. Jan. 21, 2026). The warrant for five cell phones was executed within the … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Inevitable discovery, Prison and jail searches, Warrant execution, Warrant papers | Comments Off on CA4: Def’s pants transported from hospital to jail were searched, and inevitable discovery applies

OH2: Dog handler’s testimony of dog certification was sufficient to show reliability

The dog handler’s testimony that the dog was certified before this sniff was sufficient to show the dog was reliable. State v. Murphy, 2026-Ohio-143 (2d Dist. Jan. 13, 2026). Search warrants can be based on hearsay. Mendenhall v. City & … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Informant hearsay, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH2: Dog handler’s testimony of dog certification was sufficient to show reliability

W.D.Pa.: SW for gun 11 days after a shooting wasn’t stale

The search warrant for a gun involved in shooting was not stale 11 days after the shooting. Firearms are durable and not consumables. United States v. Williams, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4950 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 12, 2026). The warrant for … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Staleness, Waiver, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: SW for gun 11 days after a shooting wasn’t stale

CA6: Random and isolated interference with prisoner mail doesn’t state a claim

Random and isolated interference with prisoner mail doesn’t state a claim for relief. Malicious interference would, but that’s not alleged. Tucker v. Horn, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 531 (6th Cir. Jan. 8, 2026). Not search case, but defendant was suspected … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Cell site location information, Prison and jail searches, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA6: Random and isolated interference with prisoner mail doesn’t state a claim

CA9: Evidence seized by state not taken or used by feds not subject to Rule 41(g)

State officers seized defendant’s Rolex watch in a search, and there was a federal prosecution, but the watch was never part of it nor evidence of anything. Thus, Rule 41(g) affords him no relief here. There’s no constructive federal possession … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Nexus, Prison and jail searches, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on CA9: Evidence seized by state not taken or used by feds not subject to Rule 41(g)

CA2: Merely having knowledge of prison strip searches doesn’t make that prison official potentially liable

Merely having knowledge of prison strip searches doesn’t make that prison official potentially liable. Baltas v. Jones, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 32676 (2d Cir. Dec. 15, 2025)*:

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Strip search | Comments Off on CA2: Merely having knowledge of prison strip searches doesn’t make that prison official potentially liable

D.D.C.: 1/6 pardonee doesn’t state claim under FTCA for having to go to trial

Plaintiff has a 1/6 pardon. She sued over things the government did to obtain her conviction. She fails to state a claim under the FTCA for alleged disclosure of private information during the trial. “Although the FTCA waives the United … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Attenuation, Cell phones, Federal Tort Claims Act, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on D.D.C.: 1/6 pardonee doesn’t state claim under FTCA for having to go to trial

AZ: Driving just under speed limit in left lane was RS when cars were passing on right

Driving a little too slow in the left lane and not attempting to pull over as cars on the right were passing was reasonable suspicion for a stop. State v. Alvarez-Soto, 2025 Ariz. LEXIS 373 (Nov. 28, 2025), vacating 258 … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on AZ: Driving just under speed limit in left lane was RS when cars were passing on right

KS: KHP power for administrative searches of truck can’t be delegated to sheriffs

Under Kansas statute, only KHP officers can randomly stop regulated trucks for inspection, and it can’t be delegated to county sheriffs by an MOU. “There is no dispute here that regulation of commercial motor carriers triggers a substantial government interest.” … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Franks doctrine, Prison and jail searches, Waiver | Comments Off on KS: KHP power for administrative searches of truck can’t be delegated to sheriffs

N.D.Ill.: Without seeing the video of the occurrence referred to in SW affidavit, court can’t find PC

The affidavit for warrant refers to a video of an occurrence, but, without seeing the video, the USMJ can’t decide probable cause for the warrant. Otherwise, it’s ratifying the officer’s conclusions, mentioning being a “rubber stamp.” In re Search of … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Probable cause, Warrant papers | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Without seeing the video of the occurrence referred to in SW affidavit, court can’t find PC

W.D.Tex.: Frequency of cell searches not a 4A claim

“Plaintiff complains of cell searches that are unscheduled or more frequent than she believes they should be. Such a claim does not state a constitutional violation. Even assuming that TDCJ policy dictates the frequency of searches, additional searches are not … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on W.D.Tex.: Frequency of cell searches not a 4A claim

S.D.N.Y.: Accidental seizure of attorney-client jail calls doesn’t lead to exclusion of non-legal calls

Use of plaintiff’s non-privileged prison calls as evidence was not a Fourth Amendment violation. The fact attorney-client calls were also seized but were segregated and not used as evidence doesn’t state a claim. Criscuolo v. Brandow, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Privileges, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Accidental seizure of attorney-client jail calls doesn’t lead to exclusion of non-legal calls

E.D.Mich.: No REP in a contraband cell phone in prison

There is no standing in a contraband cell phone in prison. United States v. Pouncy, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 202490 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 14, 2025). The trial court properly limited the time frame of this warrant when an overbreadth challenge … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Emergency / exigency, Overbreadth, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: No REP in a contraband cell phone in prison

S.D.N.Y.: Legal mail can be copied for inmate to guard against disguised legal mail

Prisons can copy legal mail in presence of the inmate to guard against contraband coming in disguised as legal mail. Prisoners’ Legal Servs. of N.Y. v. United States Dep’t of Homeland Sec., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 195443 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 5, … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Consent, Informant hearsay, Mail and packages, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Legal mail can be copied for inmate to guard against disguised legal mail