Showing posts with label Mileage. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mileage. Show all posts

Sunday, 18 January 2026

Axbridge boxed mileage mark, January 1804

I have posted an example of the "AXBRIDGE / 141" boxed mlieage mark before here, but I have now acquired a slightly better example.

This example is dated 25th January 1804, whereas my previous example was a month later dated 24th February.  This handstamp is only known used in 1804 and is quite difficult to find.  The example above shows the final "E" separated somewhat from the rest of the handstamp;  perhaps the handstamp broke so was not used later.

The contents of the letter from the Reverend Sydenham Teast Wylde at a formal attestation that he qualifies for a Deputy Lieutenancy in the county of Somerset.  With thirteen children one might speculate that he could do with some extra income.
 

Wednesday, 13 September 2023

Yeovil boxed mileage mark, 1802 & 1808

Here are a couple of examples of the "YEOVIL / 125" boxed mileage mark, known in use from 1801 to 1811.  The first is from 1802 ...

... and the contents are a report on the bids for land at auction.

The second is from 1808 with a cleaner handstamp.  The contents also relate to land purchase and are a memorandum about the purchase of various farms and estates by Sir John Lethbridge of Sandhill Park.




Wednesday, 30 June 2021

"WELLS-S / 129" Circular Mileage Mark, 1824

 The "WELLS-S / 129" circular mileage mark was known used from 1825 to 1829.  The example below from November 1824 brings the earliest date known forward.



Wednesday, 26 May 2021

Entire from Oakhill to Lincolnshire, 1821

The entire below went from Old Down to Bath in the Penny Post, and then to London and Louth in Lincolnshire.  It was written in Oakhill, three miles south of Old Down.



Sunday, 29 September 2019

Castle Car(e)y Boxed Mileage, 1822

The entire below is from Castle Car(e)y to Abergavenny in May 1822 and has a "CASTLE . CAREY / 145" boxed mileage mark on the reverse.  The handstamp is at the end of its life (it was first used in 1804) and is showing signs of wear.

Wednesday, 25 September 2019

Glastonbury boxed mileage mark, 1802

The item below is the first recorded example of the "GLASTONBURY / 134" boxed mileage mark, used in May 1802.

The next handstamp recorded is the "GLASTONBURY / 135" mileage mark, with lines above and below the "135".  This is recorded used from 1811, so there is plenty of scope for the boxed mileage mark to be used later than 1802.

Sunday, 4 August 2019

Early Ilminster Mileage Mark

Ilminster had a "141 ILMIN / STER" first type mileage mark, previously known used from 1787 to 1798.  The example below is from April 1801, the same year that the replacement "ILMINSTER / 143" boxed mileage mark is known used from.

The entire was from Ilminster to Daventry, going via London, and was charged at the 1801 postal rates introduced on 5th April 1801 (8d to London, replaced with 9d for the whole journey to Daventry).

Sunday, 9 June 2019

"144 CHARD" Mileage Mark

One of the early mileage marks that I missed out in my earlier posts is the "144 CHARD" mark.  I have now managed to acquire a copy, which can be seen below.  The mark is only known used in 1786.

Wednesday, 22 May 2019

Extended date for "WELLS-S / 129" Handstamp (SO 917)

The "WELLS-S / 129" handstamp was known in use from 1802-1808.  The partial example below extends the usage to 1810, with the replacement "WELLS / 129" handstamp known from 1811.

Sunday, 12 May 2019

Chard mileage mark from 1810

The entire below has a "CHARD / 142" mileage mark, 24x10mm, used in 1810.  This is an example of SO 349, earlier than the previously known examples from 1812-1822.  The handstamp looks fairly clean so is probably near the start of its life.

Wednesday, 1 May 2019

Milverton and Wells mileage marks

Two recent acquisitions, a very clean "MILVERTON / 172" mileage mark from April 1806 (soon after its issue), and a "WELLS.S / 129" mileage mark from May 1820 franked by the Bishop of Bath and Wells.


Sunday, 3 March 2019

Wincanton mileage mark, 1817

Here is an example of the "WINCANTON / 118" mileage mark used in 1817, not brilliant but the first example I've managed to acquire.

Sunday, 25 November 2018

Boxed Mileage Marks - "WIVELSCOMBE / 175" & "YEOVIL / 123"


The last two boxed mileage marks ...  note the spelling of "WIVELSCOMBE", no "I" in the middle (this is how it is pronounced).

WIVELSCOMBE / 175” 1805-1829



YEOVIL / 123” 1801-1811






Wednesday, 21 November 2018

Boxed Mileage Marks - "WELLINGTON / 168", "WELLS - S / 129" (& "WELLS N / 122")


WELLINGTON / 168” 1804-1829



WELLS – S / 129” 1802-1808


Norfolk: “WELLS N / 122” 1804-1820

From Bill Barrell's website, a wrapper used in 1811.

The “other” Wells boxed mileage mark !

Sunday, 18 November 2018

Boxed Mileage Marks - "TAUNTON / 161"


TAUNTON / 161” 1802-1814


The Taunton Fifth Clause Post (later the Penny Post) did not commence until 1808 so it is likely that this letter from Crowcombe was brought into Taunton by private messenger or by a passing carrier.

Wednesday, 14 November 2018

Sunday, 11 November 2018

Boxed Mileage Marks - "MINEHEAD / 185"


MINEHEAD / 185” 1801-1807


The overall postal charge of 1/7d does not tie up with the published rates/distances. 10d is the rate to London, 1/2d is the overall rate onwards to Edinburgh (for 600-700 miles). The published mileage from Edinbugh to Kirkwall is 325¾ miles, so at an additional 1d for each 100 miles, that should only be an additional 4d (or 1/6d in total), not the 1/7d charged. Was this just an error by the postal clerk or was there an additional charge, 1d for the ferry to Kirkwall perhaps ?

Wednesday, 7 November 2018

Boxed Mileage Marks - "MILVERTON / 169" & "MILVERTON / 172"


MILVERTON / 169” 1801

Discovered at the Spring Stampex 1990 and described in an article in the October 1990 S&DPHG Journal (Vol.3-2), the handstamp was illustrated but unfortunately not the complete cover.
The handstamp was used in 1801. As described in an article in the September 1994 S&DPHG Journal (Vol.3-10), at that time Milverton did not have an official office and mail from Wiveliscombe and Milverton would be brought into Wellington by one messenger. The Milverton mileage mark was to indicate to the Wellington postmaster how to apportion the fees between Milverton and Wiveliscombe (so there may be a missing “WIVELISCOMBE / 169” to find). The '169' mileage in the Milverton handstamp would be the mileage for Wellington, though when the Wellington mileage mark was issued it was for '168' miles.


MILVERTON / 172” 1805-1833


This second handstamp dates from after an official Receiving House was set up in Milverton, and the mileage from Wellington was 'calculated into the entire distance each letter will be conveyed' [Freeling Reports 25 July 1804].

Sunday, 4 November 2018

Boxed Mileage Marks - "ILMINSTER / 143" & "LANGPORT / 140"


Two more of the boxed mileage marks.

ILMINSTER / 143” 1801-1821


LANGPORT / 140” 1805-1846




Wednesday, 31 October 2018

Boxed Mileage Marks - "DULVERTON / 187" & "ILCHESTER / 130"


DULVERTON / 187” 1801-1816


This entire was sent free to the Honourable Hugh Clifford, eldest son of Charles Clifford, 6th baron Clifford of Chudleigh, by Sir Thomas Dyke Acland, MP for Devon, who has franked it.

Unfortunately I do not have a copy of either Frome mileage mark.

ILCHESTER / 130” 1803-1807


This entire is from the year before the earliest example previously known.